On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jasper Siepkes jas...@siepkes.nl wrote:
But where should I put the background info?
I'll bite: Which background info are you talking about?
Cheers,
Ralph
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Please grant edit permission to my account, JerryAmundson.
Initially, I'll change my personal page. Later, I can expand into
areas that need changes made, especially if they involve aspects of
CentOS I use daily - xen, drbd, and so on...
thanks,
jerry
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:33 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jasper Siepkes jas...@siepkes.nl wrote:
But where should I put the background info?
I'll bite: Which background
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1500
xpdf security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1500.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/xpdf-2.02-17.el3.x86_64.rpm
source:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1500
xpdf security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1500.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/xpdf-2.02-17.el3.i386.rpm
source:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:55:16PM +0200, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
nate wrote:
if you have a SAN that supports logical volumes that have snapshot and
grow and such, I'm not sure why you'd bother with LVM on top of that, it
would just further obfuscate things.
And how do you grow
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:21:01PM -0400, David Mehler wrote:
Hi,
Just the standard keys that come with centos.
Please, stop top posting and trim your replies...
Show your ks.cfg, your statement don't match your error report...
(%post with only 'yum -y update'
then GPG key import, ... what
Dear All
Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it does
not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know what is
the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?
Thank you in advance
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:37:24 +0100
hadi motamedi wrote:
Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it does
not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know what is
the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?
nmap can be installed using the yum
hadi motamedi schrieb:
Dear All
Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but it
does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let me know
what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?
Thank you in advance
Do you want something else? You may
On 15/10/2009, at 6:07 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
Please be informed that I have installed CentOS 5.2 on my client but
it does not have nmap command . Can you please do me favor and let
me know what is the equivalent of nmap command on CentOS 5.2 ?
Thank you in advance
There
Thank you very much for your reply . But this time it returns yum command
not found . Can you please help me ?
Thank you in advance
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:37:24 +0100
hadi motamedi wrote:
Please be informed that I have
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:11:07AM +0100, hadi motamedi wrote:
Thank you very much for your reply . But this time it returns yum command
not found . Can you please help me ?
Might I direct you to the following sites:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks
he is probably owner of one of those cheap virtuozzo based virtual
dedicated servers. their default templates do not include yum to prevent
high load of yum usage on the host systems.
cheers
juergen
John R. Dennison wrote
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:11:07AM +0100, hadi motamedi wrote:
Thank
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! centos
internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. Any ETA?
- Regards.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'.
Any ETA?
Just relax and wait, this is a _volunteer_ based project. Want a release
date? Go pay for RHEL.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, mbneto mbn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! centos
internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'. Any ETA?
- Regards.
___
CentOS
Thanks for the responses. I think this is what I want to do. I commented out
#Defaultsrequiretty
in /etc/sudo. But what I really wanted to do was just place it in VPNUSERS:
%vpnusers ALL=NOPASSWD: /sbin/service myciscovpn start, \
/sbin/service
Carlos Santana wrote on 10/14/2009 12:13 PM:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread. If you are not
running the latest kernel (-164), you want to give it a try because it
has patches developed by VMWare
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:00:54AM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Carlos Santana wrote on 10/14/2009 12:13 PM:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread. If you are not
running the latest kernel (-164), you
Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set it
up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous mode.
We, of course, would rather it wasn't.
Is this the case?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
Thanks for the responses. I think this is what I want to do. I commented
out
#Defaultsrequiretty
in /etc/sudo. But what I really wanted to do was just place it in
VPNUSERS:
%vpnusers ALL=NOPASSWD: /sbin/service myciscovpn start, \
/sbin/service
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'.
Any ETA?
Just relax and wait, this is
On 15/10/09 14:41, Jeremy Rosengren wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal
Many of the questions are due to ignorance from many of us not versed in
what it take s to come up with the release. For Version 5.5 when we get
that far, if some one could work up a quick and dirty web page
checklist showing the basic progress and what steps are left to bring
the release to
Jeremy Rosengren wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal network will start
Then you'll have to install yum first. There should be an RPM out there
somewhere for doing that. Chances are you'll need to track down some
dependencies first. That can be a bit of a pain. Good luck.
Pat
- Original Message -
From: hadi motamedi
To: Frank Cox
Cc: CentOS
Jeremy Rosengren wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho
mig...@ic.unicamp.br mailto:mig...@ic.unicamp.br wrote:
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked!
centos internal network will start
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set it
up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous mode.
We, of course, would rather it wasn't.
Is this the case?
If your running a bridge at least yes, maybe with other modes
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Drew Weaver wrote:
Just relax and wait, this is a _volunteer_ based project. Want a release
date? Go pay for RHEL.
This response is just as annoying as the request for an update.
-- j
+1
Annoying and rude.
This might be why the Linux community as a
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately it seems that the 'all or nothing' way
of thinking is more common that I expected.Anyone that read my post can
see that I did not use 'why is it taking so long?' or similar comments that
suggests that I am somewhat angry or anything.
I was just
Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
This whole thread and these answers are uncalled for. All of them, except
for the original above at the top.
But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent.
Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up
excitement.
