Am 04.03.11 17:06, schrieb Andreas Rogge:
I'm currently porting the public and free parts of Red Hat Documentation
to CentOS.
Being unable to do anything graphics-related, I need someone to provide
the following images:
logo.svg 300x140 CentOS Logo
image_left.png124x39
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum )
this should be mounted on a centos
Hello,
On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you want.
It would be preferable to use at least some (old but
powerful) tools such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need
is a tool providing a capture buffer (this is perl
jargon - back references in
2011/3/7 Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org:
Am 07.03.2011 08:46, schrieb Frank Cox:
Roland's screencopy shows a java process rather than openswan.
indeed, could it be http://www.iss.net/threats/414.html DoS? I would
not expect that this is happening in the kernel, though...
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:36 AM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!!
+1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software.
It really depends on your needs,
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and OpenSSH built-in. I'm
particularly looking forward to the built-in chroot
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polisher cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
covers fake RAID.
Ouch. That was *precisely* why I used the 2410, not the 1420, SATA
card, some years back. It was nominally more
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:53 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Contemporary versions of git, subversion, and
Hi :)
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:12 PM, wessel van der aart
wes...@postoffice.nl wrote:
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Have you backported OpenSSH 5.x to CentOS 5? Because I don't see the
full features set without OpenSSH 5.x, such as GSSApiKeyExchange.
Nope, I like the simple life.
Hmm. What you've described is an ssh_config option, which is set to
no by
On 06/03/2011 13:44, Always Learning wrote:
I also saw Honeywell upgrading a L66 machine so it would run faster. The
engineer pulled-out a PCB and took it away. That 'upgrade' cost over 1
million NLG (Dutch guilders).
Very annoying those big iron companies. We had two banks of ICL Eagle
drives
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Simon Mattersimon.mat...@invoca.ch
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
systems to xen virtual stacks?
I playes with VMware ages ago and it was the only
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:14 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Have you backported OpenSSH 5.x to CentOS 5? Because I don't see the
full features set without OpenSSH 5.x, such as GSSApiKeyExchange.
Nope, I like the simple life.
Hmm.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
If this works, you've just solved a *BIG* problem for me: I'd been
handed (ordered before I arrived on the site) the issues of getting
Centrify OpenSSH to play nicely, and this avoids the OpenSSH 5.x does
not read .bashrc and read user aliases for
On 06/03/2011 13:44, Always Learning wrote:
I also saw Honeywell upgrading a L66 machine so it would run faster. The
engineer pulled-out a PCB and took it away. That 'upgrade' cost over 1
million NLG (Dutch guilders).
Very annoying those big iron companies. We had two banks of ICL Eagle
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:56 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
If this works, you've just solved a *BIG* problem for me: I'd been
handed (ordered before I arrived on the site) the issues of getting
Centrify OpenSSH to play nicely, and
On 03/07/2011 12:23 PM, Robert Grasso wrote:
Hello,
On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you want.
It would be preferable to use at least some (old but
powerful) tools such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need
is a tool providing a capture
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
NFSv4 is *NOT* your friend, and Kerberizing it effectively is not
trivial. I'm using Centrify for that and to have a reliable upstream
vendor who can actually support it. (I'm on a contract.) What's the
issue you're encountering, besides the lack
On Mar 7, 2011, at 6:12 AM, wessel van der aart wes...@postoffice.nl wrote:
Hi All,
I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it
will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the
setup i had in mind is as following:
All the data is already
Hello,
On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
archictecture:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Ross Walker wrote:
1Gbe can do 115MB/s @ 64K+ IO size, but at 4k IO size (NFS) 55MB/s is about
it.
If you need each node to be able to read 90-100MB/s you would need to setup
a cluster file system using iSCSI or FC and make sure the cluster file
system can handle large
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 07.03.2011 15:41:04:
Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com
Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
07.03.2011 15:41
Bitte antworten an
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
An
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Kopie
Thema
[CentOS] yum
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
when it is released?
