> On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>
>>
>>> Testing the script, both via "/etc/init.d/Fast start" and "service Fast
>>> start" works, and it fully works for the implemented
>>> "start","stop","status" commands.
>>>
>>> "/etc/rc0.d/K10Fast stop" works as expected. (as does /etc/rc1
On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>
>> Testing the script, both via "/etc/init.d/Fast start" and "service Fast
>> start" works, and it fully works for the implemented "start","stop","status"
>> commands.
>>
>> "/etc/rc0.d/K10Fast stop" works as expected. (as does /etc/rc1,2,6 et
> Testing the script, both via "/etc/init.d/Fast start" and "service Fast
> start" works, and it fully works for the implemented "start","stop","status"
> commands.
>
> "/etc/rc0.d/K10Fast stop" works as expected. (as does /etc/rc1,2,6 etc..)
>
> The script contains full paths to everything.
>
>
Philip Amadeo Saeli wrote:
> Thank you all for the helpful and informative replies. However, I have
> some additional questions (interspersed below).
>
> For some background, the organization I'm doing this for is a
> significantly resource constrained, very small company, so I have been
> having
I got a strange problem with init.d scripts on a fully updated (as of today)
fresh install of 5.5 x64.
I've written a script, /etc/init.d/Fast that starts a fairly large and slow
commercial application, by calling that applications control binary to do the
actual work.
I "registered" the scrip
>> The linux-cluster mailing list is super friendly, has both developers
>> and consumers of the entire RHCS & associated packages - and CentOS
>> friendly :) I seriously recommend anyone looking to do any sort of work
>> with this toolchain should be on that list.
>
> Thanks, I'll surely make a vi
Thank you all for the helpful and informative replies. However, I have
some additional questions (interspersed below).
For some background, the organization I'm doing this for is a
significantly resource constrained, very small company, so I have been
having to take carefully measured steps in up
> The linux-cluster mailing list is super friendly, has both developers
> and consumers of the entire RHCS & associated packages - and CentOS
> friendly :) I seriously recommend anyone looking to do any sort of work
> with this toolchain should be on that list.
Thanks, I'll surely make a visit
Cost is per TB. Would kill me here when one user occupies 150TB just
themselves.
- Original Message -
| On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| >
| > I have a solution that is currently centered around commodity
| > storage bricks (Dell R510), flash PCI-E controllers, 1 or 10GbE (o
I guess I should send this to y...@lists.baseurl.org instead, not really
on-topic for centos.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Dave
> wrote:
> uname -a
> Linux 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Tue Oct 26 04:07:11 EDT 2010
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I thought -q meant 'no ou
On 11/9/2010 2:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
>> Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
>> your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
>
> I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
> redhat's site.
>
> My god, that's p
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 15:32 -0500, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> > Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
> > your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
>
> I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
> redhat's site.
>
On 11/09/2010 08:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> The documentation is very technichal, I'm ok with that, but it seems to miss
> some starting point. For instance, there's a part about the required number
> of journal to create and the size of those. But I cannot find suggested size
> or any thumb-rule
> Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
> your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
redhat's site.
My god, that's pretty much what I'm looking for... To the point tha
On 11/09/2010 01:57 PM, Barry Brimer wrote:
> Quoting R P Herrold:
>
>
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>
The[y] just announced customer only RHEL 5.6 beta notes:
bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
>>
>>> So is there a Centos 5.6
2010/11/9 Robert Moskowitz :
> My DNS server has been running Centos for some time.
>
> I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know).
>
> Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
> but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread
Quoting R P Herrold :
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> >> The[y] just announced customer only RHEL 5.6 beta notes:
> >>bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
>
> > So is there a Centos 5.6 beta with bind 9.7 or should I
> > switch to FC13/14? :)
>
> I inadvertently sent that under
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
>
> So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
Hi,
RHEL 5.6 Beta:
> - bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
> - PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces
That sounds great :)
Best r
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> The[y] just announced customer only RHEL 5.6 beta notes:
>> bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
> So is there a Centos 5.6 beta with bind 9.7 or should I
> switch to FC13/14? :)
I inadvertently sent that under a @centos.org email address -
tha
On 11/9/2010 12:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 12:14 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
>>> but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
>>>
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:14 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> > Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
> > but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
> > list recommends against running a DNSSEC
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:33:36PM -0600, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 12:14 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
> >> but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6
On 11/09/2010 12:14 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>> Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
>> but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
>> list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zo
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
> >
> > Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video
> > webcast.
