Re: [CentOS] ip6tables state matching

Shunsuke Otanis wrote: > Hi, > > I am having problems adding a stateful inspection rule with ip6tables on > CentOS4.5. > > #ip6tables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > > That's what I am trying to do, but > > #ip6tables: No chain/target/match by that name. > > I have b

[CentOS] ip6tables state matching

Hi, I am having problems adding a stateful inspection rule with ip6tables on CentOS4.5. #ip6tables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT That's what I am trying to do, but #ip6tables: No chain/target/match by that name. I have been googling but unable to solve the problem. a

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Lists wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running Centos 5.4 > I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/root file > I need to send this all to another address (preferrably external but > local would possibly do) > > I have searched a lot but can't find any way to do this. I have set it > s

[CentOS] OT: iscsi target bind to two addresses?

Does anyone know off hand how to bind iscsi enterprise target to two distinct addresses. Lets say I have a machine that has a bunch of interfaces on it, with different subnets. Rather than have ietd broadcast itself on all interfaces (the default), I would like to limit it to only two interfaces.

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

> Argh spoke to soon - its mostly all good apart from the attachments > that are on the emails don't come through as attachments. > Is there any way I can send the so that they are received with > attachments still intact? install mutt if you haven't already. (yum install mutt) as root, go in

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Lists wrote: > Argh spoke to soon - its mostly all good apart from the attachments that > are on the emails don't come through as attachments. > Is there any way I can send the so that they are received with attachments > still intact? > > Kate > > Not that I ca

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 16:09 +1300, Lists wrote: > Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Lists wrote: > > > > > > Kate, > > > > > > You need to modify /etc/aliases to have something like: > > > > > > > > root:

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Lists > wrote: > > Kate, > > You need to modify /etc/aliases to have something like: > > root: u...@gmail.com

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Lists >> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 21:33 >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm running Centos 5.4 >> I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/roo

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Lists > wrote: > > Kate, > > You need to modify /etc/aliases to have something like: > > root: u...@gmail.com

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Lists wrote: > > > > Kate, > > > > You need to modify /etc/aliases to have something like: > > > > root: u...@gmail.com > > > > > > You should then run /usr/bin/newaliases to make these changes active||. > > > > Matt > Hi Matt, >

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

> -Original Message- > From: Lists > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 21:33 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user > > Hi all, > > I'm running Centos 5.4 > I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/root > file I need to send th

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Lists wrote: > > I have done this and it works for new mail arriving but I need to onsend > the existing mail. IIRC procmail can do this for you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Mathew S. McCarrell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Lists > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm running Centos 5.4 > I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/root file > I need to send this all to another address (preferrably external but

Re: [CentOS] send existing root email to another user

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Lists wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running Centos 5.4 > I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/root file > I need to send this all to another address (preferrably external but > local would possibly do) > > I have searched a lot but can't find any wa

[CentOS] send existing root email to another user

Hi all, I'm running Centos 5.4 I have a pile of emails in my root users /var/spool/mail/root file I need to send this all to another address (preferrably external but local would possibly do) I have searched a lot but can't find any way to do this. I have set it so future emails get forwarded t

Re: [CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:47:24 -0700 (MST) CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > > >> Is there something "bad" about the non-threading variant? > > > > Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor. > > Which are

Re: [CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

> Robert Heller wrote: > >> Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor. >> Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant >> for little SBC/Embedded systems). I suspect that either RH or (more >> likely) the Perl people don't want to have to support t

Re: [CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

Robert Heller wrote: > Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor. > Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant > for little SBC/Embedded systems). I suspect that either RH or (more > likely) the Perl people don't want to have to support two vers

Re: [CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

> At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: >> Is there something "bad" about the non-threading variant? > > Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor. > Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant > for little SBC/Embedded

Re: [CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file: > > > * Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5 > - add two patches, which... > - Resolves: #435505, #431041 > - remove %%define threa

