With Centos 5.5, my external USB drive appears to self mount in
that the icon appears on the desktop and when I double click on
it, the files are there. However, I recall that I need to make
an entry in the fstab as well as some other changes.
When I do a
# /sbin/fdisk -l
I learn that the de
On 3/25/2011 4:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/25/11 4:45 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
>> I know this is a Linux 101 question, however I am unable to
>> locate the answer in my O'Reilly Linux book: how to set the
>> default for permissions when creating a new user. The default
>> for the GUI in my n
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
> I know this is a Linux 101 question, however I am unable to
> locate the answer in my O'Reilly Linux book: how to set the
> default for permissions when creating a new user. The default
> for the GUI in my newly installed Centos 5.5 is 700. I u
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/25/11 6:31 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
One has to be cautious about the bootstrap environment, to make sure
that the libraries available in your "mock" or other build
environments are the same libraries. Red Hat seems t
> On 03/25/2011 11:17 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
>> http://www.ksplice.com/
>>
>> I've heard of it, but never used it. Curious to hear other people's
>> experiences...
>>
>
> I have met and spoken at length with the ksplice guys - its really cool
> stuff, and they are a great bunch of guys. If yo
On 3/25/11 6:31 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>>> One has to be cautious about the bootstrap environment, to make sure
>>> that the libraries available in your "mock" or other build
>>> environments are the same libraries. Red Hat seems to be very, very
>>> good about this.
>>
>> It is not that th
on 16:45 Fri 25 Mar, Todd Cary (t...@aristesoftware.com) wrote:
> I know this is a Linux 101 question, however I am unable to
> locate the answer in my O'Reilly Linux book: how to set the
> default for permissions when creating a new user. The default
> for the GUI in my newly installed Centos
On 03/25/11 4:45 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
> I know this is a Linux 101 question, however I am unable to
> locate the answer in my O'Reilly Linux book: how to set the
> default for permissions when creating a new user. The default
> for the GUI in my newly installed Centos 5.5 is 700. I usually
> use
I know this is a Linux 101 question, however I am unable to
locate the answer in my O'Reilly Linux book: how to set the
default for permissions when creating a new user. The default
for the GUI in my newly installed Centos 5.5 is 700. I usually
use 774.
And when root creates a new directory,
On 3/25/2011 12:13 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 25 March 2011 19:09, Todd Cary wrote:
>> I am in the process of bring up Centos 5.5. My ftp server is
>> vsftp. When I add a user (e.g. brian), the "brian" directory is
>> owned by "brian" and is in the "brian" group with 700
>> permissions. How
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 5:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
> Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that
> matched
> their binaries
Red Hat's published source is what they use to create their binaries.
On 03/25/2011 11:17 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
> http://www.ksplice.com/
>
> I've heard of it, but never used it. Curious to hear other people's
> experiences...
>
I have met and spoken at length with the ksplice guys - its really cool
stuff, and they are a great bunch of guys. If you do consid
Slightly OT, but I have more than one pacemaker/corosync cluster where one
of the main reasons to use a cluster (in addition to the availability
aspect) is to be able to perform running updates without affecting the
user base. As in:
1. All services running on node A.
2. Update node B.
3. C
On 03/25/11 3:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/25/11 2:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> So doesn't that mean you need to start the next design sooner vs later?
>> If the middleware layer handles most of the component interaction you
>> might have some freedom to make piecemeal changes. On the othe
On 03/25/11 2:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> So doesn't that mean you need to start the next design sooner vs later?
> If the middleware layer handles most of the component interaction you
> might have some freedom to make piecemeal changes. On the other hand,
> distributed database technology is st
On 3/25/2011 5:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that matched
their binaries
>>>
>>> Red Hat's published source is what they use to create their binaries.
>>> There is no mis-match.
>>
>> I thought the issue causing the delays
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Santi Saez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build PHP 5.3.6 in a CentOS-4 server with MySQL 5.5.10 and I
> get this error:
Update directly to CentOS 5.5, and build the "php53" SRPM from
upstream. That will be in CentOS 5.6.
