On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:05 AM, William Warren
wrote:
> I'm curious exactly how KVM works. If i see things right it's
> virtualization that's still within a full base operating system load
> correct? How does KVM perform against VMware which uses a much smaller
> footprint? Is KVM really a hype
On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:11 AM -0500 Digimer >
> wrote:
>
>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in
>> CentOS 6
>> when it is released?
>
> A new Ruby
I just realized that the earth link I ref'd is dead.
Here
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
>> particularly looking forward to the built-in chroot capabilities and
>> GSSAPI support in OpenSSH, and the major release im
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 04.03.2011 13:50, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
>
>> Re-install, not upgrade. Components with the same name compiled for
>> different systems will occur, and may wind up presenting fascinating
>> incompatibilities.
>
> Can you elaborate?
> RHEL
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 17:50, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> I almost never log in
>> directly at a linux console anymore and if I need to do something from
>> home or remotely, I just pick the session that was my last desktop at work.
>
> I didn't k
hello list centos.
I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on
my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this
is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to
compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5
thanks for all your return
--
>yeah, definately, VM of any sort is a whole different beast, and
>no way NTP should be run in a virtualized environment.
The guests I run in KVM use ntp to keep their time accurate.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/4/2011 12:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>>
>> I think you're fundamentally failing to understand my operating mode.
>>
>> Local system == Linux === my administrative center.
>>
>> Remote hosts. May be a dozen. May be 20,000. Or some numb
> It appears that option 2 would be the best for me, so I set: sysctl
> vm.overcommit_memory=2
>
> However, it resets to 0 on reboot, and only root can reset it.
> It would be good if it would be set to 2 on reboot. Is there
> a good way to do this? I suppose I could put something in
> /etc/i
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Todd wrote:
> Brian,
> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
> reply.
>>
>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
>> handled sticky sessions well, performs monitoring of each host, allows
>> dynamic ad
On Friday, March 04, 2011 04:05:43 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Excuse me? The last time I was following this closely, and I think the
> last time I looked, about a year ago, they said the opposite, that the
> guest, if running Linux, should use ntp.
>
> Right:
> NTP Recommendations
> Note: In all
>If the Marvell drivers don't pan out, it looks like I'll have
>to either spend money on a 3Ware|LSI|Promise controller
The 3ware are excellent...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 03/04/11 12:59 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, March 04, 2011 03:54:21 pm John R Pierce wrote:
>> just setup NTP and forget about it, and it will always work right,
>> unless your system is really badly broken, whereupon, it would be better
>> to fix it than to continue to hack around like th
On 3/4/2011 12:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
> I think you're fundamentally failing to understand my operating mode.
>
> Local system == Linux === my administrative center.
>
> Remote hosts. May be a dozen. May be 20,000. Or some number between
> or beyond.
After reading this again, I'm wonder
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, March 04, 2011 03:54:21 pm John R Pierce wrote:
>> just setup NTP and forget about it, and it will always work right,
>> unless your system is really badly broken, whereupon, it would be better
>> to fix it than to continue to hack around like this.
>
> For the sake o
On 3/4/2011 3:59 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, March 04, 2011 03:54:21 pm John R Pierce wrote:
>> just setup NTP and forget about it, and it will always work right,
>> unless your system is really badly broken, whereupon, it would be better
>> to fix it than to continue to hack around like thi
On Friday, March 04, 2011 03:54:21 pm John R Pierce wrote:
> just setup NTP and forget about it, and it will always work right,
> unless your system is really badly broken, whereupon, it would be better
> to fix it than to continue to hack around like this.
For the sake of the archives, VMware g
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/04/11 12:40 PM, Matt wrote:
>>
>> I add this to /etc/rc.local
>>
>> /usr/sbin/ntpdate us.pool.ntp.org
>>
>> Sets the clock on start up. Might run it by cron once a month or so
>> too.
>
> thats just the wrong way to go about it. if your clock is running fast,
> your c
On 03/04/11 12:40 PM, Matt wrote:
>
> I add this to /etc/rc.local
>
> /usr/sbin/ntpdate us.pool.ntp.org
>
> Sets the clock on start up. Might run it by cron once a month or so too.
thats just the wrong way to go about it. if your clock is running fast,
your cronjob will set it backwards, which
On 03/04/2011 09:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> On 3/3/11 6:52 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
>> >
>> > I've been on a real roller coaster ride getting a large virtual host up
>> > and running. One troublesome thing I've discovered (the hard way) is
>> > that the drivers for Marvell SAS/SATA chips st
> Is there a package to do this?
>
> Normally the hardware clock is set during shutdown if one is running ntpd.
