On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
> Crystal clear!
> thank yo..!!
>
> Though another Q if possible..
>
> i've done the following:
>
> yum install kernel-pae
>
> vim /etc/grub.conf
> #outputs the following:
>
> # grub.conf generated by anaconda
> #
> # Note that you do no
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:16 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>>
>> What about doing all with dd ... If you have the second disk installed in
>> the same machine you can do "dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb" ort you can use
>> clonezilla is a l
At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:16 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> What about doing all with dd ... If you have the second disk installed in
> the same machine you can do "dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb" ort you can use
> clonezilla is a live cd .
dd only works IFF (!) the new drive is exactly the
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>>Is there a document with instructions for this?
>>I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
>>so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>>
>>I was thinking of copying the old root partition
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>Is there a document with instructions for this?
>I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
>so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
>I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
> sudo cp -a -P /*
What about doing all with dd ... If you have the second disk installed in
the same machine you can do "dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb" ort you can use
clonezilla is a live cd .
Gabe
On 9/14/10 8:12 AM, "Timothy Murphy" wrote:
>
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd w
At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:13:53 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> >> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Is there a document
Rob Del Vecchio wrote:
>> yum check-update does not report that there is a more recent openssh
>> available. Odd.
>
> Clear your yum cache? Since you used yum to update the package in the
> first place, yum may have stored that "I already downloaded this" data
> somewhere.
I agree - yum clean a
> yum check-update does not report that there is a more recent openssh
> available. Odd.
Clear your yum cache? Since you used yum to update the package in the first
place, yum may have stored that "I already downloaded this" data somewhere.
FYI, I am not experienced in yum specifically (debian
On Tue, September 14, 2010 02:30, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> So, I'm quite keen on finding out what is it that is causing
>> the breakage for you
>
> Karanbir, in the middle of the thread from the archive:
>
> James B. Byrne at Mon Sep 13 12:59:25 EDT 20
On Mon, September 13, 2010 19:23, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>>> This matter is somewhat urgent.
>>
>> Totally! broken sshd could cause non-trivial issues for a lot of
>> people.
>>
>> However, I can confirm that:
>>
>> * prov-kickstart-c5.5-i386 : sshd
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is there a document with instructions for this?
>> > I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in m
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerrard Geldenhuis
> Sent: 14 September 2010 16:28
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] cron breaking when enabling ldap
>
> Hi
> When I enable a box to do authentication using L
Hi
When I enable a box to do authentication using LDAP it breaks cron for users
like jboss.
I get the following in /var/log/secure
Sep 14 15:25:01 exoipatest01 crond[7214]: pam_access(crond:account): access
denied for user `jboss' from `cron'
I have the following in /etc/ldap.conf
nss_initgrou
Hi!
Trying to set up NUT on Centos 5 to monitor a CyberPower 1500AVR UPS.
There seem to be many documents, all of which seem to be not fully consistent
with each other, and most of them aren't up to date.
I'm guessing I should be using udev rather than hal, but I'm somewhat
stumped on how to fig
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:49:28 -0400
JohnS wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:19 +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:01:13 +0200
> > Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> >
> > > Even so, most machines today performs multiple tasks, so 3GB limit per
> > > process isn't really that big an
Crystal clear!
thank yo..!!
Though another Q if possible..
i've done the following:
yum install kernel-pae
vim /etc/grub.conf
#outputs the following:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:19 +0200, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:01:13 +0200
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> > Even so, most machines today performs multiple tasks, so 3GB limit per
> > process isn't really that big an issue, unless you render graphics
> > with a mono-threaded appl
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:28 +0200, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have one application which gets some data from our database but
> to print just one result it connects many times to the database over WAN.
> Of course there are some performance related problems with this type of work
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:53:42AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:39:07 -0400 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > > At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:01:13 +0200
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Even so, most machines today performs multiple tasks, so 3GB limit per
> process isn't really that big an issue, unless you render graphics
> with a mono-threaded application.
Depends the domain :) We work in satellite images processing here
Thank so much!
i try your hint
I'll ggive you novice
Best regards
Ernatalo
Il 14/09/2010 15.39, m.r...@5-cent.us ha scritto:
> Theo Band wrote:
>> On 09/13/10 17:48, Ernatalo su Gmail wrote:
>>>i know that this is a good thing, but i've only 1 partition.
>>> /boot and /root are in the sam
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Laurent Wandrebeck
wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:45:50 +0300
> Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback..
>>
>> So if i set my VM to 8 GB, each proccess would use a max of 3 GB (even with
>> PAE installed and selected on boot)?
> PAE allows a 32 b
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:45:50 +0300
Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> Thanks for your feedback..
