On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:23 +0300, Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> Thanks a lot, it seems I don't have any problem, right? :)
>
> Anas Al-Naffar
Please reread my prior post to you. You in fact have a Problem with
it. Also it can be ignored like the other Poster told you. It is your
c
Hello John,
Thanks a lot, it seems I don't have any problem, right? :)
Anas Al-Naffar
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of JohnS
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 10:04 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 CPU
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:23 +0300, Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> Actually During boot I get this failed message every time.
>
> CPU Module microcode doesn't exit /proc/modules, need to add modules
>
> And when I try to run TOP command, I only can see CPU1.
man top; type "top" hit "1" on the keyboar
Actually During boot I get this failed message every time.
CPU Module microcode doesn't exit /proc/modules, need to add modules
And when I try to run TOP command, I only can see CPU1.
Thanks
Anas Al-Naffar
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@c
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:09 -0800, nate wrote:
>
> Using 15K RPM drives I can tell you that a 3PAR T400(very well
> versed in their products, fast easy to use) can do 25.6 Gbits/second
> (3.2 gigabytes/second) sustained throughput. 640 drives, 48GB data
> cache.
>
> If you were starting out at
Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> Sorry "was empty file :)"
> Thanks for reply,
> Actually the Bios can see Dual Processor(no problem), so I think it's
> "broken" install problem, but how can I fix it without reinstalling the
> system, please find the two attached files .
>
looks good t
Hello Peter,
Sorry "was empty file :)"
Thanks for reply,
Actually the Bios can see Dual Processor(no problem), so I think it's
"broken" install problem, but how can I fix it without reinstalling the
system, please find the two attached files .
Thanks
Anas Al-Naffar
-Original Message
Hello Peter,
Thanks for reply,
Actually the Bios can see Dual Processor(no problem), so I think it's
"broken" install problem, but how can I fix it without reinstalling the
system, please find the two attached files .
Thanks
Anas Al-Naffar
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kjellstrom [ma
> My problem is that I only have a single public IP address, to serve my web
> server
> and my question is this:
>
> Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
> public IP
> address??
>
a cluster like that typically needs THREE IP addresses. one for cluster
no
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:07:56PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 21:05 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a
> > single
> > html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
> > turn the entire book i
You can try heartbeart...
:)
DS
--Original Message--
From: a...@myphonebook.co.in
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: centos@centos.org
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Apache/Cluster issue -- Single public IP address
Sent: Jan 8, 2010 11:28 PM
I want to set up a cluster
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:53 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> Your ROI of 5 minutes doesn't make any sense to me.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, Job submission and completion is what I am getting at.
> >
>
> ROI generally refers to the time an expense takes to pay off.Like,
> if buying $X worth of
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
> it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
> products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a
> suitable notebook host to provide me with Linux based alternative.
Othe
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 21:05 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a
> single
> html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
> turn the entire book into a single PDF?
cat chap*.html > temp.html
Load openoffice
File -
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:40:21 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> My CentOS4 machine died (CPU cooler failure, causing CPU to die).
> In this machine I had 5 Tbyte disks in a RAID5, and LVM structures
> on that.
>
> Now I've moved those 5 disks onto a CentOS5 machine and the RAID array
> is bein
My CentOS4 machine died (CPU cooler failure, causing CPU to die).
In this machine I had 5 Tbyte disks in a RAID5, and LVM structures
on that.
Now I've moved those 5 disks onto a CentOS5 machine and the RAID array
is being rebuilt. However the LVM structures weren't detected at boot
time. I was a
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Kay Diederichs wrote:
>> I did not look at the config, but I had good results with the 2.6.31
>> kernel compiled on CentOS 5.4 with the Fedora 12 config (but that was on
>> x86_64 so YMMV).
> this is also on x86_64 .. well, nevermind, i just tried a compile with
> original
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:33:14PM -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:05:00 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Only tangentially on topic, at best...
> >
> > Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a single
> > html file that serves as a table
Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>
Oh whew...From the other thread it looks like this bit a few people.
<<
Sorry - I came in late and missed the earlier discussion (so many emails to
skim, so little time . . . ).
Around October, a Centos 5.3 web server here also stopped updating
Webalizer stats. When I final
James Rankin wrote:
> Here is the fix. Just found this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
>
> and also
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
>
>
Thank you James. I added the mypostfix.te module and it solved the
problem. It would still seem that the fact tha
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:05:00 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> Only tangentially on topic, at best...
>
> Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a single
> html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
> turn the entire book into a single PDF?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:54 PM, James Rankin wrote:
> For anyone else finding this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
>
> and also
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
Oh whew...From the other thread it looks like this bit a few people.
_
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:05 PM, fred smith
wrote:
> Only tangentially on topic, at best...
