[CentOS] Paypal phishing warning

2011-06-08 Thread MR ZenWiz
Sorry for the cross-post, and off-topic at that, but: This morning I received a very authentic looking email from info.paypal.com, claiming that Paypal wanted me to update my browser. (Really.) It had my name in it and all the right graphics and colors and everything. Except that the from site w

Re: [CentOS] daemon user can't acess file while nobody user can.

2011-06-08 Thread Bob Hepple
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:43:28 -0400 "Nicolas Ross" wrote: > I have a server where /home is on a nfs. I installed an apache (my compile) > server. By default, it runs as daemon. That user can't acces files in > /home/*/public_html, while the nobody user can. So if I change my apache > config, it

Re: [CentOS] what is difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read" on RAID?

2011-06-08 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 09:00:48 PM mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL server with MD1000 Disk array in it. O.S. is CENTOS 5.5. > Recently every time MD1000 "patrol read" start I will get "media error" > messages on /var/log/message file. > > I use MD1000 "slow initialize" to initialize "bad d

Re: [CentOS] what is difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read" on RAID?

2011-06-08 Thread mcclnx mcc
Thank you for answer. I know "media error" mean disk going to bad. I want to know why "slow initialize" did NOT complain bad block. Based on DELL document "slow initialize" will check bad block. --- 11/6/8 (三),m.r...@5-cent.us 寫道: > 寄件者: m.r...@5-cent.us > 主旨: Re: [CentOS] what is diffe

Re: [CentOS] what is difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read" on RAID?

2011-06-08 Thread m . roth
mcclnx mcc wrote: > We have DELL server with MD1000 Disk array in it. O.S. is CENTOS 5.5. > Recently every time MD1000 "patrol read" start I will get "media error" > messages on /var/log/message file. > > I use MD1000 "slow initialize" to initialize "bad disk" and NO error. > After "slow initializ

[CentOS] what is difference between "slow initialize" and "patrol read" on RAID?

2011-06-08 Thread mcclnx mcc
We have DELL server with MD1000 Disk array in it. O.S. is CENTOS 5.5. Recently every time MD1000 "patrol read" start I will get "media error" messages on /var/log/message file. I use MD1000 "slow initialize" to initialize "bad disk" and NO error. After "slow initialize" finish, I manually

[CentOS] Looking for gfs2-kmod SRPM

2011-06-08 Thread centoslistbrian
I'm searching for the SRPM corresponding to this installed RPM. % yum list | grep gfs2 gfs2-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64 1.92-1.1.el5_2.2 It is missing from: http://msync.centos.org/centos-5/5/os/SRPMS/ What I need from the SRPM are the patches. I'm working through some issues using

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:03:14 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Only changed packages (not binary compatible) are in CentOS marked with >> .centos. so those should be replaced without question. For others, >> running "yum reinstall \*" is advised but not necessary. You a

Re: [CentOS] ipv6 day

2011-06-08 Thread Daniel Heitmann
Hi, my (german) blog has been running dual-stack for the past few days. Native of course. See http://blog.horrendum.de, if anyone speaks german. :) -- Gruß/Regards, Daniel Heitmann gpg id: B251006E | ascii: http://horrendum.de/gpg.asc | twitter: @dictvm Proprietary attachments instantly go to

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread fred smith
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:59:01PM +0100, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > And while CentOS does its best to be 100% binary compatible, I wonder how > > supportable a combined system (partial upstream binaries, partial CentOS or > > SL binaries) really will be over

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Lamar Owen wrote: > And while CentOS does its best to be 100% binary compatible, I wonder how > supportable a combined system (partial upstream binaries, partial CentOS or > SL binaries) really will be over the complete release cycle, and what sort > of oddball bugs you might r

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 11:03:14 AM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Only changed packages (not binary compatible) are in CentOS marked with > .centos. so those should be replaced without question. For others, > running "yum reinstall \*" is advised but not necessary. You are allowed > to run RH

[CentOS] ipv6 day

2011-06-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
hi, The ipv6 day[1] is now in full swing across the world. Are your CentOS machines taking part ? serving content ? Are you seeing anything interesting or strange on your CentOS machines as a fall out ? 1]: http://www.worldipv6day.org/ - KB ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Nicolas Ross wrote: >>> By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package >>> with >>> the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have >>> tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have >>> tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version number.

