Hello,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:46:17 -0800 Edward Martinez wrote:
> On 12/21/11 13:00, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 12/21/11 1:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> >> Now I understand, I'm currently downloading 254 packages, once it
> >> finishes downloading, then i will be using 6.2, presuma
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> >> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> >>> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU)
I had some trouble (now solved) with the recent upgrade to 6.2.
There was no sound from the DVI/HDMI output and video played back
much too fast. Booting kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64
restored sound and video playback. The solution is to add
'radeon.audio=1' to the kernel arguments from grub a
On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
>> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
>>> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
>>>
>>> during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "s
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:56:51PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
> >
> > during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "starging udev"
> > then nothing else for a fe
On 12/21/2011 7:44 PM, fred smith wrote:
> Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
>
> during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "starging udev"
> then nothing else for a few seconds, then a huge register dump scrolls
> by. it's too big to see the
Just did an in-place update from 6.1 to 6.2 on my eeepc 901 (Atom CPU).
during boot, (if I hit ESC to see the boot messages) it says "starging udev"
then nothing else for a few seconds, then a huge register dump scrolls
by. it's too big to see the beginning of it.
If I boot from the prior kernel
On 12/21/11 17:54, TE Dukes wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:29 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic
>>
>> On 12/21/11 1
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Edward Martinez
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:29 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic
>
> On 12/21/11 15:55, TE Dukes wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > J
On 12/21/11 15:55, TE Dukes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just upgrade to 6.2 but have not been able to run a newer kernel than
> 2.6.32-131.12.1.el6.x86_64.
>
> I'm getting the error at boot, Not syncing: VFS Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block(0,0)
>
> I have google this error and see a lot of the s
I tore my hair out for a while after rebooting into 6.2 because none of the VM
guests would start. After trying lots of things, like down grading qemu-kvm
(which fixed it when I upgraded via the CR repository and didn't this time),
cloning a VM, and even beginning to create new VM to restore fr
Hello,
Just upgrade to 6.2 but have not been able to run a newer kernel than
2.6.32-131.12.1.el6.x86_64.
I'm getting the error at boot, Not syncing: VFS Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
I have google this error and see a lot of the same but no clear answers.
Any help would be appre
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On Centos 5.6 this works as expected. On Centos 5.7 this also works but
> also outputs "RTNETLINK answers: No such device".
>
> It seems the script is not broken but the code path executed is now very
> different (due to the missing
On 12/21/2011 08:10 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> What kind of weird things?
>
> I just finally got several boxes upgraded from 5.3 to 5.7 and so far have
> not seen anything odd.
>
>
I have the following config for a vlan interface:
DEVICE=eth0.6
BOOTPROTO=none
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
VLAN=yes
BRIDGE=
On 12/21/11 1:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Most people check something (thus evoking filters), but forget to go
> back when we add a new distro and change it, thus they do not get new
> distro announcements.
bingo, that was it. I had blocked alpha and s390 stuff way back
when... I cleared all
On 12/21/11 13:00, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/21/11 1:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>> Now I understand, I'm currently downloading 254 packages, once it
>> finishes downloading, then i will be using 6.2, presumably i need to
>> reboot the OS.
>> So redhat/centos model works diffe
On 12/21/2011 03:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/21/11 12:23 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Maybe you have a topic filter set.
>>
>
> I got the various announcements before and after the 6.1 and the 6.2
> announcement, so i dunno how I wouldn't.
>
> if someone who still has that message in thei
Thanks! That did the trick.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Luigi Rosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum update woes (perl compressi
On 12/21/11 12:23 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Maybe you have a topic filter set.
>
I got the various announcements before and after the 6.1 and the 6.2
announcement, so i dunno how I wouldn't.
if someone who still has that message in their mailer could do me a
favor, copy me the full headers and
On 12/21/11 1:30 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>Now I understand, I'm currently downloading 254 packages, once it
> finishes downloading, then i will be using 6.2, presumably i need to
> reboot the OS.
>So redhat/centos model works different than Fedoras; where the
> previous release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank M. Ramaekers said the following on 21/12/11 21:54:
> Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.024 is needed by
> package perl-IO-Compress-2.024-1.el5.rf.noarch (installed)
>
> You could try using --skip-broken to work around th
I have had very little problems with yum and it's updates, but this one
has me stumped (CentOS 5.4):
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirrors.loosefoot.com
* extras: yum.singlehop.com
* rpmforge: apt.sw.be
* updates: mirrors.c
On 12/21/11 12:07, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 3:31 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> Got a question, will CentOS6.1 continue to be supported with updates,
>> or is it mandatory to upgrade to 6.2?
> Updates are available for 6.1. Apply them and you have 6.2...
