Greetings,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:06 PM, James Edwards wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've spent the past little while attempting to setup Conga on a two node
> CentOS 6 cluster. While I do have the cluster up and running, I'm
> running into problems attempting to start services through luci on
> eithe
At Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:01:04 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:57:41PM +0100, Janne Nyman wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > unless you are doing this for a specific reason (ie eval/training)
> > > would advise that centos is not really a laptop distribution
> > > despite w
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:00 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps a silly question, but why maintain patches ? Why not compile a
>>> new version and discard all the patches ? Patches are
> Note that this reply is not designed to stir up a bunch of list trolls
> and this thread degenerating into a pissing contest isn't going to help
> anyone.
I'll just cue the drum-roll. :-)
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
__
Am 09.09.2011 21:38, schrieb Alexander Dalloz:
> Am 09.09.2011 14:00, schrieb Antonio da Silva Martins Junior:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>After finding multiples answers to this question via google, but without
>> making it work on my servers. Has anybody iSCSI Offload working on a Dell
>> Server with B
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:11:57PM +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
>
> /me thinks you should quit whining about a volunteer driven project, and
> get your chequebook out and purchase a subscription from the upstream vendor
> if
> timely patches are of importance to you.
Whining about when 6
Am 09.09.2011 14:00, schrieb Antonio da Silva Martins Junior:
> Hi all,
>
>After finding multiples answers to this question via google, but without
> making it work on my servers. Has anybody iSCSI Offload working on a Dell
> Server with Broadcom NICs ?
>
>My environment: I'm running Ce
- "Steve Walsh" escreveu:
> De: "Steve Walsh"
> Para: centos@centos.org
> Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2011 9:17:50 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected
> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS5 with Dell Broadcom iSCSI Offload, does it work ?
>
> On 09/09/2011 10:05 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
On 3 September 2011 16:00, Vesselin Kolev wrote:
> Do You realise how critical is the situation now? Maybe you should think
> on what the words "Enterprise" mean. Or maybe You should think how to
> get back the lost confidence, because too many people now think that
> CentOS is no more enterprise
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:57:41PM +0100, Janne Nyman wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > unless you are doing this for a specific reason (ie eval/training)
> > would advise that centos is not really a laptop distribution
> > despite what redhat may try to suggest.
> >
> > best desktop/laptop in my opinion is ma
> Hi
>
> unless you are doing this for a specific reason (ie eval/training) would
> advise that centos is not really a laptop distribution despite what
> redhat may try to suggest.
>
> best desktop/laptop in my opinion is mageia
>
> regards peter
>> I am trying to install CentOS 6 x86_64 on a Lenov
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> Clonezilla (especially with the drbl server) can do this pretty
>>> quickly over the network without having to juggle disks, but you end
>>> up with the same problem with the NICs - and in fact you will have it
>>> with any meth
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
>
>> Clonezilla (especially with the drbl server) can do this pretty
>> quickly over the network without having to juggle disks, but you end
>> up with the same problem with the NICs - and in fact you will have it
>> with any method of backing up and restor
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>>> Take a look at automated install using pxe. That way you can install
>>> all clients identical with a short command on each client. Some
>>> scripting is of course necessary to define the kickstart scripts.
>>> Several
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> Take a look at automated install using pxe. That way you can install all
>> clients identical with a short command on each client. Some scripting is
>> of course necessary to define the kickstart scripts. Several good
>> tutorials on this topi
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Tony Schreiner wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 09/08/2011 06:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I just went to install fail2ban, and it kept failing, complaining
>>> about the EPEL GPG key. It was installed... and yum worked, once I did
>>> ln -s /etc/pki/rpm-gp
On Sep 9, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 06:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I just went to install fail2ban, and it kept failing, complaining
>> about
>> the EPEL GPG key. It was installed... and yum worked, once I did
>> ln -s /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6 /etc
On Friday 09 September 2011 10:21, the following was written:
> That's the total output?
Yep. Nothing more. I ran it again and here is the new output:
[Fri Sep 09 10:40:20] [rjs@bms] /home/rjs
~ $ sudo find / -context "*:file_t:*"
getfilecon(/proc/7408/task/7408/fd/4): No such file or direct
Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:58, the following was written:
>
>> I'm not a pro or anything, but this bug report gives a bit more info.
>> Have you made any changes to the disk lately?
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485921
>>
>> > find / -context "
On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:58, the following was written:
> I'm not a pro or anything, but this bug report gives a bit more info.
> Have you made any changes to the disk lately?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485921
>
> > find / -context "*:file_t:*"
>
> The above comma
> On 2011-09-09 14:22, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >I have need to duplicate centos 6 on 133 computers.
> > I purchased a disk duplicator make my master and the duplicator does 11
> > at a time.
> >
> > All is good so far...
> >
> > When I take a duplicated disk and stick it in the "new" box which is
>
> Take a look at automated install using pxe. That way you can install all
> clients identical with a short command on each client. Some scripting is
> of course necessary to define the kickstart scripts. Several good
> tutorials on this topic are available. Below is the a link to the centos
> int
On 2011-09-09 14:22, Jerry Geis wrote:
>I have need to duplicate centos 6 on 133 computers.
