On 08/12/2010 06:46 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
> alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate
> streams in sequence that generate 5 or 6 log files but i dont know in
> advance the names of these logs.
If "the thing" is generating log files, then it's not using "standard
out". Perha
Warren Young wrote:
>
> The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case
> behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If
> it is a problem for your application, you need a different design.
It's a bad idea in the general case. If you have scheduled
I was just shown the solution to my problem, using the "sfdisk" program
instead of the "fdisk" or "parted" programs.Apparently "parted" could
not work because the drive is not really SCSI, and the "fdisk" program is to
"incorrect" and was overwriting a portion of the disk. however, "sfdisk"
t
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Warren Young
>> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd
>>
>> On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, J
On Thursday 12 August 2010 17:56, Dan Yamins wrote:
> I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on.
I suggest you try Parted Magic: http://partedmagic.com/
It doesn't do anything you can't do from the command line, but it's much
easier to use.
--
Yves Bellefeuille
"Au Belle
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos
instead, you should have used parted(8) or similar to expand the
> partition, then used resize2fs(8) to expand the file system on this
> partition to its new size.
>
>
So I'm trying parted on a new, clean volume created from the snapshot,
attached to /dev/sdm As I explained before, I can't do
$ p
On 8/12/2010 4:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill
>> for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and
>> fussy server. All the others should just call ntpdate or ms
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:25 PM, David Véjar
wrote:
> cuak
>
?
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre
> de John R Pierce
> Enviado el: jueves, 12 de agosto de 2010 18:22
> Para: CentOS mailing list
> Asunto: Re: [CentOS] Prob
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/12/10 2:56 PM, Dan Yamins wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on.
> >
> > Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive
> >
> > Before running fdisk, I can mount t
cuak
David Véjar
Soporte y Redes
Ferretería Santiago
Soluciones de Abastecimiento
Lira 919 Santiago, Chile
Fono: (56 2) 731 3824
www.ferreteriasantiago.cl
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre
de John R Pierce
Enviado
On 08/12/10 2:56 PM, Dan Yamins wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on.
>
> Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive
>
> Before running fdisk, I can mount the volume find:
>
> $ mount /dev/sdo1 /home
>
> ... and the volume is m
On 08/12/10 2:51 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> Only one server on a given LAN should be running ntpd. It's overkill
> for every machine to keep themselves synced with such a complex and
> fussy server. All the others should just call ntpdate or msntp every
> hour or so as a cron job to keep their
Hi:
I have an NFS volume that I'm trying to resize a partition on.
Something about the fdisk process is corrupting something on the drive
Before running fdisk, I can mount the volume find:
$ mount /dev/sdo1 /home
... and the volume is mounted fine.
And,
$ e2fsck -f /dev/sdo1
/dev/sdo1: clean,
On 8/12/2010 3:43 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> Okay, I only have one timeserver,
I meant that your on-site time server should be relying on only one
other outside time server, one stratum up.
> but the ntp clients cowardly refuse to use
> less than 3.
Only one server on a given LAN should be run
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Warren Young
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:41
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd
>
> On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> > [r..
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Whit Blauvelt
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:31
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
>
On 8/12/2010 5:07 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
> [r...@devserver21 ~]# cat /etc/ntp.conf | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$
> restrict default nomodify notrap noquery
> restrict 127.0.0.1
> server 192.168.1.67
> server 192.168.1.66
> server 192.168.1.65
Some HOWTOs tell you that more time servers is better, o
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Don Krause wrote:
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html
That's an excellent little program. It can take some mucking about to find
the invocation that will save a particular file or set of files, but it
often can get the job done. It's
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 17:22
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: [CentOS] Ext3 undelete
>
> I was fooled by a hard link trying to clean up disk space.
>
> How can I undelete many files? (time is of the essence as I
I guess I can re
Google is you friend..
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/howto/undelete_ext3.html
Good luck!
--
Don Krause
Head Systems Geek,
Waver of Deceased Chickens.
Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc.
P.O. Box 608
Loma Linda, California 92354
909.79
I was fooled by a hard link trying to clean up disk space.
How can I undelete many files? (time is of the essence as I cannot unmount the
partition)
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyero
Rsync works fine for this, keeping group and user
Regards
2010/8/12, Robert Heller :
> At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:49 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Why not just do
>> >
>> > `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd
>> > of=somethin
>> >
>> >
>> > eg
>>
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:46:49 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> > Why not just do
> >
> > `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd
> > of=somethin
> >
> >
> > eg
> >
> > find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out
> >
> > You don't need tar for anything.
