Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please help me understand about the below issue ?
>
> [root@asterisk1 ~]# /etc/init.d/asterisk restart
> Stopping safe_asterisk:[ OK ]
> Shutting down asterisk:[ OK ]
> Starting asterisk: /us
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>>
>> As Tom mentioned, you need the "insecure" exports option on the NFS server
>> side, otherwise I don't do anything special on the client. I'm sourcing
>> the automount maps through LDAP. Try mounting via IP address rather than
>> NFS serv
I tried to setup CentOS 4.7 on IBM X3200 M3 but i couldn't, isn't it compatible?
if so what's the CentOS 4 release that's compatible with IBM X3200 M3?
and should i install I386 or X86_64?
Thanks
___
CentOS ma
From: Torintino T
>I tried to setup CentOS 4.7 on IBM X3200 M3 but i couldn't, isn't it
>compatible?
>if so what's the CentOS 4 release that's compatible with IBM X3200 M3?
>and should i install I386 or X86_64?
In your server's product guide, you can read:
"Operating systems supported : ... RH
Hi all,
Our network is suspected to be infected by malware by the detector in
upline network.
Turns out that some of our developers use 1.1.1.1 as a "pinging testing".
Google comes to my knowledge that 1.1.1.1 is not a private IP anymore?
Since when?
Also Google says 1.1.1.1 is well-known to be us
1/8 was debogonized last year, you can read something about it on
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/franz/content-pollution-18
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Our network is suspected to be infected by malware by the detector in
> upline network.
> Turns out that so
I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
where there are occasional thunder-storms.
There was one yesterday, when the electricity
went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
My server, an HP MicroServer,
came back (re-booted) on 2 of the 3 occasions,
but not on the third.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
> where there are occasional thunder-storms.
>
> There was one yesterday, when the electricity
> went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
Just buy a really basic UPS. I don't know w
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
> where there are occasional thunder-storms.
>
> There was one yesterday, when the electricity
> went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
>
> My server, an HP MicroServer,
>
At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:10 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
> > where there are occasional thunder-storms.
> >
> > There was one yesterday, when the electricity
> > went off 3 time
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
> where there are occasional thunder-storms.
>
> There was one yesterday, when the electricity
> went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
>
> My server, an HP MicroServer,
>
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Robert Heller wrote:
> With a non-Linux compatable UPS, you can use a old analog serial modem
> as a power sensor. If the machine has a serial port (RS-232), you can
> plug the modem into the wall outlet and connect it to the computer's
> serial port. When the power goes out,
Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:10 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
>>> where there are occasional thunder-storms.
>>>
>>> There was one yesterday, when the electr
Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Timothy Murphy
> wrote:
>> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
>> where there are occasional thunder-storms.
>>
>> There was one yesterday, when the electricity
>> went off 3 times, for a second or so on each occasion.
>> (A
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:10 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>>
I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server in a house in Italy,
where there are occasional thunder-storms.
Ther
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> *shrug* I think all the UPSs I've seen for consumers in the last five
> years seem to have a USB port to go to the computer. That, and apcupsd,
> are all you need.
Only if it speaks the right language which doesn't seem to be guaranteed.
apcupsd didn'
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> *shrug* I think all the UPSs I've seen for consumers in the last five
>> years seem to have a USB port to go to the computer. That, and apcupsd,
>> are all you need.
>
> Only if it speaks the right language which doesn't seem
John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> *shrug* I think all the UPSs I've seen for consumers in the last five
>> years seem to have a USB port to go to the computer. That, and apcupsd,
>> are all you need.
>
> Only if it speaks the right language which doesn't seem to
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> *shrug* I think all the UPSs I've seen for consumers in the last five
>>> years seem to have a USB port to go to the computer. That, and apcupsd,
>>> are all you need.
>>
>> O
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> *shrug* I think all the UPSs I've seen for consumers in the last five
>>> years seem to have a USB port to go to the computer. That, and apcupsd,
>>> are all you need.
>>
>> Only if it speaks the
apcupsd is only suppose to work with APC's UPS's and the apcupsd
developer will not deal with complaints about UPS's from other manufacturers.
