Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/11 11:33 PM, Robert wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm brand new at doing anything linux and would like feedback on this > script I'm trying to understand from an example I'm working on.. > > Oh, running Centos 5.6 > > Anyhow, I run this bash script: > > #!/bin/bash > # send data to the table in the M

Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:33:52PM -0500, Robert wrote: > > #!/bin/bash > # send data to the table in the MySQL database > > MYSQL='which mysql' You want "MYSQL=$(which mysql)" > If [ $? -eq 0 ] > then >echo "Data successfully added" > else >echo "Probl

Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Robert
Thanks for the help thus far. Have tried recommendations on the error line and still am getting the error. Oh well, its late so I'm going to stop trying tonight and will take this up again in the AM. Bob On 05/03/2011 11:49 PM, Andrew Harley wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:33 -0500, Robert

Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Andrew Harley
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:33 -0500, Robert wrote: > MYSQL='which mysql' Also this line should use either backticks or $() command substitution instead: For example: [andrew@savoy ~]$ MYSQL='which mysql' [andrew@savoy ~]$ echo $MYSQL which mysql [andrew@savoy ~]$ MYSQL=$(which mysql) [andrew@savoy

Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Andrew Harley
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 00:36 -0400, Steven Crothers wrote: > Possibly an invisible character. Delete the entire line with "then" > and re-type it. That error seems odd. > Or could change to: if [ $? -eq 0 ];then -- Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Steven Crothers
Possibly an invisible character. Delete the entire line with "then" and re-type it. That error seems odd. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Robert wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm brand new at doing anything linux and would like feedback on this > script I'm trying to understand from an example I'm worki

[CentOS] Syntax Help on a Bash Script

2011-05-03 Thread Robert
Hi All, I'm brand new at doing anything linux and would like feedback on this script I'm trying to understand from an example I'm working on.. Oh, running Centos 5.6 Anyhow, I run this bash script: #!/bin/bash # send data to the table in the MySQL database MYSQL='which mysql' if [ $# -ne 4 ]

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/03/11 6:57 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > On 05/03/2011 04:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > | Do you have any "exclude=" items in your > | /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo or your /etc/yum.conf file ... > | specifically is postgresql-libs (or postgresql*) excluded? > > Yup! That was it. Loo

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread Steven Crothers
mod_auth_postgresql (or similar, can't remember) On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:57 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > - Original Message - > | On 05/03/2011 04:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > | > - Original Message - > | > | On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > | > | > Anyone else

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | On 05/03/2011 04:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | > - Original Message - | > | On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | > | > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror | > | > is | > | > completely up to date and the machine is a fr

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/03/2011 04:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > - Original Message - > | On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > | > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror is > | > completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS > | > 5.6 > | > | /usr/l

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread Steven Crothers
Out of curiosity do you have any postgrestuff installed at all? rpm -qa | grep postgre Possible scenario: You have an rpm installed "providing" the lib, but the lib is now missing for whatever reason. *shrugs* It's hard to diagnose issues over email. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:12 PM, John R Pier

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/03/11 2:36 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > I don't have PostgreSQL installed. I have no need for it to be installed. Well, if you loaded any of the following packages, they require postgresql-libs... $ rpm -q --whatrequires libpq.so.4 dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 apr-util-1.2.7-7.el5_3.2 perl-DBD-Pg

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Devin Reade
--On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 02:39:54 PM + Tim Dunphy wrote: ># /bin/bash To start off, your hash-bang is missing its bang: #! /bin/bash Devin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message - | On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: | > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror is | > completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS | > 5.6 | | /usr/lib/libpq.so.4 should be a symlink to libpq.so.4.1, which is |

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Lucian
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:56 PM, David G. Miller wrote: > Karanbir Singh writes: > >> >> On 05/03/2011 07:57 AM, Steve Castellotti wrote: >> > >> > /"We should have news, along with a release plan, for CentOS-6 in the >> > next few days"/ >> >> There is a plan, of sorts. I wanted to make sure the

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/03/11 1:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror is > completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS 5.6 /usr/lib/libpq.so.4 should be a symlink to libpq.so.4.1, which is provided by postgresql-libs now, I'm runn

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
James A. Peltier wrote: > Considering that I am mirroring from us-msync and that my mirror is less than > 1 hour behind and that I've been trying for days I would not think it to be > my mirror, but yeah I'll try it. > > - Original Message - > | "Your" mirror? Try another mirror perhaps?

