On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:08 -0400, David Knierim wrote:
I am running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 as my dom0 and CentOS 5.3 on my domU's.
On the dom0, I have two interfaces that are bonded and have tagged
VLANs. I can get the networks to the domU's by creating a bridge for
each of the VLANS (bond0.3,
Você tem uma nova mensagem no Badoo!
Gilberto Nunes deixou uma mensagem pra você.
Clique no link para abrir:
http://us1.badoo.com/01097897898/in/BDGmMoCC9H8/?lang_id=61
E, outras pessoas estiveram procurando por você:
Manoel Felipe (Joinville, Brasil)Mara Leal mendes (Joinville, Brasil)Tiago
- David Knierim dknie...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to set up the network on the dom0 so my domU's see a
single interface with tagged VLAN support??
I haven't tried, but does just passing the bond interface through to the guest
and setting up the VLANs in the guest work? VLANs are
hola rodrigo, esta toda esta informacion en la pagina de centos
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=15
Rodrigo Leal Astorga escribió:
Hola estimados, alguine me puede dar un link para descargar la ultima version de CentOS...
Gracias
Rodrigo.
El 29 de julio de 2009 12:20, Monica BM monica...@yahoo.es escribió:
Buenas:
A ver, he estado mirando pero no encuentro nada que me sirva.
¿ Donde has mirado?
Quiero que al conectar mis USB al PC este se monte en modo solo lectura, el
montaje automático.
man fstab
Me han dicho algo
Gracias a todo por la información..
Saludos.
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org en nombre de killerfs
Enviado el: lun 03/08/2009 3:21
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Link Descargar CentOS
hola rodrigo, esta toda esta informacion en la pagina
Hi All,
I am using Caching DNS server with Bind 9
bind-utils-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
bind-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
bind-chroot-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
system-config-bind-4.0.3-2.el5.centos
bind-libs-9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.1
I am getting
Error :
named[22851]: mem.c:1061: REQUIREctx) != ((void *)0))
Dear list members,
has anybody successfully established a VPN connection with CentOS to a
VPN served by a Micorosft ISO 2006 server (IPsec + tunnel mode)?
Regards,
Peter
--
Dott. Peter Hopfgartner
R3 GIS Srl - GmbH
Via Johann Kravogl-Str. 2
I-39012 Meran/Merano (BZ)
Email:
Hi
I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM
onto centos?
I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect a new
supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?
___
CentOS mailing list
Johan Swensson wrote on Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:28:32 +0200 (CEST):
I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM
onto centos?
I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect
a new supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?
upstream
On 08/03/2009 10:28 AM, Johan Swensson wrote:
Hi
I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM
onto centos?
I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect a new
supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?
we are expecting KVM to
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:11 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Having the liveCD around is always a good idea anyway
Amen!
--
LostSon
http://lostsonsvault.org
centOS its not just for servers...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hey
I am just organizing the CentOS village at HAR and need a rough
estimate of people who will be attending.
What do people want? Shall the CentOS people have their own party
tent? We are currently with the Fedora people. I will also post on the
SL mailing list.
Hope to see you all at HAR?
Jason Pyeron wrote:
In particular do you have any complaints about doing complicated setups?
We are using a clustered mysql setup and the pdns servers all connect to
the same database. This means no worrying about master-slave XFRs. When
changes occur to database such as adding/removing zones,
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/03/2009 10:28 AM, Johan Swensson wrote:
Hi
I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM
onto centos?
I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect a new
supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?
From: muhammad panji sumodi...@gmail.com
[r...@clarisa ~]# ls -lha
total 52K
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4.0K 2009-08-01 02:38 .
drwxr-xr-x. 23 root root 4.0K 2009-07-31 15:47 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2009-07-31 15:06 backup
-rw---. 1 root root 14K 2009-08-01 08:34 .bash_history
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 15:16, Jason Pyeronjpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
Now we want to just override the MX records for pdinc.us without having to
merge
or manage all the records for every entry/subdoamin in the zone file for
pdinc.us.
Why don't you just set the MX records of pdinc.us to
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 10:10
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 15:16, Jason
Hi,
2009/8/1 fabian fab...@baladia.gov.kw:
Centos 5.0 server which is used as a
If it really is 5.0, I suggest you schedule a maintenance window to
apply all the security updates, you should be running the latest
release which is 5.3 and apply updates regularly. If you don't, your
server might
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:27, Jason Pyeronjpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
My worry is the A record for the outsourced mail service is out of our
control,
if it were to change it would be catastrophic.
