The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS
4.9 for i386 and x86_64.
This release corresponds to the upstream vendor 4.9 release.
Also released in the updates repository for CentOS-4.9 are all updates
through March 1st, 2011.
If you are currently using an older
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0318
libtiff security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0318.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
libtiff-3.6.1-17.el4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0318
libtiff security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0318.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
libtiff-3.6.1-17.el4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0307
mailman security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0307.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.i386.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0307
mailman security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0307.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
mailman-2.1.5.1-34.rhel4.7.x86_64.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0305
samba security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0305.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
samba-3.0.33-0.30.el4.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0305
samba security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0305.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
samba-3.0.33-0.30.el4.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0313
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0313.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
seamonkey-1.0.9-67.el4.centos.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0313
seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0313.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
seamonkey-1.0.9-67.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0312
thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0312.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-35.el4.centos.i386.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0312
thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0312.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
thunderbird-1.5.0.12-35.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0310
firefox security update for CentOS 4 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0310.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
firefox-3.6.14-4.el4.centos.i386.rpm
src:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0310
firefox security update for CentOS 4 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0310.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
firefox-3.6.14-4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
src:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/1/2011 1:08 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/01/11 10:59 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
Not today. My kids are all modern, computer-savvy teens (understand
teens starts at about age 11 and lasts until about age 35).
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:24:26 +0200
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So I was basically looking for something, which works in the same way
as Google Notify (let's use a different example) which logs onto a
server, queries the DB for info and displays it to the user.
Most of us call a program that does that
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:24:26 +0200
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So I was basically looking for something, which works in the same way
as Google Notify (let's use a different example) which logs onto a
server, queries the DB for info
On 3/2/11 2:24 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Our church need(ed) to send info to clients over the wire in a
guarenteed fashion. They already have a website, which is
under-utilized / not visited as often by every one. RSS didn't work
out as it should / could since many non-IT-savy-folk don't know
On 01/03/11 21:02, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/01/11 11:51 AM, Always Learning wrote:
4 hex digits vs. 1-3 decimal digits provides adequate disambiguation.
1:2:3:4 or 1.2.3.4 ? Each segment of the former is a valid 'decimal'
number and also a valid 'hexadecimal' number. Each segment of the
I have a C++ program that opens, gets a little data from, and closes
about 5000 files. Now if I run the program when I first boot up,
the running time is from about 10 seconds to a minute. Subsequently,
the program runs in well inter one second. Buffering -- right?
So I changed a parameter, so
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Michael D. Berger
m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a C++ program that opens, gets a little data from, and closes
about 5000 files. Now if I run the program when I first boot up,
the running time is from about 10 seconds to a minute. Subsequently,
the
Hi Y'All,
Yum update on CentOS 5 has for the last week or so started giving me the
following errors
root@neodymium 16:03:46 ~ # nice yum upgrade
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net
* base: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net
Chris Ross wrote:
Hi Y'All,
Yum update on CentOS 5 has for the last week or so started giving me the
following errors
root@neodymium 16:03:46 ~ # nice yum upgrade
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirror.sov.uk.goscomb.net
* base:
On 03/02/2011 04:24 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Did you try yum clean all?
An excellent suggestion, which unfortunately didn't make any difference...
root@neodymium 16:30:03 ~ # yum clean all
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Cleaning up Everything
Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
root@neodymium
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libgnokii.so.4()(64bit) for package: kdepim
--- Package gnokii.x86_64 0:0.6.29-1.el5 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: libical.so.0()(64bit) for package: gnokii
-- Running
On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
On my systems I get gnokii-0.6.27-2.el5.x86_64 resolving that
dependency from EPEL - mirror out of date perhaps?
Out of date mirror for whom? I currently have the same gnokii as you do
(6.2.27), but yum is complaining that it now wants to update
Out of date mirror for whom? I currently have the same gnokii as you do
(6.2.27), but yum is complaining that it now wants to update it to
6.2.29 but can't as kdepim (and others) have a dependency on the old
version. Unless I've misread the error message?
gnokii-0.6.27-2.el5.x86_64 is the
On 03/02/2011 05:05 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
gnokii-0.6.27-2.el5.x86_64 is the package listed in your yum output
but the dependency trying to be satisfied is libgnokii.so.4()(64bit)
True, but pedantic
root@neodymium 17:08:01 ~ # rpm -qf $(locate libgnokii.so.4)
gnokii-0.6.27-2.el5
On my system I can see that dep in EPEL given by the package I mentioned.
i.e. the package I have installed, the same as you.
Presumably your machine will try to update to the newer gnokii.x86_64
0:0.6.29-1.el5 in due course too.
Nope I said the info was found from yum info from the repos...