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: > On May 3, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> Tim Dunphy wrote: >>> hello list! >>> >>> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly >>> bring down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd >>> thing is, it does wor

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Chris Geldenhuis wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Tim Dunphy wrote: >> >>> hello list! >>> >>> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly bring >>> down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd thing is, it >>> does work on the command line. But if I

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread James A. Peltier
Considering that I am mirroring from us-msync and that my mirror is less than 1 hour behind and that I've been trying for days I would not think it to be my mirror, but yeah I'll try it. - Original Message - | "Your" mirror? Try another mirror perhaps? | | On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Re: [CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread Steven Crothers
"Your" mirror? Try another mirror perhaps? On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:50 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd?  My mirror is > completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS 5.6 > > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loadin

[CentOS] libpq.so.4 missing

2011-05-03 Thread James A. Peltier
Anyone else seeing this when trying to install httpd? My mirror is completely up to date and the machine is a fresh install of CentOS 5.6 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Excluding Packages from CentOS-5 - Base Finished Excluding Packages from

Re: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks

2011-05-03 Thread Jussi Hirvi
On 3.5.2011 22.05, Andy Holt wrote: > ls -l /dev/disk/by-id > > which on my system gives me: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 6 14:34 > scsi-SATA_SAMSUNG_HD154UIS1XWJ1BZ900317 -> ../../sdc > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 6 14:34 > scsi-SATA_SAMSUNG_HD154UIS1XWJ1BZ900318 -> ../../sdb > lrwxrw

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Chris Geldenhuis
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Tim Dunphy wrote: > >> hello list! >> >> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly bring down >> all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd thing is, it does >> work on the command line. But if I put it into a script this happen

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread aurfalien
On May 3, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Tim Dunphy wrote: >> hello list! >> >> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly >> bring down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd >> thing is, it does work on the command line. But if I put i

Re: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks

2011-05-03 Thread Andy Holt
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org On Behalf Of Jussi Hirvi > Sent: 30/04/2011 10:31 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] Identifying physical disks > > I am sure this is really simple. > > I have a setup of 2 disks (sda, sdb) which are outwardly > identical,

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Tim Dunphy wrote: >> >> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly bring >> down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd thing is, >> it does work on the command line. But if I put it into a script this >> happens: >> >> >> [root@L

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Tim Dunphy wrote: > hello list! > > I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly bring down > all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd thing is, it does > work on the command line. But if I put it into a script this happens: > > > [root@LCENT03:/home/bluethu

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Kai Schaetzl
service xendomains stop ? Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
hi and thanks for your reply.. either $1 or $2 seems to do it on the command line. virsh shutdown / xm shutdown takes both. I am simply trying to get this command to work in script form. thanks! best! tim - Original Message - From: "Johnny Hughes" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesd

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

2011-05-03 Thread aurfalien
On May 3, 2011, at 4:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011, Mattias Geniar wrote: > >> Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick >> with >> CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still >> worth "fixing". > > I'm not saying it's not worth

Re: [CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/03/2011 09:39 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > virsh list | grep -v -e Id -e --- -e Domain-0 | awk '{print $1}' Do you want the "ID Number" or the "Name" to pass in? That gives you the number, I think you want the name ... that would be $2 not $1. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 3 May 2011, David G. Miller wrote: > Thank you, KB. I think that this sort of "back of the envelop" > estimate is all quite a few of us have been asking for. We know > it's not written in stone and any hard deadline planning that relies > on it is a fool's errand. On the other hand,

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread David G . Miller
Karanbir Singh writes: > > On 05/03/2011 07:57 AM, Steve Castellotti wrote: > > > > /"We should have news, along with a release plan, for CentOS-6 in the > > next few days"/ > > There is a plan, of sorts. I wanted to make sure the QA guys had a few > days to mull it over before making it publi

Re: [CentOS] list of supported hardware

2011-05-03 Thread Devin Reade
I've also found it to be a good rule of thumb to not purchase motherboards that are using technology that have been out for less than a year or so. This is more applicable to "desktop/consumer grade" systems rather than "server grade" systems, since the latter don't tend to use a given technology

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/3/2011 9:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> If you've got one nic, it'a a pretty sure bet that any detection order >>> is going to call it eth0. Add a few more and I think you'll change >>> your >>> opinion, especially with that headless situation where all you can do

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/2011 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> The numbers chosen in the eth? scheme are more or less randomized even >> on identical hardware, so it is pretty much impossible to prepare a disk >> to ship to a remote site and have it come up working unattended or clone >> disk images for a large rol

