-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Nguyen Vu Hung said the following on 17/07/11 20:19:
>> Currently, the OS is installed on a vmware, and arcording to the tech
staff,
>> due to technical, they can not install CentOS 6 or anything other than
CentOS 5.4 :)
>I already installed CentOS (and RHEL)
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 04:04 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:37 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 09:07:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > > There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
> > > likely
>
> > RFC2821 says
On 7/18/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:30 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>> On 7/18/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>>>
Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is
the centos mailing
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:30 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> On 7/18/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is
>>> the centos mailing list for basic users like me?
>>
>> Try ubun
On 7/18/11, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is
>> the centos mailing list for basic users like me?
>
> Try ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> They always have spoon and milk po
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is
> the centos mailing list for basic users like me?
Try ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com
They always have spoon and milk powder ready and then some.
__
On 7/17/11, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is
> the centos mailing list for basic users like me?
This one is great:
https://google.com
Cody Jackson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On 7/18/11, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:24:02AM -0400, hadi motamedi wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help. At now, I have put my windows
>> machine behind my centos 5.6 firewall server with just one NIC. The
>> windows machine can ping 192.9.9.3 but it cannot bro
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:24:02AM -0400, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your help. At now, I have put my windows
> machine behind my centos 5.6 firewall server with just one NIC. The
> windows machine can ping 192.9.9.3 but it cannot browse Internet like
> connecting to google. I
On 7/16/11, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Do this:
> 1. Make sure your Centos has two network card. One connected to
> internet, one to local lan. Make sure the Centos can already browsing
> internet.
> Example internet: eth0 192.168.1.1
> local: eth1 192.168.2.1
>
> 2. Activate ip forwarding in /etc/sy
On 7/17/11 10:22 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> Multiple interfaces, multiple IP addresses. Sendmail isn't going to track
>> which
>> interface it is sending on and adjust its greeting.
>
> Sendmail ? Golly some of us have advanced to more advance systems like
> Exim ;-)
Does it vary it's HELO
On 7/18/11, Always Learning wrote:
> Sorry if I seem thick but I am having problems understanding why, with
> the use of NAT, the HELO/EHLO and their external IP address can not
> match. Also what influences does scaling have on the ability of sending
> mail servers (MTAs) to operate with host na
On 7/17/11 10:26 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Sorry if I seem thick but I am having problems understanding why, with
> the use of NAT, the HELO/EHLO and their external IP address can not
> match.
I suppose it is not impossible if you force a 1 to 1 correspondence.
> Also what influences does sc
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:12 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/17/11 9:37 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > (RFC821 actually wanted the HELO to match the connecting host, but
> > 2821 just says it must be an A record or an address literal).
> That's a long way for saying it MUST be the name of that
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 21:57 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Multiple interfaces, multiple IP addresses. Sendmail isn't going to track
> which
> interface it is sending on and adjust its greeting.
Sendmail ? Golly some of us have advanced to more advance systems like
Exim ;-)
When I complained
> Hrrm, seems as if the ISO may be using a PAE kernel by default. PAE is
> a kernel that will be able to make use of more than 4GB of RAM with
> i686.
>
> Ah, I see it's apparently a decision by RH. I assume there's some logic
> in it, though I don't know what it is.
>
>
> http://jp.centos.org/mo
On 7/17/11 9:37 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 09:07:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
>> likely
>
> RFC2821 says:
> - The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST BE either a primary
>hos
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:37 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 09:07:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
> > likely
> RFC2821 says:
>- The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST BE either a pr
On 7/17/11 9:18 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>>> Legitimate senders should not use fake, false, misleading credentials.
>
>> There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
>> likely
>> to work for multi-homed and/or clustered machines.
>
> Which type of 'multi-homing' wer
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:51:42AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
> >> The version is CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso
> >> With each virtual machine I get this result at the begi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 09:07:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
> likely
RFC2821 says:
- The domain name given in the EHLO command MUST BE either a primary
host name (a domain name that resolves to an A RR) or, if
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 21:07 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/17/11 4:48 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > Legitimate senders should not use fake, false, misleading credentials.
> There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
> likely
> to work for multi-homed and/o
Curious as to why redhat-release says "CentOS Linux release" in C6, but
on C5 it merely says 'CentOS release". This causes programs that try to
parse the file (eg Xen Tools) to fail 'cos it can't parse properly.
Yeah, it can be worked around, but it seems an unnecessary change :-(
--
rgds
Step
On 7/17/11 4:48 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> If the 'greeting name' (HELO/EHLO) does not resolve to the IP address
> used by the sending server, then the mail is not accepted.
