Hello Greg,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:05:34 -0700 Greg Bailey wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > The rpm package used to provide
> > /etc/cron.daily/rpm
> > /etc/logrotate.d/rpm
> >
> > I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
> > intended for
I noticed that after the lastest yum update on CentOS 5.6 we get Postfix
2.3.3, but the status of the postfix service (chkconfig --list postfix)
changes to off. So after a reboot, it doesn't start automatically.
I don't recall this ever happening before. Is this by design? A
packaging error?
Than
On 8/30/11, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:49 PM, hadi motamedi
> wrote:
> What happens when you type-in:-
>
> yum install gimp
>>>
Sorry. I asked and it seems that the GIMP new features just come with
centos 6 .
>>>
>>> Have you got GIMP in your Cen
> I am trying to resize a centos (5.2) VM drive. I use VMware and I have
> increased the size of the drive by 40G. I am running resize2fs on
> /dev/sdb1 (which is my root partition) but when I do I get this error:
>
> [root@centos ~]# resize2fs /dev/sdb1 120G
> resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> The
On 08/29/11 8:49 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Sorry. My centos 6.0 does not come up with GIMP as built-in . I just
> see its rpm on the install cd.
so
# yum install gimp
same as any other package.
CentOS6, I've noticed, installs a LOT less junk on the default installs.
--
john r p
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:49 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>>> > What happens when you type-in:-
>>> >
>>> > yum install gimp
>>
>>> Sorry. I asked and it seems that the GIMP new features just come with
>>> centos 6 .
>>
>> Have you got GIMP in your Centos 6 ?
>>
> Sorry. My centos 6.0 does not co
On 8/29/11, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:45 -0700, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
>> On 8/29/11, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> > What happens when you type-in:-
>> >
>> > yum install gimp
>
>> Sorry. I asked and it seems that the GIMP new features just come with
>> centos 6 .
>
>
> I am trying to resize a centos (5.2) VM drive. I use VMware and I have
> increased the size of the drive by 40G. I am running resize2fs on
> /dev/sdb1 (which is my root partition) but when I do I get this error:
>
> [root@centos ~]# resize2fs /dev/sdb1 120G
> resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
> The
Hi All:
I am trying to resize a centos (5.2) VM drive. I use VMware and I have
increased the size of the drive by 40G. I am running resize2fs on
/dev/sdb1 (which is my root partition) but when I do I get this error:
[root@centos ~]# resize2fs /dev/sdb1 120G
resize2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006)
The c
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:48 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I am sure Anne is referring to the fact that CentOS 6 has KDE 4, which has a
> distinctly different "desktop" paradigm from KDE 3 in CentOS 5. If you are
> used to only CentOS 5, and haven't been running any other distributions with
>
I am sure Anne is referring to the fact that CentOS 6 has KDE 4, which has a
distinctly different "desktop" paradigm from KDE 3 in CentOS 5. If you are
used to only CentOS 5, and haven't been running any other distributions with
KDE 4, it might come as a shock.
Emmett
On 08/28/2011 05:35 AM,
On Sunday, August 28, 2011 09:59 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 14:39 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> heh, I've been to belgium 8 times in the last 5 years. Its never
>> failed to rain on me ( even snow one in a while ). A CentOS Conference
>> would be nice, its been brought
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:16 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:57:22 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>>> Where can I find documentation on the new format of the files in
>>> /etc/init.d/?
>>
>> You mean /etc
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:06 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:03 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
>> It does seem, though this may be my age and grouchiness speaking, that
>> much of the development used to be done by people who thought like
>> system administrators, wherea
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:57:22 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> Where can I find documentation on the new format of the files in
>> /etc/init.d/?
>
> You mean /etc/event.d? Upstart...I thought Centos 6 uses systemd?
>
>
>> Thanks,
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:03 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> It does seem, though this may be my age and grouchiness speaking, that
> much of the development used to be done by people who thought like
> system administrators, whereas these days, it's done by people who
> think
> like smartphone user
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:57:22AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> > Where can I find documentation on the new format
> > of the files in /etc/init.d/?
>
> You mean /etc/event.d? Upstart...I thought Centos 6 uses systemd?
Systemd i
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> Where can I find documentation on the new format
> of the files in /etc/init.d/?
You mean /etc/event.d? Upstart...I thought Centos 6 uses systemd?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike.
>
> ___
> CentOS mail
Where can I find documentation on the new format
of the files in /etc/init.d/?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ken wrote:
>> Actually, all the missing data is on extended partitions.