__
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 4:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 03/20/2011 12:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that matched
>>> their binaries
>>
>> Red Hat's published source is what they use to
On 3/25/2011 4:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/20/2011 12:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that matched
>> their binaries
>
> Red Hat's published source is what they use to create their binaries.
> There is no mis-match.
I thought th
On 3/25/2011 2:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> So no one develops new applications there?
>
> This is a large scale manufacturing execution system. You don't just go
> off and design an all new system based on the buzzwords d'jour, when
> your factories are dependent on it.
Pretty much everyone i
On 03/20/2011 12:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Or, maybe there was back in the days when they released source that matched
> their binaries
Red Hat's published source is what they use to create their binaries.
There is no mis-match.
___
CentOS mailing li
On 3/25/2011 3:42 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
>>> My concern with buffering / blocking output has more to do with some
>>> critical service saying "wups, no more serving until I can flush my log
>>> buffers" than it does losing a few lines of logging periodically (though
>>> that should also be min
on 13:18 Fri 25 Mar, Mogens Kjaer (m...@lemo.dk) wrote:
> On 03/24/2011 10:05 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > You can create a "timestamp" cron job. Just a
> >
> > */10 * * * * root Logger "--- TIMESTAMP ---"
>
> syslogd already has this buildin. It's normally disabled
> by the "-m 0" in /etc/
on 15:28 Fri 25 Mar, Les Mikesell (lesmikes...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 2:53 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> >
> > My concern with buffering / blocking output has more to do with some
> > critical service saying "wups, no more serving until I can flush my log
> > buffers" than it does losing a
On 3/25/2011 2:53 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
> My concern with buffering / blocking output has more to do with some
> critical service saying "wups, no more serving until I can flush my log
> buffers" than it does losing a few lines of logging periodically (though
> that should also be minimized).
On 3/25/2011 2:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Well... except that in this context, it's not only database
>>> transactions: it's any granular interaction between client and server.
>>> You don't, for example, want part of a form you've just clicked
>>> on to only partly get there, if there's
On 03/25/11 12:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> So no one develops new applications there?
This is a large scale manufacturing execution system. You don't just go
off and design an all new system based on the buzzwords d'jour, when
your factories are dependent on it.
Picture large factory floors wi
on 20:19 Fri 25 Mar, Ilyas -- (umas...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Also note that:
> 1. logrotate wouldn't rotate fifo/pipes if options `notifempty'
> enabled in logrotate profiles.
> 2. enable buffering in syslog-ng.conf (next - whole list of options in
> my config):
> options {
> sync (1
on 09:08 Fri 25 Mar, Lamar Owen (lo...@pari.edu) wrote:
> On Thursday, March 24, 2011 06:52:24 pm Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > Right, and the general solution also generalizes to other tools.
> > Postgresql (which we aren't using currently) also has its own log
> > handler (a small frustration of mine
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/25/2011 2:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
transaction s
On 3/25/2011 2:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
>>> distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
>>> something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
>>> transaction state (where 'reasonable' is
On 03/25/11 12:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> * Paradigm, as in, "the new flavor toothpaste of spearment instead
> of peppermint is a New Paradigm!!! and will (dare I say it)
> Change the World As We Know It!!"
:)
We're still trying to stick forks in "Younameit as a Service" (Y
On 3/25/2011 1:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
>> distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
>> something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
>> transaction state (where 'reasonable' is define
On 25 March 2011 19:09, Todd Cary wrote:
> I am in the process of bring up Centos 5.5. My ftp server is
> vsftp. When I add a user (e.g. brian), the "brian" directory is
> owned by "brian" and is in the "brian" group with 700
> permissions. However, using a FTP client, the user "brian" can
> vi
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/25/11 11:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
>> distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
>> something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
>> transaction state (where 'r
I am in the process of bring up Centos 5.5. My ftp server is
vsftp. When I add a user (e.g. brian), the "brian" directory is
owned by "brian" and is in the "brian" group with 700
permissions. However, using a FTP client, the user "brian" can
view all of the directories. I do not see any dir
On 03/25/11 11:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Not everything deals in transactions, though. The recently popular
> distributed database versions that scale up are more about doing
> something reasonable in scenarios where you can't guarantee a
> transaction state (where 'reasonable' is defined by th
On 3/24/2011 2:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Having said that, I have this troubling thought for last decade: What
>> exactly is high availability: is it 24/7 power on time? or is ti "when
>> needed". Please not it am not talking about the maybe arrogant "on
>> demand" attitude of a human.
