Re: [CentOS] need to free space on a root partition.

thanks for the tip! On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:13 PM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Yan Yu wrote: > >> Hello, there, Happy new year everyone! >> I am puzzled here. Could some expert help me shed some light on >> this? >> this may not be a centos specific Q.. >> i have a linux machin

Re: [CentOS] need to free space on a root partition.

On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Yan Yu wrote: > Hello, there, Happy new year everyone! >I am puzzled here. Could some expert help me shed some light on > this? > this may not be a centos specific Q.. > i have a linux machine. and the root partition (/) is full.. > so I moved a dir from /data to /var (

[CentOS] need to free space on a root partition.

Hello, there, Happy new year everyone! I am puzzled here. Could some expert help me shed some light on this? this may not be a centos specific Q.. i have a linux machine. and the root partition (/) is full.. so I moved a dir from /data to /var (/var is on a different partition), and creat

Re: [CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

>You could specify the muttrc file using the -F switch, maybe that will >solve yer problem? Or are you saying that is what you're doing but it >bombs? How about telling us the command/script and the error output? >luck, >Dave Hi, I am calling mutt like so: mutt -F /path/muttrc -a /path/file -s "te

Re: [CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a user w/o a shell that runs an app as a daemon that needs to use > mutt to email an attachment from a script. > > During testing when the app was ran as root everything worked:) Now that > we obviously are running as a user w/o a sh

Re: [CentOS] yum centos repo dependency hell for matlab loaddap

Oops, I hadn't intended to hit send, but thanks for the response. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Ryan J M wrote: > maybe you can try the old version of loaddap, it depends on libdap > 3.6.2, according to their descriptions. Good suggestion, I shoulda thought of it. > Or compile the new libdap

Re: [CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

>This may or may not be useful to you, but I use this to handle email >from scripts and programs: > >http://www.cleancode.org/projects/email Now that you mention this, I recall you suggesting it on this or the fedora list before and I recall the squabbling over its name and hence exclusion from th

Re: [CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 04:21 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a user w/o a shell that runs an app as a daemon that needs to > use > mutt to email an attachment from a script. This may or may not be useful to you, but I use this to handle email from scripts and programs: http://www.cleancod

Re: [CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:21:02AM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I have a user w/o a shell that runs an app as a daemon that needs to use > mutt to email an attachment from a script. > > During testing when the app was ran as root everything worked:) Now that > we obviously are running as a use

[CentOS] mutt execution by daemon

I have a user w/o a shell that runs an app as a daemon that needs to use mutt to email an attachment from a script. During testing when the app was ran as root everything worked:) Now that we obviously are running as a user w/o a shell this little bit broke. I used mutt as I needed to send the att

Re: [CentOS] unsuscribe

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:51 PM, wrote: > unsuscribe > Have a look at the URL in the footer of the message You might have better luck there. -jon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.

[CentOS] Tyan s4985 motherboard and lm_sensors

Trying to get cpu temps from lm_sensors for a Tyan s4985 motherboard, just installed centos 5.4. Tyan release some lm_sensors conf files and other information which I have done, but I am not getting any cpu temps. I was wondering if anyone out there was running this board and if you have gotten t

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better

ann kok wrote: >> Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? << The book "Perl for System Administration ", (David N. Blank-Edelman, O'Reilly, 2000) has a chapter on using Perl to analyse log files, rotate and compress them, etc. Luckily, this chapter is the

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better

I have done similar programs in Perl (you can use PHP also) where, when I read the file in and using regex I select the records that I want to keep. Feliz Año :-) On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > ann kok wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have apache log file around 7.6G and record h

[CentOS] unsuscribe

unsuscribe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Are you sure you read the OP's message(s)? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Lost mdadm.conf

On 12/31/2009 11:27 AM, James Bensley wrote: > > I can't say this with 100% certainty but I would of thought that it > would been fine. I've lost my mdadm.conf (reinstalled OS) with a > separate 4 disk RAID 5 array and re-assembled the array and carried on > as if nothing had happened. > Yes, in g

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

> > "machines" do not have MX records, domains have MX records. MX records are associated with the domain but point to machines with IP addresses running a MTA. If you don't assign a IP address of a machine with a MTA to the MX record, then your MX record is useless. It's essential for fault to

Re: [CentOS] The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST): > >> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, >> SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 >> X-Spam-Report: >> * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. > >

