On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> We cannot tell until you check the vendor:device ID pair. It's a one-liner:
>
> for BUSID in $(/sbin/lspci | awk '{ IGNORECASE=1 } /net/ { print $1
> }'); do /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -m; /sbin/lspci -s $BUSID -n; done
>
> Then you can find out i
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:52 AM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
>>
>> I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
>> What advices I can get from you list?
>
> Nothing. All RH certificate holders are sworn to secrecy about the
> co
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 21:05 -0600, Brian Marshall wrote:
> So, when LDAP is down I can clearly see that nscd is caching passwd
> but not shadow.
---
""if getent shadow as root returns a shadow file with passwords, then
the PAM unix module can do authentication without using libpam-ldap""
So tha
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Have you looked at these CentOS wiki articles?
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Lapt
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:52 AM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
>
> I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
> What advices I can get from you list?
Nothing. All RH certificate holders are sworn to secrecy about the
content but not the format.
When I did it, there were three parts. MC
Hi All,
I have a post on the forums about this. I'm hoping maybe you guys can help me
track down what I'm doing wrong.
I am trying to get nscd to cache my LDAP user data. You know, for when the LDAP
server goes down. The problem I am having is not related to the "bind_policy
soft" issue that
I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
What advices
I can get from you list?
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> Have you looked at these CentOS wiki articles?
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/WpaSupplicant
>
That would have been too easy
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark wrote:
> I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an
> Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to
> my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't
> working) - any suggestions?
Have you looke
> [r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0 essid hrfamnet-101
> [r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0 enc XX [not really...]
> [r...@marktop mark]# iwconfig wlan0
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"hrfamnet-101"
> Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Tx-Power=0 dBm
> RTS t
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 05:19 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these
>>> systems, that they don't support NFSv3?
>>
>> It's a combination of
I have an Everex laptop (ick, but it was super cheap) that has an
Atheros wireless NIC in it, but I can't seem to get it to connect to
my wireless in-home LAN. Here's what I've done so far (that isn't
working) - any suggestions?
[r...@marktop mark]# lspci | grep Ether
00:12.0 Ethernet controller:
for 5.3.2 follow the instruction on
http://blog.famillecollet.com/pages/Config-en
I did a fair amount of research before I decided to go
with something providing a "more recent" version of PHP
and a lot of people are raving about this one.
Jobst
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:46PM +0300, To
On 07/13/2010 05:19 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these
>> systems, that they don't support NFSv3?
>
> It's a combination of some very old (RH2.1) systems and a rigid
> certification proc
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:17 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> * chuckle *
>
> The other thing might be to use that device you hold beside
> the ear and the mouth, and let the magic voices ask you for
> your chassis' Service tag or Express Service Code -- the
> voices know all sorts of information a
On 07/14/2010 01:34 PM, Todd Denniston wrote:
>
> Did your test program actually USE the 100 megs of ram?
> Because of "lazy allocation" or "optimistic memory allocation"*** as done by
> the kernel,
"over-commit" is the term you were looking for.
> the memory
> is not actually consumed until use
On 07/13/2010 05:51 PM, William Warren wrote:
>I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
> interfaces in the Kernel?
Most of the limits on the number of any device come from the major/minor
numbers o
Flaherty, Patrick wrote, On 07/14/2010 03:49 PM:
> I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
> buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
> kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
>
> (Roughly) The test was:
> * Turn swap
On 07/14/2010 12:49 PM, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
>
> I did some testing a while back, and my results showed that the -/+
> buffers line seemed to be the *Minimum* amount of ram available if the
> kernel purged it's buffers/cache. Sometimes more is available.
That can be the case if your kernel is
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>> I found one BIOS entry, "Virtualization technology"; it was initially
>> disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that
>> it
>> was still enabled la
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> continues to issue them while it remains in support,
>> particularly for the PowerEdge series
>
> This is a brand-new R310, received from Dell and installed this week.
> Which doesn't mean it's for sure at the latest BIOS level of course.