>
> Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a single
> html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
> turn the entire book into a single PDF?
>
> I can't thi
Only tangentially on topic, at best...
Given a pile of html files, comprising chapters of a book, with a single
html file that serves as a table of contents to the group, how would I
turn the entire book into a single PDF?
I can't think of a way to do that, all I can come up with would result
in
>> Your ROI of 5 minutes doesn't make any sense to me.
>>
>
> Ok, Job submission and completion is what I am getting at.
>
ROI generally refers to the time an expense takes to pay off.Like,
if buying $X worth of capital equipment will generate savings or
additional income of $x over
JohnS wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:08 -0800, nate wrote:
>> JohnS wrote:
>>
>> > Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
>>
>> You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
>> is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
>>
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:34 -0700, Nataraj wrote:
> After upgrading to centos 5.4 I am getting a selinux violation, yet
> nothing is logged to /var/log/audit/audit.log. Other violations do get
> logged.
>
> The violation occurs when running the following command on the mail
> server:
>
> aspen>
For anyone else finding this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
and also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Here is the fix. Just found this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553492
and also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553277
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I got the same thing, which I think if from the selinux updates last
night. My machine was on 5.4 since 5.4 was released. I will let you know
if/when I figure out the solution.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-January/088465.html
___
CentOS
After upgrading to centos 5.4 I am getting a selinux violation, yet
nothing is logged to /var/log/audit/audit.log. Other violations do get
logged.
The violation occurs when running the following command on the mail
server:
aspen> /usr/bin/Mail centos@centos.org
Subject: test
hi
Cc:
aspen> send
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:08 -0800, nate wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
>
> > Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
>
> You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
> is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
> (~500MB/s)
>
G Bits
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:43 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> > Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
> > support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
> > into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
>
JohnS wrote:
> Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber.
You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440
is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabits/second
(~500MB/s)
> Thats with BiDirectional, both links at 4 GB/s. Were looking for
>
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:23 -0800, nate wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
>
> > Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
> > support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
> > into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
> > yes
JohnS wrote:
> Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
> support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
> into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
> yes per second. Also what type of sparse file I/O you get . I
JohnS wrote:
> Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they
> support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked
> into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB/s banwidth sustained,
> yes per second. Also what type of sparse file I/O you get . I
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:55 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> > Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and
> > RHEL 5.
> >
> > uname -ra
> > Linux ethies 2.6.18-16
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:36 -0800, nate wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
> > On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
> >> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
> >>
> >> Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
> >
> > I think you
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
> Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and
> RHEL 5.
>
> uname -ra
> Linux ethies 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:54 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> > I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
> > CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
> > is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit becaus
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
>> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
>>
>> Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
>
> I think you are confusing it with something else. Somewhere I saw that
> thes
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:54 -0500, Robert Heller wrote:
> I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
> CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
> is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the disk images are from a
> previous PIII system), and thi
I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to
CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it
is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit because the disk images are from a
previous PIII system), and things are 'interesting' WRT how the Lava
Computer mfg Inc Quattro-P
>That's interesting... Have you tried increasing the loglevel? It's a
>kernel option, unfortunately, and enabled with an audit=xx on the grub
>boot. It might give you more than you're seeing in the audit log. You
>may also want to try a relabel and manually check the context of all
>associated bin
>By setting selinux to "permissive", you've, in effect, turned it off.
>SElinux will still provide messages about infractions, but won't prevent
>things from running... i.e., it is no longer guarding your system.
>
>hth,
>ken
Thanks for the reply; the fact that the error only occurs when Enforci
On 1/8/2010 3:06 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
>> so on.
>>
>> Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
>>
>
> Well that is really what t
> Check out this TUTORIAL
> http://www.zoominternet.net/~lazydog/iptables-
> tutorial.html#RECENTMATCH
I do not seem to be making myself clear. I do not need a tutorial
on how to use the recent module of iptables. The recent module
itself seems not to be available on this particular host anymore
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:28 AM, James Rankin wrote:
> Frankly, this error message means little to mean... in the course of
> troubleshooting, I tried this:
> # setenforce Permissive
> # /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch
>
> And it worked! The logwatch email sends without error. If I turn SELinux
> back t
On 1/8/10 11:06 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
>> so on.
>>
>> Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
>>
>
> Well that is really what th
On Fri, January 8, 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
> obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
> provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
>
I ran lsmod and I do not find that ipt_recent is
On 01/08/2010 08:28 AM James Rankin wrote:
> Hello,
> After a yum update last night, I had a CenOS 5.4 i386 system pull in the
> following selinux updates:
> Jan 07 21:39:14 Updated: selinux-policy-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch
> Jan 07 21:39:31 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-255.el5_4.3.noarch
Am Freitag, den 08.01.2010, 16:35 +0100 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> Well, centos is not optimal system for laptop due to old drivers and
> so on.
