On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:34:30 +0800
sync wrote:
> I solved it by myself .
>
> I tried to try " yum install kernel kernel-header kernel-devel "
> command to install that packages
> and then reinstall the ATI graph driver again . This time the
> screen works well ..
>
> Haaha.
>
ATI
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:20:42 +0800
sync wrote:
> Thanks for your advice .
>
> I refered to the ATI driver installation doc and found the following
> message :
>
> Note: If a Linux 2.6.11 or newer kernel was built with
> CONFIG_AGP enabled, the kernel AGP frontend is required to load
> the fglr
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:20 AM, sync wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/13 Przemysław Pawełczyk
>
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
>> John Doe wrote:
>>
>> > From: sync
>> > > I try to use that version but it does not work ...
>> > > Fatal : Module fglrx not found ..
>> >
>> > Did you check if
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 11:07 +0800, Tang Jianwei wrote:
> what should I do to fix those problems?
---
Try & try again & don't build it as root& ask on the linux-ha
LIST...
Full CentOS/RH 5.5 + epel repo should build it. No EL6 packages are
needed. But if you try to build the EL6 version one
2010/8/13 Przemysław Pawełczyk
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
> John Doe wrote:
>
> > From: sync
> > > I try to use that version but it does not work ...
> > > Fatal : Module fglrx not found ..
> >
> > Did you check if the module is present somewhere?
>
> Hi,
>
> I installed ATI
Hi guys
I got the errors like this while compiling cluster glue:
./.libs/libplumb.so: undefined reference to `uuid_parse'
./.libs/libplumb.so: undefined reference to `uuid_generate'
./.libs/libplumb.so: undefined reference to `uuid_copy'
./.libs/libplumb.so: undefined reference to `uuid_is_n
> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
> / 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
> x64.
>
(snip)
>
> So, I'm wondering, is it possible (and safe) to upgrade the existing
On 8/12/2010 9:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> ntpd always tries to move the clock fractional seconds at a time
msntp does that, too, if you give the -a flag. (You have to give either
-a or -r for it to change the system time at all.)
ntpdate also does this, as long as the delta is less than half
SOLVED: On the original topic, the problem seems to have gone away
with the latest kernel:
marichter 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10 19:05:06 EDT 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
centos-release-5-5.el5.centos.x86_64
Thanks to all who may be held responsible. :-)
Mark
___
On Friday 13 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote:
> Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Is anyone using oprofile?
> >>
> >> I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
> >> it is opreport, or just me.
> >
> >
Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 12 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is anyone using oprofile?
>>
>> I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
>> it is opreport, or just me.
>>
>
> I've tried the steps you outline below and it works for
On Thursday 12 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone using oprofile?
>
> I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
> it is opreport, or just me.
I've tried the steps you outline below and it works for me (updated C5.5 as of
10m ago). My only guess
Charles Campbell wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just thought I'd present this problem for comment/help/hints:
>
> * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13
First, this is the CentOS list - you might want to post to the redhat
mailing list, or the fedora-specific list.
That being said, I've had to upgrade
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 09:47 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/13/2010 4:06 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> > On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Clients should never be 'balky' if you have a stable clock source -
> perhaps with the exception of some virtual machine situations or
> seriously ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/08/2010 23:06, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>> The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case
>>> behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for
On 8/13/2010 4:06 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>>> The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case
>>> behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If
>>> it is a problem for your applicatio
On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case
>> behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If
>> it is a problem for your application, you need a different design.
>
> It's a bad
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 08:28 -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:57:22AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> > And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to do this (given it is a one
> > off)
>
> Or fetchmail plus procmail to get it to the proper place.
>
> Whit
>
On Aug 13, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
> / 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
> x64.
>
> Our hardware
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:57:22AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to do this (given it is a one
> off)
Or fetchmail plus procmail to get it to the proper place.
Whit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:57:22AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to do this (given it is a one
> off) so long as the email service your system is going to provide will
> be storing in whatever the local user storage that fetchmail will be
> dumping into... or
Hi,
Firstly, I would recommend you spend a bit of time and workout RAID -
what it means and what it does.
On 08/13/2010 08:50 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
> / 750G
>
> really pop3 box? Usually pop3 stores mail on local machine.
>
> on imap system imapsync is really good tool to do this.
>
> maybe there is some tools available: http://www.athensfbc.com/imap_tools/
>
> br,
>
You are confusing protocol with client
And yes I'd suggest fetchmail scripted to
2010/8/13 Jussi Hirvi :
> I need to transfer a client's email inbox from another mail server to
> our mail server (Centos 5). This is needed once only (or maybe a couple
> of times).
>
> What is the best command-line tool? Fetchmail?
>
> I did this once before, with another tool, but have forgotten
I need to transfer a client's email inbox from another mail server to
our mail server (Centos 5). This is needed once only (or maybe a couple
of times).
What is the best command-line tool? Fetchmail?
I did this once before, with another tool, but have forgotten.
- Jussi
--
Jussi Hirvi * Gree
On 13.8.2010 09:45, John Doe wrote:
> From: Rudi Ahlers
>
>> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
>> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
>> / 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
>> x64.
>> Our hardwar
From: Rudi Ahlers
> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
> / 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
> x64.
> Our hardware vendors simply always say no, so we never
Il giorno 12/ago/2010, alle ore 10.51, Simone Caldana ha scritto:
> Il giorno 11/ago/2010, alle ore 20.31, Simone Caldana ha scritto:
>>
>> I am collecting port 67 traffic on the dhcp server since this afternoon. I
>> hope to be able to find out more.
>
> further testing revealed that dhclient
2010/8/13 Rudi Ahlers :
> On 8/13/10, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> How about installing new raid 10 on same machine and just migrating
>> data using rsync ?
>> after some rsync cycles, just switching to new raid 10 storage.
>>
>> --
>> Eero
>> ___
>
>
>
>
On 8/13/10, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> How about installing new raid 10 on same machine and just migrating
> data using rsync ?
> after some rsync cycles, just switching to new raid 10 storage.
>
> --
> Eero
> ___
What do you I do with the exsting data
2010/8/13 Rudi Ahlers :
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
> upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
> / 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
> x64.
>
> Our hardware vendors simply always say no
Hi all,
Can anyone please tell me, from experience, if it's possible to
upgrade the hard drives in a RAID 10 system from 250GB HDD's to 500GB
/ 750GB HDD's, while the server is running? The server runs CentOS 5.5
x64.
Our hardware vendors simply always say no, so we never actually tried
doing thi
32 matches
Mail list logo
