On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:30:16AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2011 01:05, schrieb fred smith:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith:
> >>> Hi all!
> >>>
> >>> I'm still googling for this, but after
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:37:55AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/03/2011 01:06 AM, fred smith piše:
> >> I am in professional wireless business. My solution was to deinstall
> >> syslog and install syslog-ng, it's supports separation based on IP,
> >> name, etc..
> >
> > thanks. I w
On 12/2/2011 5:06 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:48:14AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/03/2011 12:04 AM, fred smith piše:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
>>> I figured I'd ask you guys:
>>>
>>> I've got
My Ubuntu desktop at home seems to show up to windows boxes on the
home lan and vice-versa, without me having to do anything to configure
it.
Something I've done in the past in small office situations is set up a
DNS server that knows the names of all the local machines and then
proxies off to a r
Am 03.12.2011 01:05, schrieb fred smith:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
>>> I figured I'd ask you guys:
>>>
>>> I've got m
Vreme: 12/03/2011 01:06 AM, fred smith piše:
>> I am in professional wireless business. My solution was to deinstall
>> syslog and install syslog-ng, it's supports separation based on IP,
>> name, etc..
>
> thanks. I was hoping for some kind of hack so I wouldn't need to do that.
>
I am not aware
On 12/02/2011 01:12 PM, Ryan R. Uber wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In the 6.0 release, I have found a gap in the provided source under the
> SRPMS/ directories on the mirrors.
>
> Let's take the 'bash' source as the first example. The version of bash that I
> find in the binary x86_64 directorie
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:48:14AM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/03/2011 12:04 AM, fred smith piše:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
> > I figured I'd ask you guys:
> >
> > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
> > I figured I'd ask you guys:
> >
> > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to lo
Vreme: 12/03/2011 12:04 AM, fred smith piše:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
> I figured I'd ask you guys:
>
> I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's
> system events. Works fine.
>
> however, it mixes 'em into /var/l
Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
> I figured I'd ask you guys:
>
> I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's
> system events. Works fine.
>
> however, it mixes 'em into /var/
Hi all!
I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so
I figured I'd ask you guys:
I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's
system events. Works fine.
however, it mixes 'em into /var/log/messages along with the messages
from the Centos box itse
On 11/28/2011 10:38 AM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> I finally decided to install the CR repo on one of my CentOS 6 machines that
> I use as a host for some VMs (also running CentOS 6).
>
> Before updating the host I updated a VM that was not critical to test the
> process and was able to boot that VM,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Timothy Madden wrote:
>
>
> Actually, as I was saying, I have a sub-net of 8 computers and 1 router
> (and also one switch if you want).
>
> The router is stubborn enough to make sure that no incoming connections
> or outside traffic get to the sub-net (except on t
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> My point is that every device on your network has to process every
>> broadcast packet. Maybe you have CPU overkill on all your computers,
>> but you might also have some dumb controllers too. And they have to
>> go out the wifi too.
>
> Et
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, wrote:
>>
And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
effectively static.
>>>
>>> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux
>>> tools
>> Um, no can do: we don't ru
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:59 PM, wrote:
>
>>> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
>>> effectively static.
>>
>> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
>>>
> Um, no can do: we don't run the DNS here on campus (a US gov't
On 12/02/2011 01:12 PM, Ryan R. Uber wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In the 6.0 release, I have found a gap in the provided source under the
> SRPMS/ directories on the mirrors.
>
> Let's take the 'bash' source as the first example. The version of bash that I
> find in the binary x86_64 directorie
Hello everyone,
In the 6.0 release, I have found a gap in the provided source under the SRPMS/
directories on the mirrors.
Let's take the 'bash' source as the first example. The version of bash that I
find in the binary x86_64 directories is:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.0/os/x86_64/Pack
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:45 PM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
>> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
>> effectively static.
>
> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DN
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:45 PM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
>>>
> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
> effectively static.
If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
>
>>> Um, no
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
>>
And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
effectively static.