Re: [CentOS] /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check

W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze: > hi, > it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many > discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check. > we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to > configure them not to send th

[CentOS] non-threaded perl no longer in .spec file

Hello, I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file: * Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5 - add two patches, which... - Resolves: #435505, #431041 - remove %%define threading, the non-threading variant is not supported, Related: 435376 That comment was

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

Davy Leon wrote: > [r...@linux ~]# lsusb > Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0846:6a00 NetGear, Inc. WG111 WiFi (v2) > Bus 001 Device 001: ID : > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c016 Logitech, Inc. M-UV69a Optical Wheel Mouse > Bus 002 Device 001: ID : > > so, is Realtek RTL-8187L chipset > As

Re: [CentOS] /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check

Farkas Levente wrote: hi, it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check. we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to configure them not to send these messages, but i'm not able ie

Re: [CentOS] Change system-wide default configuration for FF and OO with /etc/skel

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:59:13 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller a écrit : > > > > > There is a file named 'prefs.js' in the > > ~/.mozilla/firefox/.default/ directory. > > Now this creates another problem. I manually tested this, and it works > ok. But when I try to work w

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS 5.4 64bit on server with LSI SAS 1068E controller.

Billy Huddleston wrote: It's listed as a MegaRAID controller. I've tried the following drivers suggested by Supermicro with no success. megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-ga-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-u1-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-u2-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel5

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS 5.4 64bit on server with LSI SAS 1068E controller.

It's listed as a MegaRAID controller. I've tried the following drivers suggested by Supermicro with no success. megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-ga-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-u1-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-u2-all.img megasr-13.10.0708.2009-1-rhel50-u3-all.img From what I

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VM - ntpd running

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: > On 11/30/2009 11:34 AM, Jonathan Garden wrote: >> This is really stupid question. But referring to: >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html >> I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I n

Re: [CentOS] Change system-wide default configuration for FF and OO with /etc/skel

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Now where does this catwalksonthekeyboard.default directory come from? > What is it possibly good for? And, more interestingly, how can I put my > user preferences under /etc/skel/.mozilla so Firefox actually finds them > without me having to

Re: [CentOS] Change system-wide default configuration for FF and OO with /etc/skel

Robert Heller a écrit : > > There is a file named 'prefs.js' in the > ~/.mozilla/firefox/.default/ directory. Now this creates another problem. I manually tested this, and it works ok. But when I try to work with /etc/skel, I have some unexpected behaviour. Say I put prefs.js in /etc/skel/.

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

[r...@linux ~]# lsusb Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0846:6a00 NetGear, Inc. WG111 WiFi (v2) Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c016 Logitech, Inc. M-UV69a Optical Wheel Mouse Bus 002 Device 001: ID : so, is Realtek RTL-8187L chipset - Original Message - From: "

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

the command tail -f /var/log/messages Nov 30 12:44:35 linux kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 4 Nov 30 12:44:35 linux kernel: usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice but nothing more - Original Message - From: "Robert Heller" To: "CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] Change system-wide default configuration for FF and OO with /etc/skel

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:15:23 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using a heavily tweaked CentOS 5.4 for desktop installs (here's what > it looks like: http://www.microlinux.fr/captures.html). > > For every app I install, I try to configure a sensible default > configuration sys

Re: [CentOS] Repository for clean and safe installation of python2.6 (and other python-software)

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Bernhard Gschaider wrote: > I understand. But if I GET a dog I can hold you resonsible? ;) If it's a great dane, then you can hold my dog responsible. I claim innocence at all times. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionar

[CentOS] Change system-wide default configuration for FF and OO with /etc/skel

Hi, I'm using a heavily tweaked CentOS 5.4 for desktop installs (here's what it looks like: http://www.microlinux.fr/captures.html). For every app I install, I try to configure a sensible default configuration system-wide for all users. For example, once I found a nice configuration for XMMS (