For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and centralise (on
the machine) network authentication and (hopefully!) graphics
Am 03/07/2011 05:34 PM, schrieb Sean Carolan:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
First, if your
First, if your host is actually communicating with any kind of ip-based
network, it is quite certain, that 127.0.0.1 simply isn't his IP
address. And, at least for me, that's a fairly good reason.
Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea to have a single host using
loopback, while the rest of the
Am 03/07/2011 05:49 PM, schrieb Sean Carolan:
First, if your host is actually communicating with any kind of ip-based
network, it is quite certain, that 127.0.0.1 simply isn't his IP
address. And, at least for me, that's a fairly good reason.
Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea to have
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Laurence Hurst wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
when it is released?
For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and centralise
(on the machine) network
- Original Message -
| Hello,
|
| Today my server stopped responding.
| i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop
| of the following info shown on the screen:
|
| BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959]
|
| and alot of other information.
| ii've
When starting IPERF with iperf -s or iperf -sD it seems to stop
after client runs its first test. I would like to leave it running
for a few hours to give someone a chance to run a few tests. Is there
a way to leave it active on the server and kill it manually later?
Greetings..
Yes ENSCRIPT is a text to PostScript
conversion service.
As usual, am a bi confused on how to
implement the fit-to-page functionality.
Google resources say it is used then
proceeds to dance around the issue
Using the -ffontname@W/H option can one
calculate the necessary
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
When starting IPERF with iperf -s or iperf -sD it seems to stop
after client runs its first test. I would like to leave it running
for a few hours to give someone a chance to run a few tests. Is there
a way to leave it active on the server and kill it
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Robert Grasso wrote:
Hello,
On my opinion, grep is not powerful enough in order to achieve what you
want. It would be preferable to use at least some (old but powerful) tools
such sed, awk, or even better : perl. Actually, what you need is a tool
providing a capture buffer
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Laurence Hurst wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote:
How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6
when it is released?
For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and
centralise
(on the machine)
On 03/07/2011 09:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Charles Polishercpol...@surewest.net
wrote:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID
covers fake RAID.
Ouch. That was*precisely* why I used the 2410, not
On 03/07/11 10:43 AM, Chuck Munro wrote:
I haven't used Adaptec cards for
many years, mostly because their SCSI controllers back in the early days
were junk.
I blame Adaptec for the dominance of IDE. Seriously.
If Adaptec A) hadn't had the lionshare of the SCSI mindset in the PC
business
Hi
I used the command ip -6 addr add 2001:DB8:CAFE:::12/64 dev eth0
to add ipv6 address and can see it in ifconfig
but can't ping it
Why?
Thank you
# ping6 2001:db8:cafe:::12
PING 2001:db8:cafe:::12(2001:db8:cafe:::12) 56 data bytes
From ::1 icmp_seq=1 Destination
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost localhost.localdomain
(Make sure you pick .dummy so as not to interfere with any other DNS.)
In theory you could leave off .dummy, but then you risk hostname being
completed with the search domain in resolv.conf, which creates the
problems already mentioned with putting hostname.domain.com in
/etc/hosts. (I have
My scepticism regarding SMART data continues ... the flaky drive
showed no errors, and a full test and full zero-write using the WD
diagnostics revealed no errors either. If the drive is bad, there's
no evidence that would cause WD to issue an RMA.
I've been having a rash of drive failures
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1hostname.domain.com hostname localhost
Sean Carolan wrote:
(Make sure you pick .dummy so as not to interfere with any other DNS.)
In theory you could leave off .dummy, but then you risk hostname being
completed with the search domain in resolv.conf, which creates the
problems already mentioned with putting hostname.domain.com in
Sean Carolan wrote on Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:49:18 -0600:
Indeed. It does seem like a bad idea to have a single host using
loopback, while the rest of the network refers to it by it's real IP
address.
It doesn't matter for the other hosts, the sender ip address will always
be the outgoing
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
Our current alerting is happening through SNMP, though it's a bit hit or
miss (we apparently missed a couple of earlier
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/04/11 11:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm looking forward to the new cgroups and KVM. This will give it
some capabilities similar to AIX virtual partitions which can divvy up
CPUs at a fine resolution.
