Hi,
"nate" schrieb am 31.08.2009 23:57:09:
> MontyRee wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to delete fast without too much load?
>
> If you put /var on another file system you could:
> - go to single user mode
> - copy all files off of /var except those in the queue directory
> - re-format the fi
From: Matt Shields
>Does anyone know where I can get an RPM of Conntrack-tools,
>libnetfilter_conntrack and libnfnetlink that work with CentOS 4.8?
Rpmforge seems to have libnfnetlink for el4...
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/libnfnetlink/
JD
__
From: Timothy Murphy
> Is there a CentOS equivalent to config-system-firewall in Fedora,
> allowing specified services to pass through?
Console version is /usr/sbin/lokkit
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 09:12 +0200, frank.brodb...@klingel.de wrote:
>
> You probably want to do
>
> find /var/spool/clientmqueue -type f -exec rm -f {} \+
Or the variant ... -execdir command {} + might be preferable.
It claims to avoid potential race conditions and warns about $PATH
setting.
Barry Brimer wrote:
>> Is there a CentOS equivalent to config-system-firewall in Fedora,
>> allowing specified services to pass through?
>
> I don't know if it is the same as in Fedora, but there is firewall
> configuration available in system-config-securitylevel
Thanks.
I did know that, but ha
Hi,
I am using the yum priorities plugin and, for some reason, it is blocking all
rpmforge
updates, even for already installed rpmforge packages...
I have priority=1 for CentOS repos.
Is it the 'normal' behavior or is something wrong in my conf?
Thx,
JD
On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Chan
>> >> wrote:
>>
>>
>> How would one setup RAID 1+0 (i.e. 2x mirror'ed RAID1's and
>> then a
>> RAID 0 on top of it) on say CentOS 4.6 ?
>>
>>
> Se
We noticed a big change in the workings of the quota command when moving
from RHEL3 to CentOS5.
Under RHEL3 (quota-3.10-7), quota -v essentially lists the fs quotas for
all users logged into the local machine. Under CentOS5 (quota-3.13-1.2.5.el5),
only one user quota is displayed, and while
John Doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the yum priorities plugin and, for some reason, it is blocking all
> rpmforge
> updates, even for already installed rpmforge packages...
> I have priority=1 for CentOS repos.
> Is it the 'normal' behavior or is something wrong in my conf?
If CentOS repos are
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 09:07, John Doe wrote:
> I am using the yum priorities plugin and, for some reason, it is blocking all
> rpmforge
> updates, even for already installed rpmforge packages...
If you mean "blocking updates for already installed rpmforge packages
that also exist in the mai
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
> If CentOS repos are 1 and rpmforge is 2 (or higher), then yes it will
> PROTECT the CentOS repo from updated from rpmforge. This is the
> behavior regardless of if where the installed packages are from. If
> rsync is in bot
From: Filipe Brandenburger
> If you mean "blocking updates for already installed rpmforge packages
> that also exist in the main distro which is configured with a higher
> priority (lower number)", then yes, that is the expected from the
> priorities plugin.
My bad.
I thought the package did not
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Hodja Nasredin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did you try:
>
> iptables -I FORWARD 1 -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -I FORWARD 1 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
This did the trick, thanks!
Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
I would NOT do that. You should like the md layer handle all things
raid
and let lvm do just volume management.
>>> Your under the asumption that they are two different systems.
>>>
>>>
>> You're under the assumption that they are not.
>>
>
> http://en
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have
detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1.
However, so far I haven't been able to activate it and have read the
wiki
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless#head-320d6fcf09b7e16e0b15d19ef76adcb023a9
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>
>> Ross Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> Problem is the install program doesn't support setting up RAID10 or
>>> layered MD devices.
>>>
>> Oh? I have worked around it before even in the RH9 days. Ju
Spett.le Cliente,
dal 7 Settembre 2009 al 25 Settembre 2009 non sarò in grado di leggere le email
inviate a questo indirizzo.
Per urgenze compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl
http://www.computersrl.com/home/index.php?option=com_jforms&view=form&id=3&Itemid=87
o chiamare il numer
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Chan Chung Hang
Christopher wrote:
>
> I would NOT do that. You should like the md layer handle all things raid
> and let lvm do just volume management.
Your under the asumption that they are two different systems.
>>>
>>> You're under the assumpti
Andrew Allen wrote:
> I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have
> detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1.
> However, so far I haven't been able to activate it and have read the
> wiki
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless#head-320d6f
Hello all.
This is a question that I should be able to answer, but the old grey
cells aren't working. My Google-Fu must not be up to snuff, either.
I have a MOXA IP-RS232 converter that I'm going to be using over an RF
WAN and I need to confirm the actual data rate that I'll be able to
achieve.
Hi,
test following kernelparameters:
pci=nomsi(this works on my Asus Crosshair Formula II with Nvidia
780a SLI Chipset)
noapic
acpi=off
Am 31.08.2009 09:08, schrieb Nathan Norton:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties installing centos 5.3 on the gigabyte
> GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:38:23PM -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote:
> the end of the device. I am able to confirm that it works fine with
> minicom, but I'd like to be able to have a program read/write the device
> with a largish file and give me a throughput rating.
