on 20:35 Fri 18 Mar, John R. Dennison (j...@gerdesas.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:33:14PM -0700, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > I'm used to Debian-based distros which have a tempfile(1) utility for
> > safely and sanely creating temporary files.
> >
> > There isn't a comperable utility for
whitivery wrote:
>whitivery wrote:
>
>>whitivery wrote:
>>
>>>Patrick Lists
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote:
> # This does not work
> %include /tmp/drvdisk
>
> # This works
> #driverdisk
> --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHEL5.5_x86_402_40
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:25 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> Surely that wouldn't care how I'd done it? That requires the PTR record, and
>> that it points back to the name of the pricipal you want to use. With
>> multiple PTR records to the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:33:14PM -0700, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> I'm used to Debian-based distros which have a tempfile(1) utility for
> safely and sanely creating temporary files.
>
> There isn't a comperable utility for RHEL/CentOS systems.
Sure there is. mktemp; contained within the
I'm used to Debian-based distros which have a tempfile(1) utility for
safely and sanely creating temporary files.
There isn't a comperable utility for RHEL/CentOS systems.
I've been exercising Google-fu looking for a good robust tempfile
generation idiom, but haven't turned one up yet.
Hence thi
Tried sending this a while ago, but looks like mailman blocked it?
>But i don't know how to write the spec file so a simple yum update will
>install both packages and it won't create any problems.
A few options here, create a %{name} .spec with:
# This is part one, or the main component
%descrip
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:58 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> True. You cannot have multiple PTR records for an IP. I did not mean
>> to suggest that you could.
>
> Not saying you are wrong here, but have you an RFC reference
> to this effect? We previousl
On 18/03/11 16:49, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
>> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
>> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
>> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
>> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
>> /l
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
> True. You cannot have multiple PTR records for an IP. I did not mean
> to suggest that you could.
Not saying you are wrong here, but have you an RFC reference
to this effect? We previously held this belief from our prior
practice, but cannot find a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:25 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Arguably it's not the end-of-the-world to go though CNAMEs. If it
>> works for you, then don't let me deter you.
>
> Indeed it does, and it was the only way I could see you /could
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:07 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Jason Slack-Moehrle
>
>>> I am in a kind of fix , i got a website ( beta.somesite.com ) .. that
>>> need to be password protected , however there are two URLs that
>>> should be allowed to all with out password access. Ona cent os box
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
> /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypt
From: Jason Slack-Moehrle
>> I am in a kind of fix , i got a website ( beta.somesite.com ) .. that
>> need to be password protected , however there are two URLs that
>> should be allowed to all with out password access. Ona cent os box 5.5
>> i am running apache .
>> the entire site needs pas
On 03/18/2011 06:22 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
wrote:
Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
/lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 1429
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:23:18PM +, James Pearson wrote:
> Have you run 'modprobe -a' since installing the modules?
ITYM "depmod -a"
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Alain Péan
wrote:
> Le 18/03/2011 16:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
>
>
> ... that the default maximum group or username is 8 characters,...
>
>
> It was the case with solaris, but fortunately not on Linux. I don't
> remember what is the maximum length, but I t
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
> /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/cry
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
wrote:
> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
> /lib/modules/2.6.38
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
> /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypt
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
> /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
> root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
> /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/dri
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:25:24AM -0700, Jason Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
> >I am in a kind of fix , i got a website ( beta.somesite.com ) .. that
> >need to be password protected , however there are two URLs that
> >should be allowed to all with out password access. Ona cent os box 5.5
> >i am run
Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent
/lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ...
root@sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-*
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37
/lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.ko
-rwxr--r-- 1 ro
>>the entire site needs passwd protection except for the Below Urls .
>>
>>http://beta.somesite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/large_1990782-e1299229
>>617964.jpg
>>
>>http://beta.somesite.com/?cat=592&feed=rss2
>
> With my limited knowledge could a ReWrite rule work here?
>
Take a look at the
>I am in a kind of fix , i got a website ( beta.somesite.com ) .. that
>need to be password protected , however there are two URLs that
>should be allowed to all with out password access. Ona cent os box 5.5
>i am running apache .
