On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ken godee wrote:
> > password"? That's what I'm talking about -- how often does this sort of
> > thing happen, where you need to be subscribed to be a security mailing
> list
> > in order to know what workaround to make to stay safe, as opposed to
> simply
> > r
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Rilindo Foster wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Bennett Haselton
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gilbert Sebenste <
> > seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> >>
> >>> Suppose
On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gilbert Sebenste <
> seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>>
>>> Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
>>> extra modu
> password"? That's what I'm talking about -- how often does this sort of
> thing happen, where you need to be subscribed to be a security mailing list
> in order to know what workaround to make to stay safe, as opposed to simply
> running yum-updatesd to install latest patches automatically.
Hap
> nope. its actually quite a major pain to manage..
>
> you forgot to mention what you installed, how you did it and what you
> expected V/s achieved
I have installed all the packages from the two x86_64 DVDs with
(eventually):
yum install --exclude=ovirt\* \*
I'm not using any internet
Yeah I know that most break-ins do happen using third-party web apps;
fortunately the servers I'm running don't have or need any of those.
But then what about what my friend said:
"For example, there was a while back ( ~march ) a kernel exploit that
affected CentOS / RHEL. The patch came after 1-2
On 12/28/2011 01:29 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gilbert Sebenste<
> seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>>
>>> Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
>>> extra modules enabled, a
Everything installed on the machine had been installed with "yum". So I
assumed that meant that it would also be updated by "yum" if an update was
available from the distro.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/28/2011 04:29 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> > I was asking
On 12/27/2011 01:10 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
> I tried CentOS 6.0 and 6.1 on Mac-Air with SSD. Installer could not
> find SSD and Google did not help. FWIW, Ubuntu installed fine. If you
I've seen a couple of MacbookAir's now running CentOS-6, do you need to
set some mode (bootcamp like ?)
- KB
On 12/28/2011 04:29 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> I was asking because I had a server that did get broken into, despite
> having yum-updatesd running and a strong password. He said that even if
the software component compromised was a part of the updates being
dished out from the distro ( and the
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gilbert Sebenste <
seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>
> > Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
> > extra modules enabled, and with the "yum-updatesd" service running to
> pull
>
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
> extra modules enabled, and with the "yum-updatesd" service running to pull
> down and install updates as soon as they become available from the
> repository.
>
> So the machine c
On 12/28/2011 03:13 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Roughly what percent of the time is there such an unpatched exploit in the
> wild, so that the machine can be hacked by someone keeping up with the
> exploits? 5%? 50%? 95%?
there is no way to tell, and there is no metric to work against unless
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Michael Lampe
wrote:
> But I found almost nothing under /usr/lib.
When you were using the 5.x branch, biarch was done on install via
what some consider a glitch in the installer. There was generally much
complaining about the whole load of x86 packages when peopl
hi,
On 12/28/2011 01:47 AM, Michael Lampe wrote:
> I'm experimenting with 6.2 now. Things seem to be really great so far!
nice!
> Distribution closure is one of my favourite pets. So I tried to install
> everything.
thats tricky, ~ multiple things can provide overlapping functionality as
well.
Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
extra modules enabled, and with the "yum-updatesd" service running to pull
down and install updates as soon as they become available from the
repository. (Assume further the password is strong, etc.) On the other
hand, suppose
I'm experimenting with 6.2 now. Things seem to be really great so far!
Distribution closure is one of my favourite pets. So I tried to install
everything.
I found only one problem, but that's another (minor) thing.
But I found almost nothing under /usr/lib.
So, Biarch is really dead?
Funny! A
On 12/27/2011 03:30 PM, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
> The entry in the kernel bugzilla should be (does not open, for me):
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15923
I am unable to open bugzilla.kernel.org also, it is not just you.
Fedora bugzilla shows unknown ID.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(
Take a look for your self:
On 12/27/2011 03:05 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
>> I tried CentOS 6.0 and 6.1 on Mac-Air with SSD.
>> >
> B.J.
>
> CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
Your signature has "6.2". So... I wanted to be sure 6.2 was tested, that
is all.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL
On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
> Sorry, this is CentOS 5.7
>
> On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I have Hyper V integration working properly, but needed to do an update to
>> 2.6.18-274.12.1.el5-x86_64.
>>
>> Since then, it no l
Sorry, this is CentOS 5.7
On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Dvorkin, Asya wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have Hyper V integration working properly, but needed to do an update to
> 2.6.18-274.12.1.el5-x86_64.
>
> Since then, it no longer works. As discovered previously, one needs to
> rebuild Hyp
Hello everyone,
I have Hyper V integration working properly, but needed to do an update to
2.6.18-274.12.1.el5-x86_64.
Since then, it no longer works. As discovered previously, one needs to rebuild
Hyper V Integration tools due to the kernel panic.
http://www.sudonym.com/398/kernel-panic-afte
On 12/27/2011 11:32 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> I'm trying to learn more about Plymouth, but am having trouble finding
> sufficient documentation on it.
...
> Perhaps the error message is just confusing me.
>
> If it is just the background image, then what is not valid about the
> splash.xpm.gz now? I've re
I'm trying to learn more about Plymouth, but am having trouble finding
sufficient documentation on it.
After a rebuild of Plymouth with a few theme changes, I am getting an
error message on boot "Failed to read image" and then it gives me the
grub screen to boot one of the three kernels install
On 12/27/2011 03:05 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 15:00 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 12/27/2011 02:10 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:30 +0100, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
>>>
Did anybody succeed in installing CentOS on a MacBook Pro with nVidia
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 15:00 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 02:10 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:30 +0100, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
> >
> >> Did anybody succeed in installing CentOS on a MacBook Pro with nVidia
> >> chipset (2010 edition,
> >> http://ww
On 12/27/2011 02:10 PM, B.J. McClure wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:30 +0100, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
>
>> Did anybody succeed in installing CentOS on a MacBook Pro with nVidia
>> chipset (2010 edition,
>> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/produkte/macbook-13-2-4-ghz-mitte-2010-86/#produkt_detail
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:30 +0100, Peter Hopfgartner wrote:
> Did anybody succeed in installing CentOS on a MacBook Pro with nVidia
> chipset (2010 edition,
> http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/produkte/macbook-13-2-4-ghz-mitte-2010-86/#produkt_detail)?
> When I boot with the current minimal install
Did anybody succeed in installing CentOS on a MacBook Pro with nVidia
chipset (2010 edition,
http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/produkte/macbook-13-2-4-ghz-mitte-2010-86/#produkt_detail)?
When I boot with the current minimal install disk, Linux does simply see
non disks.
Regards,
Peter
--
Peter Ho
29 matches
Mail list logo