* chuckle
On Wed, July 14, 2010 15:08, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>> The flags from /proc/cpuinfo after this reboot where I checked the
>> virtualization setting in the bios are:
>>
>> flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic mtrr cmov pat clflush acpi
>> mmx
>>
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:57, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>>> That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be
>>> fully powered off for the entry to be effectively changed -
>>> some BIOSes evidently are flakey about it.
>>
>> Now *there's* somethi
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> The flags from /proc/cpuinfo after this reboot where I checked the
> virtualization setting in the bios are:
>
> flags : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 apic mtrr cmov pat clflush acpi mmx
> fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida pni est s
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be
>> fully powered off for the entry to be effectively changed -
>> some BIOSes evidently are flakey about it.
>
> Now *there's* something I wouldn't have thought of trying on my own.
>
> Oka
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Keith Keller
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 10:41 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] free
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:15:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > The man
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:20:10PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
>> they're not explicit as I stated but perhaps it just states as VT-D or
>> something that you may overlooked it.
>
> VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) is virtual
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>> I found one BIOS entry, "Virtualization technology"; it was initially
>> disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that
>> it
>> was still enabled la
Am 14.07.2010 20:12, schrieb Torintino T:
>
> Thanks for your info,
> but it's for CentOS 5, i need please for CentOS 4.
>
> Thanks
IUS Community provides 5.2.13 for CentOS 4.
http://wiki.iuscommunity.org/Doc/ClientUsageGuide#Common_Examples_for_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_4
Alexander
___
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:20:10PM -0500, Victor Padro wrote:
> they're not explicit as I stated but perhaps it just states as VT-D or
> something that you may overlooked it.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) is virtualization
for devices. With this it's possible for a guest OS to
> That's the entry. But reports are some systems need to be fully powered off
> for the entry to be effectively changed - some BIOSes evidently are flakey
> about it.
>
+1
Totally agree, forgot that...
--
Linux User #452368
http://twitter.com/vpadro
"Everything that irritates us about others
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:12 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
> On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:09, Brian Mathis wrote:
>
>> Are you checking the stats from inside the dom0 or a domU? What's the
>> output of 'uname -a'?
>
> In dom0; I haven't gone ahead creating domUs yet, until I'm sure I've got
> the do
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:47:00PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I found one BIOS entry, "Virtualization technology"; it was initially
> disabled, but I enabled it before I installed CENTOS, and verified that it
> was still enabled later (I reported enabling it in my original message).
> I'll
On Wed, July 14, 2010 14:09, Brian Mathis wrote:
> Are you checking the stats from inside the dom0 or a domU? What's the
> output of 'uname -a'?
In dom0; I haven't gone ahead creating domUs yet, until I'm sure I've got
the dom0 right.
[local...@prcapp00 ~]$ uname -a
Linux prcapp00.pinerivercap
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:06 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:07, Victor Padro wrote:
>
>> I own a Xeon X3430 & X3440 and both have vmx extensions so the X3450,
>> please recheck your BIOS config.
>> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=42929
>
> The Intel page certainly say
On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:07, Victor Padro wrote:
> I own a Xeon X3430 & X3440 and both have vmx extensions so the X3450,
> please recheck your BIOS config.
> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=42929
The Intel page certainly says the X3450 has vt-x and vt-d.
This system is a Dell Poweredge R31
On Wed, July 14, 2010 13:03, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
>> Xen
>> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
>> support server, so it runs a few
On Wed, July 14, 2010 12:55, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dominik Zyla
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>>> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
>>> Xen
>>> and have the full virtualization po
On Wed, July 14, 2010 12:47, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:32:12 -0500
> "David Dyer-Bennet" wrote:
>
>> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run
>> Xen
>> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
>> support server,
On 07/14/2010 10:30 AM, JohnS wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>
>> I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
>> card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
>> for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on th
Thanks for your info,
but it's for CentOS 5, i need please for CentOS 4.
