Hi All,
Can anyone with access to RHEL 6 tell me if the
official KVM supports USB ports under Windows
guests? (I would like to be able to operate
Logitech's universal remote.)
Many thanks,
-T
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
On 01/29/2011 09:32 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/29/11 5:05 AM, carlopmart wrote:
| It is very important that the virtual machine consumes the least
| resources
|possible (host has 5GB RAM and i need to run three virtual machines
|minimum,
|including this storage
On 01/30/2011 01:35 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/29/11 11:42 AM, carlopmart wrote:
All OS will be UNix based: linux, BSD or Solaris ...
Solaris is by design quite memory intensive, since on modern servers,
memory is cheap.
ZFS in particular is designed to use large amounts of memory to
Michael Klinosky wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:50 -0500:
I'm setting up a computer that will run 'CentOS 6 server'.
Sure about that? This is your first experience with CentOS/RHEL?
But, I can't find any reference to this chip.
I can't tell you either. I think the support for this is
It's not a good idea to have all these repo's enabled at the same time and
without protectbase or priorities. There's likely a conflict because of
this. And it makes debugging now more complex. Try yum clean metadata and
if that doesn't help try running with a higher debug level. Maybe an
At Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:50 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello.
I'm setting up a computer that will run 'CentOS 6 server'. The MB is an
Asus with a hw raid controller (Promise PDC-20276), which I want to use
in RAID-1 mode. I noted (from a MB website) that it also
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net wrote:
Hello.
I'm setting up a computer that will run 'CentOS 6 server'. The MB is an
Asus with a hw raid controller (Promise PDC-20276), which I want to use
in RAID-1 mode. I noted (from a MB website) that it also needs a driver
On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:50 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Many of the SATA (so-called) hardware raid controllers are not really
hardware raid controllers, they are 'fakeraid' and requires lots of
software RAID logic.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Kevin K kevi...@fidnet.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:50 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Many of the SATA (so-called) hardware raid controllers are not really
hardware raid
At Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:01:56 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Jan 30, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:33:50 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Many of the SATA (so-called) hardware raid controllers are not
Thanks.
I hadn't really looked in any of this for a few years since I used RAID to
combine 2 smaller hard drives into one larger volume. At work, I'm either just
a user of a remote server that uses netapp filers for storage, or am running
more disposable installs on lower end systems (with 1
Hello list members,
My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
But in the process of exploring, I installed a trial copy of RHEL-6 on
the new
At Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:37:19 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Hello list members,
My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I'm setting up a computer that will run 'CentOS 6 server'.
Sure about that? This is your first experience with CentOS/RHEL?
It'll run zoneminder (to create a dvr for video surveillance). I've been
using Cent5.3 (non-server) since it was released, and I used Fedora
before
On 1/30/11 1:37 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
Hello list members,
My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
But in the process of exploring, I
Hi there,
As you know, $HOME is generally located at /home/$username by default.
I would like to re-locate all users' $HOME directories to something like
/export/home/$username without having a hassle/trouble.
Initially, I've thought of just copying them to the new directory (under
This is not a CentOs issue or problem. This plain Jane UNIX. $HOME can
be anything you want or need it to be. Copy the user's home directory to
where you want and make the appropriate changes in the passwd file or
automount maps.
--
Thanks,
Gene Brandt SCSA
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA
Hi,
This is not a CentOs issue or problem. This plain Jane UNIX. $HOME can
be anything you want or need it to be. Copy the user's home directory to
where you want and make the appropriate changes in the passwd file or
automount maps.
Well, yes and no. In case of Debian/Ubuntu, we need to
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Chuck Munro chu...@seafoam.net wrote:
Hello list members,
My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
But
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
For various reasons which seemingly fail the necessary/sufficient
tests with the benefit of hindsight, I attempted to migrate a shell
machine which is the beach front from which I work (not a production
server) from CentOS
- Original Message -
| On 1/29/11 5:05 AM, carlopmart wrote:
|
| | It is very important that the virtual machine consumes the
| | least
| | resources
| | possible (host has 5GB RAM and i need to run three virtual
| | machines
| | minimum,
| | including this
Personally, I don't think that the OP really knows what they want,
or they want the best of all worlds without compromise.
I can't help but feel this is another classroom based scenario.
I mean 5GB on an actual host, seems kinda silly to me?
No real mention of what these hosts will actually
Hi All,
On one of my servers I have a personal account and root. I disable root for ssh
logins and run ssh on an alternative port. When 'scp'ing files I usually scp
them up, then ssh in 'su' root and move them to /var/www/html.
I can sftp I realize, but what group can I add my personal account
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Jason S-M
slackmoehrle.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
On one of my servers I have a personal account and root. I disable root for
ssh logins and run ssh on an alternative port. When 'scp'ing files I usually
scp them up, then ssh in 'su' root and move them
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:58:36AM +0900, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
Well, yes and no. In case of Debian/Ubuntu, we need to modify apparmor
settings (e.g., by changing etc/apparmor.d/tunables/home information)
to get it right apart from just copying them and changing passwd file.
I wondered if
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@terabit.org.uk wrote:
Hi there,
As you know, $HOME is generally located at /home/$username by default.
I would like to re-locate all users' $HOME directories to something like
/export/home/$username without having a hassle/trouble.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@terabit.org.uk wrote:
Hi there,
As you know, $HOME is generally located at /home/$username by default.
I would like to re-locate all users' $HOME directories to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi s.c...@terabit.org.uk wrote:
As you know, $HOME is generally located at /home/$username by default.
I would like to re-locate all users' $HOME directories to something like
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of cpol...@surewest.net
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
Sorin Srbu wrote:
snip
Anyway, I get a bad block
29 matches
Mail list logo
