i couldn't connect to it to check through ssh.
and when it comes to the console, i couldn't do anything either as a repetitive
output as the screen shot attached keeps appearing.
this is an internal testing server with apache and mysql installed.
usually the load average is 8 % max.
server's s
> no,my mean is the keepalived lvs need ipvsadm
Ah right. Sorry, I thought you were having more problems :)
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
no,my mean is the keepalived lvs need ipvsadm
2011/3/8 Steve Barnes
> > if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not
> work.
> > then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
> > command line below:
> > ipvsadm -A -t http://172.16.39.100:80 172.16
> if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not work.
> then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
> command line below:
> ipvsadm -A -t http://172.16.39.100:80 172.16.39.100:80
> -s rr
> ipvsadm -a -t http://172.16.39.100:80 172.16.39.100:80
> -r
thanks for relay!
if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not work.
then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
command line below:
ipvsadm -A -t 172.16.39.100:80 -s rr
ipvsadm -a -t 172.16.39.100:80 -r 172.16.39.30:80 -i
ipvsadm -a -t 172.16.39.
On 03/07/2011 08:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> That said, it can be problematic when you "ping $HOSTNAME" and get a
> valid 127.0.0.1 response, and haven't actually tested your external
> port. It also requires thought for configuring SSH and SNMP and NFS to
> allow localhost access.
When yo
> all!
> if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
> tks!
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
[steve@mail ~]$ yum provides '*/ipvsadm'
Loaded plugins: fastestm
> hello,
> all!
> if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
> tks!
I haven't used keepalived with lvs in ages, but I believe it works
directly with the kernel, and therefore does not strictly require
ipvsadm. Please note that ipvsadm is a userspace tool for
manipu
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
> packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
> archictecture:
Jump to CentOS 6. Wait, that's not out yet. Buy an RHEL 6 license or
test with Scientic
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Sean Carolan wrote:
> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
> loopback address?
>
> 127.0.0.1 hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
>
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:22, the following was written:
> Keith Keller wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
> >> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
> >> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
>
On Monday, March 07, 2011 02:41:03 pm Dave Stevens wrote:
> Dear CentOS,
>
> I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
> emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
> experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:31:17PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> Usually, it's rather an advantage because
> in cases where you would just get "localhost" you now get some meaningful
> name.
You can use the bare hostname as an alias in /etc/hosts, which is
probably marginally better than using
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:41:03 -0800
Dave Stevens wrote:
> I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
> emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
> experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
I did this a whil
On 03/07/11 2:41 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Dear CentOS,
>
> I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
> emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
> experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
you mean, like a
on 14:41 Mon 07 Mar, Dave Stevens (g...@uniserve.com) wrote:
> Dear CentOS,
>
> I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
> emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
> experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack instal
Dear CentOS,
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
Dave
--
When a respected information source covers something
2011/3/8 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> on 23:15 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
>> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
>> > on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
>> >> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
>> >> > We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800
on 23:15 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> > on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
> >> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> >> > We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
> >> > a set of databa
on 12:43 Mon 07 Mar, Dr. Ed Morbius (dredmorb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
> a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
Pardoning the self-reply, but one issue we've ahd is reconciling the
omcontrol log report with the Dell Serv
on 16:04 Mon 07 Mar, Blake Hudson (bl...@ispn.net) wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: [CentOS] Dell PERC H800 commandline RAID monitoring tools
> From: Dr. Ed Morbius
> To: CentOS User list
> Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:43:03 PM
> > We're looking for tools to be used in mo
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Dell PERC H800 commandline RAID monitoring tools
From: Dr. Ed Morbius
To: CentOS User list
Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:43:03 PM
> We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
> a set of database servers running C
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
>> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
>> > We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
>> > a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
>> >
>> > We've installed most of the OMSA (De
on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
> 2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> > We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
> > a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
> >
> > We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
> >
> > Our
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius :
> We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
> a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
>
> We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
>
> Our current alerting is happening through SNMP, though it's a bit hit or
> miss (we
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/04/11 11:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I'm looking forward to the new cgroups and KVM. This will give it
>>> > some capabilities similar to AIX virtual partitions which can divvy up
>>> > CPUs at a fine resolution.
