Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

On 4/12/11, jvalido...@juanyjosefina.com wrote: > For me mdadm is fine but if I set a server for a friend, relative or client > I want to be notified by email if something goes wrong, I mostly (99.5%) > work on windows so I don't really know what's out there for Linux. I was > very impressed with

Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

 I'm a Windows and an old guy, I don't really know what I mean. Thanks.   Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor SoftwareFrom: John R Pierce Date: Mon, April 11, 2011 9:28 pmTo: centos@centos.orgOn 04/11/11 8:07 PM, jvalido...@juanyjo

Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

For me mdadm is fine but if I set a server for a friend, relative or client I want to be notified by email if something goes wrong, I mostly (99.5%) work on windows so I don't really know what's out there for Linux. I was very impressed with the performance I got on CentOS 5.6 using software Raid 1

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 12/04/11 00:03, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >>> > This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the > processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer > anything

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

> sadly, gmail/googlemail is very hostile to proper quoting practices. > it hides quoted text, while leaving the whole previous message appended, > without any form of > quoting.   The only workable way around this is to > use a imap/pop client like Thunderbird with it, which then disables a > lot

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!

and Malaysia too. :-) On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Sorin Srbu > wrote: > > Topping that; 175 packages dropped in on my test-machine at work. 8-) > Feels like > > I'm getting spoiled with updates like this that "just work". ;*) > > > >

Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

On 04/11/11 8:07 PM, jvalido...@juanyjosefina.com wrote: > Is there an easy to install GUI software raid monitoring software that > I can use to send me an email when there are errors (or am I asking > too much). I for one wouldn't want my notifications dependent on a GUI application running.

Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:07 AM, wrote: > Is there an easy to install GUI software raid monitoring software that I can > use to send me an email when there are errors (or am I asking too much). > Thanks. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org >

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Topping that; 175 packages dropped in on my test-machine at work. 8-) Feels > like > I'm getting spoiled with updates like this that "just work". ;*) > > So far, so good. Great work CentOS-team/devs! Thanks from Uppsala/Sweden! Thanks from Sin

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!

Being the chickensh*t that I am when it comes to upgrading production machines, I gave things a few days before upgrading a CentOS 5.5 pacemaker-1.0.10 / corosync-1.2.7 cluster to CentOS 5.6 (so that I can see what, if anything, was going wrong with other installations). Echoing other peoples' ex

[CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

Is there an easy to install GUI software raid monitoring software that I can use to send me an email when there are errors (or am I asking too much). Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:12:15PM -0500, Antaryami Khuda wrote: > I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. Please take this offtopic discussion elsewhere. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us pgp1EeNfFPUUK.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 04/11/11 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > DO NOT TOP POST. sadly, gmail/googlemail is very hostile to proper quoting practices. it hides quoted text, while leaving the whole previous message appended, without any form of > quoting. The only workable way around this is to use a imap/p

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

I got frustrated with having to edit my repo files every time an update came along to the release package, so I looked for "a better way". What I found was http://www.gurulabs.com/goodies/YUM_automatic_local_mirror.php, which gave me the clues I needed to have my local repositories added to th

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

On Monday, April 11, 2011 10:12:15 PM Antaryami Khuda wrote: > I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. > > Dag how much monies you do need? > > I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join. > > Ant This is really disrespectful to talk about on here. The devs spent a ton of

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:12 AM, Antaryami Khuda wrote: > I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. > > Dag how much monies you do need? > > I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join. > I'll cough up 5,000 leones when I get them! Hordes, prepare to move out! __

[CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. Dag how much monies you do need? I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join. Ant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 is out, great my first upgrade didn't work...

