I was doing a upgrade of an existing machine from 5.4 to 5.5.
Everything else worked except for this rpm
filesystem-2.4.0-3.el5.x86_64
It seems that it's trying to unpack the file into the CentOS DVD mount point
> Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-2.4.0-3.el5.x86_64
> error: unpacking of arc
i think you'll need to re-read the man pages on prelink. specifically, the
-y or --md5 or --sha options. that is essentially what rpm -V does, it does
an "undo" of the prelink to verify the original binary file's hash; which
will be the same for the same version of software from the same package.
d
I read up on "prelink" as suggested; and used "ldd /sbin/mkfs.ext3" to
see what the dependencies (libraries) are.
There are 13 dependencies; file size is the same between servers but
md5sum's are different!
Most of these libraries have other libraries they call; I finally drilled down
to ld-2.5.s
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Jasen wrote:
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Frank Cox wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
> the printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things
Instead of unmounting the partition try using 'mount -o rw,remount ', I
dont use the live CD much, but unless you screwup the rw, remount, or the path
to the mounted partition it should either remount the partition properly or
error that you didnt point to the correct path. I have rarely ha
A bit more info about my system;
I edited /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire and commented out the
blacklist like so it looks like so;
#blacklist firewire-ohci
Running lspci returns;
10:0b.0 Firewire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB82AA2 IEEE-1394b Link
Layer Controller (rev 02)
lsmod | gr
Hi,
I'm trying to repair a remote system using the Live CD.
I have VPN access to the subnet where it lives.
An onsite person is booting from cd, and running a small script I
provided to tweak the default firewall rule set to allow incoming ssh,
and set a password for the centos user and start ssh
Hi list,
I'm running 2.6.18-164-15.1 xen kernel.
Any way to get firewire to work on it?
I've read plenty about needing the centosplus kernel but is that really
necessary?
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:02 PM, wrote:
> Frank, I'm not sure of the object of your part of the conversation, me, or
> the security team that I have to deal with. I'm also feeling as though
> we're talking past each other. They ran the scan. My manager handed the
> response handling of it to me.
On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/30/2010 4:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> companies/business units/administrators police themselves so you need
>>> metrics for someone else to test with. And even internally you need to
>>> document why the failure of any standard check
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Spiro Harvey wrote:
>> Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
>> > (a) account for the difference in the binaries, and
>> > (b) see if something else is different that I can make the same to get
>> > the mkfs.ext3 time down
On 6/30/2010 4:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> companies/business units/administrators police themselves so you need
>> metrics for someone else to test with. And even internally you need to
>> document why the failure of any standard check should be overlooked.
>
> No, the security people shoul
But the point is that the original poster is NOT the one running the
scan. And the results of the scan (complaining about
vulnerabilities based on version numbers) indicates that it is not a
true 'security' scan anyway. For (almost) every CVE issued, there
is a way to mitigate the risk that does
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 6/30/2010 4:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Frank, I'm not sure of the object of your part of the conversation, me,
>> or the security team that I have to deal with. I'm also feeling as though
>> we're talking past each other. They ran the scan. My manager handed the
>
On 6/30/2010 4:02 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Frank, I'm not sure of the object of your part of the conversation, me, or
> the security team that I have to deal with. I'm also feeling as though
> we're talking past each other. They ran the scan. My manager handed the
> response handling of it t
John Jasen wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
the printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things down a lot,
but it's "Sec
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
>>> the
>>> printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things down a lot,
>>> but
>>> it's "Secure".
>> The poin
Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
>> the
>> printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things down a lot,
>> but
>> it's "Secure".
>
> The point is that the security scan i
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
>> the
>> printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things down a lot,
>> but
>> it's "Secure".
>
>The point is that
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:14 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sorry, you lost me here. I turned off all access to the h/d/ramdisk on
> the
> printers, and left it off. This, of course, slows things down a lot,
> but
> it's "Secure".
The point is that the security scan is supposed to be verifying t
Jim Wildman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
>> What is the point of doing a security scan under conditions that are not
>> actually "live"?
>>
>> It sounds like moving the flammable materials out before a fire
>> inspection, then moving them right back in when the inspector leaves.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:54
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] Grub fails on dell optiplex 320
>
> After reading:
> *[1] http://forums.fedorafo
For most (large) organizations, security scans have NOTHING to do with
increasing security, and everything with being able to answer "Yes"
to a question like "Do you regularly scan for known defects?",
probably for a VISA type compliance check.
If you don't already know, you really don't want to k
Anyone know of a repository with uuid_fixer? Now that I've rebuilt this
thing, I need to recover the LVM that the raid comprises
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:13 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
>
>
> Hi,
>
> And here are the Release Notes for RHEL
Frank Cox wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I understand that. We had a scan a few months ago (and they're about to
>> do it again), and to satisfy it, I had to turn off the h/d/ramdisks in
>> our laser printers
>
> What is the point of doing a security sc
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:10 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I understand that. We had a scan a few months ago (and theyre about to
> do
> it again), and to satisfy it, I had to turn off the h/d/ramdisks in
> our
> laser printers
What is the point of doing a security scan under conditions tha
The above discussion of prelink gave me pause for thought...
I have a "suite" of programs that I install in their own directory,
along with their datafiles, under /opt.
Would it be a good idea to add that directory to /etc/prelink.conf?
What could go wrong?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:52 PM, wrote:
> I get an email from security, I see the article on slashdot, and other
> places, that Adobe's issued an update to acroread... but yum update
> AdobeReader_enu is still telling me there's no update. Has anyone seen it
> yet, in the repositories?
Nope. I
On 30/06/2010 17:47, cjzjm100 wrote:
> when i opened Devhelp,there was a segment err even i had reinstall it.
> How can i fix it?
