Re: [CentOS] multilib error on centos 6.2 x86_64

On 12/21/2011 08:38 AM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com wrote: ... > To solve this problem, I have to manually pick up these packages from > CentOS/6.2/updates/i386/Packages (i386 update) and install them: > jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6_1.1.i686.rpm > krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6_2.1.i686.rpm > nss-3.12.10-17.el6_2.

Re: [CentOS] multilib error on centos 6.2 x86_64

> I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected > multilib versions" error, the offending packages are: > > jasper-libs.i686 > krb5-libs.i686 > nss.i686 > > After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in > "x86_64 updates" repository, but

[CentOS] multilib error on centos 6.2 x86_64

I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected multilib versions" error, the offending packages are: jasper-libs.i686 krb5-libs.i686 nss.i686 After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in "x86_64 updates" repository, but only for x86_64 ve

Re: [CentOS] sendmail and sudo

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:10:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > echo "To: user > > > help > " | sendmail -t If you're gonna send automated email, you should specify the from address as well echo "To: user From: my_service_al...@example.com Subject: testy mctesty bleh" | /usr/sbin/

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Le 20/12/2011 22:09, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit : > Official announcement onwww.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th. Congratulations to the developpers for this very quick release of CentOS 6.2. It is a very pleasant surprise. I read some posts saying that the framework for this release was in

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Vreme: 12/20/2011 09:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše: > On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. >> >> Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: >> >> # yum clean all >> # yum update >

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 2:09 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Official announcement on www.centos.org is dated today, Dec 20th. Of course it is. :) How much a difference 24 hours make. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:57PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a > >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line > in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the > external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.ce

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ashley M. Kirchner said the following on 20/12/11 22:10: >> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ > > But did you comment out the one right above it? Yes, of course. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ In every

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:07 PM, Luigi Rosa piše: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > >> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line >> in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until a

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 2:07 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > The line I uncommented is: > > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ But did you comment out the one right above it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Vreme: 12/20/2011 10:04 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner piše: > On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= >> line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until >> all the external mirrors are caught up. >> >> Mirror

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:58: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= line > in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until all the > external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.ce

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 1:58 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > For the short term, you should be able to remark out the mirrorlist= > line in [base] and un-remark the baseurl=mirror.centos.org line until > all the external mirrors are caught up. > > Mirror.centos.org should be ok ... I have verified the file exists

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >>> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >>> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >>> the latest) and as of t

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 02:49 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >> the latest) and as of this morning I can not ins

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 m.r...@5-cent.us said the following on 20/12/11 21:51: > If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has > either an error, or a permission problem. Dunno; from the client point of view, the directory exists (I verified b

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > If I can suggest a thought, I'm wondering if the mirrors list for i386 has > either an error, or a permission problem. I'd say error: > yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors * base: mirrors.tummy.com * extra

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a >> fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as >> the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and >>

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 1:46 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > I can also verify this error/problem/issue. I had *just* installed a > fresh system yesterday with 6.1 (which I downloaded the day before as > the latest) and as of this morning I can not install any packages, and > after running a 'yum clean al

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 12:57 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. > > Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: > > # yum clean all > # yum update > > > I get this output > > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refres

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johnny Hughes said the following on 20/12/11 21:31: >> Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: >> >>> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 >>> updates fine to 6.2. >> >> Confirmed. >> >> Tried a yum clean a

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

On 12/20/2011 02:10 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: > Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: > >> Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 >> updates fine to 6.2. > > Confirmed. > > Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected. > The problem is

Re: [CentOS] sendmail and sudo [SOLVED]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or > sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service > sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs > as. > > I've dumped my environment, I've just

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

On Tue, December 20, 2011 14:42, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> >> # grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # ps -eZ | grep initrc >> system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01 >> miniserv.pl >> >> No chcon found in /etc/rc.d >> >> miniserv.pl is the Webmi

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shade.GE said the following on 20/12/11 21:04: > Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 > updates fine to 6.2. Confirmed. Tried a yum clean all/yum update on an x86_64 and works as expected. The problem is limited to

[CentOS] sendmail and sudo

This is annoying. I ssh to a server, then, it doesn't matter if I su - or sudo -s, I start a service (motion, if it matters), and when the service sends an email, it's from me, not from root, or the user the service runs as. I've dumped my environment, I've just dumped service's environment. I've

Re: [CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can confirm that issue but currently only on my i386 boxes. The x86_64 updates fine to 6.2. Am 20.12.11 20:57, schrieb Luigi Rosa: > Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. > > Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: > > # yum cle