That's ummm, kind of random. There's no reason to expect this.
>> Someone who does not want to receive mail from legiti
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
>> I want to get a look at Cents-6
>> The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
>> The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
>> I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtu
On 07/17/2011 09:32 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
I want to get a look at Cents-6
The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the
same r
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
> I want to get a look at Cents-6
> The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
> The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
> I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the
> same result
> I boot from the CD (wich have bee
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer (since this morning)
> and I'd like to open an non-standard port,
> for use on a laptop attached to the internet through the server.
>
> Do I have to explicitly add an iptables rule?
> If so, and I want to open (say) udp port 500
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 05:14:49 pm Always Learning wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 16:51 -0400, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> > This is a rather strange problem. I am using the i386 netinstall CD to
> > boot and do a URL (HTTP) install since my machine only has CD drive and
> > can't boot from USB eit
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 23:52 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
> > Do your Mail Transfer Agents use valid or bogus HELO/EHLO names ?
> >
>
> Mine uses proper name, but then again I am one of the few in my country
> to offer POP3 on SSL port 465. And I am small local WISP
Always Learning wrote:
> Do your Mail Transfer Agents use valid or bogus HELO/EHLO names ?
>
Mine uses proper name, but then again I am one of the few in my country
to offer POP3 on SSL port 465. And I am small local WISP.
And when I say *few*, I mean I do not actually *know* of any mail server
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:36:49PM +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 11:24 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > *almost* correct. In Linux, like Unix and the pre-Microsoft days,
> > uppercase letters have a different numerical value to lowercase letters.
> >
> > Uppercase 'COM' is definitely no
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 23:36 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 11:24 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> > Uppercase 'COM' is definitely not the same as lowercase 'com'.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong but afaik upper-/lowercase does not
> matter in DNS. Also, I am not aware of e.g. Postf
Devin Reade wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> I use it too. Reverse-DNS check is best SPAM repellent there is. Only
>> mail from properly set mail servers is accepted.
>
> That's fine if your check is that a reverse DNS entry exists,
> or that the HELO/ELHO exists in forward DNS or, if y
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 23:33 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> >> Organisation:British Telecommunications, EU
> >> HELO / EHLO: smtpe1.intersmtp.com
> >> HELO IP: 62.239.224.89
> >> MX IP: 62.239.224.234
> >> MX DNS A record: smtp61.intersmtp.com
> > BUT the IP address us
On 07/17/2011 11:24 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> *almost* correct. In Linux, like Unix and the pre-Microsoft days,
> uppercase letters have a different numerical value to lowercase letters.
>
> Uppercase 'COM' is definitely not the same as lowercase 'com'.
Please correct me if I am wrong but afaik
Am 17.07.2011 23:24, schrieb Always Learning:
>
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 23:15 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>
>> The 2nd one in your list:
>>
>> Organisation:British Telecommunications, EU
>> HELO / EHLO: smtpe1.intersmtp.com
>> HELO IP: 62.239.224.89
>> MX IP: 62.23
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 23:15 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> The 2nd one in your list:
>
> Organisation:British Telecommunications, EU
> HELO / EHLO: smtpe1.intersmtp.com
> HELO IP: 62.239.224.89
> MX IP: 62.239.224.234
> MX DNS A record: smtp61.intersmtp.com
>
> Here
Am 17.07.2011 22:30, schrieb Always Learning:
> Here a a few examples: http://sys.u226.com/t21/t21p003.php
Just to understand you, could you please explain one of your "examples"?
The 2nd one in your list:
Organisation:British Telecommunications, EU
HELO / EHLO: smtpe1.intersmtp.com
H
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 16:51 -0400, Armelius Cameron wrote:
> This is a rather strange problem. I am using the i386 netinstall CD to boot
> and do a URL (HTTP) install since my machine only has CD drive and can't boot
> from USB either.
>
> During the install, the installer was looking for pack
Hello,
This is a rather strange problem. I am using the i386 netinstall CD to boot
and do a URL (HTTP) install since my machine only has CD drive and can't boot
from USB either.
During the install, the installer was looking for package authconfig-
gtk-6.1.9-1.fc14.i686.rpm and claims that it's m
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 13:52 -0400, Michel Donais wrote:
> Thinkpad T-42
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThinkPad
ThinkPad T40-series
Includes the T40, T41, T42, T43, and associated p series (for
performance; e.g., T43p). A typical 14.1-inch (360 mm) T4x
weighs 4.9 lb (2.2 k
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 11:06 -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
> That's fine if your check is that a reverse DNS entry exists,
> or that the HELO/ELHO exists in forward DNS or, if your MTA is
> smart enough, it does a reverse-forward* check, but if
> you only check that the HELO/ELHO matches the reverse e
Keith Roberts wrote:
> I don't use NFS, can you actually reach your NFS machine from another
> machine on your LAN to get some sort of file listings from it, like an
> apache directory listing? This would tell you that the machine is
> actually reachable.