>
I've just pushed an update to the centos mirrors for devhelp that should
fix this issue for you. Give it a few hours to be seen publicly. If your
problem persists af
I get an email from security, I see the article on slashdot, and other
places, that Adobe's issued an update to acroread... but yum update
AdobeReader_enu is still telling me there's no update. Has anyone seen it
yet, in the repositories?
mark
__
What's the deal with all of the new dependencies for xulrunner-devel in
the last update? I'm updating my servers and the update for
xulrunner-devel is forcing me to install 43 new packages! Is this a
packaging problem, or are all of those packages really needed?
For the moment, I've been removin
when i opened Devhelp,there was a segment err even i had reinstall it.
How can i fix it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 6/30/2010 11:02 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/30/10, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> One thing you can do on the cheap is set up nightly backups with backuppc.
>> It
>> can run on a machine that does something else in the daytime if necessary
>> and
>> its pooling and compression scheme will stor
Thanks, everyone. Making the single drive a RAID-0 was the answer. From
the boot, it was , and then follow what y'all were saying. As soon
as I did that, and had the controller software make it bootable, when I
got out and went into the CenOS install, everything was wonderful - I even
saw what had
On 6/30/10, Les Mikesell wrote:
> One thing you can do on the cheap is set up nightly backups with backuppc.
> It
> can run on a machine that does something else in the daytime if necessary
> and
> its pooling and compression scheme will store about 10x the history you
> would
> expect. You need
After reading:
*[1] http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=141178
*[2]
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=22187&;
forum=39
*[3]
http://wirelessness.wordpress.com/2007/02/07/installing-fedora-linux-on-a-dell-o
ptiplex-320/
*[4] http://lists.us.dell.com/
On 30/06/10 16:25, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> is there package list with version numbers available?
>
Not that I've seen, but you could just browse the source dir:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/6Server-beta2/source/SRPMS/
___
CentOS mailing
this sounds like the right solution, you can do this either form the firmware
or the megaraid command line tool MegaCli64 (MegaCli for non-64 bit systems)
On 2010-06-30, at 7:18 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/6/30 mark :
>> Jacob Bresciani wrote:
>>> R605 is a power edge server model I think.T
2010/6/30 Morten P.D. Stevens :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:49 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
>>
>> For those who might be inte
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:49 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
>
> For those who might be interested, RHEL 6b2 has just been announce
For those who might be interested, RHEL 6b2 has just been announced.
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta
Cheers,
B.J.
CentOS 5.5, Linux 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 x86_64 10:47:08 up 8 days, 14:45, 1
user, load average: 0.56, 0.55, 0.49
___
CentOS mailing list
C
2010/6/30 mark :
> Jacob Bresciani wrote:
>> R605 is a power edge server model I think.The Perc6/i is a Dell rebranded
>> raid controller, it's actually an LSI in disguise. Try downloading the
>> Megaraid utilities from LSI and using them to see the status of the card.
>
> Hmmm, I think I see the L
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:37 -0500:
>>
>>> Apache Server 2.x Prior To 2.2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities Apache
>>> \'mod_proxy_ftp\' Wildcard Characters Cross-Site Scripting.
>>
>> Remove that module from httpd.conf and try again. If it
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
> > In my world I have two parts of the file system, one containing OS and
> > apps that runs short-name standard and the other where the user data
> > files are contained that uses long names and sometimes unicode
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:36 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Clues for the poor? I want to put the system on the SATA drive, leaving
> the raid for data.
>
>mark
---
See the drive in the raid configurator? ^C-M
Configure the 750G drive as a Raid 0? Init the Scrubing?
The controler ot
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Drew wrote:
You must be spoiled by always using GUI tools that present a pick list -
no one
would ever type all that crap every time they want to access a file. And,
you
could just as well use u
On Jun 30, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Drew wrote:
>>> You must be spoiled by always using GUI tools that present a pick list - no
>>> one
>>> would ever type all that crap every time they want to access a file. And,
>>> you
>>> could just as well use underscores instead of spaces
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:37 -0500:
>
>> Apache Server 2.x Prior To 2.2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities Apache
>> \'mod_proxy_ftp\' Wildcard Characters Cross-Site Scripting.
>
> Remove that module from httpd.conf and try again. If it still gives that
> warni
Drew wrote:
>> You must be spoiled by always using GUI tools that present a pick list - no
>> one
>> would ever type all that crap every time they want to access a file. And,
>> you
>> could just as well use underscores instead of spaces and get the same visual
>> effect AND still permit natural
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> Sounds exactly like the mentality in Hong Kong too. I mean, even the
>> bigger companies with Asian managers have a similar mentality. The IT
>> department is always the under-budgeted, under-manned and publ
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:37 -0500:
> Apache Server 2.x Prior To 2.2.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities Apache
> \'mod_proxy_ftp\' Wildcard Characters Cross-Site Scripting.
Remove that module from httpd.conf and try again. If it still gives that
warning you've proven the tool is bra
Jacob Bresciani wrote:
> R605 is a power edge server model I think.The Perc6/i is a Dell rebranded
> raid controller, it's actually an LSI in disguise. Try downloading the
> Megaraid utilities from LSI and using them to see the status of the card.
Hmmm, I think I see the Linux/CentOS megaraid load
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Spiro Harvey wrote:
> Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> > (a) account for the difference in the binaries, and
> > (b) see if something else is different that I can make the same to get
> > the mkfs.ext3 time down to 15 sec on both systems.
> > Solving (a) should shed light on
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> Sounds exactly like the mentality in Hong Kong too. I mean, even the
> bigger companies with Asian managers have a similar mentality. The IT
> department is always the under-budgeted, under-manned and public enemy
> number one when cost-c
55 matches
Mail list logo