> But if a long-running server shuts down unexpectedly, this isn't done, and
> the hardware clock might be off by a lot when it comes back up. So setting
> it periodically from a cron job
On Friday, March 04, 2011 09:48:03 am Simon Matter wrote:
> I'm not sure that's true. You have to understand that at the same time
> everybody should have worked on EL6.0, both EL5.6 and EL4.9 came out and
> for very good reason those responsible for CentOS decided to build those
> first. Just reme
I'm curious exactly how KVM works. If i see things right it's
virtualization that's still within a full base operating system load
correct? How does KVM perform against VMware which uses a much smaller
footprint? Is KVM really a hypervisor? I'm just trying figure out the
basics of KVM..:)
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have
> hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be
> divided in units of 1/10th of a CPU. The software to manage this is
> now called PowerVM (its b
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/04/11 11:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I'm looking forward to the new cgroups and KVM. This will give it
>>> > some capabilities similar to AIX virtual partitions which can divvy
>>> > up CPUs at a fine resolution.
>> Really? So IBM ported VM into native AIX? I
On Mar 4, 2011, at 12:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now)
> have
> hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be
> divided in units of 1/10th of a CPU. The software to manage this is
> now called PowerVM (its b
>the hardware clock might be off by a lot when it comes back up.
If your server was set to use UTC time at install, the hardware clock will
always be wrong.
Check /etc/adjtime
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
On 03/04/11 11:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'm looking forward to the new cgroups and KVM. This will give it
>> > some capabilities similar to AIX virtual partitions which can divvy up
>> > CPUs at a fine resolution.
> Really? So IBM ported VM into native AIX? I missed that.
IBM Power ser
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Kenneth Porter
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 14:15
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] Updating hardware clock from cron
>
> Is there a package to do this?
>
> Normally the
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, wrote:
> James Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote:
>>> Brian,
>>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
>>> reply.
OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
>
>> if th
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Digimer wrote:
>
>> Personally, I'm really looking forward to Cluster 3 support. It will be
>> fun to see how Pacemaker compares to rgmanager.
>>
>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
>> when it is released?
>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Personally, I'm really looking forward to Cluster 3 support. It will be
> fun to see how Pacemaker compares to rgmanager.
>
> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
> when it is released?
I'm looking forward to the
On 3/4/2011 1:18 PM, James Nguyen wrote:
>
> You want two boxes that run both haproxy + keepalived. This way you
> get the load balancing (HAProxy) plus the high availability
> (Keepalived) using a shared virtual IP for your two boxes. You can do
> maintenance on either one while traffic still re
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:18 PM, James Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote:
>> Brian,
>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
>> reply.
>>>
>>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
>>> handled sticky sessions
James Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote:
>> Brian,
>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
>> reply.
>>>
>>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
> if they think the solution requires a lot of CPU. Memory
On 3/4/2011 12:07 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
But why do you need screen, then?
>>>
>>> Terminal multiplexing, session persistance, scrollback/logging, split
>>> screen (top running in the top panel, shell underneath, etc.), workflow
>>> organization (similar processes are grouped in a screen
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:12:45AM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Having issues installing Earth;
/earth is 98% full ... please delete anyone you can.
-- fortune file
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cento
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote:
> Brian,
> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
> reply.
>>
>> OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
>> handled sticky sessions well, performs monitoring of each host, allows
>> dynamic add
Is there a package to do this?
Normally the hardware clock is set during shutdown if one is running ntpd.
But if a long-running server shuts down unexpectedly, this isn't done, and
the hardware clock might be off by a lot when it comes back up. So setting
it periodically from a cron job could b
On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:11 AM -0500 Digimer >
> wrote:
>
>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in
>> CentOS 6
>> when it is released?
>
> A new Ruby
+1
Having issues installing Earth;
http://open.rsp.com.au
--On Thursday, March 03, 2011 10:11 AM -0500 Digimer
wrote:
> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
> when it is released?
A new Ruby so I can deploy a Diaspora "pod" for my friends, allowing them
to escape Facebook. (I tried building Ruby from Rawhide but the
On 03/03/11 00:41, Ross Walker wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> This works with Xen or KVM, though the management and
> compartmentalization of Xen helps.
>
> Does CentOS support the shared memory pages, memory dedup, in Xen? That
> would allow for a lot more Linux VMs.
I don't think the KSM support has b
On 3/4/2011 8:15 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> I do like the way gnome collapses the icons in the task bar when you
>>> have enough of them - and pops up the list so you can see it. It
>>> makes it easy to find the terminal session connected to some
>>> particular remote host.
>>
>> WindowMaker ha
on 09:10 Fri 04 Mar, Sean Carolan (scaro...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > In this case, you might want to conditionally assign some reasonable
> > value on failure. Say:
> >
> > tput -T $TERM init >/dev/null 2>&1 || export TERM=xterm
> >
> > 'tset -q' is another test which can be used.
