> You must be spoiled by always using GUI tools that present a pick list - no
> one
> would ever type all that crap every time they want to access a file. And, you
> could just as well use underscores instead of spaces and get the same visual
> effect AND still permit natural 'break on whitespace
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 01:14 PM, Drew wrote:
>>> Barring that I've had good luck with Linksys over the years. We just
>>> recently installed a 48port gigabit switch in the office that set us
>>> back around $900. Equivalent Procurve was priced at around $3000.
>>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> For $3000 I c
Drew wrote:
>>> Samba can serve files with " to Linux clients. It's a Windows
>>> limitation not a Samba one.
>> Thanks. Well that's a bit sad really...
>
> I don't if it's so much "sad" as a design choice for NTFS. In
> Windows/NTFS one can put spaces in a filename so the " is used as a
> delimit
>> Barring that I've had good luck with Linksys over the years. We just
>> recently installed a 48port gigabit switch in the office that set us
>> back around $900. Equivalent Procurve was priced at around $3000.
>>
>
> ???
>
> For $3000 I can get PoE+, 48 port gigabit + two expansion slots (empty)
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:43 AM, Drew wrote:
>>> D-Link? :-D. I had to get D-Links when money was a bit tighter but now I
>>> have HP Procurve 9210al switches.
>>>
>>> /me stomps on Cisco crap.
>>
>> D-Link had always been decent to me so that's what I usually go for if
>> available. I've hear
On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 10:53 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/30/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> So cut appropriate corners to fit. Just not like Backblaze. Their's is
>> decidedly crap hobbled together.
>
> With the kind of budget I have to work with, things are already
> looking very rou
>> Samba can serve files with " to Linux clients. It's a Windows
>> limitation not a Samba one.
>
> Thanks. Well that's a bit sad really...
I don't if it's so much "sad" as a design choice for NTFS. In
Windows/NTFS one can put spaces in a filename so the " is used as a
delimiter of sorts on the co
>> D-Link? :-D. I had to get D-Links when money was a bit tighter but now I
>> have HP Procurve 9210al switches.
>>
>> /me stomps on Cisco crap.
>
> D-Link had always been decent to me so that's what I usually go for if
> available. I've heard people mentioned the HP ProCurves for many years
> as r
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:55 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> Googling the CVE # and the vendor will usually turn up the patched
> version or disposition quickly.
An easy way to nail down CVE verifications is via
http://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/
This url allows you to search and verify CVE issue
On 6/30/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
> So cut appropriate corners to fit. Just not like Backblaze. Their's is
> decidedly crap hobbled together.
With the kind of budget I have to work with, things are already
looking very rounded already.
>> I'm just thankful they paid for a Gigabit switch previo
Robert Heller wrote:
At Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:39:35 -1000 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
> there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
> fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do yo
At Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:39:35 -1000 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> # lvm pvs
> /dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
> Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
> PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
> /dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a- 232.72G
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> (a) account for the difference in the binaries, and
> (b) see if something else is different that I can make the same to get
> the mkfs.ext3 time down to 15 sec on both systems.
> Solving (a) should shed light on (b). Any ideas?
Look into prelinking (man prelink). A
On 06/29/10 6:17 PM, Craig White wrote:
> Similar says, not exactly and the hard drives, controller and RAID
> configuration differences would be the first place to look for your
> answer.
>
>
indeed, first place I'd look would be for things like battery backed
raid controllers with/without w
I ended up going ahead and letting the installer do whatever, then I
removed the logical volume. The howto
(http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/removelv.html) is not so helpful
about helping you figure out what you need to know. Unfortunately I
clobbered my history file & don't really know how I did it
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 18:07 -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Situation: two similar servers, both with CentOS 5.4 64-bit. Making
> an ext3 filesystem on one takes seconds, on the other minutes.
>
> Partition SizeServer 1 Server 2
>
> 1 GB 0.7 sec 0.3 sec
>
> 4
Situation: two similar servers, both with CentOS 5.4 64-bit. Making
an ext3 filesystem on one takes seconds, on the other minutes.
