On 09/04/11 11:36, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b)
Please make me a wiki editor. I want to create my personal home page.
I'd like some feedback on an idea. I apologize for my verbosity.
Cut it to shreds. Thanks in advance!
TL;DR:
Gradually tag the CentOS wiki with div's indicating status
with respect to content migration to website2.
LinkedIn
Miguel Pujante Marco pidió añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Angelo:
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. - Miguel Pujante Marco
Aceptar invitación de Miguel Pujante Marco
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 8:24:39 PM
Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 is out, great my first upgrade didn't work...
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:47 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya dvork...@umdnj.edu wrote:
Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
Questions to ask about CentOS building process, and thanks to Akemi
for a quick answer :)
Le 09/04/2011 08:23, Paul Daggett a écrit :
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Rossrossnick-li...@cybercat.ca
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 8:24:39 PM
Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 is out, great my first upgrade didn't work...
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum
Dear List,
I've taken a look at the TODO page http://wiki.centos.org/ToDo and I've
picked something at random to ask a question about and see if we can get
it done!
Add page for Hosting control panels - we seem to get a lot of people
asking about them
I spotted this quote - What exactly does
- Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca escreveu:
5.6 is out. That is good news.
Well, I did it on a bunch of servers, and until now always ok.
Nice work :)
Antonio
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Antonio S. Martins Jr. -
On 04/09/2011 10:26 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Dear List,
I've taken a look at the TODO page http://wiki.centos.org/ToDo and I've
picked something at random to ask a question about and see if we can get
it done!
Just as a warning : that page is very very out of date. A ToDo list,
drawn up
Hi
On 04/08/2011 07:47 PM, Brian Mathis wrote:
Yes, and not to mention the giant warning on the top of that page:
Comment from Karanbir Singh:
Just want to point out that CentOS does not use anything from that page
- and details / scripts on that page have nothing to do with
On 9.4.2011 01:42, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I think I could have done it with http,
at least it linked to my web-server.
But I agree with you that NFS is much the easier way.
NFS method requires you to run a nfs server. This is not easy if you are
not running nfs service at your site. You have
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 10:31 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/09/2011 10:26 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Dear List,
I've taken a look at the TODO page http://wiki.centos.org/ToDo and I've
picked something at random to ask a question about and see if we can get
it done!
Just as a
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b) Reword those that are
4) Update Wiki
(...)
Please post a follow-up, I'm curious what went wrong. :)
Maybe your server is hanging at fsck recovery shell waiting for root
password (or user interaction).
Probably that.
Do you have a option to reboot you system into rescue mode or better a
KVM over IP ?
Sorry, no, that server was
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
Ed Westphal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Ed Westphal enwes...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
+1
Thanks!
--
mv
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 09/04/11 11:36, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a) Get rid of the items that are no longer relevant
b)
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:32:34 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
I just wanted to make sure that people realise that while the process on
that page will get you to where one needs to be, the scripts etc are not
what we use in the centos buildsystem.
And that's a more useful statement than the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
When your work speaks for itself, don't interrupt.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 13:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
On 09/04/11 11:36, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Due to recent list traffic, it seems that we need to have a new todo
list! I propose the following
1) Nuke current todo page
2) Create new todo page
3) Clear out ancient todo items
a)
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 08:52 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:32:34 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
I just wanted to make sure that people realise that while the process on
that page will get you to where one needs to be, the scripts etc are not
what we use in the centos
Mister IT Guru wrote on 04/09/2011 06:36 AM:
...
Any ideas? Anyone want to comment?
The Wiki could use a lot of work in many areas including this one;
however, Wiki discussions should be conducted on centos-docs. Please
post there.
Phil
___
CentOS
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Ciao,
luigi
The same from me too!
Simon
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
cheap scsi raid? good luck. maybe something on ebay, but then its
Caveat Emptor, and likely the raid batteries will be dead or dying.
What speed is your scsi backplane? you can't get Ultra/320 speeds
across older backplanes that were designed for U80 or U160 speeds. in
fact, I've had a
On 09/04/2011 14:23, Ed Westphal wrote:
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
Ed Westphal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 15:32 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote:
On 09/04/2011 14:23, Ed Westphal wrote:
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box - 5.6 final is
running just fine. No problems. THANKS.
Ed Westphal
___
CentOS
You and your crew slowed down the internet last night with all the 5.6
downloads.
Congrats!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I don't know where you are but I have a surplus ICP vortex proper Raid
card with 1GB
of cache - PCI-X. It was nearly £1k when we bought it and it ran our
main server for years.