>> I think if I could find where /dev/sda4 begins
>> I might be able to determine where the logical partitions
>> inside /dev/sda4 start and end?
> fdisk -l
If the information given by this were correct
I would have no prob
Les Mikesell wrote:
> but haven't you had enough trouble
> yet that you see the wisdom in having a backup system or at least a
> removable/external drive that you can use for backups and installs?
I do actually run BackupPC each night,
but I didn't include / among the directories to backup,
and n
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Local hard drive install instructions:
> http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-
US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s1-steps-hd-installs-
x86.html
Thanks. I'll try that.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-
John Doe wrote:
> From: Timothy Murphy
>
>> I've installed a substitute box - and HP MicroServer -
>> which by a miracle has CentOS-5.6 installed on it.
>> Now I'm wondering what is the best way to install CentOS-6,
>> given that there is no CD/DVD driver on this machine.
>
> You could also add
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:36:13 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:18PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
>> On my CentOS 6:
>>chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
>> shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
>>/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
>> but ps -ef sh
Reading a daily Logwatch report I noticed mail.centos.org
sending packets to my outgoing mail server. The packets were blocked by
IPtables.
>From 72.26.200.202 - 18 packets
To xx.xx.xx.xx - 18 packets
Service: 33120 (tcp/33120) - 2 packets
Service: 33906 (tcp/33906) - 4
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:11:31PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> The first look isn't promising - there is only a small amount of text
> displayed and clicking through to get the rest doesn't recognize
> mobile browsers so you always have t
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:18PM +, Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my CentOS 6:
>chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
> shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
>/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
> but ps -ef shows the process running.
> Furthermore, repeated
>cd /etc/ini
On my CentOS 6:
chkconfig --list wpa_supplicant
shows off at all levels, which is confirmed by examination of:
/etc/init.d/wpa_supplicant
but ps -ef shows the process running.
Furthermore, repeated
cd /etc/init.d/
./wpa_supplicant stop
appears to succeed, but the process continues to ru
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Corey Henderson
> wrote:
>>> You can avoid a lot of the problems by making sure
>>> that apache can't write anywhere that is mounted with execute
>>> capability.
>>>
>>
>> Or install a security module to do that for you. One that I've written
>> that is nearing
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Corey Henderson wrote:
>> You can avoid a lot of the problems by making sure
>> that apache can't write anywhere that is mounted with execute
>> capability.
>>
>
> Or install a security module to do that for you. One that I've written
> that is nearing the end of
> You can avoid a lot of the problems by making sure
> that apache can't write anywhere that is mounted with execute
> capability.
>
Or install a security module to do that for you. One that I've written
that is nearing the end of its beta:
https://github.com/cormander/tpe-lkm
In some cases, yo
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>> That means he's not very good at it yet. The ones you need to worry
>> about will send quick exploit tests cycling through different
>> destinations, that if they succeed will post to a central receiver.
>> Then later, likely from a diffe
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That means he's not very good at it yet. The ones you need to worry
> about will send quick exploit tests cycling through different
> destinations, that if they succeed will post to a central receiver.
> Then later, likely from a different
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> That probably means the intrusion is self-propagating. That is, if
>> the target is running some vulnerable php version or application, it
>> is able to install a copy of itself and start over.
>
> In this particular incident, I am reas
On 8/29/2011 3:25 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:35 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> For light use you could drop in VMware server or player or virtualbox
>> without much effect on the current system. It shouldn't be necessary,
>> though, unless you'd like to install otherwis
On 29/08/11 21:11, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Clicking on the first one of those gave me a 'you do not have
> permission to access this forum' error, which might mean someone
> removed it after the rss entry was picked up, but still not a great
> user experience.
>
Yes, that was spam and was removed
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 14:49 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Ummm, 30,000 isn't a particularly big number of hits to an apache
> server, especially if all it has to do is respond with a 'file not
> found'. But you are probably wise to be defensive.
If it was the usually 50 to 100 phpmyadmin attempt
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> So, if the forums provide a usable rss feed, reading
>>> them shouldn't be that bad, even though you have to follow the links
>>> to read longer messages and reply.
>>
>> If the forums have useful RSS feeds, yeah, that would work. I use K
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:31 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Sorry, not a lunatic. Your website's name has been harvested, and added
>> to
>> some black-market commercial or script kiddie toolkit, and it's on
>> infected servers around the world. Take it from me... (I'
Is anyone else running heartbeat on CentOS 6 on x86_64?
