Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:52:01 +0200:
>
> > Dear Community,
>
> I think the community would benefit from opening a new mailing list for
> these issues. There's already a promo list, but a discussion like this
> doesn't really fit on it. I also think it do
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Dear Russ,
>
Don't misunderstand. I think you have done and are doing a great job
but some things are out of any single person's control. All I'm
suggesting is that it would be nice if there were an easy answer to the
question of "what if" those things
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 17:58, Mark Hedges wrote:
> Who packages httpd for Centos? Is there some way to contact
> a person to ask them about this?
You can report problems on the CentOS bug tracker at:
http://bugs.centos.org/
If the problem is reproducible in RHEL as well, you might as well
r
MontyRee wrote:
> # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E7:91:CC
> inet addr:192.168.195.36 Bcast:192.168.195.63 Mask:255.255.255.192
> # route -n
> 192.168.195.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 00 eth0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.195.36
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 22:19 -0700, Linux Advocate wrote:
> - Original Message
> > From: William L. Maltby
> >
> > > BTW, Scott and other IPCop users, there is a new version of IPCop
> > > coming out. It's in testing now:
> >
> > That's good to hear. I was afraid the project was dead. It
Hello,
I've got a standalone internet server, it's a vps and i'd like to
use it for proxy and add filtering. Since it's directly accessible from the
internet i need to lock it down so only designated users can get to it, i'd
prefer encrypted transmission of credentials.
I've also w
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Dear Andrew.
>>> (like the Contrib repo) are getting a bit clearer so I
>>> guess we are on the right track.
>> Contib repo !!! What Contrib repo ? The last time i tried to
>> contribute i was told to head on to Fedora or rpmforge.
>
> The Contrib repository has been re-in
Ned Slider wrote:
> Marcus Moeller wrote:
>> Dear Russ,
>>
> Don't misunderstand. I think you have done and are doing a great job
> but some things are out of any single person's control. All I'm
> suggesting is that it would be nice if there were an easy answer to the
> question
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> From my own experiences when trying to contribute, I have repeatedly
> been told not to bother, not to do it and to go away.
Being told 'no' differs from being told 'to go away' --
#centos IRC is about the only place we do that, and that is
under a standa
I am setting up a small CentOS-5.3 host to act as a router. I have
the device configured and working. What I am trying to accomplish
now is configuring the firewall so as to protect both the router and
the LAN.
The host configuration has the WAN attached to eth0 (IP_ADDR = A)
and the LAN attache
Mark Hedges wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
>> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:30, Mark Hedges wrote:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
Is this why DBD::SQLite broke under mod_perl recently in
CentOS?
>>> It might or might not be... In or
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am setting up a small CentOS-5.3 host to act as a router. I have
> the device configured and working. What I am trying to accomplish
> now is configuring the firewall so as to protect both the router and
> the LAN. []
In the past, I'd have tr
James B. Byrne wrote:
> My understanding is that INCOMING packets, for the purposes of
> iptables, originate outside the host interfaces and that OUTGOING
> packets originate from, or are forwarded across, the host itself.
> So, as I understand things, traffic from network C/24 destined to
> B/24
Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> I am setting up a small CentOS-5.3 host to act as a router. I have
>> the device configured and working. What I am trying to accomplish
>> now is configuring the firewall so as to protect both the router and
>> the LAN. [..
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote:
> > Marcus Moeller wrote:
> >> Dear Russ,
[huge snip]
> Look ... if you understand how build work, and I know you do, then you
> understand that one can not release updates that are built on 4.8
> without releasing 4.8.
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:07, James B. Byrne wrote:
> The host configuration has the WAN attached to eth0 (IP_ADDR = A)
> and the LAN attached to eth1 (IP_ADDR = B). The default gateway for
> B is A. The default gateway for B is B-1.
This statement does not make any sense to me... Could you
Dear Russ,
>
> [huge snip]
>
>> Look ... if you understand how build work, and I know you do, then you
>> understand that one can not release updates that are built on 4.8
>> without releasing 4.8.
>>
>> If you need the updates faster, feel free to pay Redhat for them.
>>
>>> There - I feel
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> In the past, I'd have tried to craft the iptables rules by hand. Now,
> older and lazier, I rely on shorewall.
This is a +1 for shorewall, which is 42 times simpler [*] than doing it by
hand.
Steve
[*] Actually, it's more than 42, but 42 is The Answer
Bob Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Ned Slider wrote:
>>> Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Russ,
>
> [huge snip]
>
>> Look ... if you understand how build work, and I know you do, then you
>> understand that one can not release updates that are built on 4
On Fri, August 7, 2009 12:54 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Bob Taylor wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> Ned Slider wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Dear Russ,
>>
>> [huge snip]
>>
>>> Look ... if you understand how build work, and I know you do, then you
>>>
Mark Hedges wrote:
> Here's what people have collected so far:
>
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=47983
>
> This is a message I posted when I signed up for the list,
> I thought it was ignored but it looks like it didn't post:
I looked through it and wow it does seem like a fairly
deep
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
There - I feel so much better getting that lot off my chest :)
>>> There are always other distros if you don't like this one ...
>> Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses similar to this
>> loses potential users or loses existing customers. Personally, it
>>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> *sigh*... Don't take this as a complaint about the quality of the
> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
> across as having a stranglehold of control. If we wanted a one man
Dear Johnny,
> Well, if something is going to be released as part of CentOS (contrib
> repo or not), then it is going to be correct and it is going to be
> vetted by someone that I PERSONALLY trust ... or it is going to be
> personally tested by me prior to release. Otherwise, it is not going to
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
> across as having a stranglehold of control.