You're probably looking for a new one but someone can have this for
beer money if it's
of any use. I'm only going to have
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 09:14 PM, Drew wrote:
cheap scsi raid? good luck. maybe something on ebay, but then its
Caveat Emptor, and likely the raid batteries will be dead or dying.
What speed is your scsi backplane? you can't get Ultra/320 speeds
across older backplanes that were
Cheers Karanbeer (sic) and team, I think we all owe you several cold ones.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:04 PM, William Hooper whooper...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
In my case, at least, I would always run a Live CD before installing an OS,
just to make sure it runs OK.
So a person might well have a Live USB
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives.
Does five drives count?
I was just hoping a slightly newer card might be available that'd give
me a speed boost for cheap. :-)
Again, like John posted, it depends on whether your
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:47 PM, Drew wrote:
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives.
Does five drives count?
I guess that depends on whether they can flood an u320 bus. If they are
10k/15k rpm drives, I'd think
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Thanks a lot!
(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 4/9/11 5:13 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
I think I could have done it with http,
at least it linked to my web-server.
But I agree with you that NFS is much the easier way.
NFS method requires you to run a nfs server. This is not easy if you are
not running nfs service at your site. You have to
After updating to 5.6 on a server this morning, I can no longer boot two
virtual machines. One is trixbox which I believe is a 32bit centos based
distro, and the other vm is a 64bit Windows 2008 installation.
The error I get in the virt-manager console is FATAL: No bootable device.
Both VMs are
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:21 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
After updating to 5.6 on a server this morning, I can no longer boot two
virtual machines. One is trixbox which I believe is a 32bit centos based
distro, and the other vm is a 64bit Windows 2008 installation.
The error I get
A similar incident was reported during the QA. Look at the .xml file.
If it says type='raw', change it to type='qcow2' and restart libvirtd.
Would that fix the problem ?
Akemi
Thank you. After reading your message, I googled the error and found a
webpage that describes a slightly different
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Seconded!
My update was trouble-free. updated something in the neighborhood
of 180 packages.
--
CentOS 5.6, x86_64
In Virt-Manager, when attempting to either change a guest's memory
allocation or even just clicking Apply on the memory tab and not
actually changing the values, the following error pops up:
Error changing memory values: this function is not supported by the
connection
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
CentOS 5.6, x86_64
In Virt-Manager, when attempting to either change a guest's memory
allocation or even just clicking Apply on the memory tab and not
actually changing the values, the following error pops up:
Error
On 04/09/11 7:08 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
In that case there's no real point upgrading. :-) The drives are U160's.
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives
SCSI (parallel) before U320 had a weak spot. the command and
On 04/09/11 8:11 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 10:47 PM, Drew wrote:
The key is the backplane, not the drives. You should be able to get u320
speeds if you have enough u160 drives.
Does five drives count?
I guess that depends on whether they can flood an u320 bus. If
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, fred smith wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:01:34PM +0200, Luigi Rosa wrote:
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Seconded!
My update was trouble-free. updated something in the neighborhood
of 180 packages.
Well done indeed, none of my CentOS systems show any problems
On 04/09/11 2:34 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, fred smith wrote:
My update was trouble-free. updated something in the neighborhood
of 180 packages.
Well done indeed, none of my CentOS systems show any problems either.
is the mirror synching officially complete? I'm seeing 5.3
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
I see the src's for the updates RPM's but not the base.
many thanks
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Kevin Thorpe
kevin.tho...@pibenchmark.comwrote:
Cheers Karanbeer (sic) and team, I think we all owe you several cold ones.
A beautiful job!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Ciao,
luigi
Seconded (or thirded, or fourthed... or...)
Update went without issue on the desktop -- currently updating the
laptop. I don't
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Ciao,
luigi
Seconded (or thirded, or fourthed... or...)
Update
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 13:54 -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
In Virt-Manager, when attempting to either change a guest's memory
allocation or even just clicking Apply on the memory tab and not
actually changing the values, the following error pops up:
Error changing memory values: this function
I guess that depends on whether they can flood an u320 bus. If they are
10k/15k rpm drives, I'd think so...
10k rpm drives. I can also get my hands on some retired IBM U320's if
I want to pull them from our shop's boneyard.
No experience with that particular unit but Supermicro has a good
On 04/09/2011 06:28 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Hmm... I guess that is a hint. That took all of half an hour for the
little morsal i nibbled to turn into the phrase, Bit off more than I
can chew!
Okay, well facing this new challenge, I have a feeling that the ToDo
page on the wiki needs
53 matches
Mail list logo