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VM - ntpd running

On 11/30/2009 11:34 AM, Jonathan Garden wrote: > This is really stupid question. But referring to: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html > I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I need > to turn-on ntpd for timekeeping on VMs? Some people say

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:53:34 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi > > There is no encryption and my neighbour knows about it, we are just trying > to build an small network for our computers. > Centos doesn't recognize the USB device. I just plug ot in and nothing > happens. > > Any sugg

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

Davy Leon wrote: > Hi > > There is no encryption and my neighbour knows about it, we are just trying > to build an small network for our computers. > Centos doesn't recognize the USB device. I just plug ot in and nothing > happens. > > Any suggestions? > > David > What chipset does the devic

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

Hi There is no encryption and my neighbour knows about it, we are just trying to build an small network for our computers. Centos doesn't recognize the USB device. I just plug ot in and nothing happens. Any suggestions? David - Original Message - From: To: "CentOS mailing list" Se

Re: [CentOS] Repository for clean and safe installation of python2.6 (and other python-software)

> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:24:24 -0500 > "JP" == Jim Perrin wrote: JP> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bernhard Gschaider JP> wrote: >> a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM b) safe: it should >> not remove the system-python (in order not to break   the >> sys

Re: [CentOS] timekeeping on VM - ntpd running

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jonathan Garden wrote: > This is really stupid question. But referring to: > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html > I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I need to > turn-on ntpd for timekeeping on VMs? Some

[CentOS] timekeeping on VM - ntpd running

This is really stupid question. But referring to: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083791.html I don't see any line related to ntpd in my /var/log/messages . Do I need to turn-on ntpd for timekeeping on VMs? Some people say not to use ntpd on VMs for timekeeping or is it ntpdat

Re: [CentOS] Wireless

> Hi folks > > I have a Centos 5.3 Box and I'm trying to setup an small wireless link > with > the AP of a neighbour. I have a brand new NETGEAR WG111V2 USB-WIFI adaptor > for that, but Centos doesn't recognize that. Any suggestions? I already > tested it on windows XP and the link works fine. How

[CentOS] Wireless

Hi folks I have a Centos 5.3 Box and I'm trying to setup an small wireless link with the AP of a neighbour. I have a brand new NETGEAR WG111V2 USB-WIFI adaptor for that, but Centos doesn't recognize that. Any suggestions? I already tested it on windows XP and the link works fine. How can I do t

Re: [CentOS] Repository for clean and safe installation of python2.6 (and other python-software)

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bernhard Gschaider wrote: > a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM > b) safe: it should not remove the system-python (in order not to break >   the system-scripts in subtle ways) but be accessible for >   instance as python2.6 (while python would still be py

Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

Mike Yates wrote: > Hi > I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares. > I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos > version upgrade. > I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs > > I have:- > [r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v >

[CentOS] Repository for clean and safe installation of python2.6 (and other python-software)

Hi! I want to test some software on my CentOS 5 machine that is not too happy with the system python (2.4). So when I install a python to my machines I want it to be a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM b) safe: it should not remove the system-python (in order not to break the system-

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote: At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:08:01 -0600 CentOS mailing list > wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Heller wrote: You either A) Don't have NetworkManager installed on the othe

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

Hi, On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 00:55 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh wrote: > > Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX > > The following 2 lines : > > PEERDNS=no > > NM_CONTROLLED=no > > Line 1 tells the the if commands not to override /etc/resolv.conf > >

[CentOS] /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check

hi, it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check. we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to configure them not to send these messages, but i'm not able ie. i already add to the S

[CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

Hi I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares. I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos version upgrade. I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs I have:- [r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v mount: no type was given - I'll assu

Re: [CentOS] Bnid Dynamic Update not returnnig latest update

>The logs show: > >client xx.xx.xx.xx#53401: view external: updating zone 'example.net/IN': >update unsuccessful: host.example.net/A: 'rrset does not exist' prerequisite >not satisfied (YXRRSET) >client >xx.xx.xx.xx#46869: view external: updating zone 'example.net/IN': >update unsuccessful: host

