I plan to make my current Centos 4 HD a slave and install Centos
5.5 on a new HD (master). Then comes the challenge of of moving
all of my /home/"user" data to the new master. I have some
preliminary questions:
Is this a good strategy for installing Centos 5.5: keep the
Centos 4 on a slave d
Sam Trenholme wrote:
* As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been
mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security
updates are being backported to SL 5.5. Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but
security patches look current)
And we try very hard not to rel
>> * As mentioned before, Scientific Linux 6.0 is out. What hasn't been
>> mentioned here is that while SL 5.6 hasn't come out, 5.6 security
>> updates are being backported to SL 5.5. Ditto with SL 4 (no 4.9 but
>> security patches look current)
>>
> And we try very hard not to release things unt
Am 23.03.2011 19:33, schrieb admin lewis:
> Thanks very much to all, now I have understood..
> anyway it's a perc s300.. I see I can make a virtual disk read-only...
> very interesting.. well .. to have a /boot partition read-only is a
> non-sense...
> thanks to all again... someone has told "goog
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
> Thanks to the help of folks on this forum, I now have my Centos 4 box up and
> working, however I do have a question on how the repair actually worked.
>
> After starting the Linux Repair, the process "found my installed Linux".
> Some of you wil
>Use fence_manual ... but it is not supported officially by TUV in
>production environments ...
Do not use that...
How does that actually fence the offending node when it needs to?
The concept of fencing is for the preservation of data integrity, circumventing
it with a manual fence is useful on
Thanks to the help of folks on this forum, I now have my Centos 4
box up and working, however I do have a question on how the
repair actually worked.
After starting the Linux Repair, the process "found my installed
Linux". Some of you will remember that I had accidentally erased
the /boot an
On 03/23/2011 11:19 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m new to configuring Clustering .
>
> The CentOS 5.5 guest machines will be running on ESXi 4.1 . I’m
> configuring the clustering using “Conga” . I see that there is support
> for using ESX to do the fencing. The problem I have is that the gu
Hi.
I'm new to configuring Clustering .
The CentOS 5.5 guest machines will be running on ESXi 4.1 . I'm configuring the
clustering using "Conga" . I see that there is support for using ESX to do the
fencing. The problem I have is that the guest machines are not allowed to have
access the "manag
> Ok, I won't argue with that; a "it fails in this scenario" overrides
> a "it works for me". I will add though, that were it got into the state
> described above was where I was able to recover it by using the reset
> button. You might want to try that next time instead of the cable
> disconnec
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:19:49 AM + Miguel Medalha
> wrote:
>
>> The D-Links are NOT suitable for professional use. I used one of their
>> models and it hanged on me multiple times. Because it is powered by the
>> keyboard/mouse/
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
Yes, but using the machine principal you're able to request any number of
service principals that are SERVICENAME/. For this to work in a
virtual hosting environment, you need multiple machine names (since we're
talking about making a number of HTTP/
2011/3/23 John R Pierce :
> On 03/23/11 10:40 AM, admin lewis wrote:
>> Hi,
>> this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
>> booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
>> something I miss ?
>
> does that system have some form of PERC raid controller?
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It is just hard for an outsider to reconcile the statements about the
> build process not needing any changes or more resources with the lack of
> a target time. Or that binary compatibility is the critical thing with
> the distribution becoming incompat
On 3/23/2011 10:40 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Sometimes looking at the list and the posts, I feel like I am
> watching a group of nuns, talking (speculating) about the life
> issues of Las Vegas showgirls
The showgirls are picky about who they let under the covers. So I
suppose we have to wait f
On 03/23/11 10:40 AM, admin lewis wrote:
> Hi,
> this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
> booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
> something I miss ?
does that system have some form of PERC raid controller? you need to go
into the PERC Bio
Le 23/03/2011 18:40, admin lewis a écrit :
> Hi,
> this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
> booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
> something I miss ?
> thanks very much for any help
> luigi
What have you as Raid Controller ? H200, H700, so
on 18:40 Wed 23 Mar, admin lewis (adminle...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
> booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
> something I miss ?
> thanks very much for any help
1: Comfirm your boot menu settings
2:
admin lewis wrote:
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
Have you configured any raid disk controllers in the bios first?
This is a very common question - servers with RAID
Hi,
this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I
booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there
something I miss ?
thanks very much for any help
luigi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. "Building it
>> yourself", without that access to your unique build environment or a
>> way to gracefully replicate it,
At Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:34:10 +0530 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Am trying to build SMP kernel.
