Re: [CentOS] iptables

I have installed shorewall at late last night and i forget it today i've restart my server now i am not able to connect it :D is there any way to connect shorewall ? 24 Nisan 2010 01:44 tarihinde cahit Eyigünlü yazdı: > Wow i see it is very cool, > and now i am starting to use it also :) > +1 fro

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Beta available for public download

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 21:19 +0100, Lucian wrote: ... > You should still be able to "experience" it a virtual machine; at > least this is how I did it and it worked great. > Maybe you should submit a bug report at redhat regarding your install issues. Works pretty well on VirtualBox 3.1.6 on CentO

Re: [CentOS] iptables

Wow i see it is very cool, and now i am starting to use it also :) +1 from me too :) thanks to every body for all help 2010/4/24 Ron Loftin > > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 18:16 -0400, Alan McKay wrote: > > Have a look at shorewall (google it) for the best thing I've ever seen > > for managing a Linux

Re: [CentOS] iptables

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 18:16 -0400, Alan McKay wrote: > Have a look at shorewall (google it) for the best thing I've ever seen > for managing a Linux firewall I agree about Shorewall. I've been using it for several years, and it does take a lot of the pain out of managing iptables. That being sa

Re: [CentOS] iptables

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Alan McKay wrote: > Have a look at shorewall (google it) for the best thing I've ever seen > for managing a Linux firewall +1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] iptables

Have a look at shorewall (google it) for the best thing I've ever seen for managing a Linux firewall 2010/4/23 cahit Eyigünlü : > how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp > base on ports > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > Cen

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

On Friday 23 April 2010 15:20, cahit Eyigünlü wrote: > how or why i have redesigned it to this and it seems like worked : See big problems in your future. > :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] Anyone with a little bit of security awareness would never set the

Re: [CentOS] USB keys

> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/23/2010 03:49 PM: >> Well, we wanted to put an install on a USB key. Neither I nor the other >> admin was amused by the singing and dancing that the wiki offers - and >> just *why* is it that syslinux is broken? > > Sorry you were unamused. Song and dance has never b

Re: [CentOS] USB keys

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on 04/23/2010 03:49 PM: > Well, we wanted to put an install on a USB key. Neither I nor the other > admin was amused by the singing and dancing that the wiki offers - and > just *why* is it that syslinux is broken? Sorry you were unamused. Song and dance has never been my f

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Beta available for public download

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Timo Schoeler a écrit : >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> http://press.redhat.com/2010/04/21/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-beta-available-today-for-public-download/ >> >> ...says it all. >> >> Have phun! > > > I just gave i

[CentOS] USB keys

Well, we wanted to put an install on a USB key. Neither I nor the other admin was amused by the singing and dancing that the wiki offers - and just *why* is it that syslinux is broken? At any rate, I did some googling, and found , and I ran this installer. Ok, it ha

[CentOS] Problem shuting down server.

Have Centos 5.3 installed in a HP ML110 server. After cloning disk using Clonezilla, if I issue a shutdown -h now, or any other command to shut down the server (i.e. init 0 or poweroff), instead of shutting down the server reboots. I googled but could't find any answer. ¿Does anybody has a clue ab

[CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> how or why i have redesigned it to this and it seems like worked  : > > Post your ip and root user/pass, we'll fix that and your mail client:P ** please ** take this catfight offlist -- Russ herrold ___ C

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

>how or why i have redesigned it to this and it seems like worked  : Post your ip and root user/pass, we'll fix that and your mail client:P ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

how or why i have redesigned it to this and it seems like worked : [r...@lin ~]# vi /etc/sysconfig/iptables # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

cahit Eyigünlü a écrit : > Thanks also i found this editinig the : edit > /etc/sysconfig/iptables is a good way for solution > problem solved thanks for everybody's attention Your attention has to come back. Editing /etc/sysconfig/iptables is *not* the solution. Just! Read!

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

>Thanks also i found this editinig  the  : edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables  is a >good way for solution  >problem solved thanks for everybody's attention I guess you missed the second line of text in that file, so probably you will be oblivious to it having changed when it does:) ___

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

Thanks also i found this editinig the : edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables is a good way for solution problem solved thanks for everybody's attention 2010/4/23 Niki Kovacs > > cahit Eyigünlü a écrit : > >> how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp >> base on ports >>

[CentOS] [Fwd: Re: iptables]

--- Begin Message --- cahit Eyigünlü a écrit : how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp base on ports If you don't want to mess with iptables, take a look at the firewall configuration tool system-config-securitylevel-tui. I think there's a graphical app also,

Re: [CentOS] iptables

>how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp base >on ports Wow Cahit, you are a sucker for punishment buddy:) First, post in text, then do a smidge of reading first... `man iptables` or google? I am guessing your iptables are stock as install left them? You might tr

Re: [CentOS] iptables

Am 23.04.2010 20:31, schrieb cahit Eyigünlü: > how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp > base on ports http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cent

[CentOS] iptables

how could i add / remove iptable rules on cet os 5.4 final for tcp / udp base on ports ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Can no longer print

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Don Krause wrote: > libcrypto is part of openssl. > > Weird that whatprovides is useless on this.. > > [r...@cartman ~]# rpm -qf /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.6 > [r...@cartman ~]# rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto > no package provides libcr