I am busy setting up some XEN servers on a SAN for high availability
and Cloud Computing, and thought it could be cool to setup
virtualization on a CentOS 5.5 Desktop, running on a Core i3 + 4GB
RAM, and use the SAN's storage to see if it could actually be worth my
while to replicate a Cloud
Yes, I know that I could have used KVM, VMWare
or VirtualBox, but I wanted to use what's included already.
KVM is included, you just have to select it. There is a loyal following of
Xen in the community, but I use KVM for my servers. I'm often called 'dumb'
for even talking about KVM, but I like
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now,
I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on
Linux. I also see ekiga, and aMSN.
Anyone here run such a beast, and have any
On 3/2/2011 11:29 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So, I installed CentOS + KDE, chose the Virtualization package and
used Virtual Machine Manager to setup another CentOS VM inside CentOS
(I only have a CentOS ISO on this SAN, since we don't use Debian /
Slackware / FC / Ubuntu / etc). The installation
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I am busy setting up some XEN servers on a SAN for high availability
and Cloud Computing, and thought it could be cool to setup
virtualization on a CentOS 5.5 Desktop, running on a Core i3 + 4GB
RAM [...]
So, I installed CentOS + KDE, chose the
m.r...@5-cent.us writes:
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now,
I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on
Linux. I also see ekiga, and aMSN.
Anyone here run
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:56 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
Yes, I know that I could have used KVM, VMWare
or VirtualBox, but I wanted to use what's included already.
KVM is included, you just have to select it. There is a loyal following of
Xen in the community, but I use KVM for my
2011/3/2 m.r...@5-cent.us:
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now,
I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on
Linux. I also see ekiga, and aMSN.
Anyone here run
On 03/02/11 10:03 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now,
I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on
Linux. I also see ekiga, and aMSN.
On 02/03/11 19:07, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/2/2011 11:29 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
So, I installed CentOS + KDE, chose the Virtualization package and
used Virtual Machine Manager to setup another CentOS VM inside CentOS
(I only have a CentOS ISO on this SAN, since we don't use Debian /
On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I thought, just for the fun of it, let's install Windows 2008 Small
Business Server.
Interestingly, using the same Virtual Machine Manager, the
installation wasn't as slow as with CentOS. It's almost asif it's more
optimized for Windows? I used
On 3/2/2011 1:35 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Differently put, we already do this with servers. One big fast Quad
XEON can run many client's Virtual Machines, very easily. And many of
those Virtual Machines host a few hundred websites, thus saving a lot
on rack space, electricity, etc, etc.
It does voice and video chat. There is a pluggin for the chrome browser.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: John R Pierce [pie...@hogranch.com]
Received: Wednesday, 02 Mar 2011, 2:38pm
To: centos@centos.org [centos@centos.org]
Subject:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/2/2011 1:35 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Differently put, we already do this with servers. One big fast Quad
XEON can run many client's Virtual Machines, very easily. And many of
those Virtual Machines host a few
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, David Sommerseth wrote:
Other than that, SPICE is probably the future [1] on Linux. That should
slowly begin to be useful in RHEL5, RHEL6 and Fedora 14, if I'm not much
mistaken. Not sure how much is implemented in RHEL5/CentOS5 though.
However, for SPICE to work, you
On 3/2/2011 2:06 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Differently put, we already do this with servers. One bigfast Quad
XEON can run many client's Virtual Machines, very easily. And many of
those Virtual Machines host a few hundred websites, thus saving a lot
on rack space, electricity, etc, etc.
You need qemu-spice for using SPICE, which does not ship with RHEL5 or
RHEL6. On top of that, SPICE is only supported by Red Hat for RHEV, not
libvirt. That may change in the future, ... but when, nobody knows ;-)
Well that's certainly disappointing. Any alternatives to spice for centos? I
know
Yes, I know KVM is included, but at this stage XEN is the default and
when you use the Virtual Machine Manager, it uses XEN.
Select Server Gui only, when it's up, use yum to install everything else. I
think yum is a better way to install than the OS installer.
No, I'm not using VNC. My
You need qemu-spice for using SPICE, which does not ship with RHEL5 or
RHEL6. On top of that, SPICE is only supported by Red Hat for RHEV, not
libvirt. That may change in the future, ... but when, nobody knows ;-)
--
No you don't Dag.
qemu-kvm and libvirt in RHEL6 already supports SPICE...
On 02/03/11 21:12, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, David Sommerseth wrote:
Other than that, SPICE is probably the future [1] on Linux. That should
slowly begin to be useful in RHEL5, RHEL6 and Fedora 14, if I'm not much
mistaken. Not sure how much is implemented in RHEL5/CentOS5
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:03:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago who recently mentioned that they'd like to do videocalling. Now,
I've heard of skype, but a quick google says there's some problems on
Linux. I also
KVM is included, you just have to select it. There is a loyal following of
Xen in the community, but I use KVM for my servers. I'm often called 'dumb'
for even talking about KVM, but I like it. (and I'm not saying, nor have I
ever said, that KVM is better than Xen)
Yes, I know KVM is
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:38 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
[snip]
I believe google chat aka google talk works on linux too, and it has a
video option. can't say I've tried it.