#showmount -e
will list available NFS
Michel Donais wrote:
> I want to get a look at Cents-6
> The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
> The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
>
> I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the
> same result
> I boot from the CD (wich have been burned from an ISO download
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nguyen Vu Hung said the following on 17/07/11 20:19:
> Currently, the OS is installed on a vmware, and arcording to the tech staff,
> due to technical, they can not install CentOS 6 or anything other than CentOS
> 5.4 :)
I already installed CentOS (
Hello,
(2011/07/18 1:06), Digimer wrote:
>
> As far as I know, upgrading between major EL versions is not supported.
> A full re-install is recommended.
Currently, the OS is installed on a vmware, and arcording to the tech staff,
due to technical, they can not install CentOS 6 or anything other th
On 07/17/2011 01:59 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running 5.4
>
> After running
>
> sudo yum clean all
> sudo yum update
>
> We got it upgraded to 5.6
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
>
> So, how can I get it my CentOS from 5.6 to 6.0?
>
> [vuhung@-08 ~
Am 17.07.2011 19:59, schrieb Nguyen Vu Hung:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running 5.4
>
> After running
>
> sudo yum clean all
> sudo yum update
>
> We got it upgraded to 5.6
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
>
> So, how can I get it my CentOS from 5.6 to 6.0?
>
> [vuhung@-08 ~]
Hi all,
I am running 5.4
After running
sudo yum clean all
sudo yum update
We got it upgraded to 5.6
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
So, how can I get it my CentOS from 5.6 to 6.0?
[vuhung@-08 ~]$ sudo yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cach
Hi all,
I am running 5.4
After running
sudo yum clean all
sudo yum update
We got it upgraded to 5.6
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
So, how can I get it my CentOS from 5.6 to 6.0?
[vuhung@-08 ~]$ sudo yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cach
I want to get a look at Cents-6
The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the same
result
I boot from the CD (wich have been burned from an ISO downloaded from a Centos
-6 repo).
The vers
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, 郑栋辉 wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: 郑栋辉
Subject: [CentOS] issues when add driverdisk to centos5.6 using NFS method
Hi, I am Ken.. I am trying to add dud(driver update disk) to centos5.6
using network method, I can successfully add dud to centos5.6 using
http and ftp met
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I use it too. Reverse-DNS check is best SPAM repellent there is. Only
> mail from properly set mail servers is accepted.
That's fine if your check is that a reverse DNS entry exists,
or that the HELO/ELHO exists in forward DNS or, if your MTA is
smart enough, it doe
On 7/16/11 1:35 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> I've done some more reading/googling and from what i'm seeing high
> security isn't doable with svnserve even with sasl, passwords from the
> client need to be stored on disk plain, this isn't desirable in my
> case.
Yes, that's why there is the ssh+svn v
On 07/17/11 1:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> If you check the frequency of Apache (httpd) security bugs on CentOS
> 5.x, I think you will see several Denial Of Service bugs, but only one
> or two that would allow code execution. And bug reports for Apache are
> made to secure mailing list so r
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:05 PM, david wrote:
> At 08:53 AM 7/17/2011, you wrote:
>>Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> > I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer (since this morning)
>> > and I'd like to open an non-standard port,
>> > for use on a laptop attached to the internet through the server.
>> >
At 08:53 AM 7/17/2011, you wrote:
>Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer (since this morning)
> > and I'd like to open an non-standard port,
> > for use on a laptop attached to the internet through the server.
> >
(snip)
> > Any advice or suggestions gratefully rec
david wrote:
> At 10:31 PM 7/16/2011, you wrote:
>> On 07/16/11 7:50 PM, david wrote:
>>> If the I386 (or i686, never could figure out why the name change)
>> I386 was the original 386 CPU, which ran at speeds from 16 to 33Mhz
>> i486 includes a few additional instructions on the 486 processor, and
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer (since this morning)
> and I'd like to open an non-standard port,
> for use on a laptop attached to the internet through the server.
>
> Do I have to explicitly add an iptables rule?
> If so, and I want to open (say) udp port 500 ,
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 20:13 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> yum install gstreamer*
>>
>
> Is yum install vlc* better that gstreamer?
>
> Ignorant queation:
> And whch repos should be in
I'm running CentOS-6 on an HP MicroServer (since this morning)
and I'd like to open an non-standard port,
for use on a laptop attached to the internet through the server.