>> Really? So
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
Our current alerting is happening through SNMP, though it's a bit hit or
miss (we apparently missed a couple of earlier
Sean Carolan wrote on Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:49:18 -0600:
> Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea to have a single host using
> loopback, while the rest of the network refers to it by it's real IP
> address.
It doesn't matter for the other hosts, the sender ip address will always
be the outgoing int
Sean Carolan wrote:
>> (Make sure you pick .dummy so as not to interfere with any other DNS.)
>>
>> In theory you could leave off .dummy, but then you risk hostname being
>> completed with the search domain in resolv.conf, which creates the
>> problems already mentioned with putting hostname.domain
Keith Keller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
>> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
>> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
>> loopback address?
>>
>> 127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname loc
> My scepticism regarding SMART data continues ... the flaky drive
>showed no errors, and a full test and full zero-write using the WD
>diagnostics revealed no errors either. If the drive is bad, there's
>no evidence that would cause WD to issue an RMA.
I've been having a rash of drive failures
> (Make sure you pick .dummy so as not to interfere with any other DNS.)
>
> In theory you could leave off .dummy, but then you risk hostname being
> completed with the search domain in resolv.conf, which creates the
> problems already mentioned with putting hostname.domain.com in
> /etc/hosts. (I
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
> loopback address?
>
> 127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdoma
Hi
I used the command "ip -6 addr add 2001:DB8:CAFE:::12/64 dev eth0"
to add ipv6 address and can see it in ifconfig
but can't ping it
Why?
Thank you
# ping6 2001:db8:cafe:::12
PING 2001:db8:cafe:::12(2001:db8:cafe:::12) 56 data bytes
>From ::1 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreach
On 03/07/11 10:43 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
> I haven't used Adaptec cards for
> many years, mostly because their SCSI controllers back in the early days
> were junk.
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business
On 03/07/2011 09:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polisher
> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
>> > covers fake RAID.
> Ouch. That was*precisely* why I used the 2410, not the 14
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Laurence Hurst wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
>>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
>>> when it is released?
>>>
>> For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and
>> centralise
>> (on
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Robert Grasso wrote:
>Hello,
>On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you
>want. It would be preferable to use at least some (old but powerful) tools
>such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need is a tool
>providing a capture buff
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> When starting IPERF with "iperf -s" or "iperf -sD" it seems to stop
> after client runs its first test. I would like to leave it running
> for a few hours to give someone a chance to run a few tests. Is there
> a way to leave it active on the server and kill it
Greetings..
Yes ENSCRIPT is a text to PostScript
conversion service.
As usual, am a bi confused on how to
implement the fit-to-page functionality.
Google resources say it is used then
proceeds to dance around the issue
Using the -f@W/H option can one
calculate the necessary dimensions for
When starting IPERF with "iperf -s" or "iperf -sD" it seems to stop
after client runs its first test. I would like to leave it running
for a few hours to give someone a chance to run a few tests. Is there
a way to leave it active on the server and kill it manually later?
_
- Original Message -
| Hello,
|
| Today my server stopped responding.
| i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop
| of the following info shown on the screen:
|
| BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
|
| and alot of other information.
| ii've to
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Laurence Hurst wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
>> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
>> when it is released?
>>
> For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and centralise
> (on the machine)
Am 03/07/2011 05:49 PM, schrieb Sean Carolan:
>> First, if your host is actually communicating with any kind of ip-based
>> network, it is quite certain, that 127.0.0.1 simply isn't his IP
>> address. And, at least for me, that's a fairly good reason.
>
> Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea
> First, if your host is actually communicating with any kind of ip-based
> network, it is quite certain, that 127.0.0.1 simply isn't his IP
> address. And, at least for me, that's a fairly good reason.
Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea to have a single host using
loopback, while the rest of t
Am 03/07/2011 05:34 PM, schrieb Sean Carolan:
> Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
> sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
> loopback address?