> > Register now.
> >
> > If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least
For what it's worth...for those who have
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
> but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
> list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zone on anything less
> than 9.6 and you really should be
My DNS servers (master slave) already running on CentOS 5.5 both 64 and
I'm using Bind 9.7.2p2 (now is latest version), I never use rpm package
because is so old, I recomended to you for compile the latest version
for more secure and more capability.
About DNSSEC I don't have experience because I'
My DNS server has been running Centos for some time.
I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know).
Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND
list recommends against r
I've not looked at it in a few years, but I seem to recall that ash
was fairly close to the traditional Bourne syntax.
I don't know if it is helpful to your case, but if you have a
script that is bash-specific, it is a good idea to change the magic
line from
# !/bin/sh
to
# !/bin/bash
That
> KB, I think the OP is looking for a nice set of userland tools which
> was included in xServer
Pretty much.
Since we were about to purchase about 8 new xserve to build a new xSan on
top of an active raid 16 1 tb disk enclosure as our new production
environement, we are exploring other possibili
> On 11/9/10 2:53 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>>
>>> Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
>>> version for
>>> a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly
>>> large
>>> size.
>>
>> 12T, IIRC.
>> That's not exactly great IMO.
>> You get t
Hey,
recently I was asked, how mailman handles bounces and after digging
around I also noticed that the current version is 2.1.14 with a lot of
bug fixes.
So I'd like to ask if there is a (src)rpm out there with the recent
version working on centos 5.5.
Thanks and best regadrs . Götz
--
Hi,
every lvm command gives one line with:
/dev/cdrom: open failed: No medium found
I looked at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431901
and changed filter in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf to
filter = [ "r|/dev/cdrom|", "a/.*/" ]
then deleted cache /etc/lvm/cache/.cache
This seems to help, but a
On 11/9/10 2:53 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>
>> Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
>> version for
>> a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly large
>> size.
>
> 12T, IIRC.
> That's not exactly great IMO.
> You get that with a RAID
On 11/09/2010 12:40 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>> I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up the
>> fact that you can achieve the entire desired feature set just using the
>> components already included in CentOS-5.
> But there is no GFS for OSX, IIRC.
The last comme
Am 09.11.2010 14:57, schrieb Robert Heller:
> At Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:26:44 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> every lvm command gives one line with:
>> /dev/cdrom: open failed: No medium found
...
> Two questions:
>
> Is your CD-ROM drive an IDE drive (/dev/hd)?
I'm running C5 as a VMw
At Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:26:44 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> every lvm command gives one line with:
> /dev/cdrom: open failed: No medium found
>
> I looked at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431901
>
> and changed filter in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf to
> filter = [ "r|/dev
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> I tried this on four differents machines here. It's a computer
> training room, so there's plenty of ready Linux installs on a Ghost
> server.
> Flash works on any one of these machines with Fedora, openSUSE and
> Arch. So it's not the hardware.
> Fresh install of CentOS
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:11:58PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> but, then, I'm not sure sh on solaris is quite exactly the same as sh on
> aix.
Right. There's no uber-standard /bin/sh. Very very old Unix systems
had a /bin/sh that didn't even support functions. And let's not talk
about the di
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 at 9:36pm, Nicolas Ross wrote
> Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We
> need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock
> files across systems. Pretty much like xSan, but not on apple. xSan is
> really StorNext from
> On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>> Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion
>> of
>> your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
>>
>
> Good point Joshua,
>
> I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up th
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>> Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
>> your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
>>
>
> Good point Joshua,
>
> I was reading thi
On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
> your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
>
Good point Joshua,
I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up the
fact that y
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:47:06 +0100
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> I tried this on four differents machines here. It's a computer
> training room, so there's plenty of ready Linux installs on a Ghost
> server.
>
> Flash works on any one of these machines with Fedora, openSUSE and
> Arch. So it's not the ha
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>
> Fresh install of CentOS with RPMForge configured and flash-plugin
> installed : Flash fails everywhere. Same result with flash-plugin from
> the Adobe repo.
>
> Still more clueless than before :o)
It just works for me on x86_64 C
> On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>>
> Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
> version for
> a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly large
> size.
12T, IIRC.
That's not exactly great IMO.
You get that with a RAID10 over two p
45 matches
Mail list logo