Re: [CentOS] The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST): > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, > SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > X-Spam-Report: > * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. add score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Jerry Geis wrote on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:05:35 -0500: > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. "machines" do not have MX records, domains have MX records. I think you told your provider some wrong information and that's why they set it up wrong. > > It is a big

Re: [CentOS] The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hey all, > > I am getting a number of incoming emails flagged as spam this morning. > Here's why: > > X-Spam-Level: * > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, >SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > X-Spam-Repor

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Jerry Geis wrote: > > > All three machines have the same FQDN. > something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com > > The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 > > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name. > > It is a big deal to request changes from

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Jerry Geis wrote: > MAIL_HUB does the trick - thanks that was what I was looking for. > you still should delete the extra MX records from the DNS ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

MAIL_HUB does the trick - thanks that was what I was looking for. jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Hi, > All three machines have the same FQDN. > something like A.mydomain.com, B.mydomain.com, C.mydomain.com No, they don't have the same fqdn, the fqdn includes the hostname. > > The IP numbers are X.Y.Z.170, .171 and .172 > > All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

lists-centos wrote: > What IPnumbers did you give the two new machines? What does your DNS > look like. > > >From the outside, mail will be delivered to the MX- (or if that > doesn't exist A-) record machine (based on the IPnumber in the DNS > record) for the FQDN on the message. > > - Rick > >

Re: [CentOS] The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hey all, > > I am getting a number of incoming emails flagged as spam this morning. > Here's why: > > X-Spam-Level: * > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, > SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > X-Spam-Report: > * 3.4

[CentOS] The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

Hey all, I am getting a number of incoming emails flagged as spam this morning. Here's why: X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Report: * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the

Re: [CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi all, > > I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with > incoming mail. > > I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them machine > names all > part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming emails are > being > round ro

[CentOS] one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up

Hi all, I had one server running centos 4.7 i686 everything was fine with incoming mail. I now added two more servers centos 5.4 x86_64 and gave them machine names all part of the same domain as machine 1. I noticed that incoming emails are being round robined to all three machines. At this

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better

ann kok wrote: > Hi > > I have apache log file around 7.6G and record half year > > Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by > date? and finally I can remove that big file and still keep the record. > > I have problem when using vi and it uses up the server memo

Re: [CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better

On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 08:45 -0800, ann kok wrote: > Hi > > I have apache log file around 7.6G and record half year > > Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by > date? Your question is a little too general. You want to extract what portion of the data, into w

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

John R Pierce wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> Given that it could have been trivial to include Sun Java ages ago, or at >> least >> not intentionally break the jpackage installation methods, I think Red Hat >> has >> done more damage to java than any other company and don't see that turning >>

[CentOS] which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better

Hi I have apache log file around 7.6G and record half year Which program/command (perl, vi, or sed) is better to extract the data by date? and finally I can remove that big file and still keep the record. I have problem when using vi and it uses up the server memory Thank you for your help

[CentOS] kickstart and logins.def question

Hello all: Happy New Year to everyone and thank you for all the knowledge this past year. I have a hopefully simple question about kickstart. In the authconfig section I can enable ldap, credential caching, etc.. Using the GUI tool there's an option to create the user home directories on first

Re: [CentOS] Lost mdadm.conf

2010/1/1 Luciano Rocha : > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 04:40:56PM +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >Not all rescue environments have MAKEDEV or have it in $PATH, so this >> >should always work. ;) >> >> Really, on my hp's as well? I don't have any /dev/hdx or /dev/sdx on the >> ones with software ra

Re: [CentOS] Update via yum fails with "needs libdbus-1.so.3, this is not available."

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Bart van Kuik wrote: > Hi list, > > I am running CentOS release 5.2. When I did a "yum -y update", I got a > large list of packages to be updated (360 packages). Then I got the > following error: > > Total download size: 499 M > Downloading Packages: > Running rpm_c

[CentOS] Update via yum fails with "needs libdbus-1.so.3, this is not available."

Hi list, I am running CentOS release 5.2. When I did a "yum -y update", I got a large list of packages to be updated (360 packages). Then I got the following error: Total download size: 499 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package xulrunner n

Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

> As luck would have it, I have copies of the java-1.6.0 b12 EPEL RPMS > that were offered before Centos added java-1.6.0 b09 as an "upgrade" > on my home page. A lot of luck (or foresight...) indeed! I used these old EPEL SRPMs + my experience of building the OpenJDK on CentOS (see previous mail