RedShift wrote:
> On 12/20/09 16:22, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
> What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
> there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> That part about high-core speed for OpenBSD pf is definitely on. The
>> multi-processor part...not too sure. Maybe with NUMA systems like what
>> you get on AMD Opteron platforms.
>>
>
> Don't both iptables and pf bypass the filters for
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 18:40 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:33:18PM -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
> > Yes, I checked that site. The printer is a USB Cannon IP1800. Chasing
> > links I found at linuxprinting I had to go to Japan to get a driver, but
> > it wouldn't work.
>
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:54 +0100, David Hláčik wrote:
> Computers from local network range 10.123.123.0/24 (eth0.7) should
> access internet using my second internet provider via ppp0.
This may be too simple for your needs, but it took a while for the light
to come on for me about this when I se
rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>> I've got a garage full of tools at my disposal. However, for the task at
>> hand, which is nailing a nail, there is no tool more appropriate than the
>> aforementioned hammer.
>
>
> Yeah, but the original poster's only tool seems to be the CentOS
> sledge-hammer.
Peter Serwe wrote:
> This thread is like a bad joke. You've been given the answer 37 times
> by 23 people.
>
And yet, none of those responses provided any objective measurements or links
to
test results. Not only were most just opinions, many said the opinions were
based on first impressio
> I've got a garage full of tools at my disposal. However, for the task at
> hand, which is nailing a nail, there is no tool more appropriate than the
> aforementioned hammer.
Yeah, but the original poster's only tool seems to be the CentOS
sledge-hammer.
I could understand him if the answer to
I've got a garage full of tools at my disposal. However, for the task at
hand, which is nailing a nail, there is no tool more appropriate than the
aforementioned hammer.
Peter
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, wrote:
> > This thread is like a bad joke. You've been given the answer 37 times by
> This thread is like a bad joke. You've been given the answer 37 times by
> 23
> people.
>
> Harrow?!!
>
Well, if all you've got is a hammer, everything will begin to look like a
nail.
Doesn't it?
;-)
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:17:07PM +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot have suspend and hibernate working on a Samsung NC10
> (netbook) running CentOS 5.4 i386.
>
> When I try suspending/hibernating the screen becomes black (with a few
> logs, like "shrinking memory" for hibernate) a
This thread is like a bad joke. You've been given the answer 37 times by 23
people.
Harrow?!!
Peter
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:10 AM, sadas sadas wrote:
> What solution for gigabit firewall can you suggest? Witch OS and packet
> filter is capable to atcheave hight performance and gigabit speed
Already I have made some progress with this,
It would seem I had some how wrote a superblock to the drives hence
mdadm picking the drives up as potential raid devices so I used the
mdadm option --zero-superblock on each drive and solved that little
issue.
On to the next problem!
--
Regards,
Jame
Hi,
I cannot have suspend and hibernate working on a Samsung NC10
(netbook) running CentOS 5.4 i386.
When I try suspending/hibernating the screen becomes black (with a few
logs, like "shrinking memory" for hibernate) and then the computer
hangs and I have to force a shutdown with the power button
Hello guys,
Sorry to bothering you.
I had a small network with one ISP and firewall.
eth1 -> Is connected to my ISP
eth0 + eth0.1 , eth0.2 and etc are my local networks.
All my network accesses internet via eth1.
My routing table looks like the following :
213.194.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Gordon McLellan wrote:
> I have a trio of servers that like to reboot during high disk /
> network IO operations. They don't appear to panic, as I have
> kernel.panic = 0 in sysctl.conf. The syslog just shows normal
> messages, like samba complaining about brow
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM, nate wrote:
> iptables makes a TERRIBLE firewall, use pf instead
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
I whole heartedly with Nate on this! I spent a bunch of time looking
at firewall solutions a year or two back, and PF was by far the
easiest solution to
Hey List,
So I had a 4 drive software RAID 5 set up consisting of /dev/sdb1,
/dev/sdc1, /dev/sdd1 and /dev/sde1. I reinstalled my OS and after the
reinstall I made the mistake of re-assembling the array incorrectly by
typing "sudo mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
/dev/sde" in a
RedShift wrote:
> Have you got some figures to back that up? Everybody's saying OpenBSD's pf
> performance is superior, yet nobody has posted some proof.
Not sure myself, keep in mind that there are (at least) two different
ways to measure firewall performance - connections/second and
throughput.
On 12/20/09 16:22, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
>>> NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSD
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
>>> NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
>>> there); h
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
> That part about high-core speed for OpenBSD pf is definitely on. The
> multi-processor part...not too sure. Maybe with NUMA systems like what
> you get on AMD Opteron platforms.
>
Don't both iptables and pf bypass the filters for established TCP connection
What solution for gigabit firewall can you suggest? Witch OS and packet filter
is capable to atcheave hight performance and gigabit speeds?
>Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
there. Maybe NetBSD with p
>It´s like samba is not being able to "talk" to the rest of the
>workgroup. (of course they are all in the same workgroup)
>
>I´m using "wins support = yes" and I´ve set the DHCP to set the clients to use
>the samba server as wins server.I´ve checked the win clients and they get the
>correct conf
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:27:09AM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> PATA (IDE) drives are not hot-swapable -- I don't think either the
> kernel IDE driver or many (if any) plain IDE controllers support hot
Annoyingly old kernels used to (2.2? 2.4? Can't remember). You could do
"hdparm -b 0 /dev/hdg
Peter Serwe wrote:
> I'll second damn near everything nate said, and hopefully add a tidbit or
> two.
>
> If you're new to BSD, you may want to consider the pfsense project in the
> aforementioned active-active configuration.
>
> It gives you a nice, intuitive gui to manage your failover firewall
sadas sadas wrote:
> The syntax is not a problem. The problem is in the performance. I suppose
> that if I configure OpenBSD to process the in/out packets only to layer 2 the
> performance will be much more than linux with iptables.
>
You know SQUAT about filtering on Linux. You want a bridg
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>> What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
>>> there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
>> NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
>> there); however, as can be read on
>>
>> http://www
At Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:49:02 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have a box running CentOS 5.3 with two Dataport removable drive bays
> installed on the second IDE interface (/dev/hdc and hdd). I want to
> configure it so I can plug in and mount various drives at different
> times, includ
I have a box running CentOS 5.3 with two Dataport removable drive bays
installed on the second IDE interface (/dev/hdc and hdd). I want to
configure it so I can plug in and mount various drives at different
times, including different size drives. So far it will only recognize
the first drive I
After running out of swap and memory and freezing, a domU called web02
won't start up.
Both dom0 and domU are running CentOS release 5.4. dom0's kernel is
2.6.18-164.el5xen and I'm running the
stock xen from CentOS: xen-3.0.3-94.el5
After issuing 'xen create web02' I see the following in the xen
On Sunday 20 December 2009, ken wrote:
> On 12/18/2009 10:53 AM Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote:
...
> >> To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can
> >> use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this:
> >>
> >> rpm -Vv u
On 12/18/2009 10:53 AM Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009, ken wrote:
>> Hey, Gang!
>>
>> To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can
>> use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this:
>>
>>
>> rpm -Vv util-linux
>>
>> /
32 matches
Mail list logo
