On 02/26/11 9:46 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Octets
>
> Thanks for pointing-out my misunderstanding.
>
> I'll remember 2 octets are really 2 characters (IBM's bytes) = 2 digits,
> 4 octal numbers or 4 hexadecimal numbers.
>
4 octal (base 8) digits only represents 12 bits. byte oriented
comput
Octets
Thanks for pointing-out my misunderstanding.
I'll remember 2 octets are really 2 characters (IBM's bytes) = 2 digits,
4 octal numbers or 4 hexadecimal numbers.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
> That just confirms my experiences. I've had issues with onboard
>Realtek cards and linux. On one desktop the Realtek card would work
>until the box was restarted. You would have to hard power it off and
>back on for it to work again. That same box worked fine with Windows.
The old RTL8139 which
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:28 AM, compdoc wrote:
>> I see that there are many Realtek RTL8169S gigabit cards
>>going for a song on eBay.
>
>
> I've always liked and used Realtek cards, and I use the RTL8169S in my
> servers. However, the RTL8169S has one problem: overheating. If you buy any,
> mak
>> IPv6 has twice (8) segments compared to IPv4 however each segment
>> is 2 octets making IPv6 address space 4 times (128 bits) compared
>> to IPv4 (32 bits).
> Oct... means 8.
>
> Each segment of an IP6 segment can contain 4 hexadecimal digits.
> Hexadecimal means 0 to F.
>
> Are you sure 'octet
> Creating lots of dummy IP6 addresses to confuse hackers is not an ideal
> solution.
scanning ports on an IP vs scanning IPs. whatever.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2 hex digits is 1 octet (or byte).
On Feb 26, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:58 +, sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> IPv6 has twice (8) segments compared to IPv4 however each segment
>> is 2 octets making IPv6 address space 4 times (128 bits) compared
>>
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:58 +, sheraz...@yahoo.com wrote:
> IPv6 has twice (8) segments compared to IPv4 however each segment
> is 2 octets making IPv6 address space 4 times (128 bits) compared
> to IPv4 (32 bits).
Oct... means 8.
Each segment of an IP6 segment can contain 4 hexadecimal di
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:41 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/26/11 12:33 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
> > Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
> > So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
> > In a year or two.
>> Always learning wrote:
>> I always thought, mistakenly, IP6 was 6 segments, because it was IP6. IP4
>> had 4 segments. However IP6 is >actually IP version 6 and it has 8 segments.
I don't think I ever heard IP6, but always IPv6. Counting segments might not be
as meaningful. IPv6 has twice (
On 02/26/11 12:33 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
> Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
> So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
> In a year or two.
> Cough-cough.
when I first saw the spec for IPv6 I mistakenly tho
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:33 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> With IPV6, you don't need to run it on a different port.
> Just bind it to a different IP in the same prefix ;-)
> So, that port-8080 stuff will be gone pretty soon.
Very interesting point.
> In a year or two.
> Cough-cough.
That long
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:24 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/26/11 12:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Because : is sometimes used in an address to indicate the start of a
> > port number, example http://www.anyonejunk.com:1234, the IP6 address can
> > be enclosed within [ ] with the port num
Am 26.02.2011 um 21:24 schrieb John R Pierce:
> On 02/26/11 12:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> Because : is sometimes used in an address to indicate the start of a
>> port number, examplehttp://www.anyonejunk.com:1234, the IP6 address
>> can
>> be enclosed within [ ] with the port number remai
On 02/26/11 12:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> Because : is sometimes used in an address to indicate the start of a
> port number, examplehttp://www.anyonejunk.com:1234, the IP6 address can
> be enclosed within [ ] with the port number remaining outside the square
> brackets.
Thats, MUST be enclos
Today I received an allocation of IP6 addresses for some servers. I can
'play' with the last 2 of the 8 IP6 address segments.
I always thought, mistakenly, IP6 was 6 segments, because it was IP6.
IP4 had 4 segments. However IP6 is actually IP version 6 and it has 8
segments. The other interesting
> Thanks.
>I'm going to use it in Italy, so I guess heat is a problem ...
I also use the Intel nics (usually the PCI-e version) and they are a lot
more expensive, but they are an excellent card.
By the way, some of those cards on ebay show a heatsink, but don't rely on
the picture - make sure you
compdoc wrote:
> I've always liked and used Realtek cards, and I use the RTL8169S in my
> servers. However, the RTL8169S has one problem: overheating. If you buy
> any, make sure they include a heatsink. Those without a heatsink are prone
> to locking up if the temperatures inside your case get to
David Sommerseth wrote:
> You can probably find pretty decent Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 cards,
> which
> really has an incomparable quality. As you're talking about the WRT54GL,
> you
> don't need to think about 1Gbit cards. Which makes the PRO/100 cards
> optimal.
Thanks very much.
I wasn't s
> I see that there are many Realtek RTL8169S gigabit cards
>going for a song on eBay.
I've always liked and used Realtek cards, and I use the RTL8169S in my
servers. However, the RTL8169S has one problem: overheating. If you buy any,
make sure they include a heatsink. Those without a heatsink are
On 26/02/11 15:38, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I need to get a second ethernet card for my HP Proliant CentOS server,
> to attach a LinkSys WRT54GL router to.
>
> I see that there are many Realtek RTL8169S gigabit cards
> going for a song on eBay.
> Is anyone using one of these under CentOS?
> Do they
I need to get a second ethernet card for my HP Proliant CentOS server,
to attach a LinkSys WRT54GL router to.
I see that there are many Realtek RTL8169S gigabit cards
going for a song on eBay.
Is anyone using one of these under CentOS?
Do they work OK?
(I used to have a couple of Realtek cards - n
22 matches
Mail list logo