I missed the memo -- what do we have a stranglehold on?
> We'd feel be
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Then you should not perhaps not call it 'Contrib' repository
> if no one that you do not personally know can add content to
> it.
You don't like reputational vetting and a meritocracy, or how
it is run by the people in charge who have as one goal: no
nate wrote:
>
>> *sigh*... Don't take this as a complaint about the quality of the
>> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
>> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
>> across as having a stranglehold of control. If we wanted a one man sho
2009/8/7 R P Herrold :
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>
>> Then you should not perhaps not call it 'Contrib' repository
>> if no one that you do not personally know can add content to
>> it.
>
> You don't like reputational vetting and a meritocracy, or how
> it is run by the people in
R P Herrold wrote:
>
>> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
>> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
>> across as having a stranglehold of control.
>
> I missed the memo -- what do we have a stranglehold on?
Remember, I'm just comment
So is it contrib repo or my buddies repo ? All we are asking is put in
place the mechanisms
to vet the reputation. The project can not be a true community project
when there are no
mechanisms for contribution.
On 07 Aug 2009, at 9:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That was in response to Johnny
Alle,
Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or
better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3?
We've been trying to build from the SRPM @
http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/srpm/flow-tools-0.68-2.src.rpm
with no luck.
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo
Les Mikesell wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>>> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
>>> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
>>> across as having a stranglehold of control.
>> I missed the memo -- what do we have a stranglehold on?
>
> Re
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Camron W. Fox wrote:
> Alle,
>
> Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or
> better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3?
> We've been trying to build from the SRPM @
> http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/srpm/flow-tools-0.68-2.src.rpm
>
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> R P Herrold wrote:
project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
across as having a stranglehold of control.
>>> I missed the memo -- what do we hav
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> R P Herrold wrote:
> project, just the PR vibes here. You aren't giving people the warm
> fuzzies about the project's ability to survive when you make it come
> across as having a stranglehold of control.
I miss
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Camron W. Fox wrote:
> From: Camron W. Fox
> Subject: [CentOS] Flow-Tools RPM for CentOS 5.3
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 1:26 PM
> Alle,
>
> Does anyone know if there is/where to
> get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66 or
> better for CentOS/
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
> And meanwhile there are things that aren't on schedule.
> Or maybe there isn't a schedule - or maybe no one is
> supposed to expect one.
oh please -- You've been around software, computers, and FOSS
long enough to know the game --
Publish a schedule
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> That was in response to Johnny's comment about having to personally know
> someone before they would be allowed to touch anything in the
> repository. What if something happens to Johnny? Is there a bigger
> picture?
I'm not quite sure what
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Camron W. Fox wrote:
>> Alle,
>>
>>Does anyone know if there is/where to get an rpm of flow-tools V0.66
>> or
>> better for CentOS/RHEL 5.3?
>>We've been trying to build from the SRPM @
>> http://cng.ateneo.net/cng/wyu/software/sr
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:54:26 -1000
Camron W. Fox wrote:
> /root/rpm/SOURCES/flow-capture.init;4a7caede: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch
Fedora 11 uses a different checksum algorithm than Fedora 10 and below.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:54:26 -1000
> Camron W. Fox wrote:
>
>> /root/rpm/SOURCES/flow-capture.init;4a7caede: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch
>
> Fedora 11 uses a different checksum algorithm than Fedora 10 and below.
You might want to start with Fedora Cor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
>> R P Herrold wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>> The bit that causes all the confusion here is the "C" in the name
>> CentOS. It would all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camron W. Fox wrote:
> Yagi-san,
>
> We've tried that with flow-tools-0.68.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm but get the
> following error:
>
> r...@rb3:/var/tmp [1002/2]# rpmbuild --rebuild
> flow-tools-0.68.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
> Installing flow-tools-0.68.
I have a friend that hosts a few basic ASP pages. some simple links
and plays a few media files with Windows Media Player.
Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re-
writing it for him
-jason
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
> You can report problems on the CentOS bug tracker at:
> http://bugs.centos.org/
Umm, as I said, I couldn't sign up to file a bug report.
Nope, still broken.
APPLICATION ERROR #2800
Invalid form security token. Did you submit the form
twice by accident?
> If the problem is reproducibl
> Yeah it doesn't make sense to me why it's an advantage for
> RedHat to selectively backport patches instead of keeping
> up what the developers believe is a stable API for all
> callers. It's the same corporate cargo cult they were in
> when they made the mod_perl1 "compatibility" interface for
>
>I have a friend that hosts a few basic ASP pages. some simple links
>and plays a few media files with Windows Media Player.
>
>Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re-
>writing it for him
Possibly, yes.
___
CentOS mailing
ML wrote:
> I have a friend that hosts a few basic ASP pages. some simple links
> and plays a few media files with Windows Media Player.
>
> Is there any way I can host his site on my Linux Server? Without re-
> writing it for him
>
it really depends on what those ASP pages are doing.
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > Bob Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> > Exactly the *wrong* response. I wonder if responses similar to this
> > loses potential users or loses existing customers. Personally, it
> > disgusts me.
>
> It is not *wrong* ... any more than your respon
49 matches
Mail list logo