Well, if you *must* use a name like mx.google.com for your MX, you
could also set up an
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:27, Jason Pyeronjpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
My worry is the A record for the outsourced mail service is out of our
control,
if it were to change it would be catastrophic.
Well, if you *must* use a name like mx.google.com for your MX, you
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Filipe Brandenburger
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 10:40
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:27, Jason
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 11:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:27,
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Personally, I don't like to rely on features that are
vendor-specific like that but it might be a quick fix for
this problem. The real solution would be to configure your
sending sendmails to use a MAIL_HUB setting - at least any
Not all of the systems can be
Jason Pyeron wrote:
I like the idea about the cname. Can a cname be used as a host for a MX
record?
CNAME's can only be used for things that only have an A record. for
example, you can't use a CNAME for a domain, which needs a SOA, A, NS,
MX record.
in general, CNAME's should be
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:28
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
Jason Pyeron wrote:
Personally, I don't like to rely on
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:34
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Split dns issues
Jason Pyeron wrote:
I like the idea about the cname. Can a
Jason Pyeron wrote:
I'd expect the most common case to be mail user agents that
have to be specifically configured for the forwarding smtp
server anyway.
In fact most are default configurations. An engineer will up an (vm) image,
give
it some tasks to do (temp website, software
--On Sunday, August 02, 2009 10:31 PM +0200 Kai Schaetzl
mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Why? This questions is really not appropriate for this list.
To follow up, the Apache web server mailing lists are here:
http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html
For your other problems, find mailing lists,
Jason Pyeron wrote:
CNAME's can only be used for things that only have an A record. for
example, you can't use a CNAME for a domain, which needs a SOA, A, NS, MX
record.
Not sure if you are ACKing or NAKing?
Pdinc.us mx 1 smtprelay.pdinc.us
Smtprelay.pdinc.us cname
My firewall config is below...
I am trying to figure out why another machine has access to port 5038 on
my machine
based on these firewall rules.
I thought the reject at the bottom would take care of all other ports?
It does not.
I have restarted with server iptables restart and same thing. I
Hi Jerry,
according your rules you have opened all incoming traffic to interface
eth0 and eth1.
I think that is the issue. Try to remove or modify them --
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
Check how your other rules are working - take a look in
This is because you have the following rules declared:
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
You should not use these rules because iptables will mark this traffic as
valid and will not even try to match any rule defined later in the table. If
you want
Hi Jerry,
according your rules you have opened all incoming traffic to interface
eth0 and eth1.
I think that is the issue. Try to remove or modify them --
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
Thanks that does do it...
I was using lokkit to
Hi !
I am posting this again, since I still have the problem and have not
been able to resolve this. Please, take a look and comment if you can.
Thank you !
I am running CentOS 5 (core pkgs) / x86_64 using grub 0.97 and I am trying to
configure a fallback between two partitions on my local
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 13:33, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote:
This rule gets put in by default:
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
How do I prevent that?
I'm not familiar with lokkit, but I believe it will read the file
/etc/sysconfig/system-config-securitylevel on startup,
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 13:44, Matthias
Blankenhausmatthiasblankenh...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am running CentOS 5 (core pkgs) / x86_64 using grub 0.97 and I am trying to
configure a fallback between two partitions on my local disk, each installed
with a CentOS image. The idea is to be able
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 13:54, Filipe Brandenburgerfilbran...@gmail.com wrote:
All I can say at this point is Read the Source, Luke!
I mean: Use the Source, Luke!
Was thinking of RTFS when I wrote it before...
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello guys
I have a new Centos 5.3 running, and I have a text file with a bunch
of accounts (more than 100) that I should create
.
File format is like this
user1 pasword1
user2 passwrd2
How can I do this task easier than creating user one by one by hand?
Need some help for building an
David Leon wrote:
Hello guys
I have a new Centos 5.3 running, and I have a text file with a bunch
of accounts (more than 100) that I should create
What's the question? How to do it? Parse the text file and use
something like useradd to add the accounts, is probably the quickest
way.
nate
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, David Leondleon741...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys
I have a new Centos 5.3 running, and I have a text file with a bunch
of accounts (more than 100) that I should create
.