We have it installed, rpm -qi says it's from fedora, and
/etc/init.d/heartbeat, after sourcing its shell environment, decides that
it should look for the executables in /usr/lib/heartbeat. Unfortunately,
where I found them, and where the pack
On 08/29/11 11:19 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>
> I never ever give a virtual host declaration an IP address. If moving
> the virtual host to another server, I don't have to change anything
> expect the DNS. Also virtual hosts are web sites with different domain
> names, so I,,,
Always Talking
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:31 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sorry, not a lunatic. Your website's name has been harvested, and added to
> some black-market commercial or script kiddie toolkit, and it's on
> infected servers around the world. Take it from me... (I'm a contractor
> for a US Federal
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> For light use you could drop in VMware server or player or virtualbox
>> without much effect on the current system. It shouldn't be necessary,
>> though, unless you'd like to install otherwise conflicting rpm
>> packages or give root ac
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:35 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> So why can't you do that for your new virtualhost instead of running
>> on a different IP?
>
> A mentally deranged lunatic has sent 30,000+ wrong URLs to a tiny web
> site. Its started about 5 August but significa
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:35 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> For light use you could drop in VMware server or player or virtualbox
> without much effect on the current system. It shouldn't be necessary,
> though, unless you'd like to install otherwise conflicting rpm
> packages or give root access t
At 11:52 AM 8/29/2011, you wrote:
>On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
>a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
>found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
>booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
>Is there a way to
Michael D. Berger wrote:
> On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
> a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
> found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
> booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
> Is there a way to get
On my old CentOS 5, when it boots up (to level 3) it displays
a line for each of the things it is starting as it does it. I
found that quite useful. On my new CentOS 6, while it is
booting up, it displays a useless CentOS trademark picture.
Is there a way to get the old kind of display in CentOS
At Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:37:45 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:49 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
> >>> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
> >>> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
> >>> don't see it under Ap
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> I was thinking virtualization (Xen or an OpenVZ style might be
>> appropriate).
>
> Perhaps when I start using Centos 6.1. KVM or XEN ?
For light use you could drop in VMware server or player or virtualbox
without much effect on the cur
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:26 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I was thinking virtualization (Xen or an OpenVZ style might be
> appropriate).
Perhaps when I start using Centos 6.1. KVM or XEN ?
> Listen should be used in the global configuration. So, for example
> your 2.2 configuration file liste
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> >>> I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
>> >>> intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in
>> >>> cron.daily and logrotate.d?
>
>> Looks like:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:30 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> yes but, no ... your content was not wild-ass OT political
I'm apolitical with an occasional sense of humour. Which USA party do
you want me to favour? I'll find it difficult to endorse the former
governor of Alaska or the Tea Drinkers.
P
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:49 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>>> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
>>> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
>>> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under my
>>> previous centos 5.6 . Can you
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 10:28 -0700, Greg Bailey wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 09:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >>> I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
> >>> intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in
> >>> cron.daily and logrotate.d?
> Looks lik
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Russ, my fault - I'd crossposted to here and the general RH list. Dunno if
> I should consider filing this as a bug or not with upstream.
yes but, no ... your content was not wild-ass OT political
- R
___
On 08/29/2011 09:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Greg Bailey wrote:
>>On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> The rpm package used to provide
>>> /etc/cron.daily/rpm
>>> /etc/logrotate.d/rpm
>>>
>>> I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
>>> intended f
Greetings,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> I didnt imply holding postings back for moderation
>
> I start with the view that the policy restrictions that make 3rd party
> package repositories necessary and not re
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 13:09 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> -- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy
> to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here
I cancelled it from the Red Hat moderation queue, because, as
intelligent people know, one can not post to lists one is not subscrib
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> Brilliant job creation scheme to increase State and Federal tax yields.
>
> 'Always'
>
> -- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy
> to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here
Russ, my fault - I'd crossposted
Always Learning wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:49 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Greg Bailey wrote:
>> > Looks like those files are now provided by the "rpm-cron" package in
>> > RHEL 6 / CentOS 6.
>
>> Thanks, Greg. Though it seems really dumb and pointless to make a
>> separate package just
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> Brilliant job creation scheme to increase State and Federal tax yields.