It works for me on Ubuntu/Fedora. Apparently some have gotten it to
work on RHEL5/CentOS5 but I have
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, James Hogarth wrote:
You need qemu-spice for using SPICE, which does not ship with RHEL5 or
RHEL6. On top of that, SPICE is only supported by Red Hat for RHEV, not
libvirt. That may change in the future, ... but when, nobody knows ;-)
qemu-kvm and libvirt in RHEL6 already
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RFC: video call recommendations
2011/3/2 m.r...@5-cent.us:
I run CentOS at home, not just at work... Anyway, I've got a friend in
Chicago
Interesting, could you shed a light on what exact XML is needed ?
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsGraphics
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsVideo
You need to set the video type to qxl and the graphical type to spice
... then set the appropriate attributes on the
Thanks for all the responses, folks. If I have any time, I'll pick up an
inexpensive webcam, dunno, Best Buy or Target or whatever, and install
skype Sunday or Monday, and let y'all know how it works later next week.
mark
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RFC: video call recommendations
Thanks for all the responses, folks. If I have any time, I'll pick up an
inexpensive webcam, dunno, Best Buy or Target or
Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
RHEL4:2005-02-14
CentOS-4: 2005-03-0923 days
RHEL5:2007-03-14
CentOS-5: 2007-04-1229 days
RHEL6:2010-11-10
CentOS-6: TBD 112+ days
+1 for Skype on CentOS 5.5, RHEL 6, and various flavors of Ubuntu.
B.J.
CentOS 5.5, Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 athlon 17:56:31 up 13 days, 22:24,
1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.53, 0.43
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 18:39 +, Lars Hecking wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us writes:
I run CentOS at home, not
On Mar 2, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
I am busy setting up some XEN servers on a SAN for high availability
and Cloud Computing, and thought it could be cool to setup
virtualization on a CentOS 5.5 Desktop, running on a Core i3 + 4GB
RAM, and use the SAN's storage to
Quoting Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS
4.9 for i386 and x86_64.
Outstanding! Thanks CentOS team for all your hard work!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
RHEL4:2005-02-14
CentOS-4: 2005-03-0923 days
RHEL5:2007-03-14
CentOS-5: 2007-04-1229 days
RHEL6:2010-11-10
On Mar 2, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
RHEL4:2005-02-14
CentOS-4: 2005-03-0923 days
RHEL5:2007-03-14
CentOS-5: 2007-04-12
On 03/02/2011 08:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
AND?
Do you think we can't count?
Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast as we
possibly can?
What, exactly, is the problem here?
You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
If I may say;
The
I'm happy to wait rather is works properly.
Thanks to the Team/Community for a great product
Greg Machin
Systems Administrator - Linux
Infrastructure Group, Information Services
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Digimer
Me too. Who cares if it comes out within the next 3 months. As long as they
keep releasing the security updates quickly I've given up on waiting
for new releases :(
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Machin, Greg
greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz wrote:
I'm happy to wait rather is works
On 03/02/2011 09:31 PM, robert mena wrote:
Me too. Who cares if it comes out within the next 3 months. As long as
they keep releasing the security updates quickly I've given up on
waiting for new releases :(
If you've given up, use something else. Red Hat can serve you well right
away,
on 21:35 Wed 02 Mar, Rudi Ahlers (r...@softdux.com) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:56 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
Yes, I know that I could have used KVM, VMWare
or VirtualBox, but I wanted to use what's included already.
...
What I'm getting at:
Can, or will virtualization
On Monday, February 28, 2011, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:16:59PM -0500, Lars Nordin wrote:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:
IPV6INT=yes
Typo; IPV6INIT=yes
sigh. Thanks for the responses, fixing my misspelling got me working.
# repquota -a
(snip)
user -- 40 0 0 7 0 0
(snip)
W2K8AD1\administrator -- 124 0 0 28 0 0
W2K8AD1\samba -- 4 0 10 1 0 0
It seems possible with winbind.
2011/3/2 William Warren
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast as we
possibly can?
What, exactly, is the problem here?
You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Good answer!
:)
Kwan Lowe wrote:
Michael D. Berger
I have a C++ program that opens, gets a little data from, and closes
about 5000 files. Now if I run the program when I first boot up,
the running time is from about 10 seconds to a minute. Subsequently,
the program runs in well inter one second.
Hi ,all :
Today I run the following command to mount the Linux Server Samba share
folder
on my computer which installed CentOS 5.5 x86_64 .
root@test ~: mount.cifs //IP/share /mnt
root@test ~: mount -o loop /mnt/xxx.iso /media
xxx.iso: Permission denied
But I see the permission of
72 matches
Mail list logo