If your non-APC UPS works with apcupsd, then count yourself lucky. If you
want to use another manufacturer's UPS, check out NUT
(http://www.networkup
On Friday, July 01, 2011 05:52:51 AM Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Google comes to my knowledge that 1.1.1.1 is not a private IP anymore?
> Since when?
1.1.1.1 has never been an RFC1918 'private' address. Applications that treat
it as such are broken.
RFC1918 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918 ) on
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> It seems to me that it should be possible
> to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
> which will keep the machine alive long enough
> to make a graceful exit.
> A full-blown UPS would be excessive, I think,
> as I only want the machi
On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP servers and
most of them will not work on cheap UPS's as they do not produce the pure
sine wave modern HP machines require but r
Colin Coles wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
>
> If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP servers and
> most of them will not work on cheap UPS's as they do not produce the pure
> sine wave mode
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Colin Coles wrote:
>> On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
>>
>> If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP servers
>> and most of them will not work on cheap UPS's as they do n
On Friday 01 July 2011 15:25, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Colin Coles wrote:
> > On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
> >
> > If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP servers
> > and most of them will not w
Colin Coles wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2011 15:25, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Colin Coles wrote:
>> > On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> >> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
>> >
>> > If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP
>> >servers a
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Power-outage
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Friday, July 01, 2011 9:28:21 AM
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Colin Coles wrote:
>>> On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Any advice or suggestions
On Friday 01 July 2011 15:38, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Question: are we talking server-grade systems, rackmounts? I can't imagine
> that they'd do that for consumer-grade machines.
DL385 G7 rackmounts, wonderfull machines otherwise.
Colin.
___
CentOS
Blake Hudson wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>> Colin Coles wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP
servers and mos
At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:23:31 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > Robert Heller wrote:
> >> At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:26:10 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >>>
> I have a CentOS-5.6 remote server i
At Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:25:33 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Colin Coles wrote:
> > On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >>
> >> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
> >
> > If you are thinking of the UPS route a caveat: I have several HP servers and
> > most of
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Power-outage
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
To: CentOS mailing list
Date: Friday, July 01, 2011 9:57:41 AM
> Blake Hudson wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Colin Coles wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05,
On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>
> APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some
> (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't
> include Linux support. These solutions are intended for the cheaper or
> otherwise 'unsupported' UPSes. It *sou
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>
>> APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some
>> (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't
>> include Linux support. These solutions are intended for the cheaper
>> o
Blake Hudson wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Blake Hudson wrote:
>>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Colin Coles wrote:
>> On Friday 01 July 2011 12:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Any advice or suggestions gratefully received.
>> If you are thinking of th
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>>
>>> APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some
>>> (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't
>>> include Linux support. These solutions ar
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
wrote:
>
> NO UPS MADE TODAY (according to my reading of the stats on
> advertisements) eats lightning strikes and asks for more.
>
> So per your experiences and greater technical savvy: What PSU/PC kill
> power irregularities will be stopped by wh
At Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:46:40 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> > On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> >>
> >> APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some
> >> (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> It seems to me that it should be possible
>> to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
>> which will keep the machine alive long enough
>> to make a graceful exit.
> A UPS would be your simplest option here since the UPS can send a
> signal to the OS to shutdown prope
On 7/1/2011 12:36 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>>> It seems to me that it should be possible
>>> to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
>>> which will keep the machine alive long enough
>>> to make a graceful exit.
>> A UPS would be your simplest option here since the
At Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:36:56 +0100 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> >> It seems to me that it should be possible
> >> to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
> >> which will keep the machine alive long enough
> >> to make a graceful exit.
>
> > A UPS would be you
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>
>>> And the APC Smart-UPS 750 units are not all that expensive
>>> either. Even the 1500VA units are a lot less expensive then they
>>> were 5-10 years ago. $250-$300 to protect $2000-$6000 worth
Greetings-
Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today should
be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things still on
track?
--Tim
[1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cen
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Please help me understand about the below issue ?