Re: [CentOS] Bnid Dynamic Update not returnnig latest update

>Do you see anything in the logs about a failed update? Do the >permissions on the bind zone directory allow named to write the update >to file? Perms are ok, it writes it out eventually (as it supposed to) and when the daemon is stopped. The logs show: client xx.xx.xx.xx#53401: view external:

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:08:01 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > > >> > >> You either > >> > >> A) Don't have NetworkManager installed on the other servers > >> (eg 'rpm -q Netwo

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:27:27 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > > > > You either > > > > A) Don't have NetworkManager installed on the other servers > > (eg 'rpm -q NetworkManager' yields 'package NetworkManager is not > > installed

Re: [CentOS] Fedora 11 i386 Evolution address book --> CentOS 5.4 x86_64 (Solved)

On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 10:32 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, David McGuffey > wrote: > > > > Maybe I should check to see if Evolution on F11 can export the db into > > something that Evolution on 5.4 can import. > > Yes. If you are lucky, that will work OK. Possibly

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and DRPM

I finally managed to do it. server: I had to rebuild the latest createrepo package from sourcerpm: wget http://createrepo.baseurl.org/download/createrepo-0.9.8-1.src.rpm rpm2cpio createrepo-0.9.8-1.src.rpm | cpio -idmv --no-absolute-filenames change yum dependency to yum >= 3.2.22 in the spec file

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Rob Townley wrote: > > i uninstall NetworkManager as well, but i would think you have bigger > problems since it appears you have both the 64bit and 32bit versions > of software installed? > ___ Well, I use a x64 syste

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > >> >> You either >> >> A) Don't have NetworkManager installed on the other servers >> (eg 'rpm -q NetworkManager' yields 'package NetworkManager is not installed') >> >> OR >> >> B) Don't

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and DRPM

On 11/27/2009 11:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: > OK I figgured out the client part. But unfortunately this was the easy part. > I still can't figure out, what i'm doing wrong on the server. > I tried installing deltarpm package from epel and the newest createrepo > package from atrpms (deltarpm from

Re: [CentOS] how to install ash on CentOS 5.4?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > > hmmm.  ash was included with EL3 and EL4, but appears to have been > dropped in EL5.  its a stripped down bourne shell, you might just try > >    $ sudo ln -s /bin/bash /bin/ash > > and see if that OpenQRM thing works like that. > > or, I

Re: [CentOS] how to install ash on CentOS 5.4?

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if it's possible to install ash on CentOS 5.4, or > just CentOS 5, for that matter? I'm trying to install OpenQRM which > requires ash, but ash doesn't exist in the repositories. rpmfind.net > als only has an older version listed, for CentOS 4 > http://

Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > You either > > A) Don't have NetworkManager installed on the other servers > (eg 'rpm -q NetworkManager' yields 'package NetworkManager is not installed') > > OR > > B) Don't have NetworkManager running on the other servers > (eg '/sbin/ch

[CentOS] how to install ash on CentOS 5.4?

Hi, Does anyone know if it's possible to install ash on CentOS 5.4, or just CentOS 5, for that matter? I'm trying to install OpenQRM which requires ash, but ash doesn't exist in the repositories. rpmfind.net als only has an older version listed, for CentOS 4 http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/searc

Re: [CentOS] AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?

Hi Ian, On 11/30/2009 01:07 AM, Ian Forde wrote: >> I still want to see the changes, but it would be nice to see the >> ones I >> authorized through the update service to be partitioned off from the >> ones that seem to have no reasonable explanation. > > Seems to be that a yum plugin could be wri

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and DRPM

OK this is the error I get. createrepo --database --deltas -s sha --oldpackagedirs . . Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 222, in ? main(sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/share/createrepo/genpkgmetadata.py", line 196, in main mdgen.doPkgMet