Since you have loopback adapter c
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Barry L. Kline wrote:
> Short of writing my own program, can anyone point me to a good tool for
> that purpose. yum search RS232 and yum search serial haven't provided
> what I'm looking for and I can't imagine that this isn't already done.
Are the Kansas City cassette tape
Barry L. Kline wrote:
> Short of writing my own program, can anyone point me to a good tool for
> that purpose. yum search RS232 and yum search serial haven't provided
> what I'm looking for and I can't imagine that this isn't already done.
For writing have you tried dd ?
nate
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Harris wrote:
> Since you have loopback adapter connected you need to read/write from
> the device at the same time. So... first attempt:
> cat /dev/null &
> time cat large_file > /dev/ttyr00
>
> Been a long time since I played with se
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:38:23PM -0400, Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
>> the end of the device. I am able to confirm that it works fine with
>> minicom, but I'd like to be able to have a program read/write the device
>> with a largish file and give me a throughput rating.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
R P Herrold wrote:
> As I understand the problem it may be that the signal could
> degrade from whatever max data rate the circuit is rated for.
> I am not aware of a resampling routine in any recent kit that
> CentOS ships
Hi Russ.
This RF-WAN i
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 01:33:44PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> > cat /dev/null &
> > time cat large_file > /dev/ttyr00
> >
>
> I'd replace /dev/null with large_file_copy, then run md5sum on both to
> confirm things are working reliably.
That's the second step :-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nate wrote:
> Barry L. Kline wrote:
>
>> Short of writing my own program, can anyone point me to a good tool for
>> that purpose. yum search RS232 and yum search serial haven't provided
>> what I'm looking for and I can't imagine that this isn't alr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John R Pierce wrote:
> I'd replace /dev/null with large_file_copy, then run md5sum on both to
> confirm things are working reliably.
John
Nice tweak!
Thanks -- I'll make that change.
Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/
Barry L. Kline wrote:
> I used dd to create the file I'm sending, so that every test is starting
> with the same data and length.
How about writing it directly to the device?
dd if=source of=/dev/ttyr00 (if that's the device? I forgot)
similar to using cat though if it matters you could play wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> VirtualBox works great but, since I only really use one Windows
> program (an older, specialized word processor called Movie Magic
> Screenwriter), I'm thinking of using Wine to run it in CentOS and
> getting rid of the Windows vi
>> You know what, let me try just that today, I have a new install to do, so
>> I'll try pre-creating a RAID10 on install and report back. First I'll try
>> layered MD devices and then I'll try creating a RAID10 md device and we'll
>> see if it can even boot off them.
>>
>
> Ok, I verified th
CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
Hi All:
I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
right direction I would greatly appreciate it.
We curre
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
>
> Hi All:
>
> I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
> I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
> close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
> right direction
From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>
> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>
> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
reason my brain was stuck on seeing so much about incoming emails that
I read that in
Hi,
Is there a list for rpm makers from beginner to intermediate level?
Private responses please.
Thanks.
Dave.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>>
>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>
> I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
> reason my brain was stuck on seeing so much about inc
Clint Dilks wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>>
>>> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>>>
I believe mailertable is what you want.
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>>> I do believe you are right. I had looked at th
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> CentOS 4.8, sendmail 8.13
>
> Hi All:
>
> I have a couple of questions regarding the routing of outgoing emails.
> I have spent several hours doing Google searches but I have not come
> close to what I am looking for. If someone can give me push in the
> right direction
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
>> From: Clint Dilks Sent: September 1, 2009 19:38
>>
>>> I believe mailertable is what you want.
>>>
>>> http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
>>>
>> I do believe you are right. I had looked at that before but for some
>> reas
I manage some remote multi-user computers where it would be very handy to be
able to "edit" the users' panel bars remotely, adding, removing and arranging
applications and icons as needed.
It's easy to put an icon on a user's desktop -- just write a .desktop file and
put it into the user's Desktop
> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
Could a milter do it?
Maybe capture all outbound messages and stop them from
processing on the original server. Next, create an smtp
session to the new outbound s
From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 21:18
>
> But what it actually said was:
>
> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that
> are from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a
> separate SMPT server."
>
> Which didn't sound like routing _to_ one of th
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>
>
> Could a milter do it?
>
No idea. I do not know if the milter interface supports changing the
routing...it would have to be abl
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 21:18
>
>> But what it actually said was:
>>
>> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that
>> are from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a
>> separate SMPT server."
>>
>> Which didn'
Les Mikesell wrote:
> "What I would like to do is route (relay?) any outgoing emails that are
> from emails addresses using only one of those domains to a separate
> SMPT server."
>
> Which didn't sound like routing _to_ one of the domains. So maybe neither
> approach will work.
>
yeah, most
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
>
> You are correct. I was referring to routing email _from_ one of our
> domain names through a separate mail server then out to the 'net.
> Upon rereading the mailertable doc it appears that this is for routing
> email _to_ on of our domain names so it will not work fo
> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>
>
Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
sendmail.cf after applying this hack.
http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/sender_ba
Christopher Chan wrote:
>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>
>>
>>
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after applying this hack.
>
> http:/
51 matches
Mail list logo