Partition SizeServer 1 Server 2
1 GB 0.7 sec 0.3 sec
4 GB 2.5 sec 1.2 sec
40 GB15 sec
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
>> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
>> there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
>> fixed
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:25 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
> wrote:
>
>> Define cheap. Like these...er...hmm...creative chums here?
>>
>> http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
>>
>> Or how about 78
On 06/29/2010 03:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> It's internal, but requires a formal response - or an application
> update. The test tool says:
>
> These are the reported vulnerabilities
>
> Apache Server 2.x Prior To 2.2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities Apache
> \'mod_proxy_ftp\' Wildcard Characters C
R605 is a power edge server model I think.The Perc6/i is a Dell rebranded raid
controller, it's actually an LSI in disguise. Try downloading the Megaraid
utilities from LSI and using them to see the status of the card.
Also, when you boot the R605, you should be able to get into the Perc's
firm
On 6/29/2010 4:37 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010, Brian Mathis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
>>> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
>>> there
On 06/29/2010 02:39 PM, Dave wrote:
> # lvm pvs
>/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
>Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
>PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
>/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a- 232.72G 0
>/dev/sdb1 V
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> I think there was just a thread 'bout this, and I didn't pay attention...
> and then I walked into our smallest server room to rebuild a server with
> CentOS... and that's what it is. The problem I'm having is this: there are
> two 1T SAS drives, raided,
# lvm pvs
/dev/hda: open failed: No medium found
Couldn't find device with uuid r5HNPO-l18V-XfJ7-9RXY-AaWC-a4YY-3oL5h7.
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda2 VolGroup01 lvm2 a- 232.72G 0
/dev/sdb1 VolGroup00 lvm2 a- 232.81G 32.00M
unknown device V
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010, Brian Mathis wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
>> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
>> there an official document about what known vulnerabili
I think there was just a thread 'bout this, and I didn't pay attention...
and then I walked into our smallest server room to rebuild a server with
CentOS... and that's what it is. The problem I'm having is this: there are
two 1T SAS drives, raided, via the controller. There's also a 750G SATA
drive
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
> there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
> fixed in the RHEL/CentOS upda
On 6/29/2010 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
> there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
> fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do yo
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
> apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
> there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
> fixed in the RHEL/CentOS upda
What's the correct response to a security scan that points out that
apache versions below 2.2.14 have multiple known vulnerabilities? Is
there an official document about what known vulnerabilities have been
fixed in the RHEL/CentOS updates or do you have to wade through the
changelog to try to
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> *shrug*
> "Custom partition", which is what I *always* do, both at work and at home,
> since, unlike WinBlow$, I *NEVER* want everything on the same
> partition
I've been bitten a few times with the partitioner programs.
My strategy now is to con
Dave wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller
> wrote:
>> At Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -1000 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> > So, am I stuck? It seems like my only option is to go ahead and add
>> > both disks, then try to remove one of the disks after completing the
>> > install
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:15:20 -1000 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
> > So, am I stuck? It seems like my only option is to go ahead and add both
> > disks, then try to remove one of the disks after completing the install. Is
> > there some sort
+1...from mePLUS the many others for their ongoing, Herculean CentOS
efforts..
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, didi wrote:
>
> > A nice little insight into CentOS :
> >
> > http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature
>
> Nice! T
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, didi wrote:
> A nice little insight into CentOS :
>
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100628#feature
Nice! Thanks for the link.
(And thanks to KB for his ongoing, Herculean CentOS efforts...)
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
_
Greetings,
On 6/29/10, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Monday 28 June 2010 21:32:21 Murali M wrote:
>> The billion dollar question among the computer users in India now!
>>
>>
>> * Has NRC-FOSS done its job in promoting FOSS in India since 2005 ???
>>
>> * If not, do we need such anorganization
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552127
>
> You can update spamassassin rules by running as root:
>
> sa-update
I have a simple cron script stuck in /etc/cron.daily that's useful for
getting notice of spamassassin rules updates:
This is a web hosting mailserver, so there are multiple domains being
passed through this email system.