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/2011 9:42 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> If you've got one nic, it'a a pretty sure bet that any detection order >> is going to call it eth0. Add a few more and I think you'll change your >> opinion, especially with that headless situation where all you can do is >> move wires until ssh wo

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6.1 beta

2011-05-03 Thread Steve Clark
On 05/02/2011 10:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/2/2011 8:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 05/02/2011 09:38 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Monday, May 02, 2011 06:48:37 AM Christopher Chan wrote: biosdevname for nics...bye bye eth0! Not by default, and according to the release notes only for certain De

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote: > On 5/3/2011 8:49 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> >>> So you save a second in boot time, then waste half an hour trying to >>> figure out which wire goes to which network interface... Doesn't >>> sound like a win to me unless you only have one NIC. >> >> I got one nic on one

[CentOS] virtdown script

2011-05-03 Thread Tim Dunphy
hello list! I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly bring down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd thing is, it does work on the command line. But if I put it into a script this happens: [root@LCENT03:/home/bluethundr/bin] #virtdown > it expects a

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/2011 9:01 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems >> pointlessto me > The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops Fast boots also matter for embedded systems. >>> +1 >>> >>> So does booting on small, non-PAE hardware. >>>

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/2011 8:49 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > >> >> So you save a second in boot time, then waste half an hour trying to >> figure out which wire goes to which network interface... Doesn't >> sound like a win to me unless you only have one NIC. > > I got one nic on one single-core non-PAE i586

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Steve Clark
On 05/03/2011 09:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops Fast

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread R - elists
> > There is a plan, of sorts. I wanted to make sure the QA guys > had a few days to mull it over before making it public. And > then there was the rather nice and long holiday weekends here > in the UK. 10th is the first target, with a release couple of > weeks later. We have a potential re

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >>> On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> > Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems > pointlessto me The Linux kernel is also used in

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

2011-05-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/03/2011 03:20 AM, Laurent CREPET wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011 09:46:05 +0200 > Laurent CREPET wrote: > >> I will look at the latest RPMs to check differences on >> /etc/logrotate.d/squid. > > I'm suprised... it seems that both packages have not been modified for a > while. > >> [root@sta

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Enough is enough. Can we _please_ consolidate such status updates, the few times they appear, at _one_ location? People should not have to play guessing games as to where status updates may or may not appear, nor should they have to

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 05/03/2011 08:15 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John R. Dennison >> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:59:03AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: >>> >>> Forums,

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed

2011-05-03 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/3/11 8:17 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems pointlessto me >>> >>> The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops >> >> Fast boots also matte

Re: [CentOS] Boot speed (was: RHEL 6.1 beta)

2011-05-03 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On 5/2/2011 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> Trying to save a few seconds when rebooting a server seems >>> pointlessto me >> >> The Linux kernel is also used in laptops/desktops > > Fast boots also matter for embedded systems. +1 So does booting on sm

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John R. Dennison > wrote: >> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:59:03AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>> Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: >> >> Forums, mailing lists, twitter feeds... >> >> Enough is enough

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

2011-05-03 Thread John Hodrien
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Mattias Geniar wrote: > Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick with > CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still > worth "fixing". I'm not saying it's not worth fixing, I suspect it's fundamentally unfixable without a comple

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

2011-05-03 Thread Mattias Geniar
> I'd probably argue that nss_ldap is fundamentally unfixable. Why *not* get > behind sssd? Have you given a recent version a try? > > jh Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick with CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still worth "fixing".

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:53:23AM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > > I will leave it to core team members to comment on how "official" it is, > but the "CentOS Announcements" link is available from the menu bar at > the top of the home page or from any Forum page. It points to content > that is

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 05/03/2011 07:57 AM, Steve Castellotti wrote: > > /"We should have news, along with a release plan, for CentOS-6 in the > next few days"/ There is a plan, of sorts. I wanted to make sure the QA guys had a few days to mull it over before making it public. And then there was the rather nice and

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Phil Schaffner
John R. Dennison wrote on 05/03/2011 04:12 AM: ... > Having a single location would be a great boon and would allow us to > point people to one "official" location when the inevitable questions on > releases come up. I will leave it to core team members to comment on how "official" it is, but the

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Ned Slider
On 03/05/11 09:12, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:59:03AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: > > Forums, mailing lists, twitter feeds... > > Enough is enough. > > Can we _please_ consolidate such status updates, the fe