>>>
>>> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
>> Um, no can do: we don't run the DNS here on campus (a US go
On 02.12.2011 18:17, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:06:51 AM Craig White wrote:
>> ummm... there are WINS master browser elections on every subnet ...
>
> 'Master browser election broadcasts' != 'broadcast-based name resolution.'
>
> I have measured significant broadcast traffi
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, wrote:
>
>>> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
>>> effectively static.
>>
>> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
>> just normally make this difficult. SME server made it handy long ago
>> by combining
On Friday, December 02, 2011 01:17:19 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Within our division, we
> control the horizontal, we control the vertical
And now we have reached the outer limits of topicality.
/me
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 02.12.2011 17:01, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 06:36:25 AM Timothy Madden wrote:
>> Sorry to say the instructions did not work for me.
> ...
>> Still, no success in ping-ing other (samba) machines in my network. But
>> I could ping the same machines from a Windows workstation
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>>
>> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're
>> effectively static.
>
> If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
> just normally make this difficult. SME server made it handy long ag
On Friday, December 02, 2011 12:40:32 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > But, lacking metrics, it's somewhat of a moot point.
> My point is that every device on your network has to process every
> broadcast packet. Maybe you have CPU overkill on all
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>
> And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're effectively
> static.
>
If you've done that, you might as well put them in DNS. Linux tools
just normally make this difficult. SME server made it handy long ago
by combining the user entr
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:43:48 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Nobody cares much about hardware/network efficiency these days since
>> you are likely to have plenty except in those marginal wifi areas, but
>> broadcasts get accepted by every NI
On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:40:39 AM Craig White wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > I have measured significant broadcast traffic reduction when migrating from
> > non-WINS to WINS SMB/CIFS name resolution.
...
> As for how much broadcast occurs... A very detailed page
On 02.12.2011 16:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Timothy Madden wrote:
On 02.12.2011 13:25, �лек�андр Кириллов wrote:
[...]
For some strange reasone, when I do that, I get 'host name lookup
failure' during `service network restart´ invocation, so in the end I
resorted to using ju
On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:43:48 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> Nobody cares much about hardware/network efficiency these days since
> you are likely to have plenty except in those marginal wifi areas, but
> broadcasts get accepted by every NIC on the network and pushed up the
> network stacks until
http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation?action=show
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> I'm sort of surprised no one pointed out that mDNS/avahi type of name
>> resolution was probably the way to go for a heterogenous network but yes, it
>> too is not generally installed/configured on a normal Linux install.
>
> While there is
On Dec 2, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 09:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 12/02/2011 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> [netbios naming is] like a
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> There is also certainly nothing wrong with doing dynamic dns if you have
> a linux box giving out dhcp addresses. You can run ddns and wins on the
> same box. I have both.
And we have our DHCP give out IP by MAC addresses, so they're effectively
static.
mark
_
On Dec 2, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:06:51 AM Craig White wrote:
>> ummm... there are WINS master browser elections on every subnet ...
>
> 'Master browser election broadcasts' != 'broadcast-based name resolution.'
>
> I have measured significant broad
On 12/02/2011 09:46 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
[netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
name all th
On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:02:18 AM Craig White wrote:
> I'm sort of surprised no one pointed out that mDNS/avahi type of name
> resolution was probably the way to go for a heterogenous network but yes, it
> too is not generally installed/configured on a normal Linux install.
While there is
On Friday, December 02, 2011 11:06:51 AM Craig White wrote:
> ummm... there are WINS master browser elections on every subnet ...
'Master browser election broadcasts' != 'broadcast-based name resolution.'
I have measured significant broadcast traffic reduction when migrating from
non-WINS to WIN
On Friday, December 02, 2011 10:47:53 AM Craig White wrote:
> I think 'recommended' is a bit of a stretch - it is a possibility.
'Recommended' if you don't want to (or can't) use either old-style NT domains
or ActiveDirectory. When you need to support routable SMB/CIFS traffic for
WinXP Home, V
On Dec 2, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 10:38:11 AM Craig White wrote:
>> indeed but to continue Les's fairly adept analogy, this is akin to running
>> wires & a PA system to another office so the yelling happens not just in one
>> room but in several rooms.
