On Sat, 21 May 2011, Eero Volotinen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition
2011/5/20 Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net:
Has anyone actually used a SSD in a Centos setup?
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
for i in $(find . -type f | grep .rpm); do
rpmsign --addsign `find . -type f | grep .rpm | grep -v .zzz`
just a small comment, grep uses regexps so this doesn't do what you want
(eg the . is a wildcard char). Your script can break, silently (won't
sign rpms whose
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:30:06AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
for i in $(find . -type f | grep .rpm); do
rpmsign --addsign `find . -type f | grep .rpm | grep -v .zzz`
just a small comment, grep uses regexps so this doesn't do what you want
(eg the .
On 05/21/11 12:43 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
find . -type f -name \*.rpm ! -name \*.zzz
that won't work right anyways.the first -name says match just .rpm
files. none of those will be .zzz so the 2nd expression won't ever get
hit (all .rpm files are not .zzz files).
--
john r
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:30:06AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
for i in $(find . -type f | grep .rpm); do
rpmsign --addsign `find . -type f | grep .rpm | grep -v .zzz`
just a small comment, grep uses regexps so this doesn't do what
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 09:30:06AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
for i in $(find . -type f | grep .rpm); do
rpmsign --addsign `find . -type f | grep .rpm | grep -v .zzz`
just a small comment, grep uses
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:13:52AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
agreed, using find alone is another way to do it, although as stated
by John Pierce the second -name is useless here.
I was pointing out a flaw in the code and offering a correction using
the same way to do it.
Oh,
On 05/20/2011 01:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs
Subject: [CentOS] Passing password to script for rpmsign of list of .rpm
files
I am trying to automatize
On Friday, May 20, 2011 10:43:10 AM Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:44:49AM -0400, Steven Crothers wrote:
It's a bit funny that logrotate is difficult to fix for you...
considering you have System Engineer Sr. Professional in your
signature...
This gave me a chuckle. :)
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/20/2011 01:13 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs
Subject: [CentOS] Passing password to script for rpmsign of list of .rpm
files
I am trying
On 21.5.2011 19.02, Lamar Owen wrote:
Now, one of my C5.6 boxen is set up with /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf:
# The name of log file when xferlog_enable=YES and xferlog_std_format=YES
# WARNING - changing this filename affects /etc/logrotate.d/vsftpd.log
#xferlog_file=/var/log/xferlog
#
which
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
Wait a cotton-picking minute. Why is vsftpd writing to
/var/log/xferlog in the first place, and not
/var/log/vsftpd.log?
early in the thread, it was clear from a reply's content that
a locally installed 'ftpd' and not the CentOS vsftpd was
being
On 21.5.2011 20.43, R P Herrold wrote:
early in the thread, it was clear from a reply's content that
a locally installed 'ftpd' and not the CentOS vsftpd was
being used
I think you are inadvertently confusing the issue. ftpd is mentioned in
this file (see below), but still vsftpd is used:
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 01:43:10 PM R P Herrold wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
Wait a cotton-picking minute. Why is vsftpd writing to
/var/log/xferlog in the first place, and not
/var/log/vsftpd.log?
early in the thread, it was clear from a reply's content that
a
Hi Keith
not sure about OCZ reliability for production , but i can confirm
Intel x-25 drives work great with centos ( about 11 month's now ).
I use two drives as /var in md mirror , using it for SQL and logs -
it's an amazing boost vs ordinary drives.
if you use the SSD for swap, don't put
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Just buy fastest ocz drive than you can find from stores.
--
Eero
Simply buying OCZ because its cheap is wrong. OCZ drives use MLC
flash, I'm sure you know the difference between single level cells and
multiple
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:29 PM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
if you use the SSD for swap, don't put anything important on them, I
have managed to destroy a drive which was used for heavy swap
operations.
(insane experiment with KVM virtual machines got to that situation ).
You might be able to go a simpler route, try building a GFBD between
them and sharing the storage that way. I personally have never tried
it, but that might give you the HA you're looking for while staying
withing the CentOS/Upstream packaging. One added benefit is the
ability to scale vertically
It's really neat when an OCZ drive fails, it doesn't tick. You just
lose all your data. Here today, gone tomorrow.
Just swap drive and restore from backup, no problem ?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
That's expensive, don't know about you but I don't factor in drives to
be dead within 3-4 months of installation for my machines. Running
swap on an MLC SSD will most definitely kill it in 3-4 months. You
expect to get at least 18-36 months out of a drive before it either
dies or requires an
20 matches
Mail list logo
