On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Martin Hewitt wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: Martin Hewitt
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 Java Process Death
Hi Mark,
I've exhausted the Java avenues for debugging this issue, but, since
my last email, the process I pointed strace at has been killed, but
I'm afra
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've installed CentOS 5 on Hyper-V and finally got everything working.
>
> I would like to setup a template, but google is failing me. Everything I
> read does not seem very promising when it comes to templates support with
Hey there!
the newer plugin should work with latest Firefox , just configure the
path correctly and you are set ,or use a symlink.
check out this fine article
http://koolinus.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/enable-java-plugin-on-firefox-with-centos-or-rhel-64bit/
what is your uname -a ? , maybe you
Hi Brian T. & Robert,
Thanks for your input.
I did a uname -a on a selection of Centos 5.5 machines and found the
servers, netbooks and laptops were all a variety of 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5
and 2.6.19-194.32.1.el5-centos.plus. Only the VPS were different most
likely, as Robert suggested, because of
Hi Mark,
I've exhausted the Java avenues for debugging this issue, but, since
my last email, the process I pointed strace at has been killed, but
I'm afraid the rather raw format of the strace file is lost on me.
The last six lines of the ouput file are:
clone(child_stack=0x4202a250,
flags=CLONE_
On Friday, February 11, 2011 02:36 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
> I'm hoping CentOS-6 doesn't present me with the same problem. Because
> I'm not a registered RHEL user, I don't have the ability to submit a bug
> report at RedHat.
>
You don't have to be an RHEL user to file a bug report according to
s
At Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:25:24 + CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk
> normal service resumed, then I notices this:
>
> CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
>
> Kernel 2.6.35.4 on an
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:25 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Strange Kernel for Centos 5.5
>
> One of my VPS stopped working. After the da
One of my VPS stopped working. After the data centre replaced a disk
normal service resumed, then I notices this:
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.35.4 on an x86_64
I always thought Centos 5.x would always be on 2.6.18. Any thoughts?
_
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Eero Volotinen
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.5 + firefox 3.6 and 64bit javaplugin (1.6u23)
snip
> Looks like firefox is 32bit version, not 64bit version, but 32bit java
> 1.6.u23 still fails.
>
> about:plugins just
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:59:48PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
> > packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option.
>
> I would very much appreciate yo
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
> packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option.
I would very much appreciate your referral to a repo that has a current BIND.
__
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Peter Brady wrote:
> On 10/02/11 11:49 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes?
>
> I have it working. Have a very occasional problem with static
> addresses on Windoze machines but I suspect that this is a Windoze
> driver p
On 10/02/11 11:49 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes?
I have it working. Have a very occasional problem with static addresses
on Windoze machines but I suspect that this is a Windoze driver problem
than DHCP.
Cheers
-pete
___
On 02/10/2011 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
>> people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
>> likely places).
>>
>> We want our release
Hi all,
Few questions.
Does DHCP failover work with statically assigned nodes?
Seems like the failover statements only work in shared networks with
non bootp clients?
I'm assuming Centos 6 will have DHCP v4.2? Currently 5.5 ships with
v3.0.5b.
And will DHCP v4.X have easier failover imple
Hey, Martin,
Martin Hewitt wrote:
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful.
> Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount
> of free disk.
If you can do the code changes (and the try/catch is *supposed* to be in
there, according to java style),
Hey, Martin,
Martin Hewitt wrote:
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful.
> Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount
> of free disk.
If you can do the code changes (and the try/catch is *supposed* to be in
there, according to java style),
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
> people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
> likely places).
>
> We want our release to be the same source code where ever possible ..
Hi Mark,
Thanks, I didn't know about the strace command, so that's useful.
Fortunately, this is on a dedicated server, so there's a fair amount
of free disk.
I've also remembered that one server was previously running CentOS
5.4, so I'm rebuilding the mirror server with 5.4 to see if that made
a
Martin Hewitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running CentOS 5.5 Final, Java version "1.6.0_17" OpenJDK Runtime
> Environment (IcedTea6 1.7.5) (rhel-1.16.b17.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit
> Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) installed via Yum.
>
> We have a java application, packaged as a jar, running on
Hi all,
I'm running CentOS 5.5 Final, Java version "1.6.0_17" OpenJDK Runtime
Environment (IcedTea6 1.7.5) (rhel-1.16.b17.el5-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit
Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode) installed via Yum.
We have a java application, packaged as a jar, running on our servers
which, periodically,
Hello all,
In the process of building a new VM box to replace several individual
CentOS servers, I've had the "interesting" experience of running both
CentOS-5.5 and RHEL-6 (eval copy) as I build out the hardware based on a
Supermicro motherboard.
A couple of observations regarding RAID-6:
-
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl
> wrote:
> >> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
> >> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
> >
> > Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not her
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
>> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
>
> Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
> updated version of the package.
>
> This wasn't
> Looks like firefox is 32bit version, not 64bit version, but 32bit java
> 1.6.u23 still fails.
Where did you install Java from?
The Java browser plugin is not available in teh OpenJDK shipped with CentOS 5.5.
You need to install the JRE from Sun.
In this page:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaO
> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
updated version of the package.
This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of
c
2011/2/10 Lars Hecking :
> Eero Volotinen writes:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 & firefox 3.6?
>>
>> For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ?
>
> Check out these threads:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-November/101229.html
> http
Eero Volotinen writes:
> Hi List,
>
> Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 & firefox 3.6?
>
> For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ?
Check out these threads:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2010-November/101229.html
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/cent
Hi List,
Any success running 64bit javaplugin on centos 5.5 & firefox 3.6?
For me it always complains about wrong elfclass64 ?
thanks for any help..
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 2/9/2011 7:04 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On 2/9/11, Denis Zaharov wrote:
>> Dear mailing list members,
>>
>> There are two servers with CentOS 5.5 installed.
>> The servers are working with Zabbix (monitoring system for traffic,
>> using a MySQL), wiki and RT (all are usi
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 06:42:48 am Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
> the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is* in EPEL,
and CentOS users
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:42:48PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
> the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
Personally, I have no problem with it. Cross-community communication
over potentially shared pro
Hi everyone,
I've installed CentOS 5 on Hyper-V and finally got everything working.
I would like to setup a template, but google is failing me. Everything I read
does not seem very promising when it comes to templates support with MS
Hyper-V.
I was wondering if maybe someone here has succes
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:52 PM, sri wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to use 2.6.18-194.el5-PAE kernel source code.
> Unable to find it over web.
>
> Appreciate any pointers for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Sri
If you run "yum list", you get the list of all available packages,
installed or not. You should see that
On 02/09/2011 07:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:54 -0800, Drew wrote:
I have posted to the ipsec-devel list and haven't gotten any responses. Also I
have spent 2 days googling with
no results about the above setup. Is it even possible to tunnel ipv4 packet thru
an
Larry, could you please stop spamming this list with problems you see on
the SL list? Thanks. This package isn't even part of CentOS.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/10/2011 12:37 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 10/02/11 02:05, Larry Vaden wrote:
>> In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
>> scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm a little bit hazy on the deta
38 matches
Mail list logo