I decided this new system would be Postfix and followed the Centos Wiki
to aid in the installation and setup.
It seems that Amavisd is throwing this error from time to time.
-
Subject: C
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
wrote:
> Define cheap. Like these...er...hmm...creative chums here?
>
> http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
>
> Or how about 7850USD for a 4U, 36 bay ( loaded with 12 x 1TB - not going
> full out :-(
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
> wrote:
>> gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
>> yet for a reason
>
> Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
> have a need for ACL on the storage, it is always go
sync wrote:
>
> I am trying to setup OpenLDAP on CentOS 5.3 i386 for a client of mine.
> everytime I try running 'service ldap start',
> I get the following in syslog:
>
> r...@xx ~: tailf /var/log/messages
> .slaptest: sql_select option missing
> slaptest: auxpropfunc error no mechanism av
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I tried both things. The bios update and the i810 driver and nothing
worked.
After the bios update the vesa driver seems a bit more stable, but still
not 100%.
And with the i810 driver it doesnt work at all.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:11:00PM +0800, sync wrote:
> dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org
> changetype: add
> objectClass: groupOfNames
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: posixGroup
> cn: admins
> gidNumber: 1001
> member: cn=admin,dc=X,dc=org
Shouldn't these members be membeUid and just be the local unix
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
wrote:
> gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
> yet for a reason
Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
have a need for ACL on the storage, it is always good to be aware of
any potential pitfal
Dear All,
Previously we have used
CentOS4.4 release with Supported Cluster Suite and DRBD 8.0.0
Active/passive (failover)
We have build the DRBD 8.0.0 Source in CentOS4.4 Setup
We have configured the DRBD Resource with default OS installed LVM
(/dev/mapper/vgroot-LogVol00 and /dev/mapper/vgroot
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
>> you have more than one host accessing the data...
>
> This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
> zfs -> iscsi to gluster unit e
Hi,all:
I'm working on populating an OpenLDAP server (Dapper) for pam
authentication. I'm having trouble import LDIFs for my groups. The
following is and example:
(this imports on CentOS 5.3 i386, openldap version is 2.3.43-3.el5 )
# org.X.admins
dn: cn=admins,dc=X,dc=org
changetype: add
obj
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dicker, Edwin wrote:
>
> This is an issue with the graphics, it gets initialized in the wrong way
> ( driver ) The installer does not recognize the correct video chip
> during install.
> If you boot the system in runlevel 3 and then change the driver to i810
> in
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Janez Kosmrlj
Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 13:59
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] centos 5.5 on optiplex 745
Hi,
we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q
chipset. The problem is, tha
Hi,guys:
I am trying to setup OpenLDAP on CentOS 5.3 i386 for a client of mine.
everytime I try running 'service ldap start',
I get the following in syslog:
r...@xx ~: tailf /var/log/messages
.slaptest: sql_select option missing
slaptest: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available
slapd
On Monday 28 June 2010 12:58:36 Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
> Hi,
> we have some old dell optiplex 745 machines which have the Intel 965q
> chipset. The problem is, that they freeze as soon as the system tries to
> start the X system. It happens even before any log is written. This happens
> almost every
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Eric B. wrote:
> I've got CentOS 5.3 installed as a Xen client installed. I've recently been
> trying to install TrueCrypt on the VM, but am having miserable troubles with
> the Fuse kernel module.
>
> To date, I've installed the following packages:
> yum install
On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
> raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
> you have more than one host accessing the data...
This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
zfs -> iscsi to gluster unit ext3 since gluster doesn't do zfs ->
On 06/28/10 7:53 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> The only problem is their HA is commercial only and costs more than
> the entire hardware budget I've got for this. Crucially, it relies on
> a failover/heartbeat kind of arrangement. According to some sources,
> the failover delay of a few seconds w
On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 01:23 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> The only problem is their HA is commercial only and costs more than
>>> the entire hardware budget I've got for this. Crucially, it relies on
>>> a failover/heartbeat kind of arrangement. Accord
57 matches
Mail list logo