You do know that the *stock* CentOS 5.x kernels (2.6.18-...) are already
built as SMP kernels? That is, under RHEL 5/CentOS 5 you don't even get
uniprocessor kernels, unless you bui
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, cornel panceac wrote:
> 2011/3/23 R P Herrold
>
>> This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
>> 'doing' rather than
>> talking in the cloister
> as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
> became harder.
ehhh? It
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 03:19:49 AM + Miguel Medalha
wrote:
> The D-Links are NOT suitable for professional use. I used one of their
> models and it hanged on me multiple times. Because it is powered by the
> keyboard/mouse/video connectors, the only way to recover it is to
> physicall
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:56:34 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Understood. I'd like to replicate or examine the error. "Building it
> yourself", without that access to your unique build environment or a
> way to gracefully replicate it, represents dozens or hundreds of
> man-hours for each con
2011/3/23 R P Herrold
> This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
> 'doing' rather than
> talking in the cloister
>
> as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder. so i believe the real question is: how can we help the CentOS
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi! I would need an advice from those that use IB (as admins :) ) i have a
choice between :
1. Mellanox InfiniHost(r) III Lx HCA card, single-port CX4, DDR, PCIe x8,
mem-free, tall bracket, RoHS R5
2. QLogic Single Port 20 Gb InfiniBand to x16 PCI Express Adapter (Single Pack)
aside the price
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> It takes hours to analyze all the packages in a build ... I do not have
> hours to spend on doing it for SL ... but here is another error that I
> found in the SL tree when figuring out build issues in the CentOS 5.6 tree:
Which is why opening the proce
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the
> SL notes on the srpms that don't build with the listed
> dependencies as shipped - and they aren't being picky about
> the library linkages matching the RH binaries like CentOS
> is.
> If
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> sri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am trying to build SMP kernel.
>> Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
>> Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot
>> up, following errors were sh
On Monday, March 21, 2011 07:53:04 pm Max Hetrick wrote:
> If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
> Duplicate Messages on Mozilla's add-on site.
As a pointer, the kmail I'm using, from within Kontact, also can do
de-duplication; click 'Folder' then 'Remove Duplicate
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
>> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
>> 133 days delay, an all time rec
sri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am trying to build SMP kernel.
> Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
> Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot
> up, following errors were shown up(highlighted in bold & red color):
> My kernel config file has AC
Hi,
Am trying to build SMP kernel.
Took kernel-2.6.18-194.src.rpm, extracted, rpmbuilded with SMP option.
Successfully compile the new kernel and when using that kernel to boot up,
following errors were shown up(highlighted in bold & red color):
My kernel config file has ACPI and PCI configs enabl
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji
> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is
> 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
>
> DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2
> Finally found that
Hi! I would need an advice from those that use IB (as admins :) )
i have a choice between :
1. Mellanox InfiniHost® III Lx HCA card, single-port CX4, DDR, PCIe
x8, mem-free, tall bracket, RoHS R5
2. QLogic Single Port 20 Gb InfiniBand to x16 PCI Express Adapter
(Single Pack)
aside the price is t
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Ouch. Johnny, I'd really like to replicate this error, but I just
>> don't have the visibility into your build configurations. Saying "it's
>> easy to do yourself" doesn't work, because the
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD
> Version is 8.3.10
>
> DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Node testing with
> Simplex Setup
> Server 1 : 192.168.13.131 IP Address and h
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is
> 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
We're pretty much unable to help because yours is a RHEL6 system, we're
stuck at RHEL5.5 until our team gets R
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
>>> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
>>> like RHEL.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On 3/22/11 7:38 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> You missed my point to the poster. While Centos is my defacto
>> production OS, he mentioned switching to Ubuntu which is nothing
>> like RHEL.
>>
>> So I thought instead of going with such a diff paradigm,
On 03/23/2011 07:53 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>> And then looking at the reason for the fails:
>>
>> Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out:
>> --- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0 -0500
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Sam Trenholme
> wrote:
>>
>> As an open-source developer, I understand the frustration of working
>> hard and having a lot of freeloaders not appreciating my work. I feel
>> people posting here talking about how unpr
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> And then looking at the reason for the fails:
>
> Differing package requirements certmonger-0.30-4.el5.x86_64.rpm.out:
> --- work/SL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0 -0500
> +++ work/RHEL-req 2011-03-23 02:53:25.0 -0
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and
>> DRBD Version is 8.3.10
>>
>> I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this
>> peculia
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD
> Version is 8.3.10
>
> I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this
> peculiar problem
>
> Please replay me ASAP.
the problem is, thats a RED
On 03/22/2011 08:37 AM, Sam Trenholme wrote:
> Hello everyone:
>
> * DNS does not have a "refresh rate". In DNS, the person running the
> domain determines what the "refresh rate" (it's called TTL in DNS) for
> their records is; for example, Google has a TTL of "once per hour" and
> my domains (m
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Sam Trenholme
wrote:
>
> As an open-source developer, I understand the frustration of working
> hard and having a lot of freeloaders not appreciating my work. I feel
> people posting here talking about how unprofessional CentOS is acting
> are completely missing th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 06:45:46AM +, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> I see time-lines clearly published in this FAQ on the CentOS website:
Trimmed for brevity.
> "This will normally be within 2 weeks of the Update Set release."
>
> The above FAQ creates an expectation of 2 weeks being the no
50 matches
Mail list logo