> I purchased a disk duplicator make my master and the duplicator does 11
> at a time.
>
> All is good so far...
>
> When I take a duplicated disk and stick it in the "new" box which is
> different than
On 09/08/2011 06:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I just went to install fail2ban, and it kept failing, complaining about
> the EPEL GPG key. It was installed... and yum worked, once I did
> ln -s /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6 /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL
Oops, it installed for me b
Paul,
Its pretty nice and actually runs quite well as a Xen guest (my hardware
at home doesn't support full virtualization)...
I believe its more on par with Fedora 12 (maybe 13?). KDE is fairly
modern (4.2 something I believe). Unfortunately, the KDE version is a
version before the "tabbin
> This isn't for me :) Someone posted the original question and I was
> attempting to help ;)
Thanks Scott. Have a very nice day and an enjoyable weekend. :-)
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
I have need to duplicate centos 6 on 133 computers.
I purchased a disk duplicator make my master and the duplicator does 11
at a time.
All is good so far...
When I take a duplicated disk and stick it in the "new" box which is
different than the
master machine of course all seems to work excep
Paul,
This isn't for me :) Someone posted the original question and I was
attempting to help ;)
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Can you use one of the alternatives for Switchdesk ?
>
> Paul.
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
On 09/09/2011 10:05 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could be wrong here but don't you go into the Broadcom NIC configuration
> while the server is booting and add the iSCSI target in there and then it
> should appear as "Just Another Volume (TM)" to the operating system?
>
> I've never tried i
Hi,
I could be wrong here but don't you go into the Broadcom NIC configuration
while the server is booting and add the iSCSI target in there and then it
should appear as "Just Another Volume (TM)" to the operating system?
I've never tried it but I assume thats how the 'offloading' works.
thank
Hi all,
After finding multiples answers to this question via google, but without
making it work on my servers. Has anybody iSCSI Offload working on a Dell
Server with Broadcom NICs ?
My environment: I'm running CentOS 5.6 CR, on a Dell PowerEdge R710 with
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme I
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:41 +0100, Janne Nyman wrote:
> I am trying to install CentOS 6 x86_64 on a Lenovo Thinkpad x220.
>
> During the installation it asks me to insert a driver.
What type of 'driver' ? Any more clues ? At what stage of the
installation did you get the request ?
Paul.
__
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:05 +0200, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> It is quite different and not to be compared in any way. C5 was based
> on F6, while C6 is based on F12. Differences are quite extreme in some
> aspects (for example KDE3 vs KDE4). Even the set of available packages
> is different (for e
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:05 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
> > Just the answer to my previous question. What is C6 like compared to
> > 5.6 ?
> newer.
That is the major problem with Centos - It is boring; it just works :-)
Paul.
___
On 09/08/2011 06:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I just went to install fail2ban, and it kept failing, complaining about
> the EPEL GPG key. It was installed... and yum worked, once I did
> ln -s /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6 /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL
>
and this isnt the epel list!
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> I just went to install fail2ban, and it kept failing, complaining about
> the EPEL GPG key. It was installed... and yum worked, once I did
> ln -s /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6 /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL
You did not say on whichCentOS version but, works w
From: Robinson Tiemuqinke
> I just like to confirm whether this is true: on x86_64 arch machines, Centos
>6's anaconda/kickstart will install only noarch and x86_64 arches RPMs, and no
>i686 arch RPMs installed by default. This seems like exactly different from
>Centos 5 --- Centos 5 anacon
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Janne Nyman wrote:
> I am trying to install CentOS 6 x86_64 on a Lenovo Thinkpad x220.
>
> During the installation it asks me to insert a driver.
>
> Has anyone done this successfully?
You might want to be a bit more specific about what it's complaining about.
About the only g
On Friday, September 09, 2011 12:54:51 AM Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a host which is connected to SAN via single Fibre channel HBA
> (qlogic). I have several LUNS assigned to this (sdc, sdd). I added
> another single port HBA to this host. I can now see two world wide
> names.
>
> Now
I am trying to install CentOS 6 x86_64 on a Lenovo Thinkpad x220.
During the installation it asks me to insert a driver.
Has anyone done this successfully?
--
Rgds,
Janne Nyman
M: +44 751 696 1842
E: jny...@jbtec.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
John Hinton wrote:
>
> /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
>
> It seems this must be owned by postfix but it was owned by root.
>
> So, can somebody check to see if this is there in a CentOS 6 Postfix
> install where Amavis is not installed? And if so, what are the default
> permissions?
maybe try
rpm
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Just the answer to my previous question. What is C6 like compared to
> 5.6 ?
It is quite different and not to be compared in any way. C5 was based
on F6, while C6 is based on F12. Differences are quite extreme in some
aspects (for example
Always Learning wrote:
> Just the answer to my previous question. What is C6 like compared to
> 5.6 ?
newer.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
44 matches
Mail list logo