On Dec 2, 2011, at 5:10 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
>
> Maybe I got used too much to the way this thing "just works" on a
> Windows network. But I really expected a modern Linux OS to have some
> better decentralized name resolving support off-the-box for a small,
> router-based home network. I
On Friday, December 02, 2011 10:38:11 AM Craig White wrote:
> indeed but to continue Les's fairly adept analogy, this is akin to running
> wires & a PA system to another office so the yelling happens not just in one
> room but in several rooms.
Uh, no. With properly configured WINS (both server
On Dec 2, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> [netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
>> name all the time as a means of identification with no way to handle
>> those out of hearing distance or to arbitr
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> [netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
>>> name all the time as a means of identification with no way to
On Dec 2, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> [netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
>>> name all the time as a means of identification with no way to ha
On 12/02/2011 08:54 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
>> [netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
>> name all the time as a means of identification with no way to handle
>> those out of hearing distance or to arbitrate du
On Friday, December 02, 2011 06:36:25 AM Timothy Madden wrote:
> Sorry to say the instructions did not work for me.
...
> Still, no success in ping-ing other (samba) machines in my network. But
> I could ping the same machines from a Windows workstation...
...
> I the end, I had to revert to stati
Timothy Madden wrote:
> On 02.12.2011 13:25, ÐлекÑÐ°Ð½Ð´Ñ ÐиÑиллов wrote:
>>> Sorry for the wrong wording: what I want is the DHCP client to send
>>> the hostname when a lease is requested, but I do not want to give
>>> dhclient any explicit hostname to be sent.
>>>
>>> I want dhclien
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011 01:53:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> So, I've done pgscan, vgscan, see the group name, tried vgchange
>> --mknod,
>> but the groups aren't active, nor is there a VolGroup directory created
>> down in /dev. Anyone know what I've missed?
>
> vgchan
On Friday, December 02, 2011 08:42:42 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
> [netbios naming is] like a roomfull of people yelling out their own
> name all the time as a means of identification with no way to handle
> those out of hearing distance or to arbitrate duplicates.
...
> But that's a matter of luck,
On 02.12.2011 13:25, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> Sorry for the wrong wording: what I want is the DHCP client to send
>> the
>> hostname when a lease is requested, but I do not want to give
>> dhclient
>> any explicit hostname to be sent.
>>
>> I want dhclient to read the hostname from `hostname` o
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 01:53:59 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, I've done pgscan, vgscan, see the group name, tried vgchange --mknod,
> but the groups aren't active, nor is there a VolGroup directory created
> down in /dev. Anyone know what I've missed?
vgchange -ay perhaps?
_
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
>
>> After you've set that up, test it with 'dig @192.168.0.1 name.localdomain'.
>
> Well ... yes, you are right, the router has that reservation table in
> its DHCP settings. But if I have to include *all* my machines on the
> DHCP reservation
On 30.11.2011 17:39, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Timothy Madden
> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you all for your answers.
>>
>> Indeed, my router (D-Link DIR-100) only does DNS relay and nothing more.
>
> Errr, unless I'm looking at the wrong online manual, DNS relay does
> _exact
On 30.11.2011 17:00, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 08:54:04 AM Timothy Madden wrote:
>> Is there a way to get the name service switch to use wins, while the DNS
>> configuration is handled by DHCP client ?
>
> Yes, there is (or at least should be). While I know some will obje
> Sorry for the wrong wording: what I want is the DHCP client to send
> the
> hostname when a lease is requested, but I do not want to give
> dhclient
> any explicit hostname to be sent.
>
> I want dhclient to read the hostname from `hostname` or from
> /etc/sysconfig/network or any other way, an
Richard,
we have just installed a CentOS 5.5 on 320G6 with B110i controller. As you
correctly said, the CentOs shows both devices while booting w/o dd. However, as
we have found, contrary to what is said in release notes for the controller DD,
you must not dd it, however, just unzip it and place
60 matches
Mail list logo
