On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 22:05 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> And even more are mature enough not to have to get defensive and try to
> get the last word in on every thread they are part of. In my opinion you
> could learn something from such people.
I was merely replying to the gentleman's conc
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:01:23AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Some are wise enough not to prolong a now boring thread.
And even more are mature enough not to have to get defensive and try to
get the last word in on every thread they are part of. In my opinion you
could learn something fro
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:54 +1200, Spiro Harvey wrote:
> > Please additionally note I thought, mistakenly it appears, I was being
> > helpful and have taken notice of the objections.
> Please note, this is a mailing list for people to get help with CentOS.
> Nothing else.
I reiterate for your p
> Please additionally note I thought, mistakenly it appears, I was being
> helpful and have taken notice of the objections.
Please note, this is a mailing list for people to get help with CentOS.
Nothing else.
Most people here are old enough to figure out how to get their own news.
--
Spiro Har
>3) flush multipaths
>4) stop iscsi
I guess that's the point, it seems the init script does not flush them out so
the module and any dependent dm mods stay active.
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 00:48 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> More importantly the address he posted is a law firm and as such
> cannot really make any sort of guarantees. At best this is false
> advertising and at worst it's an outright scam.
I have subscribed to several English law mailing
On 08/21/2011 11:30 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.
>
> This has been available for a long time.
>
> The important question is why in the world would you spam this
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>>> / From the man page:
>> /
>> "...Note that this passphrase is only used if the option --batch has also
>> been given."
> Mike,
>
> Thanks - that does work. I was thinking "too hard" and thought it was
> something
> with the gpg-agent.
>
> Thanks
>
> Je
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:11:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.
This has been available for a long time.
The important question is why in the world would you spam this list
with yet more off-topic garbage? The signal to noi
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 23:15 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Keep that elsewhere! Do not spam this list with non CentOS topics. Thanks.
Some on here may will to protect their domain names.
www.centos.xxx
for example
Best wishes,
Paul.
_
Am 21.08.2011 23:11, schrieb Always Learning:
>
> A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.
Keep that elsewhere! Do not spam this list with non CentOS topics. Thanks.
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
A new .xxx domain suffix for sexual content is becoming available.
If you have a cherished Trade Mark or brand name and do not want relish
having your_domain_name.xxx being available to Cyber Squatters or the
'porn trade' you can block the issuing of that .xxx domain name for a
single payment of
und 3:30am.
>>>
>>> On the 64-bit systems, no mail is occurring. From the "cron" log on
>>> a 64-bit system, there are lines like:
>>>
>>> cron-20110821:Aug 21 03:36:23 XXX run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[9727]:
>>> finished 0logwatch
uot; log on
> > a 64-bit system, there are lines like:
> >
> > cron-20110821:Aug 21 03:36:23 XXX run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[9727]:
> > finished 0logwatch
> > (where "XXX" stands for the server name)
> >
> > but no report is sent.
> >
>
Am 21.08.2011 21:49, schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
> I have several CentOS 6 boxes that mount iscsi based luns and use mpath.
> They all had problems shutting down as a result of unused maps not getting
> flushed as the system halted.
>
> After examining the init scripts, netfs, iscsi and multipathd a
On 08/21/2011 02:34 PM, Craig White wrote:
>> Maybe SELinux blocks Apache from writing to /etc/sysconfig/iptables?
>> Have you looked at fail2ban and denyhosts? These apps seem to offer a
>> similar solution.
>
> fail2ban and denyhosts center on failed logins - I don't think this is
> what he
> >/ From the man page:
> /
> "...Note that this passphrase is only used if the option --batch has also
> been given."
Mike,
Thanks - that does work. I was thinking "too hard" and thought it was
something
with the gpg-agent.
Thanks
Jerry
___
CentOS
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Under Centos 5 I ran this command:
> gpg --passphrase-file /home/myuser/pass_phrase.txt -c
> ../Versions/program.x86_64.tgz
>
> and this worked fine.
>
> On CentOS 6 running the same command prompts me for the passphrase.
>
> Thats exactly what I dont want
uot; log on
> > a 64-bit system, there are lines like:
> >
> > cron-20110821:Aug 21 03:36:23 XXX run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[9727]:
> > finished 0logwatch
> > (where "XXX" stands for the server name)
> >
> > but no report is sent.
> >
>
I have several CentOS 6 boxes that mount iscsi based luns and use mpath.
They all had problems shutting down as a result of unused maps not getting
flushed as the system halted.
After examining the init scripts, netfs, iscsi and multipathd all had the
correct
order but mpath failed to flush these
Under Centos 5 I ran this command:
gpg --passphrase-file /home/myuser/pass_phrase.txt -c
../Versions/program.x86_64.tgz
and this worked fine.
On CentOS 6 running the same command prompts me for the passphrase.
Thats exactly what I dont want to have happen. I have the pass phrase I
want in th
doing its thing properly on my 32-bit servers, delivering
> the report by mail to my root account once a day sometime around 3:30am.
>
> On the 64-bit systems, no mail is occurring. From the "cron" log on
> a 64-bit system, there are lines like:
>
> cron-20110821:Aug 21 0
Folks
Logwatch is doing its thing properly on my 32-bit servers, delivering
the report by mail to my root account once a day sometime around 3:30am.
On the 64-bit systems, no mail is occurring. From the "cron" log on
a 64-bit system, there are lines like:
cron-20110821:Aug 21 03
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> I could probably achieve this by having two temporary tables (for
> blocked IP addresses) and after a week or two delete the contents of one
> table and than at another interval delete the contents of the second
> table. This would
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 05:46 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> I'm going to present another view of what I think is a larger picture.
>
> What you seem to want to do is to block host access (TCP possibly UDP)
> based upon certain GET/POST activities on your web server.
Yes, in this instance the annoyi
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 08:46 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:50 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe SELinux blocks Apache from writing to /etc/sysconfig/iptables?
>>> Have you looked at ? These apps seem to offe
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:46:18AM -0700, Craig White wrote:
>
> What you seem to want to do is to block host access (TCP possibly UDP)
> based upon certain GET/POST activities on your web server. Thus you are
> attempting to create a curtain based upon things that have already
> failed and eventua
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:50 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
>
> > Maybe SELinux blocks Apache from writing to /etc/sysconfig/iptables?
> > Have you looked at ? These apps seem to offer a
> > similar solution.
>
> I'm not using SELinux at th
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:50 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 08/21/2011 01:09 AM, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
> > routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
> > site's .htaccess file. It works and t
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 08:26 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:
> There is also another application that reads the Apache log
> file, and then IIRC writes IPTables rules to deal with these
> sort of attacks. It was written for a university thesis
> several years ago, but I just do not remember the nam
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 22:43 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
> > routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to that web
> > site's .htaccess file. It works and the attacker, on second and
> > subsequent attacks, g
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Barry Brimer wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Barry Brimer
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache Changing IPtables C 5.6 via Apache
>
>> When a web site is attacked, so far by unsuccessful hackers, my error
>> routine adds the attackers IP address, prefixed by 'deny', to t
33 matches
Mail list logo