>
> 127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
First, if you
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
> How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
> when it is released?
>
For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and centralise (on
the machine) network authentication and (hopefully!) graphics
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
___
CentOS mailing list
C
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 07.03.2011 15:41:04:
> Tim Dunphy
> Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
>
> 07.03.2011 15:41
>
> Bitte antworten an
> CentOS mailing list
>
> An
>
> CentOS mailing list
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> [CentOS] yum tries to install a mix of architectures
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
> 1Gbe can do 115MB/s @ 64K+ IO size, but at 4k IO size (NFS) 55MB/s is about
> it.
>
> If you need each node to be able to read 90-100MB/s you would need to setup
> a cluster file system using iSCSI or FC and make sure the cluster file
> system can handle la
Hello,
On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
archictecture:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:12 AM, wessel van der aart wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
> will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
> setup i had in mind is as following:
> All the data is already stored on a Stor
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> NFSv4 is *NOT* your friend, and Kerberizing it effectively is not
> trivial. I'm using Centrify for that and to have a reliable upstream
> vendor who can actually support it. (I'm on a contract.) What's the
> issue you're encountering, besides the lac
On 03/07/2011 12:23 PM, Robert Grasso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you want.
> It would be preferable to use at least some (old but
> powerful) tools such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need
> is a tool providing a ca
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:56 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> If this works, you've just solved a *BIG* problem for me: I'd been
>> handed (ordered before I arrived on the site) the issues of getting
>> Centrify OpenSSH to play nicely, and this avoids the
> On 06/03/2011 13:44, Always Learning wrote:
>> I also saw Honeywell upgrading a L66 machine so it would run faster. The
>> engineer pulled-out a PCB and took it away. That 'upgrade' cost over 1
>> million NLG (Dutch guilders).
> Very annoying those big iron companies. We had two banks of ICL Eagl
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> If this works, you've just solved a *BIG* problem for me: I'd been
> handed (ordered before I arrived on the site) the issues of getting
> Centrify OpenSSH to play nicely, and this avoids the "OpenSSH 5.x does
> not read .bashrc and read user aliases
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:14 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> Have you backported OpenSSH 5.x to CentOS 5? Because I don't see the
>> full features set without OpenSSH 5.x, such as "GSSApiKeyExchange".
>
> Nope, I like the simple life.
>
>> Hmm. What you'v
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Simon Matter
>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
> systems to xen virtual stacks?
I playes with VMware ages ago and it was the only solution at
On 06/03/2011 13:44, Always Learning wrote:
> I also saw Honeywell upgrading a L66 machine so it would run faster. The
> engineer pulled-out a PCB and took it away. That 'upgrade' cost over 1
> million NLG (Dutch guilders).
Very annoying those big iron companies. We had two banks of ICL Eagle
driv
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Have you backported OpenSSH 5.x to CentOS 5? Because I don't see the
> full features set without OpenSSH 5.x, such as "GSSApiKeyExchange".
Nope, I like the simple life.
> Hmm. What you've described is an ssh_config option, which is set to
> "no" by
Hi :)
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:12 PM, wessel van der aart
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
> will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
> setup i had in mind is as following:
> All the data is already stored o
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>>
Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
particular
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polisher wrote:
> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
> covers fake RAID.
Ouch. That was *precisely* why I used the 2410, not the 1420, SATA
card, some years back. It was nominally more expensive but well w
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
>>> particularly looking forward to the built-in chroot capabilities and
>>
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!!
>
>> +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software.
>
> It really depends on your needs, if you are building a produc
2011/3/7 Alexander Dalloz :
> Am 07.03.2011 08:46, schrieb Frank Cox:
>
> Roland's screencopy shows a java process rather than openswan.
>
indeed, could it be http://www.iss.net/threats/414.html DoS? I would
not expect that this is happening in the kernel, though...
__
Hello,
On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you want.
It would be preferable to use at least some (old but
powerful) tools such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need
is a tool providing a capture buffer (this is perl
jargon - "back references" in
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum )
this should be mounted on a centos se
70 matches
Mail list logo
