Hi
I am getting the following errors when i try to use yum to install the
net-snmp paclages.
[r...@sc1 yum.repos.d]# yum install net-snmp
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
yummain.user_main(sy
On 7/14/10, William Warren wrote:
> ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
> been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
> linux system.
Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24
physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/14 William Warren:
>>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
>>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
>>> interfaces in the Kerne
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/7/14 William Warren :
>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
>> interfaces in the Kernel?
>
> can you really create hardware with huge n
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>
>> Well on the 2008 box you can have a share available by NFSv3 AND CIFS and on
>> the old Redhat boxes you might be able to mount the CIFS share since they
>> don't support NFSv3, though if
2010/7/14 William Warren :
> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
> interfaces in the Kernel?
can you really create hardware with huge number or real ethernet controllers?
--
Eero
_
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> Well on the 2008 box you can have a share available by NFSv3 AND CIFS and on
> the old Redhat boxes you might be able to mount the CIFS share since they
> don't support NFSv3, though if they don't support NFSv3 I have my doubts they
> suppo
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 07:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
>> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
>> clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but
On 07/13/2010 07:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
> clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance
> issues were discovered with the setup.
I'
Giulio Troccoli wrote:
> I hope someone can help me because I have spent a week on this and
> still I can't make it to work.
>
> I have a CentOS 5.5 server and I am trying to set it up so that upon
> login the gnome default keyring is unlocked. I don't have a desktop
> as users will login using ss
On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>
>> It really is NOT a good idea to re-export a network-mounted file system.
>> Is there some reason you cannot simply migrate the data on the Windows
>> 2008 server to a new CentOS system?
Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
Greetings,
On 7/13/10, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My offer:
> "Every reply for this thread will get INR 11/- from me iff only I
> could remit my money in a single click to the thread posters and me."
oops!,
"Every reply"
Should have read; "Every verifiable reply"
As at the
Greetings,
I am atempting to build the above captioned environment.
I will contribute to this list my learnings.
I need income as I need to fund this project.
Threre are various revenue sharing models I have in mind. One size
just cant fit all after all.
(angel investors or whatever, anybody)
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> It really is NOT a good idea to re-export a network-mounted file system.
> Is there some reason you cannot simply migrate the data on the Windows
> 2008 server to a new CentOS system? Note that you can also install
> Samba on the new Cent
At Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:01:18 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
> done it before.
>
> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software.
Le 2010-07-02 09:35, Guy Boisvert a écrit :
>
> Yes i tried to boot with the other kernels, same result. I'll check
> device.map soon (i'm offsite now).
>
> Thanks.
>
Finally, i decided to download the latest CentOS version DVD and do an
upgrade. I booted from the DVD, typed "linux upgrad
On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
> done it before.
>
> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
> clients mount
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
> done it before.
>
> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
> clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 m
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter
wrote:
> re-exporting a nfs mount with the kernel nfs server works for me.
Did you need to do anything special to get it to work? I am mounting
an NFS3 share and exporting that same filesystem as NFS2. These are
the types of errors I get:
re-exporting a nfs mount with the kernel nfs server works for me.
On 07/13/2010 04:01 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
> done it before.
>
> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
> server end is a Windows 2
I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has
done it before.
On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the
server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The
clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance
iss
I hope someone can help me because I have spent a week on this and still I
can't make it to work.
I have a CentOS 5.5 server and I am trying to set it up so that upon login the
gnome default keyring is unlocked. I don't have a desktop as users will login
using ssh only.
I have search the forum
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:14 AM, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
> I could not find any reference if the version of apache compiled for centos
> 5.x has support for more than 256 clients in apache's maxclients.
> If that is not the case how can I recompile the package with such support?
> Regards.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