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

2011-05-03 Thread Arun Khan
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 4/29/11, Lucian wrote: >> Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly >> you are trying to achieve? >> Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on >> eth0? This cannot work. > > Well,

Re: [CentOS] list of supported hardware

2011-05-03 Thread Brandon Ooi
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:30 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 05/03/11 2:16 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > Hello CentOS list, > > > > I have been looking for a list of hardware that is supported by the > > Centos kernel and its modules. I couldn't find anything in the > > documentation at Centos n

Re: [CentOS] list of supported hardware

2011-05-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 05/03/11 2:16 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Hello CentOS list, > > I have been looking for a list of hardware that is supported by the > Centos kernel and its modules. I couldn't find anything in the > documentation at Centos nor at RH. Google didn't bring up anything > either. Is there any li

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

2011-05-03 Thread John Doe
From: Laurent CREPET > Any ideas ? Different setup here (compiled latest squid 2.7.STABLE9). Main difference I can see with the rpm's rotatelog is that we use delaycompress... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mail

Re: [CentOS] running kvm and vnc same time

2011-05-03 Thread Arun Khan
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to run kvm (which works) on my desktop. > then when I vnc into my desktop I can use everything as normal > except the kvm window. It messes up. Its like the mouse isnt really > when its supposed to be or something. I don

Re: [CentOS] LDAPs causing System Message Bus to hang when there's no network

2011-05-03 Thread John Hodrien
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Devin Reade wrote: > Probably moot now anyway as nobody is interested in fixing it since sssd > will cure all ills and bring world peace. (Insert sarcasm/skepticism as > appropriate.) I'd probably argue that nss_ldap is fundamentally unfixable. Why *not* get behind sssd? H

[CentOS] list of supported hardware

2011-05-03 Thread Michael Schumacher
Hello CentOS list, I have been looking for a list of hardware that is supported by the Centos kernel and its modules. I couldn't find anything in the documentation at Centos nor at RH. Google didn't bring up anything either. Is there any list or will I need to browse the source code directories?

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Lucian
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:12 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:59:03AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> >> Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: > > Forums, mailing lists, twitter feeds... > > Enough is enough. > > Can we _please_ consolidate such status u

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

2011-05-03 Thread Laurent CREPET
On Tue, 3 May 2011 09:46:05 +0200 Laurent CREPET wrote: > I will look at the latest RPMs to check differences on /etc/logrotate.d/squid. I'm suprised... it seems that both packages have not been modified for a while. > [root@stargate ~]# ls -latr /var/log/yum.log* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11559

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Steve Castellotti
On 05/03/2011 02:59 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=25878&forum=53 > > The latest (post #9) says: > > "What I can tell you, as a result of my recent communication with > Karanbir, i

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:59:03AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > Forum Announcement is yet another place you may want to check: Forums, mailing lists, twitter feeds... Enough is enough. Can we _please_ consolidate such status updates, the few times they appear, at _one_ location? People should

Re: [CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

2011-05-03 Thread Laurent CREPET
On Tue, 3 May 2011 09:46:05 +0200 Laurent CREPET wrote: > I will look at the latest RPMs to check differences on /etc/logrotate.d/squid. Packages: squid-2.6.STABLE21-6.el5 logrotate-3.7.4-9.el5_5.2 In /var/log/squid/cache.log: > 2011/05/03 04:02:12| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting... > 2011/05

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Steve Castellotti wrote: >     I check the @CentOS twitter feed several times per day. > >     I lurk in the #centos, #centos-devel, #centos-qa, and > #centos-social IRC chat rooms regularly. > >     I checked the centos and centos-devel mailing list archives for

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Steve Castellotti
On 05/03/2011 02:26 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: > Have you been following things lately or not? If I missed an update or announcement I apologize. I check the @CentOS twitter feed several times per day. I lurk in the #centos, #centos-devel, #centos-qa, and #centos-social IRC cha

[CentOS] since CentOS 5.6 upgrade, squid crashes

2011-05-03 Thread Laurent CREPET
Hi, I have recently upgraded our web proxy to CentOS 5.6. Before the upgrade, squid was running fine. Since the upgrade, sometimes, squid crashes: > [root@stargate ~]# service squid status > squid dead but pid file exists Looking at log files, I think it could be related to logrotate stuff, >

Re: [CentOS] community communication

2011-05-03 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 02:57 PM, Steve Castellotti wrote: Have you been following things lately or not? They are now QA the installers. If you so cannot wait, go hit SL or RH. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l