>
> The remote
on 08:15 Fri 04 Mar, Les Mikesell (lesmikes...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 3/4/11 12:15 AM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> >> But why do you need screen, then?
> >
> > Terminal multiplexing, session persistance, scrollback/logging, split
> > screen (top running in the top panel, shell underneath, etc.), workf
>
> On Wed, March 2, 2011 20:43, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast
>> as we possibly can?
>>
>> What, exactly, is the problem here?
>
> The problem here is fear.
>
> I am not now asking, nor to the best of my ability to recall have I
> ever a
On 03/04/2011 12:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> mark, *not* looking forward to a major upgrade of all these
> machines
Heh, neither am I. 5.5 is trucking along just fine on many though, so I
don't expect to actually rebuild many. I'll probably roll out new
machines as CentOS 6 once I f
David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 04/03/11 16:59, Digimer wrote:
>> On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>>> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>
Brian,
Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your
reply.
OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
> handled sticky sessions well, performs monitoring of each host, allows
> dynamic adding/removing of servers, as well as maintenance modes.
>
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On Wed, March 2, 2011 20:43, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast
>> as we possibly can?
>>
>> What, exactly, is the problem here?
>
> The problem here is fear.
Your fear is not shared by me, in the least.
>What part of KVM seems immature to you? I deploy public-facing
>machines using both it and Xen, and I can't really speak to any
>difference in performance or small-scall management.
I like kvm - no issues
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> I need to restructure my server farm from tower PC:s to a minimal
> amount of 1U rack servers. I am going to rely on xen virtualization,
> as KVM seems not to be very mature yet.
What part of KVM seems immature to you? I deploy public-facing
machines us
On 04/03/11 16:59, Digimer wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>>
>>> Scientific Linux 6 is based
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> erikmccaskey64 wrote:
>> I'm searching for a method [on client side] to redirect to HTTPS
>> in a few given domains.
Is this a browser issue? If so then I know that Firefox has at
least two plugins that can be configured to force https on links to
certain domains or subdomains. On is NoScrip
also I forgot to mention for heartbeat I use keepalived
http://www.keepalived.org/
I found hearbeat a little difficult to implement but keepalived by
comparison is a breeze to setup. Forget about multiple A records.
That's a naive approach and entirely unnecessary. As other's have
pointed out ju
>OK, so what's good? For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent. It
> handled sticky sessions well, performs monitoring of each host, allows
> dynamic adding/removing of servers, as well as maintenance modes.
> It's very easy to install and configure. I'm using is as the backend
> to apache that
On 3/4/2011 8:51 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 17:50, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> I almost never log in
>> directly at a linux console anymore and if I need to do something from
>> home or remotely, I just pick the session that was my last desktop at work.
>
> I didn't know you coul
On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>
>> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific com
On Wed, March 2, 2011 20:43, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast
> as we possibly can?
>
> What, exactly, is the problem here?
The problem here is fear.
I am not now asking, nor to the best of my ability to recall have I
ever asked, for when
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 06:55:56 pm Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> I thought a bit about that when posting earlier. I still disagree WRT
> dual-booting. And no, virtualization doesn't need twice the hardware by
> a long shot (aggregated load averaging, shared componentry, and a host
> of other savin
> In this case, you might want to conditionally assign some reasonable
> value on failure. Say:
>
> tput -T $TERM init >/dev/null 2>&1 || export TERM=xterm
>
> 'tset -q' is another test which can be used.
The remote host's $TERM variable is in fact xterm. When I connect to
the screen session
On Wed, March 2, 2011 17:57, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> +1 for Skype on CentOS 5.5, RHEL 6, and various flavors of Ubuntu.
>
> B.J.
> CentOS 5.5, Linux 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 athlon 17:56:31 up 13 days,
> 22:24,
> 1 user, load average: 0.67, 0.53, 0.43
>
>
So, how did you install Skype on CentOS-5.5? I
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Todd wrote:
> Hi All,
> Can anyone help me hash out how best to load balance a website that is
> getting considerable traffic? In the past I only have experience with BigIP
> where you have a load balancing device that keeps track and send traffic to
> the best ser
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:33:20AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> > I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
> > Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the iso's
> > over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that
On Mar 3, 2011, at 17:50, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I almost never log in
> directly at a linux console anymore and if I need to do something from
> home or remotely, I just pick the session that was my last desktop at work.