Do I have to explicitly add an iptables rule?
If so, and I want to open (say) udp port 500 ,
what command should I give?
I've
Keith Roberts wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 10:37 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think I have been on a forums or mailing list that refused to
>>> point someone in the right direction. "Give a man a fish, you have fed
>>> him for today. Teach a man to fish, and you have fed him
At 10:31 PM 7/16/2011, you wrote:
>On 07/16/11 7:50 PM, david wrote:
> > If the I386 (or i686, never could figure out why the name change)
>
>I386 was the original 386 CPU, which ran at speeds from 16 to 33Mhz
>i486 includes a few additional instructions on the 486 processor, and
>IIRC, ran at spee
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Always Learning
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewall?
>
>
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 10:37 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> I don't think I have been on a forums or mailing list that refused to
>> point someone in the
Greetings,
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 20:13 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
> yum install gstreamer*
>
Is yum install vlc* better that gstreamer?
Ignorant queation:
And whch repos should be included 1. for gstreamer and 2. for VLC?
--
Eugene Poole wrote:
> Has anyone seen an issue like this? I'm continuing to run CentOS 5.3
> because VMware Server 2.02 works well there. And I haven't found a
> tutorial or 'How To' showing how to move to kernel based virtualization
> (KVM) on the later versions of CentOS.
Tutorial, or better
Hi, I am Ken.. I am trying to add dud(driver update disk) to centos5.6
using network method, I can successfully add dud to centos5.6 using
http and ftp method, but fail when using nfs method. However those all
three methods are officially supported in the centos5.6.
As indicated in the centos5.6 w
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 08:35:55AM -0400, Eugene Poole wrote:
> I sent the following message back in June, but I must have missed the reply:
>
>
> I'm attempting to install and configure HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and
> Printing) software on my CentOS 5.3 x86_64 system without success. I've
I sent the following message back in June, but I must have missed the reply:
I'm attempting to install and configure HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and
Printing) software on my CentOS 5.3 x86_64 system without success. I've
got a HP Officejet Pro 8500 multi-function printer connected via
eth
At Sat, 16 Jul 2011 22:31:51 -0700 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 07/16/11 7:50 PM, david wrote:
> > If the I386 (or i686, never could figure out why the name change)
>
> I386 was the original 386 CPU, which ran at speeds from 16 to 33Mhz
> i486 includes a few additional instructions on the
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 10:37 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I don't think I have been on a forums or mailing list that refused to
> point someone in the right direction. "Give a man a fish, you have fed
> him for today. Teach a man to fish, and you have fed him for a
> lifetime" most peopl
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
*snip*
>>> I read some time ago something about tunneling different protocols
>>> through firewalls? which sounded quite scary.
>>
>> This is what I was refering to:
>>
>> Data Driven Attacks Using HTTP Tunneling
>>
>> "... HTTP Tunneling Example
>>
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just tried to install EXT4 onto a CentOS 5 machine but it failed.
> Does anyone know in which repository it is?
>
> root@usaxen01:[~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
>
> root@usaxen01:[~]$ uname -a
> Linux usaxen01 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5xen
Always Learning wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 13:25 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>> But, sadly google can't teach someone to start making their own
>> choices or to think for themselves
>
> Learning Linux/Centos on one's own, and without good text books, is a
> very daunting task even for those w
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:17 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 07/05/11 9:04 PM, Charles Polisher wrote:
>> The PostgreSQL wiki seems to say that database tables are
>> allocated in 1GB extents. In workloads with which I am
>> familiar, with an RDBMS the extents don't bounce
>> around all that much, i.
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> From: Keith Roberts
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewall?
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>>> I wrote about "physical presence *outside* of your network", like if
Always Learning wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 20:06 -0400, Mark Weaver wrote:
>
>> On 7/16/2011 6:50 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> If there was an automatic ban on List mail containing HTML parts, it is
>>> likely the latest crap would not be distributed to everyone.
>>>
>>> A possible test
david wrote:
> Just a thought
>
> If the I386 (or i686, never could figure out why the name change)
> disk doesn't quite fit on the DVD+, and needs a DVD-, this might put
> some folks at an inconvenience.
>
> I wonder if the difference between fitting and not fitting is small
> enough, so that
Always Learning wrote:
> Centos 5.6 X86_64 is on two DVDs. Can not determine if -R or +R. However
> when installing, disk 2 is never required.
I used it on my first and only install. Of course I chose some extra
packages, and that is why infrequently used packages are on the disk 2.
Ljubomir
__
80 matches
Mail list logo