>
> Personally I prefer ubuntu, fedora or opensuse on laptops.. or OSX.
>
Well that is really what the OP asked for NOT. There have been good
answers
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:32, James B. Byrne wrote:
> :BRUTE_FORCE - [0:0]
>
> . . .
> -A BRUTE_FORCE -p tcp -m tcp -m state -m recent --set -i eth0
> --dport 22 --state NEW
> -A BRUTE_FORCE -m comment -j RETURN --comment "Return to calling chain"
> COMMIT
Check out this TUTORIAL
http:
Quoting "James B. Byrne" :
> I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
> obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
> provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
>
> I determined that none of my backed up configuration files going
> back to
I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and
obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were
provided even when I ran restore with the -v option.
I determined that none of my backed up configuration files going
back to October will load either. This is mor
On 01/07/2010 02:14 PM Robert Heller wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:37:46 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace
>> it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based
>> products and would very much like to
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
> seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
>
> --
> Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
> Deepwoods Software -- Download the Mode
Thank you for the many helpful suggestions. I have to spend a bit
more time researching this evidently.
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Broc
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, wrote:
>
>>> Looks like the new kernel stanza gets added to lilo.conf
>>> automatically, but the default needs to be changed manually.
>>
>> That's ok, I randomly see that with grub, too.
>
> grub is supposed to set the default kernel to the newly installed one
Hi
No if you have a dual hba then the host should in worst case scenario
become un-responsive for a second or two but then continue as nothing
had happen.
If it fails then it may be your multipath config but a lot of the time
it is sitting at your switch level or san.
Regards
Per
On Fri, 2010-0
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, wrote:
>> Looks like the new kernel stanza gets added to lilo.conf
>> automatically, but the default needs to be changed manually.
>
> That's ok, I randomly see that with grub, too.
grub is supposed to set the default kernel to the newly installed one
(type) as
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller
>> wrote:
>>> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
>>> wrote:
>
>>> Thanks. I'm guessing that I'll have to manually update lilo.conf after
>>> kernel updates.
>>
>> If I remem
Thanks for the Link Ray.
One thing I am confused is... "failover manual" means whenever there is a
link failure this will case the host to be rebooted?
Paras.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:45:14AM -0600, Paras pradhan wrote:
> > Since I se
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:29:06 -0800 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> >> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
> >> wrote:
>
> >> Thanks. I'm guessing that I'll have to
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> Thanks. I'm guessing that I'll have to manually update lilo.conf after
>> kernel updates.
>
> If I remember correctl
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>> If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from:
>>
>> ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo/
>>
>> works just fine on CentOS-5.
>
> Thanks. I'm gues
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 1/7/2010 10:54 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Karanbir Singh
>>> On 01/07/2010 02:30 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
KB, thanks. When you say "dont go over 1 TiB in storage per spindle"
what are you referring to as spindle?
>>>
>>> disk.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Matty wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
>> wrote:
>> > John Doe wrote:
>> >> From: Boris Epstein
>> >>> This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are tr
At Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:36:57 -0800 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> > Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
> > seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
>
> If you must use lilo .
On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
>
> Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
I think you are confusing it with something else. Somewhere I saw that
these list around $400k for 80TB -
> Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
> seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
>
I use grub, but I wish I could go back to lilo - it was so much less
complicated and finicky.
> --
> Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
> Deepw
nate wrote ..
> a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
>
> > Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
> > public IP
> > address??
>
> You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
> seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer instead. Myself
>
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs?
Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
> seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
If you must use lilo ... the version of lilo available from:
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/syst
Does there exist a version of Lilo built for x86_64 CentOS 5? It does not
seem to be on the DVD. *I* really, really, prefer Lilo over Grub.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linu
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:06:10AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/8/2010 10:09 AM, nate wrote:
> > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >
> >> Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
> >> meanwhile, AT&T, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
> >> CA that I
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
snip
>
> Good question, they are after all ( the Sun 45xx's ) just
> opteron box's with a mostly standard build. Finding a CentOS
> compatible ( drivers pre-included, and not crap like cciss )
> would not be too hard.
>
> Who wants to offer up a machine to test on :)
John Doe wrote:
> From: Thomas Harold
>> Yah, RAID-5 is a bad idea anymore with the large drive sizes. RAID-6 or
>> RAID-10 is a far better choice.
>>
>> I prefer RAID-10 because the rebuild time is based on the size of a
>> drive pair, not the entire array.
>
> Anyone tested RAID 50 and/or 60 ar
> a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
>
>> Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
>> public IP
>> address??
