Maybe the list doesn't accept attachments if that's what you have been sending.
Please try using something like pastebin.com and include the URL in your email.
On 7/10/10, mj wrote:
> My log seems not to be accepted by the list
>
>
> ___
> CentOS maili
On Friday 09 July 2010 21:37, listmail wrote:
> I'm trying to get lm_sensors to work on a Shuttle with an AMD K10.
> The version of lm_sensors in the main CentOS repo is 2.10.7, which is
> two years old now. Support for the K10 was added about a year ago.
>
> So, does anyone know if there are bina
>
> I think it is specific to RHEL/Centos. Server 2.x was broken by an update to
> RHEL 5.x and neither RHEL nor VMware have done anything to fix it. I don't
> think other supported distros were affected.
>
There is also some unfixed security issues with 2.x.
> I don't think anyone likes the we
>
> Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
> just version 2?
>
> I'm still using version 1.08, and it works fine, except that Win XP
> SP3 won't Hibernate or Stand-by due to an incompatibility with one of
> the VMWare drivers. I was using the VMWare save machine sta
Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>> I'm not talking about VMware Server 2.x because VMware has abandoned it,
>> although I use it on CentOS 5.5 with some workarounds.
>>
>
> Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
> just version
Hi All,
I'm trying to get lm_sensors to work on a Shuttle with an AMD K10. The version
of lm_sensors in the main CentOS repo is 2.10.7, which is two years old now.
Support for the K10 was added about a year ago.
So, does anyone know if there are binaries available for more recent versions
of lm_s
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
> I'm not talking about VMware Server 2.x because VMware has abandoned it,
> although I use it on CentOS 5.5 with some workarounds.
>
Can you expand on that? Did they abandon VMWare Server altogether, or
just version 2?
I'm still using v
On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>>> wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
>>>
Am 10.07.2010 01:59, schrieb mattias:
> How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu?
> I meen
> Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu
VMware is a company, not a specific product.
One (CentOS) may be supprted, the other (Ubuntu) not.
Alexander
On 07/10/2010 12:59 AM, mattias wrote:
> How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu?
> I meen
> Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu
>
>
I suppose that you mean VMware Workstation 7.1 / Player 3.1.
VMware officially supports their desktop products on RHEL 5.x, OpenSuSE,
Ubu
How can vmware run more stable on centos and not on ubuntu?
I meen
Usb works fine on centos but not on ubuntu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> And I'd still be interested (as in, genuinely curious, not skeptical) to
> hear what sorts of applications benefit from optimized kernels (HPC? I/O
> intense?) and what kind of performance increases one can get.
I'd be interested as well. I can see HPC applications potentially
benefiting but wh
My log seems not to be accepted by the list
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/09/2010 02:23 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 07:17 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> Afternoon,
>>
>> Sorry for being dense but I can seem to configure the repo for atrpms
>> correctly. I've tried a few things and none of them seem to work so
>> rather than embarrass myself in rega
On 07/09/2010 07:17 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>Afternoon,
>
> Sorry for being dense but I can seem to configure the repo for atrpms
> correctly. I've tried a few things and none of them seem to work so
> rather than embarrass myself in regard to yum repo configuration, can
> someone post the repo
On 07/09/2010 02:17 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>Afternoon,
>
> Sorry for being dense but I can seem to configure the repo for atrpms
>
Oops - that should be "can't" instead of can :)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
Afternoon,
Sorry for being dense but I can seem to configure the repo for atrpms
correctly. I've tried a few things and none of them seem to work so
rather than embarrass myself in regard to yum repo configuration, can
someone post the repo configuration?
TIA!
Jeff
On 7/9/2010 1:32 AM, Jeff Hefner wrote:
> I've still been keeping this one simmering back burner and trying to
> figure the workflow for getting a system up and running with minimal
> user interaction. I do realize the PXE agents don't have any concept
> of tagged vlans. The thought was more along
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 at 8:32am, Seth Bardash wrote
> My intent was to inform and hear from people that had similar issues and
> to learn what they might have done to work around them. Not to cause a
> debate on business practices, criticize Red Hat or inflame the Centos
> community.
I appreciate y
On 07/09/10 08:03, Agnello George wrote:
> i had a small query , whant is the difference between stickybit SUID
> and SGID , is there any proper site where i can get a clear
> understanding .
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Agnello D'souza
>
http://www.standalone-sysadmin.com/blog/2010/06/setting-unix-fi
On 7/8/2010 6:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/08/10 2:39 PM, Seth Bardash wrote:
>> To the Linux Community at Large:
>>
>> I reported to this list back in January, 2010 that the standard x86_64
>> kernel, when built from the src.rpm and modified for ...
>
> I don't understand how you think that
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>> wrote:
>>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
>>
>>> you are mixing two different sources for OO: some of your install
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Lars Hecking
>> wrote:
>>> echo 'exclude=openoffice.org-*'>> /etc/yum.conf
>>
>> Lars: Thank you! Lanny
>
> Lars' advice is if you want to use the OO.org provided rpms (it tel
At Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:30:06 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:40 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
> >> corresponding disabling of hardwar
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Lars Hecking
> wrote:
>> echo 'exclude=openoffice.org-*'>> /etc/yum.conf
>
> Lars: Thank you! Lanny
Lars' advice is if you want to use the OO.org provided rpms (it tells
yum to ignore the centos oo rpms, in particular it prevents yum fro
Here are my personal notes regarding these special perms :
Octal perm : 4000 (chmod +s ) SUID Other users execute this file as owner
of file
Octal perm: 2000 (chmod +g ) GUID Other users execute this as group of
the file/dir (It can be applyied to directories )
Ocatl perm: 1000Sticky bi
i had a small query , whant is the difference between stickybit SUID and
SGID , is there any proper site where i can get a clear understanding .
--
Regards
Agnello D'souza
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
>
>> you are mixing two different sources for OO: some of your installed
>> packages come from the
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Lars Hecking
wrote:
> echo 'exclude=openoffice.org-*' >> /etc/yum.conf
Lars: Thank you! Lanny
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
> you are mixing two different sources for OO: some of your installed
> packages come from the OO website, and you are trying to yum install the
> centos vers
echo 'exclude=openoffice.org-*' >> /etc/yum.conf
---
This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its
subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received
in error, please advise the sender and immediately dele
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I had a corrupted installation of OpenOffice.org 3.1.
>
> When I used "yum remove openoffice.org-core" the response was "package
> openoffice.org-core available but not installed", but then, when I
> used "yum install openoffice.org-core there was a long list of
> Transaction
On Friday 09 July 2010, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 at 8:16pm, Whit Blauvelt wrote
>
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:35:47PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> >> It has been stated many times and on many fora that Red Hat's bugzilla
> >> is not a mechanism for support. They ar
On Thursday 08 July 2010, Seth Bardash wrote:
> To the Linux Community at Large:
>
> I reported to this list back in January, 2010 that the standard x86_64
> kernel, when built from the src.rpm and modified for AMD K8 / K10
> Extensions would not build. I reported this here and to Red Hat via
> Bug
34 matches
Mail list logo