[CentOS] yum update for CentOS 6.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don't know if it is a mirror synch issue or what else. Given a CentOS 6.1, if I give the commands: # yum clean all # yum update I get this output Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base:

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/2011 07:33 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >>> >> >> grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d >> >> Would be an easier way to do this... >> >> ps -eZ | grep initrc >> > # grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # p

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

On Tue, December 20, 2011 13:40, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> > > grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d > > Would be an easier way to do this... > > ps -eZ | grep initrc > # grep -R chcon /etc/rc.d # ps -eZ | grep initrc system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s01211 ?00:00:01 miniserv.pl No chcon found in /etc/rc

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/2011 04:55 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> >> This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context that the >> kernel does not understand. I would look for a chcon in an init >>

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

On Tue, December 20, 2011 09:49, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > This means somebody is executing a chcon with a context > that the kernel does not understand. I would look for a > chcon in an init script. I tried this and did not find any in the init scripts: find /etc/rc.d -print | xargs grep chc

Re: [CentOS] Disable autoneg on r8169?

On 20 December 2011 14:34, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>, > William Warren wrote: >> On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full >> >> duplex. >> >> 2. Many times

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:34 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše: >>> e-letter wrote: > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > > I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's > java, which is the Source o

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic piše: > Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše: >> On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše: On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I finally started yum

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše: >> e-letter wrote: From: m.r...@5-cent.us I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's java, which is the Source of All Java >>> Sun java was obtained. After attempt to

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše: > e-letter wrote: >>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us >>> >>> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's >>> java, which is the Source of All Java >>> >> Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error >> o

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

Vreme: 12/20/2011 04:15 PM, Johnny Hughes piše: > On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše: >>> On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. yum reports that

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

On 12/20/2011 09:03 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše: >> On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. >>> >>> yum reports that I have already installed >>> >>> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

On 12/20/2011 09:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. > > yum reports that I have already installed > > perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1, > > but perl-CGI requests for > > perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo. > > Can someone advise on the best c

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

e-letter wrote: >> From: m.r...@5-cent.us >> >> I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's >> java, which is the Source of All Java >> > Sun java was obtained. After attempt to run jedit, the following error > occurred: > > jedit > Warning: $JAVA_HOME environment variabl

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

Vreme: 12/20/2011 03:58 PM, Fabien Archambault piše: > On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. >> >> yum reports that I have already installed >> >> perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1, >> >> but perl-CGI requests for >> >> perl-5.10.1-119.e

Re: [CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. > > yum reports that I have already installed > > perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1, > > but perl-CGI requests for > > perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo. > > Can someone advise on the best course

[CentOS] yum update fails on perl dependancy

I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64. yum reports that I have already installed perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1, but perl-CGI requests for perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo. Can someone advise on the best course of action? Logical would be to downgrade perl to the one from ISO

Re: [CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/2011 02:44 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host. > > I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log file a new > guest immediately after startup. Can someone tell me what it means > and what I should d

[CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/chcon "mac_admin" access

CentOS-6.1 KVM guest on CentOS-6.1 host. I am seeing this SEAlert in the /var/log/audit/audit.log file a new guest immediately after startup. Can someone tell me what it means and what I should do about it? A Google search reveals a number of Fedora issues with similar errors dating back a few ye

Re: [CentOS] java installation failure

> > Message: 37 > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:41:26 -0500 > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > Subject: Re: [CentOS] java installation failure > To: "CentOS mailing list" > > I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's > java, which is the Source of All Java > Sun java was obtained

Re: [CentOS] Disable autoneg on r8169?

In article <4ef0939c.9030...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>, William Warren wrote: > On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: > >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full > >> duplex. > >> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot: > >> > >> Any

Re: [CentOS] Disable autoneg on r8169?

On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex. >> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot: >> >> Any other ideas? > udev rules? > mii-tool? > ___ > CentOS ma

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade frim 6.0 to 6.1 crashes on x3850

On 12/20/2011 03:24 AM, Thomas Rønshof wrote: > Hi, > > After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the > kernel crashes on boot. > > I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and > there seems not to be a solution yet. > > The kernel that crash

[CentOS] Upgrade frim 6.0 to 6.1 crashes on x3850

Hi, After yum update on a Cent OS 6.0 IBM x3850 server to Cent OS 6.1, the kernel crashes on boot. I have googlet a little, and find that others have the same problem and there seems not to be a solution yet. The kernel that crashes is 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64. If i boot the prior kernel 2.