>> To follow-up on my own storry, I got there this morning, expecting to >> find the server stuck at fsck or somthing similar, only to find it with >> only the sord "GRUB" on the screen, and beeping like crazy. I didn't >> have any iso nor centos cd with me, so I'll get back there this >> after-no

Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for /var/www/html/

> chcon -R -u system_u -t httpd_sys_content_t chcon is a temporary change - to make it permanent use restorecon after: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Security-Enhanced_Linux/sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Working_with_SELinux-SELinux_Contexts_Labeling_Files.html Josh __

Re: [CentOS] Just a question about the Announce List

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:12:30PM -0400, William Hooper wrote: > You might want to log into Mailman and check your filters. When I > didn't get it, I noticed that there was a filter for (IIRC) "Centos-5" > that I didn't have checked in mailman. Yeah; if you're subscribed to the i386 list then yo

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100 Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote: > > Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes > > (http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list > > of packages modified by centos - and that include

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 02:32:36AM +0200, Tamada Wilder wrote: > your constantly recurring ignorance and blindness is way more > monotonously then everything dag wrote so far. DO NOT TOP POST. THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. Sorry to shout, but you've been asked in the past to stop i

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

your constantly recurring ignorance and blindness is way more monotonously then everything dag wrote so far. 2011/4/12 John R. Dennison : > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >> Yes, and CentOS does not have issues ! It's all Dag that's making it up. >> >> Without Dag r

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 12:20 PM: ... > No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the distro is quite a different > ballgame from userend support. Yes, but it seems to be rather closely held. >> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. > > The aim is to solve problems on a

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:48 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > > Yes, and CentOS does not have issues ! It's all Dag that's making it up. > > > > Without Dag releases would be more timely :) Pigs can fly ! > > Oh, stop it. I n

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

John R. Dennison wrote on 04/11/2011 07:48 PM: > Your constant drive-by snipes don't do much to give the devs > additional motivation to correct any of the issues that are > present. I don't think anyone with the constant presence Dag has exhibited can be characterized as a driv

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > Yes, and CentOS does not have issues ! It's all Dag that's making it up. > > Without Dag releases would be more timely :) Pigs can fly ! Oh, stop it. I never once said that there were no issues; we all know that ther

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

Les Mikesell wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 PM: > On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote: ... >> It's laborious, it's repetitive, it's boring, >> sometimes it's time-consuming but it's really NOT difficult. > > That depends on where and whether you can find the component(s) that > were missing or the wr

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:19:37PM -0700, Keith Keller wrote: Oy, I am very sorry for this post--my fumblefingers asked mutt to encrypt my post instead of simply signing it. List admins, is it possible to have the post deleted? (If not, it won't be the first or last time my clumsiness is on publ

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

bineS2Mn4u7uM.bin Description: application/pgp-encrypted msg.asc Description: Binary data ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

Dag Wieers wrote on 04/11/2011 07:03 PM: ... > Anyone from the QA team interested to share some information on what > happened during QA ? A very limited group did a lot of work on QA and missed some issues that might have been caught by a more open process. "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer anything, they simply rebuild the upstream sources. I

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Keith Keller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, John R. Dennison wrote: >>> >>> Except for the whole "I resign" issue with Dag and the project. >>> >>> He's stirring up trouble for the sake of stirring up troubl

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > >>> This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the >>> processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer >>> anything, they simply rebuild the upstream sources. It's not rocket science. >> >> It's not simple...

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:08:29AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, John R. Dennison wrote: > > > > Except for the whole "I resign" issue with Dag and the project. > > > > He's stirring up trouble for the sake of stirring up trouble. > > Yes, and CentOS does not have issues

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 11/04/11 22:38, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote: >>> >>> /putting on asbestos pants. >>> >>> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows, >>> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer. >>> >> >

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > It's not simple... They don't ship until they reproduce something that > they consider 'binary compatible' to the upstream binaries, which > depends on a build environment containing some things that don't match > the sources.  Some of this i

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:27:13PM -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> >> If it were me, wiser you are to listen to frogs and crickets. >> Dag is saying "I want to help but your system is closed". >> I believe him more than anybody in CentOS. > >

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote: >>> >>> /putting on asbestos pants. >>> >>> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows, >>> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer. >>> >

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 04/11/2011 11:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?

Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for /var/www/html/

Todd Cary wrote: >> The privileges are 754 (rwxr-xr--), however apache does not have access to them. Should the owner be apache? Group? << It's probably the SELinux labels preventing access - I stumbled across this yesterday while setting up a local mirror to deploy 5.6. Do an ls -lZ on the s

Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for /var/www/html/

>For a long period of time, my Apache root directory has been >/home/httpd. For security reasons, this is not so good as >SELinux has informed me. Now all of the files have been copied >to /var/www/etc with owner and group "root". The privileges are >754 (rwxr-xr--), however apache does not

Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for /var/www/html/

On 4/11/2011 2:50 PM, Todd Cary wrote: > For a long period of time, my Apache root directory has been > /home/httpd. For security reasons, this is not so good as > SELinux has informed me. Now all of the files have been copied > to /var/www/etc with owner and group "root". The privileges are > 7

[CentOS] Best configuration for /var/www/html/

For a long period of time, my Apache root directory has been /home/httpd. For security reasons, this is not so good as SELinux has informed me. Now all of the files have been copied to /var/www/etc with owner and group "root". The privileges are 754 (rwxr-xr--), however apache does not have

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:27:13PM -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > > If it were me, wiser you are to listen to frogs and crickets. > Dag is saying "I want to help but your system is closed". > I believe him more than anybody in CentOS. Except for the whole "I resign" issue with Dag an

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't know, >> that's one thing, but Dag's been contributing to Linux as a whole for a >> lotta years, and his site is a major repository. > >

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote: >> >> /putting on asbestos pants. >> >> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows, >> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer. >> > > This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 4:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't know, > that's one thing, but Dag's been contributing to Linux as a whole for a > lotta years, and his site is a major repository. Heh, I suppose we could have approximately the same

Re: [CentOS] Just a question about the Announce List

on 4/11/2011 2:12 PM William Hooper spake the following: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Scott Silva wrote: >> Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun? >> If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters. >> >> If it hasn't gone out yet, then m

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Tru Huynh wrote: >> Same answer for you than I made for Dag, volunteer to coordinate, >> build, write scripts, publish *your* work and you will be helping > your fellows. > > I must be missing something here. If it had been someone I didn't > know, that's one th

Re: [CentOS] Just a question about the Announce List

At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:07:12 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun? > If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters. It went out. > > If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK... > > See... No "i

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 3:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > >> I might throw some time and equipment at it if I knew I wasn't >> re-inventing square wheels (or even round ones for that matter). And I >> suspect that others smarter than I am would do the same and maybe even >> improve the approach by coming up with

Re: [CentOS] Just a question about the Announce List

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Scott Silva wrote: > Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun? > If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters. > > If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK... > > See... No "is it ready" crap in here! It we

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: >> > >> >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and >> >>> document/report back what you find out as the proper order of >> >>> rebuild of the upstream SRPMS

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven > wrong. We are more alike than it seems at first. I don't see actions either, I only see the output of actions because the process is deliberately closed. -- -- dag wieers, d...@w

[CentOS] Just a question about the Announce List

Did the Announce go out for CentOS 5.6, or are people just jumping the gun? If it went out, I missed it, and need to look at my spam filters. If it hasn't gone out yet, then maybe I'm OK... See... No "is it ready" crap in here! ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > ... >>> My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS), >>> What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes? >> >> The build order is

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote: > > /putting on asbestos pants. > > each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows, > so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer. > This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the processes involved in reb

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > >>> back > >>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > >> > >> So having e

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: ... > > My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS), > > What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes? > > The build order is not what took 86 days, was it ? it's too eas

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report >>> back >>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? >> >> So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your >> idea of doi

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: >> >>> right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere. >>> Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the >>> person who find

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> By the way, has this been accepted in the mainline kernel? > The patches are in 2.6.38.2 just downloaded from kernel.org. Indeed. Just found it here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/st

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > [free troll feeding is over for me] > -- Do you want payment for your troll feeding now? ;) -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere. > > Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the > > person who find the exit. We don't have the solution at t

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: >> >>> 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?" >>> >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:44:03PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > > back > > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > > So having everyone rep

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?" > > > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > > back > > what you find out as the pr

Re: [CentOS] ext4 not on a bootable partition

On 04/11/2011 11:04 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/" >> partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition. >> bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I >> was disapp

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?" > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > > [... anything usefull for y

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your idea of doing things faster

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6

On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: >>> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!! > > Thanks a lot! > (especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0) +1 -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstat

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: > > I for one am glad about it as it is obvious that it needs to be > addressed. we all agree that it can be done better/faster/... > The constant retorts against anyone asking is just > unbelievable. Maybe if the questions can be re

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote: > On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what >>> [ ... ] I no longer

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > /putting on asbestos pants. Not needed... And they itch. > Perhaps the tack to take is to apply pressure to the upstream provider > to release the build details? I am sure that many folks who start with > CentOS, grow to be large and move to RH proper. So there

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 04/11/2011 03:10 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >>> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what >> [ ... ] >>> I no longer expect any change. >> >> Then why are you alw

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > >> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what > [ ... ] >> I no longer expect any change. > > Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns > if you

Re: [CentOS] updates to package

Great! Thanks a lot! On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update. > > http://linux.die.net/man/1/yum-changelog > rpm -qa --changelog fo

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >> Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what > [ ... ] >> I no longer expect any change. > > Then why are you always coming back here to voice your conce

Re: [CentOS] updates to package

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:54, Bernard Fay wrote: > Hi, > > I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update. http://linux.die.net/man/1/yum-changelog rpm -qa --changelog foo.bar.rpm Cheers, -- Kind Regards, Christopher J. Buckley __

[CentOS] updates to package

Hi, I'ld like to know where or how I can find changes in a package update. Also, is there a way to find out which package updates are security updates? thanks -- Bernard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what [ ... ] > I no longer expect any change. Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns if you don't expect any change? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mir

Re: [CentOS] whats the package that allows copy and paste between windows

On 4/11/2011 1:22 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > >> does it work if you log in as another user? > > So long as it is the same X Server. If you log into a different console > and then do a 'startx -- :1' (or :2, :3, etc.), then no it won't work. > If you just do a su or sudo su in a [gnome] terminal, t

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:51 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) Akemi HOORAY - it works. I got an ipv6 address: $ ip6 a s eth2 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qle

Re: [CentOS] whats the package that allows copy and paste between windows

At Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:27:54 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Jerry Geis wrote: > > Jerry Geis wrote: > >> What is the package that allows copy and paste between windows? > >> I think I need to yum reinstall it. > >> after the 5.6 update I get the copy button when I right click - (for > >>

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. >>> >>> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Yes, that ( 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1 ) is the right one. :) > > Akemi > > HOORAY - it works. > > I got an ipv6 address: > $ ip6 a s eth2 > 4: eth2: mtu 1500 qlen 1000 >     inet6 2001:db8

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:19 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 11:36 files let me try the kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm 09-Mar-2011 > 11:36 > > files let me try the > > kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report th

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in > 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased  to report > that they appear to work as adverti

Re: [CentOS] CentOSPlus kernel (Was: Centos 6 Update?)

On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. I

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> >>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. >> >> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS. > > That's only true if you think the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6

Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> Luigi Rosa wrote: >>> >>> Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!! >>> >> #insert >> >> (In addition to the update, NO MORE "WHEN WILL 5.6 COME >> OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!" threads!) > > So when will 6.0 be out? > > (sorry; yes I am OCD-enabled; no obv

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 04/11/11 9:14 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> >> The main support*I* need is timely updates and releases. >> > >> > This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS. > That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching > some definition of 'timely'. well, whatever

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 04/10/2011 07:15 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > You just gave me examples of more "person Foo dropping by Bar"... I'm > not sure how that can shorten the gap between upstream and CentOS > releases. It seems more in the way of giving user support. No, re-read what I said. Ownership in the

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > >> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. > > This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS. That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching some definitio

Re: [CentOS] whats the package that allows copy and paste between windows

> What is the package that allows copy and paste >between windows? How do you connect to centos? VNC? If you're running vnc4server on the centos box, there's a program you have to leave running named vncconfig that allows clipboard xfer... ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] ext4 not on a bootable partition

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > Just tried running a configuration on 5.6 with ext4 as the "/" > partitition. I got the error that cannot boot ext4 partition. > bummer I know this is just a boot issue and make the ext3 but I > was disappointed. > > Maybe 6.0 will have ext4 bootable. I ins

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS. Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts. //me **

  1   2   >