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring) suite.
Our current alerting is happening through SNMP, though it's a bit
on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've installed most of the OMSA (Dell monitoring)
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
We've
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Dell PERC H800 commandline RAID monitoring tools
From: Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com
To: CentOS User list centos@centos.org
Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:43:03 PM
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
on 16:04 Mon 07 Mar, Blake Hudson (bl...@ispn.net) wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Dell PERC H800 commandline RAID monitoring tools
From: Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com
To: CentOS User list centos@centos.org
Date: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:43:03 PM
We're
on 12:43 Mon 07 Mar, Dr. Ed Morbius (dredmorb...@gmail.com) wrote:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800 arrays on
a set of database servers running CentOS 5.5.
Pardoning the self-reply, but one issue we've ahd is reconciling the
omcontrol log report with the Dell
on 23:15 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
We're looking for tools to be used in monitoring the PERC H800
2011/3/8 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
on 23:15 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
on 22:57 Mon 07 Mar, Eero Volotinen (eero.voloti...@iki.fi) wrote:
2011/3/7 Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com:
We're looking
Dear CentOS,
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
Dave
--
When a respected information source covers something
on 14:41 Mon 07 Mar, Dave Stevens (g...@uniserve.com) wrote:
Dear CentOS,
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
On 03/07/11 2:41 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
Dear CentOS,
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
you mean, like a web
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:41:03 -0800
Dave Stevens wrote:
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
I did this a while
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:31:17PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Usually, it's rather an advantage because
in cases where you would just get localhost you now get some meaningful
name.
You can use the bare hostname as an alias in /etc/hosts, which is
probably marginally better than using the
On Monday, March 07, 2011 02:41:03 pm Dave Stevens wrote:
Dear CentOS,
I have a user group that would like to be able to routinely post (easily)
emails to a web site. Must be usable without special training. I have no
experience with this. Anyone have a suggestion? LAMP stack installed.
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:22, the following was written:
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Sean Carolan scaro...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback address?
127.0.0.1 hostname.domain.com hostname localhost
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On my centos boxes whenever I try to install packages I get a mix of
packages from the repos that are both i386 and x86_64 in
archictecture:
Jump to CentOS 6. Wait, that's not out yet. Buy an RHEL 6 license or
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
I haven't used keepalived with lvs in ages, but I believe it works
directly with the kernel, and therefore does not strictly require
ipvsadm. Please note that ipvsadm is a userspace tool for
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[steve@mail ~]$ yum provides '*/ipvsadm'
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
On 03/07/2011 08:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
That said, it can be problematic when you ping $HOSTNAME and get a
valid 127.0.0.1 response, and haven't actually tested your external
port. It also requires thought for configuring SSH and SNMP and NFS to
allow localhost access.
When you ping
thanks for relay!
if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not work.
then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
command line below:
ipvsadm -A -t 172.16.39.100:80 -s rr
ipvsadm -a -t 172.16.39.100:80 -r 172.16.39.30:80 -i
ipvsadm -a -t
if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not work.
then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
command line below:
ipvsadm -A -t http://172.16.39.100:80 172.16.39.100:80
-s rr
ipvsadm -a -t http://172.16.39.100:80 172.16.39.100:80
-r
no,my mean is the keepalived lvs need ipvsadm
2011/3/8 Steve Barnes st...@echo.id.au
if i only use ha+lvs configuration of keepalived.the load balance not
work.
then,i install ipvsadm and setup lvs with tun by ipvsadm ,it's work.
command line below:
ipvsadm -A -t
no,my mean is the keepalived lvs need ipvsadm
Ah right. Sorry, I thought you were having more problems :)
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
i couldn't connect to it to check through ssh.
and when it comes to the console, i couldn't do anything either as a repetitive
output as the screen shot attached keeps appearing.
this is an internal testing server with apache and mysql installed.
usually the load average is 8 % max.
server's
71 matches
Mail list logo
