Hello Mark and others,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:21 PM, wrote:
> At this point, I'd run the long test on each drive, and (after coming back
> an hour or two later, see the results.
I have that dreadly warning again -
/etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check:
WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not
Hello Dave, this really works -
I run Drupal 7 at my CentOS 5.6 machine with
the "native" php53 and postgresql84 packages.
Just remove the older php packages first.
Regards
Alex
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
On 4/30/11 4:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
> ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
You asked for something 'centos-y'. And there really is nothing specific to
centos other than it's differences
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
> it's hard
> to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos
Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about
how to
On 04/30/2011 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> I am sure this is really simple.
>
> I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
> are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
> disks can boot.
>
> Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 21:56, NOYK wrote:
> Given the difficulty of getting Centos 6 released - maybe this is not the
> correct group to ask. Just saying. ;)
>
It seems to me that is exactly why he was asking. The OP doesn't
really want to create Paul Linux, he wants to know what CentOS does to
On 4/30/11 1:09 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>> But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
>> "centosy", and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing
>> the
>> artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
>
> Are we? I don't see this and
On 30/04/11 17:57, Markus Falb wrote:
> CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html
>
> While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages,
> Bugzilla #606272 look
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> > BTW, can guests be installed on raw (unformatted or formatted)
>> > partitions (not images)? Can virt-install do that? I tried it and had no
>> > luck.
>> >
>> > - Jussi
> You can install them to logical volumes...
>
On 28.4.2011 21.29, Jim Wildm
Les Mikesell wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:33:21 -0500:
> But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
> "centosy", and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing
> the
> artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
Are we? I don't see
The title gives a bit of info if that helps ;-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html
While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages,
Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information
ab
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 4/30/11 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
> This list once was a valuable peer-to-peer support list but has been
> turning into a meta-centos/rhel discussion list lately. There was already
> a lot of off-topic "linux-only" stuff on it in the past that didn't
> qualify for "centosy" things, but that
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:54:01 +0800:
> if they are accessible via the Internet, then it means it wasn't
> necessary to add any IP to a bridge.
FYI: the IP addresses of host and guest don't have to be in the same
subnet, e.g. your host may have a private, non-routable IP a
On 30.4.2011 12.34, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> take look at serial number using smartctl
>
> http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/using-smartctl-to-get-smart-status-information-on-your-hard-drives/1389
>
Thanks, I did. I am sure they will help me when it is time to actually
replace the drive.
Peter Peltonen wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:51:08 +0300:
> And I don't think you are even
> given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
Of course, you can ;-)
If you have only a few of these I'd rsync them over to dom0 lv's and
change domU fstabs and xen config accordi
Paul Johnson wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:23 -0500:
> After that, what am I legally required to do?
This is not the place to ask.
> I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take
> all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them
> on a disk, and you
Peter Peltonen wrote on 04/30/2011 03:51 AM:
> ... I just clicked my way through the CentOS installation like I
> usually do, and that meant using LVM. And I don't think you are even
> given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
If you want to use the default setup but h
2011/4/30 Jussi Hirvi :
> I am sure this is really simple.
>
> I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
> are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
> disks can boot.
>
> Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the
>
I am sure this is really simple.
I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly identical, and
are mirrors of each other. Together they form 3 raid1 devices. Both
disks can boot.
Now sda has bad sectors, and I should replace it. But which one of the
physical disks is sda??
The machi
I would try to first "yum erase php", and then install the php53 version.
- Jussi
On 30.4.2011 9.29, Dave Cross wrote:
> I have a Centos 5.6 server which is using the default php packages.
> These currently contain PHP 5.1.6.
>
> My main use of PHP on the server is to support an installation of
>
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/29/11 3:05 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>> I have a centos 5.6 server that has xen domUs installed on their on
>> logical volumes. These logical volumes contain their own volume groups
>> and again their own logical volumes. I want to
>> .
23 matches
Mail list logo