Thanks
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:00:25 +0100
> From: athma...@gmail.com
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 on CentOS 4
>
> On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
> >
> > How can i upgrade from PH
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
>> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
>> support server, so it runs a few
On 07/14/2010 07:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
>>
>> How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> See http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PHP_5.1_To_5.2
>
Sorry, i thought about CentOS 5,
for CentOS 4 try Utter Ramblings re
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
> support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
> playing with thing
On 07/14/2010 06:48 PM, Torintino T wrote:
>
> How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
>
> Thanks
>
See http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PHP_5.1_To_5.2
--
Athmane Madjoudj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dominik Zyla wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
>> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
>> support server, so it
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> X3450
Shutdown the machine pull the power cord (s) completly. Let it sit a
while plug her back up and they should show now.
John
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:32:12PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
> support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
> playing wi
How can i upgrade from PHP 5.1.6 to PHP 5.2.9 on CentOS 4.
Thanks
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969__
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:32:12 -0500
"David Dyer-Bennet" wrote:
> I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
> and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
> support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
> playing with
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen
and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development
support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for
playing with things; putting the "playing with things" functions into
virtual servers
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
> card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
> for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I had 'issues' with
> bonding and VMs tho
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> > Filed some bug reports, and it was evident from the response that very, very
> > few Linux users ever go> 4 eth's on a system. Thus the lack of properly
> > debugged IPv6 support for that then. Fortunately I don't (yet) need IPv6
On 07/14/2010 08:17 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
>
>
>> Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
>> before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
>> with the number of interrupt
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
> before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
> with the number of interrupts needed to *PROPERLY* service all of those
> interfaces
Start with a 4 port PCI ethercard
http://www.cyberresearch.com/store/industrial-computers-rugged-pcs/industrial-computer-accessories-pc-peripherals/bus-adapters-expansion-chassis/bus-adapters-expansion-chassis-pci/PRO_3212_8873.2.htm
Expand a PCIex1 slot into several PCI slots, claiming 13 PCI slo
- "Brian T. Brunner" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limi
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 7/14/10, William Warren
> wrote:
>> ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
>> been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
>> linux system.
> Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup
- "Brian T. Brunner" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limi
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
>
> 2010/7/14 William Warren
> :
> >
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
> GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
>
> Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"?
>
> Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions.
Still in the beginning
On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Jens Neu wrote:
> > I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
>
> there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
> Besides, I'm talking about a drop of >150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
> when cracking the 2.2T size. This
On Tuesday 13 July 2010, Jozsi Avadkan wrote:
> Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the
> GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default]
That is not possible (for reasonable values of possible...). No such operating
system exists today.
/Peter
> Or this solution is
>> I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
>
> there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
> Besides, I'm talking about a drop of >150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
> when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
> that
Jens Neu writes:
> > I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
>
> there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
> Besides, I'm talking about a drop of >150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
> when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the e
Sorry, if I was not clear: I was just throwing ideas because I will
have soon to face a similar need.
I just wanted to explore if you could avoid using the gnome-keyring at all.
I was not pretending to give you a direct solution for your pb.
> Subversion is already set up correctly to use the keyr
> I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of >150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
that matter
2010/7/14 Jens Neu :
> Dear all,
>
> unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
> LUNs >2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
> Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs >2.2T and
> goes back to normal performance when u
Dear all,
unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
LUNs >2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs >2.2T and
goes back to normal performance when using a LUN <2T with "normal",
> > Just to let you know, I use the keyring to store passwords
> for a Subversion repository. The first time, after logging
> in, I use Subversion I am asked for the password to unlock
> the keyring. Then everything goes fine, i.e. I'm not ask for
> the Subversion password.
>
> Which version of Sub
> Just to let you know, I use the keyring to store passwords for a Subversion
> repository. The first time, after logging in, I use Subversion I am asked for
> the password to unlock the keyring. Then everything goes fine, i.e. I'm not
> ask for the Subversion password.
Which version of Subvers
>
Linedata Limited
Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA
Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03
-Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael Klinosky
> Sent: 14 July 2010 00:1
Hi,
Did you try to disable the mirror selection and specify one single repo?
-Jens
- Originalnachricht -
Von: Jatin Davey [jasho...@cisco.com]
Gesendet: 14.07.2010 11:03 ZE5B
An: centos@centos.org
Betreff: [CentOS] Running yum shows errors
Hi
I am getting the following errors when
73 matches
Mail list logo