I didn't know you could do this with NX. I've been using VNC to connect
t
Anyway, this was an information by the OP and by itself ok, although I
guess everybody already knew it. But please try to refrain from making it
another longwinding thread. Not aimed at anyone particular, you are just
the last in the thread I have here. Thanks :-)
Kai
Jason Brown wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> robert mena wrote:
>>> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no
>>> plans to change the way things are handled (lack of communication,
treat this
>>> as personal project etc) the best way to simply for
Jason Brown wrote:
On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
robert mena wrote:
Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans
to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as
personal project etc) the best way to simply forget a
> On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> robert mena wrote:
>>> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no
>>> plans
>>> to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this
>>> as
>>> personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about i
On Friday, March 04, 2011 10:18:53 am sync wrote:
> Hi , all :
>
>
> Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short
> message in syslog saying: "[localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0:
> transmit timed out" (or similar).
>
> By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64
On 3/4/11 12:15 AM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
>
>> I do like the way gnome collapses the icons in the task bar when you
>> have enough of them - and pops up the list so you can see it. It
>> makes it easy to find the terminal session connected to some
>> particular remote host.
>
> WindowMaker has a
sync wrote:
>
> Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short
> message in syslog saying: "[localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0:
> transmit timed out" (or similar).
>
> By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64 bit and the kernel version
> was 2.6.18-164.
>
> Has a
> On 3/4/11 5:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>>> I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
>>> Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the
>>> iso's
>>> over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that still the
>>>
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Todd wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone help me hash out how best to load balance a website that
>> is getting considerable traffic? In the past I only have experience
>> with BigIP where you have a load balancing device that keeps track
>> and send tr
Greetings,
On 3/4/11, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> I always liked the way you could NFS-install from a directory containing the
> downloaded CD iso images but I could never get that to work with a dvd iso.
> Is
> there an equally easy way to install from a DVD image on a box without a DVD
> drive?
>
On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> robert mena wrote:
>> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans
>> to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as
>> personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it.
>>
>> The s
On 3/4/11 5:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>> I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
>> Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the iso's
>> over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that still the
>> plan? As fa
robert mena wrote:
> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans
> to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as
> personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it.
>
> The solution is good now and will be good whenever it appear
Am 04.03.2011 13:50, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
> Re-install, not upgrade. Components with the same name compiled for
> different systems will occur, and may wind up presenting fascinating
> incompatibilities.
Can you elaborate?
RHEL5's and C5's packages were known to be interchangeable.
Without
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Digimer wrote:
>
>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
>> when it is released?
>>
>
> Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
> particularly looking forward to the bu
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:44:46AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> Now, now, be nice. It's nice to know if another open source knowledge
> has achieved a goal. It also provides an early testing platform for
> people who want to run some behavior comparisons. For example, the
> format of the "k
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Simon Matter
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
systems to xen virtual stacks?
Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
> particularly looking forward to the built-in chroot capabilities and
> GSSAPI support in OpenSSH, and the major release improvements to git
> and subversion.
What does the new GSSA
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>>>
>> And?? Why do you want to start a new flame??
That was certainly not the intent. Pls. see below.
> Now, now, be nice. It's nice to know if another open source knowledge
> has achi
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>>> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
>>> systems to xen virtual stacks?
>>>
>>> Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would tak
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/2/28 JD :
>> Any word on approximate release date of Centos 6?
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> Scientific Linux already released version 6. take it and then upgrade
> to centos, when it is available ..
Re-install, not upgrade. Components with the sa
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>> I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
>> Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the iso's
>> over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that still the
>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>
>> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scien
On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>
> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing.
>
> FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are prett
I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing.
FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are pretty much the same as in RHEL, so are
the base package
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:49:37PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>>
>> I meant to note earlier: the upstream NX developers have gone non-free,
>> no?
>
> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/NX_technology#License
Version 4, which is
On 03/04/2011 02:31 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
> systems to xen virtual stacks?
>
> Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would take
> plenty of work.
I think I would use KVM guests and not Xen guests ... but
On 03/03/2011 11:44 PM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> I do have one question about Cent OS 6.
> Sonetimes back, I remember reading that the plan was to spread the iso's
> over multiple cd's, rather than put it all on 1 dvd. Is that still the
> plan? As far as when it's released, I say take all the tim
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> > On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
> > > I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
> >
> > Hm, that is kind of the only important thin
the archive would have told you.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4.3.2011 11.42, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> is pretty much like this:
>
> - ssh into the standalone system.
Ok, thanks - that looks like a real how-to already. I will have to
consider if I want to take the risk. With name server I would not
bother, but with mail server maybe.
- Jussi
__
On 4.3.2011 11.42, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> is pretty much like this:
>
> - ssh into the standalone system.
Ok, thanks - that looks like a real how-to already. I will have to
consider if I want to take the risk. With name server I would not
bother, but with mail server maybe.
- Jussi
__
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
>> systems to xen virtual stacks?
>>
>> Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would take
>> plenty of work.
>>
>
> If you're talking about Xen PV
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
> systems to xen virtual stacks?
>
> Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would take
> plenty of work.
>
If you're talking about Xen PV domUs,
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