--
Dear All,
If someone asks a question such as When is Centos 5.4 coming out bare
in mind that it may be because they genuinely want to know when it's
coming out, and feel that somehow, they have not been privy to that
information. To me, I see CentOS as a polished professional product
given
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent.
Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up
excitement.
Thanks for the jab. It is fun to be punched.
If there were not false steps along any path, one would
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
When someone asked “When will **CentOS 5.4 come out??** The answer is,
“When it is good and ready”, and when they ask “Why/What does that
mean?”, ask them to Google “*open source distribution release cycle*”.
That should keep them busy for long enough for me/you
-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20091015/33d30553/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:03:59 +0200
From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, one of our boxes is running VMware server, and the admin who set
it up is under the impression that the NIC *has* to be in promiscuous
mode.
We, of course, would rather it wasn't.
Is this the case?
If your running a bridge at least yes, maybe with other modes
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We were hoping we could lock it down. Thanks.
Use ESX, the virtual switches in ESX can have promiscuous mode
disabled on them, while I suspect the uplinks from the host to
the switches have it enabled, the guest VMs cannot access the
wire because it's blocked at the
R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
But virtually guaranteed for any process that isn't transparent.
Someone must enjoy it. Maybe the anticipation is supposed to build up
excitement.
Thanks for the jab. It is fun to be punched.
It's not fun on the other side of
HI All,
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of
knowledge on distros that are stable on
ML writes:
HI All,
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of
knowledge on distros
ML wrote:
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of
knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc.
I *think* debian is the only major distro left that supports
SPARC to the fullest extent. Though watch out if your running the
latest T1/T2 type processors, last I
ML wrote:
HI All,
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
-Jason
Hi
There are some options, like Debian or Fedora 11 in case of Linux or
something different try FreeBSD.
Regards
mg.
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Marcelo M. Garcia spake:
ML wrote:
HI All,
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
-Jason
Hi
There are some options, like Debian or Fedora 11 in case of Linux or
something
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
NetBSD?
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC
version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of
knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
Hi Nate,
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of
knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc.
I *think* debian is the only major distro left that supports
SPARC to the fullest extent. Though watch out if your running the
latest T1/T2 type processors, last I
- ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
HI All,
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have
from [CentOS] CentOS 5.4? anyone?
Is that a big problem for the people who write the code and have every
revision preserved for posterity (and for others to learn from) in a
public revision control system?
I'm not sure that I understand.
Is there indeed such a public repository of the build
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope you have seen my earlier posts in this thread. If you are not
running the latest kernel (-164), you want to give it a try because it
has patches developed by VMWare engineers for RHEL kernels. If you
are already
HI All,
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
Don't forget, if you don't put another o/s on it,
http://www.sunfreeware.com/
mark
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
When someone asked “When will **CentOS 5.4 come out??** The answer is,
“When it is good and ready”, and when they ask “Why/What does that
mean?”, ask them to Google “*open source
Solaris 10. Top notch OS, and comes with ZFS. As does OpenSolaris.
Recommend to max it out on RAM.
Max out RAM? 16gb? How do you figure that?
Apache and MySQL will definitely benefit from it, but if you don't plan
on running a busy production server, 2-4GB will probably do.
I was
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in the
dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things.
Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently released a
solid distribution. If I
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in
the
dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things.
Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently released a
solid
Les Mikesell wrote:
I think for a lot of us, the 'we'll release when it's ready' mentality
is the main reason we aren't using debian. I don't think CentOS should
repeat their mistakes.
So what do you suggest? Release the OS with known problems, just to
satisfy a date and the hysteria
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand.
Is there indeed such a public repository of the build scriptds / RPM
specs used by CentOS?
That would indeed be fascinating and useful to have a look at it.
(I rebuilt libvirt from RedHat SRPM, just to test the some new
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in
the
dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things.
Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently
Hey, folks,
yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers.
HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want
to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at
least for 5.3.
What I see, googling, is the workaround is to
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 10/15/2009 05:01 PM:
Hey, folks,
yum is telling me that I need to update openjdk on several servers.
HOWEVER, they've all got openjdk-plugin installed, and yum doesn't want
to update, and tells me there's no openjdk-plugin package to install, at
least for 5.3.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not fun on the other side of this fence either. Being kept in
the
dark makes you imagine all sorts of scary things.
Oh give me a break. The CentOS developers have consistently
released a
solid distribution.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:55:40AM -0500, Carlos Santana wrote:
1. Kernel options added as:
divider=10
clocksource=acpi_pm
2. ntp.conf file was modified as per wiki instructions as follows:
(add to the top of the
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
--
Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca
Yves
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
--
Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
Could someone
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so
that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
Could
nate wrote:
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could the same be done this time?
Les Mikesell wrote:
nate wrote:
Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
If I remember correctly, when version 5.3 was released, about 95% was
made available by BitTorrent before the official release date, so that
the entire file would be available as soon as possible after the
release.
Could
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives
the need that you need to have it _right now_ ?
There is always the risk that a critical security vulnerability will be
discovered with the fix only made available in an update to 5.4.
Jim Wildman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Could someone describe to me what the rush is? I mean what drives
the need that you need to have it _right now_ ?
There is always the risk that a critical security vulnerability will be
discovered with the fix only made available
71 matches
Mail list logo