>
> Think of th
On 12/21/2011 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Release for CentOS-6.2 i386 and x86_64 (Karanbir Singh)
>>
>
> odd. I subscribe to CentOS-Announce, yet I never got this message. I
> got the ones before
On 12/21/2011 01:27 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 21/12/2011 19:49, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn a écrit :
>> On 12/21/2011 07:25 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>>> Gents
>>> I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
>>> release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2
On 12/21/2011 3:31 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Got a question, will CentOS6.1 continue to be supported with updates,
> or is it mandatory to upgrade to 6.2?
Updates are available for 6.1. Apply them and you have 6.2...
Think of the point releases as a large collection of updates
Le 21/12/2011 21:31, Edward Martinez a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> Got a question, will CentOS6.1 continue to be supported with updates,
> or is it mandatory to upgrade to 6.2?
>
6.2 is an update. So if you do an 'yum update', you will see a lot of
packages being updated, and you will be automatical
No more updates for v6.1. This is the RedHat/CentOS model. Think of the minor
version numbers as 'service packs', as opposed to releases.
For example, let X < Y. Then, Everything fixed in 6.x is also fixed in 6.y.
However, updates new to v6.y are not made available for v6.x.
- Original
Hello,
Got a question, will CentOS6.1 continue to be supported with updates,
or is it mandatory to upgrade to 6.2?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 21/12/2011 19:49, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn a écrit :
> On 12/21/2011 07:25 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>> Gents
>> I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
>> release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2 some
>> 10 days after 6.1. Johnny, you are not
What kind of weird things?
I just finally got several boxes upgraded from 5.3 to 5.7 and so far have
not seen anything odd.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentOS
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/21/11 9:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Release for CentOS-6.2 i386 and x86_64 (Karanbir Singh)
>>
>
> odd. I subscribe to CentOS-Announce, yet I never got this message. I
> got the on
Hi,
after a lot of head scratching I found that the ifup-eth script in the
initscripts package seems to be corrupt.
I filed a bug with the details here:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5333
Given the nature of the corruption you might be not affected at all, see
strange error messages or end
On 12/21/11 9:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Release for CentOS-6.2 i386 and x86_64 (Karanbir Singh)
>
odd. I subscribe to CentOS-Announce, yet I never got this message. I
got the ones before it and after it.
Same thing happened with the 6.1 annou
On 12/21/2011 07:25 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> Gents
> I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
> release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2 some
> 10 days after 6.1. Johnny, you are not that ugly after all :-).
>
I concur and just out of curios
+3
and let me say: thanks and happy holidays to all!
Am 21.12.11 19:32, schrieb Rob Townley:
> +2
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
>>> release of
+2
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>
> > I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
> > release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2
> > some 10 days after 6.1. Johnny, you are not
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
> release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2
> some 10 days after 6.1. Johnny, you are not that ugly after all :-).
+1
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.
Gents
I would like to express my appreciation for the unbelievably quick
release of Centos 6.2. Thanks a million! You managed to release 6.2 some
10 days after 6.1. Johnny, you are not that ugly after all :-).
Louis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Patrick,
Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:
> On 21.12.2011 16:05, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>>Should semanage be part of the policycoreutils package? At least in
>> 6.x, it's not.
>
> I also stumbled accross this, as spacewalk and koan needed semanage.
> semange is included in package polic
On 21.12.2011 16:05, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Folks,
>
>Should semanage be part of the policycoreutils package? At least in
> 6.x, it's not.
>
> mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi
Folks,
Should semanage be part of the policycoreutils package? At least in
6.x, it's not.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Just for the head's up, iptables rules created by system-config are
fine, I was just hitting a default route problem due to the fact
another fw is already in prod with another ip address.
The one I'm configuring is aimed to replace the one already running.
Now, I'm just fighting with rules for
On 12/21/2011 01:38 AM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected
>> multilib versions" error, the offending packages are:
>>
>> jasper-libs.i686
>> krb5-libs.i686
>> nss.i686
>>
>> After some investigation, it turns out that the
李耀宗 píše v Út 20. 12. 2011 v 22:54 -0800:
> I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected
> multilib versions" error, the offending packages are:
>
> jasper-libs.i686
> krb5-libs.i686
> nss.i686
> After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:38 PM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> In CentOS/6.2/os/x86_64/Packages (x86_64 main), there are those packages
> available:
>
> jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6.i686.rpm
> jasper-libs-1.900.1-15.el6.x86_64.rpm
> krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6.i686.rpm
> krb5-libs-1.9-22.el6.x86_64.r
Hello Mogens,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:57:59 +0100 Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 08:38 AM, lee_yiu_ch...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ...
> > To solve this problem, I have to manually pick up these packages from
> > CentOS/6.2/updates/i386/Packages (i386 update) and install them:
> > jasper-libs-1.90
48 matches
Mail list logo
