Thomas Harold wrote:
>> I've read most of the articles in this thread,
>> and I haven't seen anything that persuades me
>> SSD would be a good investment in my case,
>> either in servers or laptops.
> *whistles* If you have not tried out a SSD laptop or desktop then you're
> in for a big surprise
On May 25, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> I don't know... "SSD drive with a USB interface" sounds a big
> mouthful... most people I know just call thumb drives :D
Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what is
used in hard drive replacement units. I
On 5/24/11, Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 05/24/2011 08:25 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> I know you get some USB type SSD's, but people still refer to them as
>> SSD drives, and not USB drives
>>
> The correct way to describe it is 'a SSD drive *with a USB interface*'
> or 'a SSD drive *with a SATA inter
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 5/25/2011 12:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted)
>>> geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam.
>>> becoming quite annoying, the way
On 5/25/2011 12:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted)
>> geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam.
>> becoming quite annoying, the way the list servers filter on
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted)
>
> geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam.
> becoming quite annoying, the way the list servers filter on the 'from'
> address has become inadequate :(
Yeah
On 5/24/2011 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:00:01PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
>> OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
>> uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
>> PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out wit
On 05/25/2011 08:54 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted)
> geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam.
> becoming quite annoying, the way the list servers filter on the 'from'
> address has beco
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Hello CentOS it took a few days before i got the hang of it
> http://email.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=emai
> l&zu=http://cnbc7.com ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org
On 05/25/11 8:52 AM, tro...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello CentOS it took a ... (spamcrap deleted)
geez, all my email lists are getting hit with this sort of spam.
becoming quite annoying, the way the list servers filter on the 'from'
address has become inadequate :(
--
john r pierce
Hello CentOS it took a few days before i got the hang of it
http://email.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=email&zu=http://cnbc7.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:28:00AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Good grief! Back in '06 and '07, where I worked, I had to build php
> because it didn't have mcrypt support by default. They *still* don't, at
> this late date?
I'm sure that there was a valid reason for this changelog entry fr
Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 25.05.2011 14:09, schrieb John R. Dennison:
>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you elaborate what "other issues" it has?
>>
>> Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
>> Lack of native mcrypt support
> Yeah ok. Let's hope that at least
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Steven Crothers wrote:
>
> Why should a PHP 5.3 package provide PHP? To many libs are different,
> and it would allow for the installation of something like php-ldap
> from base to a php53 which provided the php dependency. That is not
> how RPM's are suppo
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> Dump the CentOS php53 package and use the 5.3 provided by the IUS
> repository. See http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
> for more information and links to IUS.
>
> CentOS' 5.3 doesn't Provide: php and has some other i
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Kevin K wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Kevin K
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition
>
>
> To bad I don't make purchasing decisions at work, or I
> would like a SSD for my Linux system, probably to be
> upgraded to 6 later in the yea
Am 25.05.2011 14:09, schrieb John R. Dennison:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
>>
>> Could you elaborate what "other issues" it has?
>
> Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
> Lack of native mcrypt support
> I think there were problems with mbstring early on that may ha
To bad I don't make purchasing decisions at work, or I would like a SSD for my
Linux system, probably to be upgraded to 6 later in the year.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:11:57PM +0200, Rainer Traut wrote:
>
> Could you elaborate what "other issues" it has?
Doesn't Provide: php / php-common
Lack of native mcrypt support
I think there were problems with mbstring early on that may have been resolved.
Perhaps others that I am not thinking
Am 24.05.2011 23:41, schrieb John R. Dennison:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:00:01PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
>> OK, so I did an upgrade to PHP 5.3 on one of my servers. I noticed the
>> uninstall of php also removed SquirrelMail and it won't install under
>> PHP 5.3. Has anybody worked this out wi
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Kevin K wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: Kevin K
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp & /var/ partition
On May 24, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
But don't you think that a SSD, or rather Solid State Drive, would
still be seen as a different type
21 matches
Mail list logo
