On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:20:35PM -0700, John R Pierce (pie...@hogranch.com)
wrote:
> On 06/24/10 7:50 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> > Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater
> > than 5.2.1
> > as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module dev
I effectively have 1 drive /dev/sda (it's actually a hardware raid 10 array)
I have lots of free sapce. I want to resize my partitions (boot, home,
/) bigger.
Going to use Clonezilla to make an image of each partition and save it
on another box.
Then re-partition and format new bigger partitions
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> > The part I'm not certain about is the grub voodoo to get the system to
> boot to
> > the lvm with the restored root file system.
>
> Look at ./etc/lvm/backup/* in your dumped files, it will show you the VG,
> LV and ID. Create your new
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:50, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
>
> Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
> 5.2.1
> as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
> I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
>
http:
2010/6/25 Jobst Schmalenbach :
>
> Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
> 5.2.1
> as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
> I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
>
> Does anyone know of a reliable
W dniu 2010-06-25 04:50, Jobst Schmalenbach pisze:
> Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
> 5.2.1
> as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
> I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
>
> Does anyone k
On 06/24/10 7:50 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
> 5.2.1
> as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
> I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
>
so, basically,
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:14 +0900, Shinobu Takasugi wrote:
> Question 1
> Is there no problem from the view point of CentOS license?
>
> Question 2
> Should we donate to CentOS community?
>
> In FAQ http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=49,
> there is a description concerning d
>Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
>5.2.1
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Whether I like it or not I need to get a version of PHP that is greater than
5.2.1
as the latest SugarCRM version require this and as I am a module developer
I need to have one of the later versions of PHP on my machines.
Does anyone know of a reliable and good archive for PHP that provides
high
> I'll create a new lvm logical volume, create a file system, and restore from a
>level 0 dump taken from a lvm snapshot just before things broke.
Ok.
> The part I'm not certain about is the grub voodoo to get the system to boot to
> the lvm with the restored root file system.
Look at ./etc/lvm
Hi,
There's a RHEL5 system somewhere across the internet with a trashed root
file system. I have VPN access to the subnet where it lives. But the
system is not talking to the network.
The current plan is having an onsite person boot from a CentOS Live CD, copy
a small script to configure networ
Hello,
I've sent this mail when I didn't subscribe this mailing list.
Now I subscribe and I sent again.
I'm sorry to bother you.
Our company make and sell some measurement system controlled by PC.
We use Red Hat Enterprise Linux on the PC currently.
We are thinking CentOS is another option for u
On 06/24/2010 05:24 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working through Sander Van Vugt's "Beginning the Linux
> Command Line" (Apress), just for fun. Right now I'm just trying out all
> the examples in chapter 5, dedicated to managing partitions and logical
> volumes. After some wor
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:07 -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:11 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:11 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:02 PM, David Mansfield wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 09:25 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:02 AM, David Mansfield
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi All:
> >> > error: Failed build dependencies:
>
>On another list I'm told there is a newer HP PSP version
>that comes with an installer so all this may be moot.
Brandon,
Check the itrc forum, the PSP Developer participated in a
thread with myself and another user and cleared up a good
chunk of info wrt the psp.
Not only does the new installer
At Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:16:52 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:16:43AM -0400, John Kennedy wrote:
>
> > Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
> > RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as they will
> >
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 16:10 +, Brandon Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, JohnS wrote:
> What's the purpose of this? Is there an rpm that triggers
> something
> after this step? I'm just curious about it and would like to
> try it but
> I
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:49 -0400, Cliff wrote:
> Why would u install psp with out a proliant??
---
You don't get my point.
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:16:43AM -0400, John Kennedy wrote:
> Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
> RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as they will
> go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when they have 4.8
>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:47 PM, JohnS wrote:
> What's the purpose of this? Is there an rpm that triggers something
> after this step? I'm just curious about it and would like to try it but
> I have no Proliant to test on.
Sorry, you are right this is a part of the document I should explain s
Why would u install psp with out a proliant??
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:47 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 23:45 -0400, Brandon Wood wrote:
>
>> If you have feedback or questions please let me know,
> ---
> 3) Build the kernel config
>
> [r...@server ~]# cd /usr/src
Hi,
I'm currently working through Sander Van Vugt's "Beginning the Linux
Command Line" (Apress), just for fun. Right now I'm just trying out all
the examples in chapter 5, dedicated to managing partitions and logical
volumes. After some work with fdisk (which I normally use), the book
introduc
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> John Kennedy wrote:
>> Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In
>> the RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as
> If you can find a copy of the 4.7 iso you can upgrade from that.
These older ISO i
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, John Kennedy wrote:
> For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
> 4.7.
* nod *
> In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save
> the (perceived) headaches of upgrading. That is not an
> option in this case. Are there any
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 23:45 -0400, Brandon Wood wrote:
> If you have feedback or questions please let me know,
---
3) Build the kernel config
[r...@server ~]# cd /usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-194.3.1.el5-x86_64
[r...@server 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5-x86_64]# make oldconfig && make
prepare
---
What's th
John Kennedy wrote:
> Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In
> the RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as
> they will go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when
> they have 4.8 certified...
> I just do as I am told...
Only going to 4.7 because the required app is not certified for 4.8 (In the
RHEL world which is what we are basing this on). 4.7 is as high as they will
go. I know I will be doing this again in a month's time when they have 4.8
certified...
I just do as I am told...To an extent...
Thanks,
John
On
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Alex Still wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
On some servers this behavior returned despite rsize being set to 32k,
I had to set it to 8k to get reasonnable throughput. So there's
definitly something fishy going
At Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:53:47 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello all,
> For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
> 4.7.
> In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save the (perceived)
> headaches of upgrading. That is not an option
Hello all,
For (system) certification purposes, we have to upgrade our 4.4 machines to
4.7.
In the past I usually have just reinstalled machines to save the (perceived)
headaches of upgrading. That is not an option in this case.
Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when upgrading? Is it even pos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Zyla
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 13:55
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to specify the default route?
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:57:13PM -0400, Rick
From: Matt
> Is there something like iotop in rpm form available for
> Centos 4.x?
The iotop homepage (http://guichaz.free.fr/iotop/) has rpms...
Older versions can be found here: http://guichaz.free.fr/iotop/files/
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
34 matches
Mail list logo
