I am working on moving some nfs shares from an older Linux system to CentOS5
server.
some are used by the machine and its clients as $HOME (but not mounted at
/home) and working
directories.
using selinux-policy-targeted.
Are there any selinux policy additions (so restorecon keeps them each tim
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> Anyone here using openpkg? Any thoughts about it?
We have been using this since 2001 or so when we moved from
Caldera Linux to SuSE. We now use it on CentOS, OpenSolaris,
FreeBSD, OS X, and even SCO OpenServer 5.0.6a.
For an old writeup I did o
> Gentoo? What do you have against the OP? Why subject him to such madness and
> unnecessary pain? :D
Don't be dissin my friends over at the funny farm. :-P We likes our
36hr recompiles because the cflags on our l33t boxen weren't "just
right". :-)
It's actually not a bad distro, just gets a bad
Anyone here using openpkg? Any thoughts about it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
At Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:28:22 -0600 (CST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> - "Marko Vojinovic" wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 December 2009 19:54:03 Jerry Geis wrote:
> > > > It may be one way to do it, but that is not how xen or kvm are
> > > > ordinarily set up under CentOS -- qemu has (had) the h
- "Marko Vojinovic" wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2009 19:54:03 Jerry Geis wrote:
> > > It may be one way to do it, but that is not how xen or kvm are
> > > ordinarily set up under CentOS -- qemu has (had) the hooks to
> > > simulate the missing opcodes of some arch's, but at a
> > > perform
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 19:54:03 Jerry Geis wrote:
> > It may be one way to do it, but that is not how xen or kvm are
> > ordinarily set up under CentOS -- qemu has (had) the hooks to
> > simulate the missing opcodes of some arch's, but at a
> > performance penalty
>
> if there is a way to "si
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Kemp, Larry wrote:
> Yep. Dnsmasq was parked on 67. Gonna have to "yum remove" him. Big thanks
> guys.
better be sure first that it is not also acting as a DNS server since
it does both
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michae
Yep. Dnsmasq was parked on 67. Gonna have to "yum remove" him. Big thanks guys.
LK
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Ron Loftin
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:13 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS D
See if someone else is hanging onto port 67
[r...@morrison ~]# lsof -i -P | grep :67
dnsmasq 23404nobody5u IPv4 46029087 UDP *:67
dnsmasq is a popular light-weight DHCP server
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In De
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:03 -0500, Kemp, Larry wrote:
> CentOS Community,
>
> I need help with a CentOS DHCP server.
>
> I have a simple 32bit CentOS 5.3 server running on an Intel chip server in a
> lab environment with two NIC's.
>
> Interfaces:
> eth0 - Is connected to the Internet using a
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Kemp, Larry wrote:
> CentOS Community,
>
> I need help with a CentOS DHCP server.
>
> I have a simple 32bit CentOS 5.3 server running on an Intel chip server in a
> lab environment with two NIC's.
>
> Interfaces:
> eth0 - Is connected to the Internet using a static
At Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:02:28 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to take the 686 CentOS 5, install that in virtual machine,
> install a custom kernel that is the 486 flavor, take that image and
> put it on a 8G CF card - insert that into a small form factor 486 cla
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Looking for any solution.
how deep is your wallet ;)
I would just find a 486 out in the boneyard.
As I still have a RHL 4.2 486/33 s/ 16 meg of ram in daily
service, I know just what machine to pull and replace
-- Russ herrold
_
CentOS Community,
I need help with a CentOS DHCP server.
I have a simple 32bit CentOS 5.3 server running on an Intel chip server in a
lab environment with two NIC's.
Interfaces:
eth0 - Is connected to the Internet using a static public IP address.
eth1 - Is connected to a private 10.1.1.0/24 L
Hi all,
I've set up a CentOS flash stick using the LiveCD tools, then dumping
that onto flash with a persistent overlay - instructions here:
http://wtf.geek.nz/?blog/2009/12/08/how-to-make-a-useful-centos-utility-flash-stick
This gets me to a prompt in which I can do recovery stuff, but I'm
curio
>
> It may be one way to do it, but that is not how xen or kvm are
> ordinarily set up under CentOS -- qemu has (had) the hooks to
> simulate the missing opcodes of some arch's, but at a
> performance penalty
>
if there is a way to "simulate" missing opcodes in the kernel - that would
be grea
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to take the 686 CentOS 5, install that in virtual machine,
> install a custom kernel that is the 486 flavor, take that image and
> put it on a 8G CF card - insert that into a small form factor 486 class
> machine and have that work?
>
> I am hoping th
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Alan McKay wrote:
> When you create a virtual machine don't you have a choice of
> what type of processor you want and so forth?
nope
> That would be the clean way to do it would it not?