>
>the entire site needs passwd protection except for the Below
Le 18/03/2011 16:07, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
... that the default maximum group or username is 8 characters,...
It was the case with solaris, but fortunately not on Linux. I don't
remember what is the maximum length, but I think it could be up to 128
characters...
Alain
--
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> It can otherwise be done manually, but the data entry time wasted for
>> your engineers well justifies the price of a Centrify license or two.
>
> What do you mean by manually? Can't this al
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It can otherwise be done manually, but the data entry time wasted for
> your engineers well justifies the price of a Centrify license or two.
What do you mean by manually? Can't this all be done with ypcat, ldapmodify
and a shell script? After whi
Hi,
I have a custom rpm for our application. The problem is that it grew old and
fat. It's about 30 MB. So i would like to split it into two parts. One big
part that almost never changes and one smaller part that is changed more
frequently. But i don't know how to write the spec file so a simple yu
hersh parikh wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We want to install packages like xfig and transfig on centos 5.5. We
> found rpms available but them but it seems there are lot of dependencies
> for these packages. So we would like to setup yum repo for this. Can
> anyone suggest trusted baseurl for yum repo?
xfi
On Mar 18, 2011, at 8:31 AM, "MOKRANI Rachid" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
> an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
> management of id and gid.
>
> How to move 1000 actual NIS users to AD ?
> How to keep t
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:31 AM, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
> an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
> management of id and gid.
>
> How to move 1000 actual NIS users to AD ?
> How to keep the
Le 18/03/2011 14:06, Dvorkin, Asya a écrit :
Hi,
Check out Likewise open. I think this is what you are looking for.
http://www.likewise.com/products/likewise_open/
" Likewise Open is the open source foundation for Likewise Enterprise
that joins Linux, UNIX, and Mac OS systems to Microsoft Ac
Hi,
Check out Likewise open. I think this is what you are looking for.
http://www.likewise.com/products/likewise_open/
" Likewise Open is the open source foundation for Likewise Enterprise that
joins Linux, UNIX, and Mac OS systems to Microsoft Active Directory to securely
authenticate non-Wi
Le 18/03/2011 13:31, MOKRANI Rachid a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
> an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
> management of id and gid.
Here is a very good blog, scott Lowe, where I f found precise
informati
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
> an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
> management of id and gid.
>
> How to move 1000 actual NIS users to AD ?
Create matching accounts i
Hi,
I'm looking a wiki or share experience for replace NIS authentication by
an existing Active directory Server (W2003). The problem is on the
management of id and gid.
How to move 1000 actual NIS users to AD ?
How to keep the same id and gid for this 1000 users ?
What's happen with nfs linux
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 08:18 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
> I am trying to wrap my head around on this topic.
> Was wondering : Just as there is some scope for mapping ipv4 directly
> into IPV6 space, Is there a MAC ID or some kind of WWID has also been
> taken into consideration
Hi All
We want to install packages like xfig and transfig on centos 5.5. We found rpms
available but them but it seems there are lot of dependencies for these
packages. So we would like to setup yum repo for this. Can anyone suggest
trusted baseurl for yum repo?
Regards
Hersh
___
H All
I am in a kind of fix , i got a website ( beta.somesite.com ) .. that
need to be password protected , however there are two URLs that
should be allowed to all with out password access. Ona cent os box 5.5
i am running apache .
the entire site needs passwd protection except for the Below
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Arguably it's not the end-of-the-world to go though CNAMEs. If it
> works for you, then don't let me deter you.
Indeed it does, and it was the only way I could see you /could/ do this.
Especially if you're not a domain admin. I'm still n
Le 18/03/2011 01:32, Timothy Murphy a écrit :
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had been a problem.
This is exactly the point. I can add that all my C
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Timothy Murphy
>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:33 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>However, I don't think people who ask reasonable questions politely
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:18 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>> I don't know what the official view is on going through a CNAME but I
>> think that is probably a dubious practice. The proper way to handle
>> this scenario would be to add another servicePrincip
43 matches
Mail list logo
