Re: [CentOS] Centos|Windows Cross Platform File Managers

On 7/2/11, Keith Roberts wrote: > I'm not a lover of M$ stuff, but the application I need to > run is Windows only, and doing a fresh install of Vista as I > also have the Tech Guys recovery disk seems like the easiest > option for me. I'm probably a bit biased since lately I've been messing arou

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on the HP MicroServer

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:33:10PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 7/3/11, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > I'm been running two HP MicroServers as home-servers under CentOS-5.6 > > for 2 months, and have been very happy with their performance. > > I'm wondering if there are many other MicroServer/

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on the HP MicroServer

On 7/3/11, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm been running two HP MicroServers as home-servers under CentOS-5.6 > for 2 months, and have been very happy with their performance. > I'm wondering if there are many other MicroServer/CentOS users around? I thought the HP MicroServer was a nice little box for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

On 7/4/11, Karanbir Singh wrote: > not all links work at 25mbit/sec - that is really only local loop's - > most machines are 100mbps within the country but transit rates can vary. > Also, the tree size is 28G at this point - and will grow a bit more by > the time we release. oic, I've been using

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

On 07/03/2011 09:25 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Although I'm quite curious, how is the push done? Given the > requirements of 25Mbits for donated servers, it would take less than > an hour to push through even 10GB worth of DVD + CDs. It seems quite > odd that it takes 2~3 days just to push to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

On 11-07-03 07:04 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > Anything else is just pure conjecture. > > > > > > > John > I do concede the point with regards to your logic, John. And I, of course, feel the same hesitation over the use of "weasel words".

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

On 7/3/11, Mark Bradbury wrote: >> > Of course, this time estimate is my guess and you should wait for >> > official estimate from someone from dev team. >> > >> Sorry my mistake. They will be available for download in 4-5 days, sync >> to external mirrors should be finished in 2 days. >> >> > Dat

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 77, Issue 1

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

On Sunday 03 July 2011 13:21:31 Robert Heller wrote: > > Actually, now that I think more and more about it, I am not so sure it is > > not doable. However, it is far from being trivial, and it certainly > > cannot be something that can be as thin as ordinary shades. It has to be > > bulky and heavy

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

> > Of course, this time estimate is my guess and you should wait for > > official estimate from someone from dev team. > > > Sorry my mistake. They will be available for download in 4-5 days, sync > to external mirrors should be finished in 2 days. > > Dates changed again http://qaweb.dev.centos.

Re: [CentOS] php 5.1.6 vulnerability in CentosPlus repo

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:29:12PM +0200, Alain Péan wrote: > > > So 5.1.6 is the current package on CentOS, at least in base repo, I > don't know for CentOSPlus, and your question is totally valid. The php in base, for both C4 and C5, gets updates. I've not seen an update for the C4 plus pack

Re: [CentOS] php 5.1.6 vulnerability in CentosPlus repo

On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 09:28:03AM +0100, Spike Turner wrote: > > I'm running it on an internal box not accessible from the internet. I > do run a yum update and that seems to be the latest CentOS Plus > version. You never said it wasn't facing the internet. And it's not been updated in nearly 3

Re: [CentOS] php 5.1.6 vulnerability in CentosPlus repo

Le 03/07/2011 10:28, Spike Turner a écrit : > --- On Sat, 2/7/11, John R. Dennison wrote: > >> That's not been supported in, literally, ages. You >> may want to consider >> a "yum update" once in a while. >> >> And yes, that specific version has multiple known and >> exploitable >> security issue

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

At Sun, 3 Jul 2011 04:30:37 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Sunday 03 July 2011 00:51:29 Robert Heller wrote: > > > > There is (in the SciFi world) the idea that someday > > > > 'desktops' in the current / conventional sense may completely vanish > > > > from the universe, taken over pro

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Jeff Sheltren A: There's a good chance. Please continue to watch the >> QAweb site for updated information. > > Last word on the QA website is that final ISO's are in the making (or > they have already been made by now) and should be av

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 Progress as per qaweb

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Jeff Sheltren A: There's a good chance. Please continue to watch the > QAweb site for updated information. Last word on the QA website is that final ISO's are in the making (or they have already been made by now) and should be available for download on all official

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: >> Greetings,, >> >> On 7/3/11, Robert Heller wrote: >>> At Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:58:14 +0100 CentOS mailing list >>> wrote: >>> There is (in the SciFi world) the idea that someday >>> 'desktops' in the current / conventional sense may compl

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings,, > > On 7/3/11, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:58:14 +0100 CentOS mailing list >> wrote: >> There is (in the SciFi world) the idea that someday >> 'desktops' in the current / conventional sense may completely vanish >> from the universe,

[CentOS] CentOS on the HP MicroServer

I'm been running two HP MicroServers as home-servers under CentOS-5.6 for 2 months, and have been very happy with their performance. I'm wondering if there are many other MicroServer/CentOS users around? I've been surprised when looking at the MicroServer forums (eg <

Re: [CentOS] php 5.1.6 vulnerability in CentosPlus repo

--- On Sat, 2/7/11, John R. Dennison wrote: > That's not been supported in, literally, ages.  You > may want to consider > a "yum update" once in a while. > > And yes, that specific version has multiple known and > exploitable > security issues. >             >     John I'm running it on an int

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

On 7/3/11, Les Mikesell wrote: > If you are facebook, you can design/demand whatever you want, including > single-voltage motherboards. Not sure why everyone else put up with the > problem for so long. Legacy support and pure economies of scale :D ___

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

On 7/3/11, Robert Heller wrote: > (I'm guessing that Google's massive array of battery powered servers use > things like Atom processors or some other mobile or embeded processing > elements on their custom motherboards, which might be a customized > variant of a laptop or embedded processing moth

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

On 7/3/11, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > be a good investment, but still I wonder why there are no offers on the > market with a "boosted" PSU units that can sustain DC power for a couple of > seconds > during the AC "blinks". They don't even need to use a battery, maybe a set > of condensers could s

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

Steven Crothers wrote: > You should invest in a Spider KVM or similar, they hang off the back and > don't use any rack space. They can also be POE, so they wont use a plug. > That'll provide you out of band management and remote reboots and what > not. How exactly would that work? -- Timothy Mu