Hi Folks,
fresh CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
One USB-printer connected (HP Business Inkjet 1200)
Printing from localhost:631 (Testpage) works.
But no from any application.
>From OO only the message: printer-problem - no more.
Second printer is from far (Cupsd) in the network.
Works well.
But what's about
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Timothy Kesten
> Subject: [CentOS] Printer-Problems
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> fresh CentOS 5.5 x86_64.
> One USB-printer connected (HP Business Inkjet 1200)
> Printing from localhost:631 (Testpage) works.
> But no from any applic
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 10:45:05 schrieb Keith Roberts:
> Which printer is set as default?
The local USB-printer
> What types of apps are you tring to print from - JAVA?
Yes - java
but also kmail - get error message:
client-error-not-authorized
Timothy
__
The whole error message from kmail was:
A print error occured. error message received from system:
cupsdoprint -P 'HP_Business_Inkjet_1200' -j 'file:///' -H 'server:631' -U
'admin' -o 'copies=1 multiple-document-handling=seperate_documents-collated-
copies orientation-request=3' '/tmp/kde-admin/
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Timothy Kesten
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems
>
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 10:45:05 schrieb Keith Roberts:
>
>> Which printer is set as default?
> The local USB-printer
>
>> What types of apps are you tri
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Timothy Kesten wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Timothy Kesten
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Printer-Problems - addendum
>
> The whole error message from kmail was:
>
> A print error occured. error message received from system:
>
> cupsdoprint -P 'HP_Business_Inkjet_1200'
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 11:27:04 schrieb Keith Roberts:
> What desktop are you running - KDE?
jepp - KDE
Timothy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
My computer is "server-new"
I have a second computer in my network called "server".
There is cupsd running.
On "server-new" I have in /etc/cups/client.conf
a line
ServerName server
So I can use the printer on "server".
Next I have added the local printer.
But cupsdoprint use -H "server:631"
My computer is "server-new"
Here is the local printer
I have a second computer in my network called "server".
There is running cupsd and I can use this printer from "server-new"
(/etc/cups/client.conf -> ServerName server).
Added the local printer - doesn't work.
cupsdoprint use "server" as h
On 02/08/2011 05:54 PM, Drew wrote:
I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I
have spent 2 days googling with
no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru
an ipv6 ipsec tunnel?
AFAIK, No.
IPv4& IPv6 are different pr
Hi
i got two server webserver1 and webserver2 i want to rsync some data form
webserver1 to webserver2 using a user called syncuser
( syncuser is added to the group apache : adduser -G apache syncuser )
here is my command :
[root@web1 projects]# rsync -avzh /var/www/projects/beta-website1
sync
On 02/09/2011 05:53 AM, Agnello George wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> i got two server webserver1 and webserver2 i want to rsync some data
> form webserver1 to webserver2 using a user called syncuser
>
> ( syncuser is added to the group apache : adduser -G apache syncuser )
>
> here is my command :
>
> [
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Jason Brown
wrote:
> In our configuration, we are going to have our iSCSI targets and
> initiators all connected to the same layer 3 switch and isolate the
> iSCSI traffic on separate networks. Would it be beneficial to also set
> up multipath for this as well?
Most
Hi all,
Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible?
I've created PPTP VPN in the office.
Then from home, first I need to use company's official AT&T VPN.
Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client.
Got connected, but cannot ping the PPTP gateway, and half minute later
the PPTP got discon
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:43, Carlos S wrote:
> Thanks for the help.
You are welcome.
> Robert, you pointed out the mistakes correctly. Not sure why I used
> iptables-save command at first place...
Most likely because in ever other distro and web page that is the way to do
it. It's ju
Fajar Priyanto writes:
> Hi all,
> Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible?
> I've created PPTP VPN in the office.
> Then from home, first I need to use company's official AT&T VPN.
> Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client.
> Got connected, but cannot ping the PPTP gateway, and h
Dear mailing list members,
There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task.
There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache).
If one server will have became not ava
On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote:
Fajar Priyanto writes:
Hi all,
Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible?
I've created PPTP VPN in the office.
Then from home, first I need to use company's official AT&T VPN.
Then after connected, I fire up the PPTP VPN client.
Got connected, but cann
On 02/09/2011 07:50 AM, Denis Zaharov wrote:
> Dear mailing list members,
>
> There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task.
>
> There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
> The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
> using a MySQL), wiki and RT (al
Denis Zaharov wrote:
> Dear mailing list members,
>
> There was a branch about clusters, but I have a certain task.
>
> There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
> The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
> using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache).
> If o
The mkinitrd command worked out. Thanks a lot for your help. :)
- xinhuan
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Robert Heller
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
This may or may not be of interest to CentOS developers; if it is not
or if it is redundant of your efforts to keep atop of what's
happening, you have my apologies.
Whether it is joint or disjoint wrt to the upstream code is not known
at this point, but I have submitted a request for elucidation
On 10/02/11 02:52, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote:
>> Fajar Priyanto writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible?
>>> I've created PPTP VPN in the office.
>>> Then from home, first I need to use company's official AT&T VPN.
>>> Then after c
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 08:21:38 pm Jay Leafey wrote:
> Much as I love Linux, I'd still prefer to be running VMS on an x86
> desktop box!
1.) Get an OpenVMS hobbyist media kit and license for OpenVMS/VAX.
2.) Install simh from a third-party CentOS repository, or from source.
( simh.trai
On 02/09/2011 09:35 AM, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> On 10/02/11 02:52, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 09/02/2011 15:46, n...@nux.ro wrote:
>>> Fajar Priyanto writes:
>>>
Hi all,
Just wondering if VPN inside VPN is possible?
I've created PPTP VPN in the office.
Then from home, first I need
On 02/09/2011 12:01 PM, Nataraj wrote:
> I would also look at routing. When the second vpn comes up, it may be
> configured to alter the routing table which would then try to route the
> first vpn through the second and the second through the first.
That sounds mostly right. Many VPNs will take
On 2/9/2011 2:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> Another problem is that pptp is udp only and cannot be tunneled through
>> a firewall easily like openvpn or ipsec, so if there is any kind of nat
>> going on when you connect through the first vpn, it won't work because
>> you won't get your packets
Greetings,
On 2/9/11, Denis Zaharov wrote:
> Dear mailing list members,
>
> There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
> The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
> using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are using Apache).
> If one server will have became not available t
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote:
> > I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses.
> > Also I
> > have spent 2 days googling with
> > no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet
> > thru
> > an ipv6 ipsec tunnel?
> AFAIK, N
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
>
> I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the
> meeting here[1]:
>
> http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/ac
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 2/9/2011 2:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>>> Another problem is that pptp is udp only and cannot be tunneled through
>>> a firewall easily like openvpn or ipsec, so if there is any kind of nat
>>> going on when you connect through the fir
Hi
I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code.
Unable to find it over web.
Appreciate any pointers for that.
Thanks,
Sri
--
--
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 20:52, sri wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code.
> Unable to find it over web.
>
> Appreciate any pointers for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Sri
Hmmm...I place the following into firefox searchbox (google is my
search engine): "2.6.18-194.el5-PAE SRPM"
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 21:06 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hmmm...I place the following into firefox searchbox (google is my
> search engine): "2.6.18-194.el5-PAE SRPM"
>
> I seem to have lots of hits (maybe they're no good):
>
> This one looks pretty good and it is the first one on the list:
On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
> In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
> scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
>>
>> I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the
>> meeting
35 matches
Mail list logo
