[CentOS] Fan speed control on Supermicro X8DAL board with CentOS

Hello folks, I'm having a difficult time trying to figure out why the CPU cooling fans run at full speed on my Supermicro X8DAL-3 motherboard. There doesn't seem to be any variable speed (the fans are PWM compatible) ... they either idle at almost nothing, or suddenly burst into a high-pitche

Re: [CentOS] future version of bind for el5

2011/2/5 fakessh @ : > hello all the people > > I'd call http://people.redhat.com/ atkac ~ / official member of the team > redhat for news of future versions of bind 9.7 for el5 rpm.pbone.net shows ftp://mirror.switch.ch/pool/1/mirror/scientificlinux/5rolling/i386/SL/bind97-9.7.0-6.P2.el5.i386.rpm

[CentOS] future version of bind for el5

hello all the people I'd call http://people.redhat.com/ atkac ~ / official member of the team redhat for news of future versions of bind 9.7 for el5 sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 signature.asc Descript

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 15:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > EPEL has a *nasty* habit of upgrading packages and not leaving the old > one behind for reversion or regression testing. .. All the more reason to introduce a 'local' repository where packages can accumulate and gracefully grow ol

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 17:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> I just found a nasty bug. Hold off on using that. > > Share it a bz #? > > > John EPEL has a *nasty* habit of upgrading packages and not leaving the old one behind for reversion or re

Re: [CentOS] x25 line xterm

On 2/4/2011 5:57 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011, Hal Davison wrote: >> Noted that xterm by default uses 24 lines >> per window. >> >> I have reviewed /etc/termcap looking for a >> specific entry for xterm that I can edit >> to change the ln#24 to ln#25 for our >> application. >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Was, Re: CentOS 6.0 alpha testers, is features (actually syslogd)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Pearson said the following on 05/02/11 17:44: > The default rsyslog config should do that same as the default config > settings for syslog Confirmed. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Even the smallest candle burns brighter in the da

Re: [CentOS] Was, Re: CentOS 6.0 alpha testers, is features (actually syslogd)

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Ok, here's one: I'm having a problem with syslogd - due to the upper > heirarchy, we've started logging our (*yuck*) Windows servers to our > centralized logging server, and so far, the other admin hasn't managed to > make WinBlows less than maximum verbosity. I know I

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 17:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > I just found a nasty bug. Hold off on using that. Share it a bz #? John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LiveCD System recovery - Mounting LVM?

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:06 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > [root@SeVi ~]# vgrename /dev/VolGroup00 /dev/SeViGroup00 > Volume group "VolGroup00" still has active LVs > Internal error: Volume Group SeViGroup00 was not unlocked > Device '/dev/sda2' has been left open. > Device '/dev/sda2'

Re: [CentOS] Was, Re: CentOS 6.0 alpha testers, is features (actually syslogd)

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:49 AM, wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Matt wrote: >>> I am excited about CentOS 6.x though.  Aren't there supposed to be >>> some neat new features etc for virtualization and cloud computing? >> >> this could be the start of a dangerously long