Phil Schaffner wrote on 07/22/2011 09:44 AM:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/MigrationGuide/MigratingFiveToSix
Have at it. :-)
The page having had some attention by Alan, and another revision or two,
the DRAFT status is being removed and a link being added to
HowTos/MigrationGuide.
Phil
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 21:36 -0600, troxlinux wrote:
Slds lista , alguien a instalado unsort en centos 5.x , Quiero
instalarlo pero no encuentro como!
hum
shuf que lo tienes en los coreutils, debe hacer lo mismo... creo que
unsort no está mantenido por lo que leí
cat /etc/aliases|shuf
saludos
Buenas tardes Compañeros; tengo el siguiente inconveniente con un disco externo
con
conexion USB, lo tengo conectado para hacer nackup de el sistema pero cuando lo
realiza
sale el siguiente error:
end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 86537887
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block
2011/7/22 thomas veymont thomas.veym...@gmail.com:
hello,
after a Centos 6 fresh install, I don't see any run-parts scripts in
/etc/contab
like in the 5.x releases :
# run-parts
01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly
02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily
22 4 * * 0 root run-parts
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have a rather annoying issue on going with one of my centos virtual servers.
the server hosts a website using apache and mysql ,there are three
persons involved with keeping the site up and running.
and i am his root due to the fact
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
ext4 slows down, if there is too much files in same directory.
XFS-fs is solution to fix this
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
Red Hat does not support upgrades between major versions (doesn't necessarily
mean it's not possible)
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/ch-upgrade-x86.html
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
ext4 slows down, if
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 08:30 -0300, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
My point is that big changes happen in Linux much frequently than in
Solaris and even Solaris sometimes doesn't support these kinds of
upgrades.
It is the inevitable and time-consuming upheaval which many will
probably find daunting.
yonatan pingle wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Alexander
good suggestions, ill monitor I/O and mysql code, sounds like a code
related issue and not a centos issue after all.
it runs on ext3 ,i could only guess how to code deals with the dir,
as it seems
Do you have cahcing turned on in CMS? That could help.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
RHCT | RHCSA | CCNA1
If you are using phpMyAdmin the status page will aid you in tuning
mySQL. Look for values in red. The description will usually tell you
what to adjust to improve performance.
Ryan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
im good with mysqltuner.pl,
as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
values in my.cnf according to the application needs.
looks like it's all in the code and the way the CMS handles the
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
im good with mysqltuner.pl,
as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
values in my.cnf according to the
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:26 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 07/23/11 12:09 PM, Tom H wrote:
Even after this explanation I don't understand your objection to
helping someone with a firewall and routing issue on a CentOS box. You
might have a point if the executables didn't
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly evident from an
earlier posting that your disks are thrashing with insanely
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
there is no caching system, its a home made CMS.
You can use an accelerator too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP_accelerator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PHP_accelerators
Please, make a big backup before this! (I nevever had a
Am 24.07.2011 14:04, schrieb Always Learning:
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 08:30 -0300, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
My point is that big changes happen in Linux much frequently than in
Solaris and even Solaris sometimes doesn't support these kinds of
upgrades.
It is the inevitable and
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do not expect coders to remain 'not tech savvy'
If the coder is not willing
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Rogelio scubac...@gmail.com wrote:
The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests), and I
was wondering if anyone had any open source suggestions of solutions
that could scale
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 15:59 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Paul,
as much as I understand your point of view, I must disagree taking
upstream's and CentOS's position. Your description reflects a home user
or an administrator with just less than a handful of systems.
Alexander,
I have 11
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
pix2.jpg in directory ./1/ and pix3.jpg in directory
./b/ and so forth -- if the
On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:48:23 Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
pix2.jpg in directory ./1/
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
directory structure something like this
/pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
/pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
/pix/6/72/pix67255.jpg
Go read Knuth
One does not do that because then one is
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
directory structure something like this
/pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
/pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:50 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
Just ran the installation DVD but there is no option to 'upgrade'. Looked at
the RHEL docs,
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installati
on_Guide/ch-guimode-x86.html#id4594292 referenced off
Greetings,
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after looking into the website folders, i have found one folder which
from my point of view is one of the causes for the server loads.
hmm... does mount dir -noatime -noadirtime help speed it
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:38:33AM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
hmm... does mount dir -noatime -noadirtime help speed it up?
Just an FYI:
noatime is a superset that includes noadirtime.
John
--
You can safely assume you've
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:51 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrading from CentOS 5.6 to 6.0
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Thomas Dukes
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:20:07PM -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
I have never had a problem upgrading a CentOS release since I started with
3.x. Seems now, I can't even upgrade from 5.6 to 5.7. I have never had to do
a complete re-install since moving from Slackware 1.x to Redhat 2.x except
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 22:20 -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
The compliation of ffmpeg/zoneminder seems to be an issue
with CentOS with the outdated php/mysql and other various libs.
PHP and MySQL work fine for me. My systems depend on both these being
reliable, efficient, dependable and robust -
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 22:20 -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:51 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Upgrading from CentOS 5.6
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 19:51 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
Installing non RPM software on an RPM Distro like CentOS is frowned
upon. That is the worst way to do it.
why?
you made a vacuous argument.
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
On 7/24/11 4:08 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread,
I'll be moving to Ubunto. They have a 3 year window for support on a
distribution unlike CentOS/RHEL. They seem to be more user friendly for a
home networking environment.
RHEL is supported for 10 years on each major release.
--
Eero
___
CentOS
41 matches
Mail list logo