>>
>> [root@asterisk1 ~]# /etc/init.d/asterisk restart
>> Stopping safe_asterisk: [ OK ]
>> Shutting down asteris
Tim Nelson wrote:
> Greetings-
>
> Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today
> should be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things
> still on track?
>
> --Tim
>
> [1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa
Admin of the QA site replied to my questi
On 7/1/2011 1:02 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>>
And the APC Smart-UPS 750 units are not all that expensive
either. Even the 1500VA units are a lot less expensive then they
were 5-10
On 7/1/11, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The principle is the same but the way to control it would be different.
> Spamassassin is a perl program that uses a lot of memory and takes a
> lot of resources to start up. If you run a lot of copies at once,
> expect the machine to crawl or die.
This I had
On 7/1/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> It seems to me that it should be possible
> to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
> which will keep the machine alive long enough
> to make a graceful exit.
> A full-blown UPS would be excessive, I think,
> as I only want the machine to re-boot
> when
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Keith Roberts
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos|Windows Cross Platform File Managers
>
>
> Here's the output of running DC from the command line:
>
> [root@karsites doublecmd]# ./doublecmd.sh
> Start watching
> Double Comm
On 7/1/11, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:25:33 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Colin Coles wrote:
>> perhaps naively, I'm surprised: doesn't this mean they put crappy PSUs
>> in those servers?
>> I thought decent PSUs were expected to deal with dirty input AC?
>
> AND
Hello all. I posted this in the forum and was told to instead post it to
the mailing list. My apologies for the redundancy if you have already
seen and been irritated by my blatherings.
Thanks.
_
I am working on a CentOS clustered LAMP stack and running into problems.
Ryan Bunce wrote:
> I must say that I am less familiar with how all of the cluster
> components work together. All of the Linux clusters I have built thus
> far have been heartbeat+mon style clusters.
>
> I'm looking to find out if there is an additional debug layer that I can
> put in place to
Ryan Bunce wrote:
> I am working on a CentOS clustered LAMP stack and running into problems. I
> have searched extensively and have come up empty.
>
> Here's my setup:
>
> Two node cluster identical hardware. IBM x226 with RSAII adapters for
> fencing.
> Configured for Active/Passive failover - no
I have two computers, one with a HP printer on it and one with a Samsung
printer on it.
Both systems have their respective pritnters listed under
system-config-printer and have "enabled" "accepting jobs" and "shared" checked.
Up to a few days ago this worked fine. Suddenly I can't see either pr
Creating a new printer with system-config-printer seems to work. "new
printer" "IPP", "generic postscript driver". Print test page. Test page
printed.
So it's just the automatic find-the--remote-printer function that's not working.
I have avahi-daemon disabled on both of these computers? Is
Frank Cox wrote:
> Creating a new printer with system-config-printer seems to work. "new
> printer" "IPP", "generic postscript driver". Print test page. Test page
> printed.
>
> So it's just the automatic find-the--remote-printer function that's not
> working.
>
> I have avahi-daemon disabled
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:07:45 +0200
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Have you rebooted after the updates?
What updates?
I started avahi-daemon on both computers, restarted cups on both computers.
Nothing changed -- Still didn't see the remote printers.
I've had avahi-daemon turned off on these comp
On Friday, July 01, 2011 11:46 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>> On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
>>>
>>> APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some
>>> (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't
>>> include
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> wrote:
>> Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Please help me understand about the below issue ?
>>>
>>> [root@asterisk1 ~]# /etc/init.d/asterisk restart
>>> Stopping safe_asterisk:
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:15 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:07:45 +0200
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> > Have you rebooted after the updates?
>
> What updates?
>
> I started avahi-daemon on both computers, restarted cups on both computers.
>
> Nothing changed -- Still didn't
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:10:36 -0700
Craig White wrote:
> Logs? /var/log/cups/error_log
Nothing of note.
>
> Settings? /etc/cups/printers.conf & cupsd.conf
Nothing changed from when it did work before.
>
> Ping?
Network connectivity is fine.
>
> Telnet from client? telnet $CUPS_SERVER 631
C
63 matches
Mail list logo