>
>
> Fedora 13 does save the guest on shutdown so I would expect this will be
> supported in RHEL6/CentOS 6 too. But when do you actually power down a
> RHEL/CentOS server? And if you did, wouldn't you have migrated the
> guests to another box already?
>
mainly it is an issue for a quick reboot of th
On 08/12/10 10:35 AM, Drew wrote:
> Not with the Intel Pro 1000's. The PCIe versions require a x4 slot in
> the dual or quad configuration. Can't speak to the PCI-X version as I
> don't have any in my inventory.
yeah, a single PCI-E 'lane' (eg, x1) is only about twice as fast as a
PCI 32 bit
>>> Sorry to hijack this thread, but it could be relevant.
>>> As matter of interest, do these cards offer lower throughput than 4x
>>> single 1GB cards?
> If you should use them in a PCI slot yes, not if you use them in a PCI-X
> or PCI-e slot (although you could saturate a PCI-e x1 with 4 gbit po
On 8/12/2010 8:46 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
>> Why not just do
>>
>> `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd
>> of=somethin
>>
>>
>> eg
>>
>> find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out
>>
>> You don't need tar for anything.
>
>
> alas the thing that generates the output
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
John Doe wrote:
> From: sync
> > I try to use that version but it does not work ...
> > Fatal : Module fglrx not found ..
>
> Did you check if the module is present somewhere?
Hi,
I installed ATI in Debian dozens of times. Just tried the same proces
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Benjamin Franz
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware
> issue?
>
> On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I don't mean to incite debate or something, just
Hi all,
Is anyone using oprofile?
I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
it is opreport, or just me.
In case it is something just plain daft I am doing, here is how it goes:
opcontrol --reset
opcontrol --setup --no-vmlinux
opcontrol --start
... now I run my
On 08/12/2010 05:01 PM, Ramon Nieto wrote:
> When this kernel update be released for CentOS 4?
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0606.html
>
I'm working on trying to get it out asap.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cento
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Nick wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Nick
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] problems with yum_priorities on CentOS5/RHEL5
>
> On 10/08/10 17:52, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> 1. yum check-updates and yum update do *not* warn you of an impending
>>>unresolved dependency caused by
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] preupgrade
>
> On 08/12/2010 03:22 PM, Charles Campbell wrote:
>> * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13
>
> you have the wrong list. try the Fedora lists!
Hi Chip.
There's
When this kernel update be released for CentOS 4?
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0606.html
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 08/12/2010 05:37 PM, Joe Pruett wrote:
[snip]
> the one thing that hasn't been addressed yet by kvm scripts is that a
> shutdown/reboot of the host won't do a save/restore of the guests like
> xen can do. for that reason i still use xen for production systems and
> only use kvm for testing rando
as i'm reviewing the courseware for the rhel (centos) course
i'm teaching next week, i'm going to ask the occasional question,
possibly technical, possibly more policy.
first one involves the choice for virtualization. the course has a
short section involving virt using xen but everything i've
On 08/12/2010 03:22 PM, Charles Campbell wrote:
> * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13
you have the wrong list. try the Fedora lists!
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello!
Just thought I'd present this problem for comment/help/hints:
* want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13
* I have a 64-bit system with Vista as a host o/s, running VMWare, and
FC11 as a client o/s
* cloned my FC11 as a backup
* ran preupgrade, got expected problem with 200MB /boot, but p
On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:55:29 am Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
> no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
> when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That
> thing happened for y
> Why not just do
>
> `the thing that generates standard out here` | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd
> of=somethin
>
>
> eg
>
> find . | ssh -q 192.168.122.2 dd of=find.out
>
> You don't need tar for anything.
alas the thing that generates the output creates 5 or 6 seperate
streams in sequence that gene
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Denniston
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:07
> Jason Pyeron wrote, On 08/12/2010 08:01 AM:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Simon Billis
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36
> >>
> >> Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:
> >>
> >
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:18:31AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> program | bzip2 | ssh -q remote-host 'bunzip2 | remote-program'
If you're gonna put a compression tool in the pipeline then I recommend
you ensure ssh's own on-the-wire compression is turned off 'cos otherwise
you're potentially was
Robert Heller wrote, On 08/12/2010 09:18 AM:
> At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:05:25 -0700 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If
>>> you
>>> want to collect it to a remote file, you can
>> As matter of interest, do these cards offer lower throughput than 4x
>> single 1GB cards?