'Always'
-- if you are going to post cr*p, at least have the courtesy
to not CROSS post to Red Hat lists and here
-- Russ herrold
__
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:49 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Greg Bailey wrote:
> > Looks like those files are now provided by the "rpm-cron" package in
> > RHEL 6 / CentOS 6.
> Thanks, Greg. Though it seems really dumb and pointless to make a separate
> package just to run something that's alre
On 8/29/11, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:53 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
>>
>> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
>> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
>> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under my
>
Greg Bailey wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> The rpm package used to provide
>> /etc/cron.daily/rpm
>> /etc/logrotate.d/rpm
>>
>> I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
>> intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in
>>
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:45 -0700, hadi motamedi wrote:
> On 8/29/11, Always Learning wrote:
> > What happens when you type-in:-
> >
> > yum install gimp
> Sorry. I asked and it seems that the GIMP new features just come with centos
> 6 .
Have you got GIMP in your Centos 6 ?
Paul.
_
On 8/29/11, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:23 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
>> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
>> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
>> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:23:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:13 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
> > First, this sounds like a messy way to do it... spinning up another
> > OS instance with the appropriate version of Apache you are after sounds
> > cleaner...
>
> I
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 09:13 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> First, this sounds like a messy way to do it... spinning up another
> OS instance with the appropriate version of Apache you are after sounds
> cleaner...
I have a spare server but I want to use an under-utilised one.
> As long as you k
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:01:13PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Just wondering how to run 2 versions of Apache on the same server,
> listening on different IPs and both on port 80.
>
> Does one give them, the httpd, different names and effectively duplicate
> most of the Apache set-up ?
>
On 08/29/2011 08:54 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> The rpm package used to provide
> /etc/cron.daily/rpm
> /etc/logrotate.d/rpm
>
> I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
> intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in
> cron.daily and logrotate.d?
Just wondering how to run 2 versions of Apache on the same server,
listening on different IPs and both on port 80.
Does one give them, the httpd, different names and effectively duplicate
most of the Apache set-up ?
I use Apache;s virtual hosts facility for normal purposes but this is
for a dif
tOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/
The rpm package used to provide
/etc/cron.daily/rpm
/etc/logrotate.d/rpm
I see /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log and rpm.daily, which looks like they're
intended for that purpose. Anyone have any idea why they're not in
cron.daily and logrotate.d?
mark
___
C
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2011 06:47:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> So, if the forums provide a usable rss feed, reading
>> them shouldn't be that bad, even though you have to follow the links
>> to read longer messages and reply.
>
> If the forums h
On Sunday, August 28, 2011 06:47:08 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> So, if the forums provide a usable rss feed, reading
> them shouldn't be that bad, even though you have to follow the links
> to read longer messages and reply.
If the forums have useful RSS feeds, yeah, that would work. I use Kontac
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Or, boot the Netinstall image and do an NFS intall from your local copy.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> Unfortunately I don't have a second desktop on my local LAN.
> Will Netinstall allow me to use a partition on the same box
> that it
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
Now I'm wondering what is the best way to install CentOS-6,
given that there is no CD/DVD driver on this machine.
I have access to the internet, so I can download the CD/DVD .
I know I could ins
I am experimenting with KVM and I wish to create a virtual machine
image in a logical volume. I can create the new lv without problem
but when I go to format its file system then I get these warnings:
Warning: WARNING: the kernel failed to re-read the partition table
on /dev/sda (Device or resou
Hello,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:04 +0100 Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:45 +0200, wwp wrote:
>
> > I've recently switched from Fedora 11 to CentOS6. Now my SD cards
> > (automatically mounted on plug) contents is displayed as UPPERCASE
> > filenames.
>
> My current came
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:45 +0200, wwp wrote:
> I've recently switched from Fedora 11 to CentOS6. Now my SD cards
> (automatically mounted on plug) contents is displayed as UPPERCASE
> filenames.
My current camera has file names on a SD card like:-
IMG_6988.JPG
so I used a simple bash
Le lun 29 aoû 2011 15:23:12 CEST, Hakan Koseoglu a écrit:
> On 29 August 2011 15:18, Philippe Naudin
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to do something *bad* : to mount an already mounted ext3
> > partition.
> Use a clustering file system (i.e., ocfs2) instead.
I need to learn more about it before,
Hello John,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:19:31 -0700 (PDT) John Doe wrote:
> From: wwp
>
> > I've recently switched from Fedora 11 to CentOS6. Now my SD cards
> > (automatically mounted on plug) contents is displayed as UPPERCASE
> > filenames.