It may be one way to do it, but that is not how xen or kvm are
ordinarily set up under
When you create a virtual machine don't you have a choice of what type
of processor you want and so forth?
That would be the clean way to do it would it not?
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
Hi all,
Is it possible to take the 686 CentOS 5, install that in virtual machine,
install a custom kernel that is the 486 flavor, take that image and
put it on a 8G CF card - insert that into a small form factor 486 class
machine and have that work?
I am hoping the extra instructions in a 686 (M
Anyone thought about installing R from the Scientific Linux site? R is a
standard part of SL. It might be a bit more compatible with CentOS than other
sites. Just an idea.
--
Brent L. Bates (UNIX Sys. Admin.)
M.S. 912 Phone:(757) 865-1400, x204
NASA Lan
2009/12/8 John Doe :
> From: Stephen Nelson-Smith
>> I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
>> username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
>> get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user.
>> singhh - nofile unl
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> R-core-2.10.0-2.el5.x86_64 from R-project has depsolving problems -->
> Missing Dependency: perl(File::Copy::Recursive) is needed by package
> R-core-2.10.0- 2.el5.x86_64 (R-project)
>
>
If you don't want to use the epel repository, then you will need to ge
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 at 6:45pm, Diederick Stoffers wrote
>
>> Has anyone been able to successfully install R on CentOS5.4? I am having
>> problems with dependencies perl is installed.
>
> I use the packages from EPEL without a problem.
Using it h
Lars Hecking wrote:
> This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect:
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 001
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 002
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 003
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 004
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root roo
Jim Perrin wrote:
>> I would imaging it's rather similar to this ->
>> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097
>
>
> Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up waht I mean. s/imaging/imagine/
>
Ridiculous, I know...a computer should know what you're thinking and how
to spell it. :)
Jim Perrin writes:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
> wrote:
>
> I would imaging it's rather similar to this ->
> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097
Been there, tried that.
VirtualBox actually complains if you mess with /sys/bus/usb/drivers:
"You seem to h
able
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20091208/a9b3ee20/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:35:18 +0100
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1625 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64
expat - security
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
> wrote:
>
> I would imaging it's rather similar to this ->
> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097
Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up waht I mean. s/imaging/imagine/
--
Durin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking
wrote:
I would imaging it's rather similar to this ->
http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
_
> Get your vboxusers group ID
> # cat /etc/group | vboxusers
>
> Remount the USBFS with your vboxusers GID
> # mount -t usbfs -o remount,devgid=GID,devmode=664 /proc/bus/usb
> /proc/bus/usb
This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect:
# ll /proc/bus
total 0
dr-x
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
> username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
> get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user.
>
> singhh - nofile unlimited
I think t
Lars Hecking wrote:
> I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox
> web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB
> access to work on the guest.
>
> This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a
> web
> (feedback). Problem is I can't get the mic to actually work with skype
> (eg with skype call testing service) - it may be that one of the many
> settings is incorrect - has anybody else had this problem and got any
I got it to work (Skype beta static on CentOS 5.4 x86_64) by playing
with "Captu
From: Stephen Nelson-Smith
> I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
> username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
> get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user.
> singhh - nofile unlimited
Don't you mean /etc
hi,
maybe it will be interesting -
http://www.openlogic.com/news/press/12.01.09.php
http://www.openlogic.com/products/centos-support.php
OpenLogic began to offer commercial technical support for CentOS.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:19 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I wanted to know about any commercial
Hi,
I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set
username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I
get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user.
singhh - nofile unlimited
I think this is related to PAM, so I've modifed /
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 16:33 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Also, do the test with a mixer open (aumix etc) and see if the bars
> >> are moving. igain is especially important, it should not be 0 when you
> >> talk.
> >
> > Thanks, but
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Diederick Stoffers wrote:
>Hi,
>We have a new 24-core Dell PowerEdge R905 server with 128GB's RAM. The 64
>bits version of Fedora 12 lists the correct amount of 128GB, CentOS only
>finds 32GB (and so does Scientific Linux). I would much pref
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
>
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> thus Christopher Chan spake:
>>>
>>>
Ian Forde wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> thus Christopher Chan spake:
>>
>>> Ian Forde wrote:
>>>
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei
wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> I've always avoided XFS because A) it w
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Christopher Chan spake:
>
>> Ian Forde wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
John R Pierce wrote:
> I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in
> RHEL
> anyway
I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox
web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB
access to work on the guest.
This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a
web search, but I have not found a
thus Christopher Chan spake:
> Ian Forde wrote:
>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei
>> wrote:
>>
>>> John R Pierce wrote:
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in
RHEL
anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic
l
45 matches
Mail list logo