>
> So if i set my VM to 8 GB, each proccess would use a max of 3 GB (even with
> PAE installed and selected on boot)?
PAE allows a 32 bits host to see more than 4GB of ram. but each process
is still limite
At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:39:07 -0400 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there a document with instructions for this?
> > > I've had smartd
Thanks for your feedback..
So if i set my VM to 8 GB, each proccess would use a max of 3 GB (even with PAE
installed and selected on boot)?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:50:18 +0200
From: l.wandreb...@gmail.com
To: centos@centos.org
CC: r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos Virtua
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
> I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
>
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Could you offer a precise command for copying the system
>> from / to /mnt/hd , say?
>> Would one exclude /dev or /proc , for example?
>
> I've not updated this in years nor for a 2.6 kernel and
> grub, but the process is basicall
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Could you offer a precise command for copying the system
> from / to /mnt/hd , say?
> Would one exclude /dev or /proc , for example?
I've not updated this in years nor for a 2.6 kernel and
grub, but the process is basically unchanged:
http://w
Theo Band wrote:
> On 09/13/10 17:48, Ernatalo su Gmail wrote:
>> i know that this is a good thing, but i've only 1 partition.
>> /boot and /root are in the same partition that i convert from ext3 ti
>> ext4.
>> everything works fine until this morning. I "rebooted" the server many
>> time from
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Is there a document with instructions for this?
> > I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> > so I am installing a new drive
On 09/14/10 6:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> rsync -HPavxz --exclude /mnt /. /mnt/.
>
>
how does rsync handle links? not symlinks, but actual file links?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/13/10 17:48, Ernatalo su Gmail wrote:
> i know that this is a good thing, but i've only 1 partition.
> /boot and /root are in the same partition that i convert from ext3 ti ext4.
> everything works fine until this morning. I "rebooted" the server many
> time from the "convertion"
> but i
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 9/14/10 7:54 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>
Is there a document with instructions for this?
I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>>
>>> I generally use d
On 09/14/10 5:54 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>>> Is there a document with instructions for this?
>>> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
>>> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>> I generally use dump ... | restore ... to
At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:38 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
> >> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> >> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> >> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
> > I generally us
On 9/14/10 7:54 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>>> Is there a document with instructions for this?
>>> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
>>> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
>> I generally use dump ... | restore ... to
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:12 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
> I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
>
kalinix wrote:
>> I think the command rsync is a better approach for this task. It has
>> much more features, for example, you can exclude certain files.
> In offline mode is even better
How exactly?
This is my server, so if I stopped it
I would not have access from any other machine.
--
Timot
At Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:12:46 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
> I was thinking of copying the old root partition
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>> I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
>> sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
> I think the command rsync is a better approach for this task. It has
> much more features, for example, you can exclude certain files.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Could you offer a prec
John R Pierce wrote:
>> Is there a document with instructions for this?
>> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
>> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
> I generally use dump ... | restore ... to clone a complete e2fs/e3fs
> volume. it copies ev
Hi Guys,
I have a couple of servers which runs CentOS 5.5 and CentOS 5.4. We have
decided to buy a UPS and we choose Eaton EX RT 11 plus eaton network
management card minislot. I have read on the site of Eaton that they have
two applications which could gracefully shutdown my servers - LanSafe and
On 09/14/10 5:12 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is there a document with instructions for this?
> I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
> so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
>
> I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
> sudo cp -a -P
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:16 +0100, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
> > sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
> > (after mounting the prospective new root partition).
> > Then I'd have to modify the new /etc/fstab .
>
> Hi
>
> I th
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
> sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
> (after mounting the prospective new root partition).
> Then I'd have to modify the new /etc/fstab .
Hi
I think the command rsync is a better approach for this task. It has
much more f
Is there a document with instructions for this?
I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick,
so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old).
I was thinking of copying the old root partition with
sudo cp -a -P /* /mnt/hd
(after mounting the prospective new root
From: James B. Byrne
> Starting sshd: Auto configuration failed
> 6486:error:0E065068:configuration file routines:STR_COPY:variable
> has no value:conf_def.c:629:line 207
> [FAILED]
Maybe did you check line 207 of sshd_config...?
JD
___
Ce
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:01:52 +0100
Kevin Thorpe wrote:
> > Strange. 64 bits is here for years, 64 runs 32 bits code perfectly.
>
> Not always. 32 bit support is good but we had a program here which I
> couldn't get to work any way up.
Oh ? which one ? We've switched to 64 during C4.0 days, ne
> Strange. 64 bits is here for years, 64 runs 32 bits code perfectly.
Not always. 32 bit support is good but we had a program here which I
couldn't get to work any way up.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
50 matches
Mail list logo