>
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/25/11 3:15 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't
>> reboot.
>> Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
>> don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (po
Hi!
Also note that:
1. logrotate wouldn't rotate fifo/pipes if options `notifempty'
enabled in logrotate profiles.
2. enable buffering in syslog-ng.conf (next - whole list of options in
my config):
options {
sync (128);
time_reopen (10);
log_fifo_size (16384);
chain
On 03/25/11 3:15 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't
> reboot.
> Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
> don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (postponing
> to some other da
Windsor Dave L. (AdP/TEF7) wrote:
>
> On 3/25/2011 7:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Dave Windsor
>>
>>> Today, there are not high I/O loads. This server was intended to
>>> replace two older HP-UX servers. I had just begun to migrate the
>>> workload to the new server when the crashes began t
On 3/25/2011 7:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Dave Windsor
>
>> Today, there are not high I/O loads. This server was intended to
>> replace two older HP-UX servers. I had just begun to migrate the
>> workload to the new server when the crashes began to occur. There are
>> some minor, sporad
Hello,
I'm trying to build PHP 5.3.6 in a CentOS-4 server with MySQL 5.5.10 and
I get this error:
//usr/include/mysql/my_config_i386.h:610:1: warning: "PACKAGE_NAME"
redefined
/usr/include/mysql/mysql/psi/mysql_thread.h:100: error: syntax error
before "pthread_rwlock_t"
/usr/include/mysql/my
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> But what could be the cause for throwing this ACPI errors?
I've had acpi errors like the ones you list, that went away when I
installed SL6.0
Before then I had to boot acpi=off. Your board is not SMP and does not
support ACPI.
>> following errors were shown up
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 06:52:24 pm Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> Right, and the general solution also generalizes to other tools.
> Postgresql (which we aren't using currently) also has its own log
> handler (a small frustration of mine with the database).
PostgreSQL has had syslog support since ve
On 03/24/2011 10:05 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> You can create a "timestamp" cron job. Just a
>
> */10 * * * * root Logger "--- TIMESTAMP ---"
syslogd already has this buildin. It's normally disabled
by the "-m 0" in /etc/sysconfig/syslog. Change the zero
to 10, restart syslogd and you get t
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:35 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but if you're not a domain admin, you've only got a machine principal,
>> and your own principal (which I can use to join machines to the d
From: Dave Windsor
> Today, there are not high I/O loads. This server was intended to
> replace two older HP-UX servers. I had just begun to migrate the
> workload to the new server when the crashes began to occur. There are
> some minor, sporadic I/O loads but nothing that I would thin
> Hi all,
> I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't
> reboot.
> Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
> don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (postponing
> to some other date), right?
On the topic of updating the k
At Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:15:38 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't
> reboot.
> Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
> don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (post
Hi Fajar,
usually you're fine, although i experienced some kind of "binary rot"
if I did that too excessively. Especally things that are located
"near" the kernel like initscripts and the xen daemon may
start acting funny (like domU not starting up any more and such
things...) if the kernel versio
Hi all,
I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't reboot.
Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (postponing
to some other date), right?
Thank you.
First: thanks very much for spelling this out, Ilyas. This was along
the lines of what I'd been considering. You addressed a number of
concerns I had (e.g.: non-blocking output) which is really helpful.
on 08:39 Fri 25 Mar, Ilyas -- (umas...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using follow method
54 matches
Mail list logo