Re: [CentOS] Can no longer print

Don Krause wrote: > [r...@cartman ~]# rpm -qf /lib/libcrypto.so.6 > openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5_4.6 > [r...@cartman ~]# rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto > no package provides libcrypto > [r...@cartman ~]# > fwiw, yum provides libcrypto.so.6 does tell you what RPMs. ditto... $ rpm -q --wh

Re: [CentOS] Can no longer print

On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > Reply to All / Reply to List > On Friday 23 April 2010 18:30:40 MHR wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Anne Wilson > wrote: >>> Running 'hp-check -t' tells me that libcrypto is a required dependency >>> and I don't have it. 'rpm --redha

Re: [CentOS] Can no longer print

Reply to All / Reply to List On Friday 23 April 2010 18:30:40 MHR wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Running 'hp-check -t' tells me that libcrypto is a required dependency > > and I don't have it. 'rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto' says that no > > package provides it

Re: [CentOS] Can no longer print

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: : > > Running 'hp-check -t' tells me that libcrypto is a required dependency and I > don't have it.  'rpm --redhatprovides libcrypto' says that no package provides > it, and no package of that name is listed.  Where can I get it? > Have you chec

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI / GFS shared web server file system

> http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/doc/nfscookbook.pdf > > I think it'd be much easier if you just replicate the data between > the servers with rsync or something. GFS sounds like way overkill > for a couple of web servers. > Maybe you're right that GFS would be overkill -- I know you have t

Re: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes

On 4/23/2010 11:17 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:20:01AM +0200, Jure Pečar wrote: >> Ray Van Dolson wrote: >> I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write >> cache. >> >> When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to "cache" >>

[CentOS] Can no longer print

My server has CentOS 5.4. I had hplip-2.7.12 installed and running, as earlier versions didn't work with my printers, and was able to print to a networked printer. As far as I'm aware, that's the version that was still running last time I printed. Recently I decided to add a local USB printer

Re: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:20:01AM +0200, Jure Pečar wrote: > > > > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > >> I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write > > > >> cache. > > When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to "cache" > frequent fsyncs was to run it in a full data

Re: [CentOS] Adding ps2pdf support on centos

At Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:21:26 +0530 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I wanted to install the ghostscript for ps2pdf support. I wanted to know > the required rpms for this > and also the order of installation. As of now i don't have this support on > my system. > > Please provide

[CentOS] vmcore on 5.4

Information: 5.4 kernel (2.6.18-164.el5). I have a vmcore (from kdump), if the developers are interested, let me know a place to upload the vmcore file. I used the crash command to do a backtrace. I manage to get machines with later 5.4 and 5.5 to panic the same way. Broadcom or Intel NICs panic

Re: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes

Jure Pečar wrote: >>> Ray Van Dolson wrote: > I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write > cache. > > When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to "cache" frequent > fsyncs was to run it in a full data journaling mode, with external journal on > a sepa

Re: [CentOS] Adding ps2pdf support on centos

From: "premr...@digilink.in" > I wanted to install the ghostscript for ps2pdf support. > I wanted to know the required rpms for this > and also the order of installation. > As of now i don't have this support on my system. yum install ghostscript JD __

Re: [CentOS] Adding ps2pdf support on centos

> Hi, > > I wanted to install the ghostscript for ps2pdf support. I wanted to know > the required rpms for this > and also the order of installation. As of now i don't have this support on > my system. > > Please provide me with information on this. Have you considered RTFM? Do you understand Lin

[CentOS] Adding ps2pdf support on centos

Hi, I wanted to install the ghostscript for ps2pdf support. I wanted to know the required rpms for this and also the order of installation. As of now i don't have this support on my system. Please provide me with information on this. Disclaimer : This message is proprietary to Smartlink Netw

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Beta available for public download

Timo Schoeler a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > http://press.redhat.com/2010/04/21/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-beta-available-today-for-public-download/ > > ...says it all. > > Have phun! I just gave it a spin on two of my machines, two NEW Powermates which I use

Re: [CentOS] scripting CPAN installs

On 15 April 2010 21:23, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > Maybe there is a Perl/CPAN list that is a better place to ask this? > If so, maybe someone can point me to it. > > Anyway, I want to be able to script the installation of a bunch of > CPAN modules, and the first basic problem I am coming u

[CentOS] IPV6 and DNS...

Hi, I keep getting entries like these in my logs: network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN': 2001:500:40::1#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org//IN': 2001:500:e::1#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving '0.centos.pool.ntp.org/AAA

Re: [CentOS] rpm -U query

On 22 April 2010 22:18, Steve Thompson wrote: > CentOS, RHEL, all versions. > > Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not > relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files. > It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been insta

Re: [CentOS] rpm -U query

On 22 April 2010 22:18, Steve Thompson wrote: > CentOS, RHEL, all versions. > > Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not > relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files. > It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been insta

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI / GFS shared web server file system

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote: > OCSF2 over iSCSI is a good option to look at, too.  There is also gluster. > But NFS is going to be the mainstream approach with the best support and > administration options unless the OP is running into some technical > limitations. I have a

Re: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes

> > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > >> I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write > > >> cache. When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to "cache" frequent fsyncs was to run it in a full data journaling mode, with external journal on a separate disk. This turned

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI / GFS shared web server file system

> my impression is GFS requires shared storage, I believe there > are ways around it, but take a look at this for setting up GFS > for use with NFS iSCSI provides the basic foundation needed by GFS for shared storage, so the OP is good for that. GFS, however, is not exactly a simple technology t