> Depends mostly on if you are using PCI/PCI-X vs PCI-express. At high bit
> rates you can saturate the old PCI bus. A single gigabit port can pretty
> much saturate a 32-bit PCI bus at 33MHz.
>
> PCI-expr
> On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
>>>
Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with
CentOS 5.x
>>> I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Int
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:05:25 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If
> > you
> > want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat>
> > path_to_file'. Just
On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
>
>> On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
>>
>>> Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x
>> I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:11:21 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard
> out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without
> ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to
> create t
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:55:29 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
> experience and a little curiosity.
>
> Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
> no admin was available to manage it, the
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x?
>>
>
> I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards.
> They work fine.
>
> --
>
Jason Pyeron wrote, On 08/12/2010 08:01 AM:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis
>> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36
>> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd
>>
>
On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you
> want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat>
> path_to_file'. Just be sure to quote the redirection so it happens on the
> remote side.
>
>
At
We have several Quads in use, Myricom & Intel. Bot work well, the
Myricoms are cheaper.
On 08/12/2010 02:56 PM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x?
>
>
> Thanks,
___
CentOS maili
On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x?
>
I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards.
They work fine.
--
Benjamin Franz
___
Hello,
Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x?
Thanks,
--
Daniel Bruno
http://danielbruno.eti.br
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
> experience and a little curiosity.
>
> Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
> no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard
> out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without
> ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to
> create the archive as the i dont know what the contents of
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:14
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd
>
> Hi,
>
> > > Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-1
Hi,
> > Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:
> >
> > > We have a local time server and all of our machines are
> > pointed at it
> > > for the time.
> > >
> > > How can the clock drift by a day and a half?
> >
/SNIP
> > It is unlikely that the machine in question drifted forward
> > in time
Hi,
> > Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:
> >
> > > We have a local time server and all of our machines are
> > pointed at it
> > > for the time.
> > >
> > > How can the clock drift by a day and a half?
> > >
> > > [r...@devserver21 ~]# date
> > > Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010
> > > [r...@
Hi
I have a process that creates 'some data' and outputs this to standard
out and i want to shift this data over ssh to a remote box without
ever writing anything locally. I have been experimenting with tar to
create the archive as the i dont know what the contents of 'some data'
might be so i jus
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Simon Billis
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:36
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Date drift and ntpd
>
> Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:
>
> > We
Jason Pyeron sent a missive on 2010-08-12:
> We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it
> for the time.
>
> How can the clock drift by a day and a half?
>
> [r...@devserver21 ~]# date
> Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010
> [r...@devserver21 ~]# rdate -s 192.168.1.67
> [r...@
We have a local time server and all of our machines are pointed at it for the
time.
How can the clock drift by a day and a half?
[r...@devserver21 ~]# date
Fri Aug 13 14:43:29 EDT 2010
[r...@devserver21 ~]# rdate -s 192.168.1.67
[r...@devserver21 ~]# date
Thu Aug 12 07:02:39 EDT 2010
[r...@devser
From: Fajar Priyanto
> Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
> no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
> when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That
> thing happened for years and it was fine ^^
> Recently,
From: sync
> I try to use that version but it does not work ...
> Fatal : Module fglrx not found ..
Did you check if the module is present somewhere?
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
2010/8/12 Fajar Priyanto :
> Hi guys,
> I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
> experience and a little curiosity.
>
> Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
> no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
> when the off
Hi,
ext3 is very reliable, i never had such issues (fsck after a power
failure, yes... but no data loss). so i whould say its a hardware issue.
Greetings
On 08/12/2010 10:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
> experience and a
Hi guys,
I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share
experience and a little curiosity.
Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due
no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off
when the office closed, and auto power on again in t
Il giorno 11/ago/2010, alle ore 20.31, Simone Caldana ha scritto:
>
> I am collecting port 67 traffic on the dhcp server since this afternoon. I
> hope to be able to find out more.
further testing revealed that dhclient really asks for the wrong ip (but always
sends the client-identifier), and
Am 12.08.10 09:06, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> 2010/8/12 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator :
>> Hi,
>>
>> recently I had to instal a new raid storage system for our central
>> fileserver. It is connected by iscsi (1Gbit) and the fielsystems mounted
>> are 400GB and 1TB and ext3. curretly about 400 GB ar
2010/8/12 Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator :
> Hi,
>
> recently I had to instal a new raid storage system for our central
> fileserver. It is connected by iscsi (1Gbit) and the fielsystems mounted
> are 400GB and 1TB and ext3. curretly about 400 GB are used by 1.5 Mio files.
>
> I turned quota on and
73 matches
Mail list logo
