Re: [CentOS] Gnome Notification Applet

On 04/16/2011 06:34 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: [snip] > the clock). I spent most of my "trial time" with SL 6 trying to figure > out how to separate these two applets from the Notification Applet -- > without success. Is there a configuration file I can change or a > configuration program I can run to

Re: [CentOS] cross-platform email client

--On Friday, April 15, 2011 8:56 PM -0600 Devin Reade wrote: > Check out Mulberry. It hasn't been updated > in a while, but don't let that scare you off. It's a very solid mail > reader for Linux, Mac, and Windows. It does all the usual mail-related > protocols, inclu

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Notification Applet

> I realize it's not a huge deal, but it's an irritant. Why does Gnome > want to limit the ability to customize? Check out Gnome3 then. And weep. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cents 5.6 ..... futur

On 04/16/2011 12:18 AM, Devin Reade wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > >> have all your configuration under a change management system, with an at >> least semi-automated installation procedure, such as kickstart. > > Or have the self discipline to keep a text file (or other record) of > *all* ch

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: > Hi, > > I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used > ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the > network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right > time on the machine. This is with / w

Re: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...

John Doe wrote on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:25:13 -0700 (PDT): > And that running in PAE would slow down some processes. The overhead is minimal, if you want those extra 700 MB, do it. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/m

Re: [CentOS] cents 5.6 ..... futur

On 4/16/11 12:18 AM, Devin Reade wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > >> have all your configuration under a change management system, with an at >> least semi-automated installation procedure, such as kickstart. > > Or have the self discipline to keep a text file (or other record) of > *all* changes y

Re: [CentOS] cents 5.6 ..... futur

On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 19:53 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > On 04/15/11 7:40 PM, Michel Donais wrote: > >>> Will it be the same from 5.6 to 6.0 or a full install will be better. > >> Full installs are always recommended between major versions. > > > > Thank's all for the advise; but is there any easy

Re: [CentOS] cross-platform email client

Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Friday, April 15, 2011 8:56 PM -0600 Devin Reade wrote: > >> Check out Mulberry. > > The main drawback to Mulberry is that it doesn't display images, and its > HTML rendering is primitive. But if you're like me and deal primarily in >

[CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. Regards, ___ CentOS m

Re: [CentOS] cents 5.6 ..... futur

On 04/16/11 8:32 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > At least for the rpm-packaged programs in the base and most > 3rd party repos, all of the configuration files will be under /etc one notable exception to that is postgresql, its config files are normally in the postgres data directory, nominally /var/l

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? > > The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the > regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... > > I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. I

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

> I *believe* it's been already built. But it needs to be released. > Karanbir is away this weekend. Can other dev push it? Johnny? Tru? > > Akemi It's not that urgent, it's just that yum sees that the update from the regular repository, and I ended up with no external drive to my backup storage

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

Nicolas Ross wrote on 04/16/2011 02:25 PM: > It's not that urgent, it's just that yum sees that the update from the > regular repository, and I ended up with no external drive to my backup > storage server and it took a while to figure it out... You might want to add an "exclude=kernel*" in [upda

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 12:50 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? > > The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the > regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... > > I need the plus because of the firewire drivers. I thought that

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/16/11 12:50 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >> Is it possible that the kernel in the centosplus repo is not up to date ? >> >> The centosplus kernel I have is kernel-PAE-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 and the >> regular one is 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5... >> >> I

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Notification Applet

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 04/16/2011 06:34 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > [snip] >> without success. Is there a configuration file I can change or a >> configuration program I can run to customize this? > > Afaik there is no way to make Gnome applets that make use of th

Re: [CentOS] Gnome Notification Applet

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: > >> I realize it's not a huge deal, but it's an irritant. Why does Gnome >> want to limit the ability to customize? > >  Check out Gnome3 then. And weep. Hopefully Red Hat (and CentOS) will continue using Gnome 2.x.x for a while yet. I don't u

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

> If it is the classic stack of firewire drivers that are required, and > there is nothing else needed from the centosplus kernel, a good > solution is to get the kABI-tracking firewire modules from ELRepo: > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=kmod-ieee1394 > > It provides: > > dv1394.ko

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 2:25 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: > >> If it is the classic stack of firewire drivers that are required, and >> there is nothing else needed from the centosplus kernel, a good >> solution is to get the kABI-tracking firewire modules from ELRepo: >> >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?pag

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: >> http://elrepo.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=kmod-ieee1394 >> >> It provides: >> >> dv1394.ko >> eth1394.ko >> ieee1394.ko >> ohci1394.ko >> pcilynx.ko >> raw1394.ko >> sbp2.ko >> video1394.ko >> >> Because they survive kernel updates transpa

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

>>> Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the >>> distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. >> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access >> my 2tb firewire external drive that is used for backup rotation. >> >> I will

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On 4/16/11 6:37 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. >>> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access >>> my 2tb firewire external drive tha

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

At Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:37:24 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > >>> Because they survive kernel updates transparently and you can run the > >>> distro kernel, there will be no "waiting" for each kernel update. > >> That is indeed what I need, I use ieee1394, raw1394 and sbp2 to access > >> my

[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Hi, I woke up Saturday morning unable to boot my freshly upgraded 5.6 with grub hanging at "GRUB". After getting the boot loader fixed I experienced crashes in evolution. Downgrading glibc to 2.5-58 seems to fix these issues. Anyone else seeing this? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /ge

Re: [CentOS] centosplus kernel not up to date ?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > If you enable the kernel from the CentOSPlus repo, you should *disable* > kernel updates from the standard repo, otherwise yum will get updates > from *both* places.  By disabling the kernel packages from being updated > from the standard re

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi, > > I woke up Saturday morning unable to boot my freshly upgraded 5.6 with > grub hanging at "GRUB". After getting the boot loader fixed I > experienced crashes in evolution. Downgrading glibc to 2.5-58 seems to > fix these issue

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:14:11AM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > I woke up Saturday morning unable to boot my freshly upgraded 5.6 with > grub hanging at "GRUB". After getting the boot loader fixed I > experienced crashes in evolution. Downgrading glibc to 2.5-58 seems to > fix these is

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Hello John, On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 20:19 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693882 > > I've heard from an OOB source that a fix is in QA at Redhat now. Is this somehow related to how my grub got broken? Or is that a different issue? Or just a coincidence

Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:37:38AM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > Is this somehow related to how my grub got broken? Or is that a > different issue? Or just a coincidence :) ? That I don't know, sorry. I've not seen references to that particular problem being related to the glibc issue

[CentOS] timezone issue

hey list! having a slightly odd time issue on one host... can I get some help with this? This is the current time from a working system: Sun Apr 17 00:28:18 EDT 2011 However from the problem system this is the time: Sat Apr 16 20:30:01 EDT 2011 I have set the time zone as such: lrwxrwxrwx

Re: [CentOS] timezone issue

On 17/04/11 2:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > [root@VIRTCENT08:/etc] #date > Sat Apr 16 19:46:42 EST 2011 > > > can someone hit me upside the head with the cluehammer? Well, depending on the system (and how old it might be) perhaps the BIOS time? Regards, Ben signature.asc Description: Ope

Re: [CentOS] timezone issue

On 17/04/11 2:47 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > But when I run ntpdate it returns the wrong time: > > 16 Apr 19:46:13 ntpdate[1968]: step time server 204.235.61.9 offset > 14408.651330 sec > > > [root@VIRTCENT08:/etc] #date > Sat Apr 16 19:46:42 EST 2011 > > > can someone hit me upside the head w