> > I well see in mount's man that vfat's shortname op
On 29 August 2011 15:18, Philippe Naudin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to do something *bad* : to mount an already mounted ext3
> partition.
Use a clustering file system (i.e., ocfs2) instead.
> This recovery is probably triggered by the file /.autofsck, but I
> have not found how to get rid of this fe
From: wwp
> I've recently switched from Fedora 11 to CentOS6. Now my SD cards
> (automatically mounted on plug) contents is displayed as UPPERCASE
> filenames.
> I well see in mount's man that vfat's shortname option can be set to
> either lower, win95, winnt, mixed. OK, that's for entries in /et
Hi,
I want to do something *bad* : to mount an already mounted ext3
partition.
Mounting "-o bind" is not an option, this partition is mounted by
different virtual machines. NFS is the right way to go, so I want
another one :-)
I have no problem mounting this partition read-only, but it seems
th
Hello there!
I've recently switched from Fedora 11 to CentOS6. Now my SD cards
(automatically mounted on plug) contents is displayed as UPPERCASE
filenames.
I well see in mount's man that vfat's shortname option can be set to
either lower, win95, winnt, mixed. OK, that's for entries in /etc/fsta
On 08/29/11 3:20 AM, ken wrote:
> Snob appeal does work on a lot of people. Maybe in today's world it's a
> character flaw, but I prefer actual reasons.
how "passive-aggressive" of you. There's nothing 'snob' about it, it is
a simple technical and financial decision. RHEL targets SERVERS, and
Always Learning wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 06:12 -0400, ken wrote:
>
>> I hope we're not going to start rationalizing the presence of linux
>> bugs on the basis of Microsoft's record of failures.
>
> Bugs, or "programme difficulties", are inevitable.
>
> M$ success is promoting the standardisat
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:23 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under my
> previous centos 5.6 . Can you please
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 06:12 -0400, ken wrote:
> I hope we're not going to start rationalizing the presence of linux
> bugs on the basis of Microsoft's record of failures.
Bugs, or "programme difficulties", are inevitable.
M$ success is promoting the standardisation of exchange of computer data
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:53 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
>
> I upgraded from centos 5.6 to centos 6.0 to have all of the new
> featues on GIMP at hand. I selected Desktop when installing. But I
> don't see it under Applications -> Graphics as I had it under my
> previous centos 5.6 . Can you please
On 08/29/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
>
>
>>> I've had a disaster on my home network server;
>>> the partition table on the disk containing / has become corrupted,
>>> and testdisk has not enabled me to recover the table.
>>> If anyone can help with this I should b
On 8/28/11, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 13:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> This is a mailing list, a conversational forum. not a blog or a
>> documentaion forum. If you want to contribute such stuff productively,
>> do so in the wiki, where it would be appreciated and act
Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Now I'm wondering what is the best way to install CentOS-6,
>>> given that there is no CD/DVD driver on this machine.
>>>
>>> I have access to the internet, so I can download the CD/DVD .
>>> I know I could install through a USB stick;
>>> I'm just wondering if there is a m
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/28/11 6:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Now I'm wondering what is the best way to install CentOS-6,
>> given that there is no CD/DVD driver on this machine.
>>
>> I have access to the internet, so I can download the CD/DVD .
>> I know I could install through a USB stic
Always Learning wrote:
>> I've had a disaster on my home network server;
>> the partition table on the disk containing / has become corrupted,
>> and testdisk has not enabled me to recover the table.
>> If anyone can help with this I should be grateful.
>
> Have you used testdisk to find and cop
From: Timothy Murphy
> I've installed a substitute box - and HP MicroServer -
> which by a miracle has CentOS-5.6 installed on it.
> Now I'm wondering what is the best way to install CentOS-6,
> given that there is no CD/DVD driver on this machine.
If you have the management card, you could moun
On Monday, August 29, 2011 12:12:03 PM ken wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 11:37 PM Always Learning wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 22:33 -0400, ken wrote:
> >> On 08/28/2011 09:17 PM Always Learning wrote:
...
> >> Well, since I've got two or three other machines I'm either upgrading or
> >> installing li
On 08/28/2011 11:38 PM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 08/28/11 7:33 PM, ken wrote:
>>> Recently someone wrote that PAE related to i386 but was not required for
x64. What CPU type is your target machine ?
>> Broadly speaking it's a pentium i686, but without pae. The fact that
>> this machine is ex
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