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread Nicolas Ross
>> By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package >> with >> the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have >> tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have >> tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version number. So the >> installed pack

Re: [CentOS] Cloning LVM

2011-06-08 Thread Christopher Hearn
On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Christopher Hearn > wrote: > >> I have a workstation with two separate drives set up with LVM. I'm buying >> an LSI RAID controller to set up mirrored drives. I'd like to clone the >> existing drives over to the ne

Re: [CentOS] Cloning LVM

2011-06-08 Thread Ross Walker
On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Christopher Hearn wrote: > I have a workstation with two separate drives set up with LVM. I'm buying an > LSI RAID controller to set up mirrored drives. I'd like to clone the > existing drives over to the new mirrored drives somehow, but not sure the > best way t

Re: [CentOS] Revisor

2011-06-08 Thread John R. Dennison
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:55:25AM -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > > Now: Please stop fretting about it, posting about it, or adding to > list-clutter with it. If people top-post they will be called out on it. If you don't like it, well, tough. The CentOS lists have guidelines; if you don't li

[CentOS] Cloning LVM

2011-06-08 Thread Christopher Hearn
I have a workstation with two separate drives set up with LVM. I'm buying an LSI RAID controller to set up mirrored drives. I'd like to clone the existing drives over to the new mirrored drives somehow, but not sure the best way to do it. The original drives & their respective replacements ar

Re: [CentOS] Revisor

2011-06-08 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:59:44PM -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> >> Please stop fretting about top posting. > > http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 > > "Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts" - specific section quoted > below: >

Re: [CentOS] mouse scroll-wheel side-click configuration?

2011-06-08 Thread fred smith
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 09:39:52AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > fred smith wrote: > > I've got this logitech v220 notebook mouse, and the scroll wheel > > can be clicked left or right as well as rotated or clicked by > > pressing down. > > > > "normal" usage (i.e., left click, right click

Re: [CentOS] Revisor

2011-06-08 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: >> On 6/7/2011 1:22 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:40:13PM -0300, Deivison Moraes wrote: Hello,I was able togeneratetheiso,butwhen I installreturnserror ¨exec of anaconta failed: No such file or direct

Re: [CentOS] Revisor

2011-06-08 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 06/06/2011 01:58 PM, Deivison Moraes wrote: > Thestable versionofEL6yousay? > Myfear islosingtwo weeksandthis newversionalsodoes not work... here is what you do : write a test, I'll run it - and make sure its run nightly on all c5/c6 builds ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] High system load but low cpu usage

2011-06-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Emmanuel, On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 15:26 +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Originally I suspected maybe it's i/o but on checking, there is very > little i/o wait % as well. > Cpu(s): 4.1%us, 2.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 76.4%id, 17.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st 17% i/o wait time seems a significant

Re: [CentOS] Changing from RHEL to CentOS

2011-06-08 Thread John Hodrien
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Nicolas Ross wrote: > By looking at the man page, distro-sync wouldn't re-install a package with > the same version. For exemple, on my rhel boxes, I have > tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch installed, and on my sl6's one, I have > tzdata-2011g-1.el6.noarch. It's the same exact version

Re: [CentOS] mouse scroll-wheel side-click configuration?

2011-06-08 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
fred smith wrote: > I've got this logitech v220 notebook mouse, and the scroll wheel > can be clicked left or right as well as rotated or clicked by > pressing down. > > "normal" usage (i.e., left click, right click, middle click, and > rotation of scroll wheel) works fine. > > Using xev I don'

Re: [CentOS] Installing rather than changing

2011-06-08 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
You'll probably be able to use rsync to copy everything from your server first before the re-install. Something like rsync -avcz --partial --progress --rsh="ssh" your_login@your_server.com:/home/path_to_folder/* /home/path_to_local_folder Possibly also need to copy the config files for whatever e

[CentOS] High system load but low cpu usage

2011-06-08 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm trying to figure out what's causing an average system load of 3+ to 5+ on an Intel quad core. The server has with 2 KVM guests (assigned 1 core and 2 cores) that's lightly loaded (0.1~0.4) each. Both guest/host are running 64bit CentOS 5.6 Originally I suspected maybe it's i/o but on checking,