>
> You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
> seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer instead. Myself
> I have most experien
I was wondering this myself (we use F5) but if he doesn't have the budget
for a redundant pair of F5's )they are pricey...) then he may be trying to
get resilience this way
That said a single front end apache server with mod_proxy and load balanced
across N nodes (depending on front end firew
From: Thomas Harold
> Yah, RAID-5 is a bad idea anymore with the large drive sizes. RAID-6 or
> RAID-10 is a far better choice.
>
> I prefer RAID-10 because the rebuild time is based on the size of a
> drive pair, not the entire array.
Anyone tested RAID 50 and/or 60 arrays?
"RAID-50 – Strip
On 1/8/2010 10:09 AM, nate wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
>> meanwhile, AT&T, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
>> CA that I worked for earlier this year, and here at the US NIH, we run
>> Linux.
>
a...@myphonebook.co.in wrote:
> Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a service with ONE
> public IP
> address??
You sure you have the right solution? Using RHCS for web serving
seems really complicated, I would use a load balancer instead. Myself
I have most experience with F5 ge
Yes that's why it depends on his ISP and network layout
Ideally he'd have his firewall allowing http in to his public IP (with
appropriate routing) and the floating IP actually be a private IP in the
internal address space that floats between two systems with private IPs in
the relevant networ
From: mcclnx mcc
> Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and
> bash.
> When I put on cron job I got error message:
> /bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
It says you miss a closing back-quote...
JD
_
From: "a...@myphonebook.co.in"
> I want to set up a cluster that is used for web hosting (RHCS cluster).
> Recently,
> I experimented with a 2 node cluster and was able to run it successfully.
> However,
> I have started facing some issues with Apache, which I had configured as a
> service
> us
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> Is this the end of the road, for installing apache as a
> service with ONE public IP
> address??
If I understand clustered services, you have only one
public IP address for the cluster, but that IP address needs
to be a virtual IP which can be point to one or more machines
on private IP adresse
Don't bind it to an IP (so listen shows 0.0.0.0) on either node of the
cluster? When the IP address is floated across it will still accept requests
on that then - in additional the the real node IP address.
Given that you are talking a public IP address however it depends on your
network confi
> Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and
> bash. When I put on cron job I got error message:
>
> /bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
>
> any ideal (CENTOS 4 and 5)?
>
Please read the cron man page. *THOROUGHLY*
A job running from cr
Thank you. This script only work on regular enviroment like sh, ksh and bash.
When I put on cron job I got error message:
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `''
any ideal (CENTOS 4 and 5)?
--- 10/1/5 (二)，John R Pierce 寫道：
> 寄件者: John R Pierce
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS
I want to set up a cluster that is used for web hosting (RHCS cluster).
Recently,
I experimented with a 2 node cluster and was able to run it successfully.
However,
I have started facing some issues with Apache, which I had configured as a
service
using the Cluster configuration tool. To do this
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 11:25:08AM -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 1/7/2010 12:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >>> I also heard that disks above 1TB might have reliability issues.
> >>> Maybe it changed since then...
> >>>
> >>
> >> I remember rumors about the early 2TB Seagates.
> >>
> >> Person
On 1/7/2010 12:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> I also heard that disks above 1TB might have reliability issues.
>>> Maybe it changed since then...
>>>
>>
>> I remember rumors about the early 2TB Seagates.
>>
>> Personally, I won't RAID SATA drives over 500GB unless they're
>> enterprise-level on
Hmm it could be worth checking the fc switch log also if you get stuck.
Per
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Jan 2010, at 15:37, Paras pradhan wrote:
Per,
Yes I have a device mapper out of my detected LUNS. My storage is
Hitachi OpenV . My multipath.conf files looks like below. Do I need
to add
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dunno why you say that. Lessee, both google and maybe amazon run Linux;
> meanwhile, AT&T, where I worked for a couple of years, Trustwave, a root
> CA that I worked for earlier this year, and here at the US NIH, we run
> Linux.
Since this is a storage thread.. back in 2
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:46 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 11:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> > Depends what hardware you have. ELRepo has a fixed powernow-k8 driver
> > for AMD processors that allows correct scaling on multicore processors.
> > See here:
>
> OP has a VIA nano, the K8 st
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:45:14AM -0600, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Since I see the following entry
> at /usr/share/doc/device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7/multipath.conf.defaults
> I am assuming I do not need to add it to multipath.conf but I do not know
> exaclty. Also my storage is Hitachi openv and the
Since I see the following entry
at /usr/share/doc/device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7/multipath.conf.defaults
I am assuming I do not need to add it to multipath.conf but I do not know
exaclty. Also my storage is Hitachi openv and the default one has Product
name as "DF.*" as you can see below.
So I am
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