File format is like this
user1 pasword1
user2 passwrd2
How can I do this task
I'm trying to avoid typing every password manually. I just need an
script that makes the job.
useradd creates the account but still need to setup accpunt's password.
On 8/3/09, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
David Leon wrote:
Hello guys
I have a new Centos 5.3 running, and I have a
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 14:49, David Leondleon741...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to avoid typing every password manually. I just need an
script that makes the job.
echo $password | passwd --stdin $username
Obviously, this must be run as root.
HTH,
Filipe
David Leon wrote:
I'm trying to avoid typing every password manually. I just need an
script that makes the job.
useradd creates the account but still need to setup accpunt's password.
from 'man passwd'
--stdin
This option is used to indicate that passwd should read the
Try this:
while true
do
read username passwd
if [ $username == ]
then
exit
fi
passwd_hash=$(openssl passwd $passwd)
echo Using the following password hash for user $username:
$passwd_hash
/usr/sbin/useradd $username -p $passwd_hash;
done
I found this
This command is intended to be used in a large system environment
where many accounts are updated at a single time (batch mode). Since
username and passwords are stored in clear text format make sure only
root can read/write the file.
Use chmod command:
# touch
thanks, I will try this, it looks like what I'm looking for
On 8/3/09, a arias aarias...@gmail.com wrote:
Try this:
while true
do
read username passwd
if [ $username == ]
then
exit
fi
passwd_hash=$(openssl passwd $passwd)
echo Using
To safely make Perl modules from CPAN in Solaris, I used this procedure:
mkdir /opt/cpan
chmod 777 /opt/cpan
chown joe:101 /opt/cpan
PERL5LIB=$PERL5LIB:/opt/cpan
export PERL5LIB
/usr/perl5/bin/perlgcc -MCPAN -e shell
Also, ~/.cpan/CPAN/MyConfig.pm specifically had
'makepl_arg' = q[LIB=/opt/cpan
Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 21:59 +0200 schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
To safely make Perl modules from CPAN in Solaris, I used this procedure:
mkdir /opt/cpan
chmod 777 /opt/cpan
chown joe:101 /opt/cpan
PERL5LIB=$PERL5LIB:/opt/cpan
export PERL5LIB
/usr/perl5/bin/perlgcc -MCPAN -e shell
Also,
--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
wrote:
All I can say at this point is Read the Source,
Luke!
I mean: Use the Source, Luke!
Was thinking of RTFS when I wrote it before...
This is a new one :)
However, I actually figured it out myself. The
There is tons of perl module RPMs in rpmforge. We also take requests
there.
Not the few I need.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 17:06, Matthias
Blankenhausmatthiasblankenh...@yahoo.com wrote:
BTW, a new grub2 is on its way and it will replace the current grub ...
I think it's been in development for about 5 years now, and I still
haven't seen anyone use it yet... Vaporware??? :-)
Filipe
Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 23:09 +0200 schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
There is tons of perl module RPMs in rpmforge. We also take requests
there.
Not the few I need.
As I said we take request. State your request on repmforge suggest
mailinglist.
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Filipe
Brandenburgerfilbran...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
You might use lokkit -f to prevent reading options from that file, or
just edit that file manually and remove that specific option.
You might want to look into a more complete and flexible firewall
On Monday 03 August 2009 00:36, Les Mikesell wrote:
Drew wrote:
It's a bit of bad form to use NAT and private addresses at all because
the internet really wasn't designed to be segmented, but everyone does
it.
Why is NAT bad form?
I don't mean to imply it shouldn't be used -
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
root ~]# rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2
My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you
enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Mike -- EMAIL
IGNOREDm_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:11:09 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you
enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients.
HostnameLookups Off
The changes were largely the removal of a lot of common
code for Directorys and VirtualHosts to
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:11:09 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you
enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients.
HostnameLookups Off
The changes were largely the removal of a lot of common
code for
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:23:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
[...]
Are you doing any proxy passthrough's or rewrites resulting in a proxy?
Or client access permissions based on hostnames. These things might be
specified in a .htaccess file. Also, remember that all the
/etc/httpd/conf.d/*.conf
Greetings,
On 8/3/09, David Leon dleon741...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys
I have a new Centos 5.3 running, and I have a text file with a bunch
of accounts (more than 100) that I should create
.
File format is like this
user1 pasword1
user2 passwrd2
How can I do this task easier
61 matches
Mail list logo
